Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc RYCEF Peers
See (RYCEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RYCEF | $12.00 | +1.14% | 101.6B | 30.00 | $0.40 | +0.50% |
| EADSY | $47.09 | -0.21% | 148.3B | 29.62 | $1.59 | +1.80% |
| EADSF | $187.20 | -3.31% | 147.4B | 29.11 | $6.43 | +1.78% |
| SAFRY | $75.86 | +0.55% | 127.9B | -168.57 | -$0.45 | +0.94% |
| SAFRF | $304.82 | +1.62% | 127B | -168.41 | -$1.81 | +0.88% |
| RYCEY | $12.14 | +1.23% | 102.8B | 30.34 | $0.40 | +0.47% |
| RNMBF | $2,050.00 | -4.21% | 93.4B | 97.11 | $21.11 | +0.37% |
| RNMBY | $410.42 | -4.16% | 91.6B | 97.03 | $4.23 | +0.37% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | -12.28% | 83.8B | 0.28 | $0.02 | N/A |
| BAESY | $105.46 | -3.18% | 77.4B | 30.39 | $3.47 | +1.57% |
Stock Comparison
RYCEF vs EADSY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while EADSY trades at $47.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs EADSF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 147.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while EADSF trades at $187.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SAFRY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 127.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SAFRY trades at $75.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -168.57. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SAFRF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SAFRF trades at $304.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -168.41. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs RYCEY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while RYCEY trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 30.34. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs RNMBF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while RNMBF trades at $2,050.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 97.11. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs RNMBY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RNMBY has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while RNMBY trades at $410.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RNMBY's P/E ratio is 97.03. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RNMBY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to RNMBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs RLLCF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 83.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BAESY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BAESY trades at $105.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BAESF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 76.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BAESF trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs FINMY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 69.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while FINMY trades at $30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs THLLY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while THLLY trades at $59.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 53.15. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs THLEF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while THLEF trades at $295.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 52.67. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs FINMF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while FINMF trades at $60.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs DUAVF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while DUAVF trades at $375.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SAABY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SAABY trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SAABF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SAABF trades at $53.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 58.52. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs HAGHY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while HAGHY trades at $57.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 127.40. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MTUAY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MTUAY trades at $202.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 30.93. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MTUAF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MTUAF trades at $395.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SGGKY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SGGKY trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SGGKF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SGGKF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 34.76. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs HNSDF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while HNSDF trades at $113.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 127.19. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BDRBF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BDRBF trades at $73.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 26.85. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BDRAF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BDRAF trades at $72.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs YSHLF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while YSHLF trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BOMBF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BOMBF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BDRXF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BDRXF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs NSKFF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while NSKFF trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SMBMF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SMBMF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs FNCNF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while FNCNF trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 81.48. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SMBMY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SMBMY trades at $17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 47.28. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ACLLY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ACLLY trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BDRPF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ACLIF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ACLIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs AVIJF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while AVIJF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs QNTQF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while QNTQF trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -17.55. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs QNTQY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while QNTQY trades at $30.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -16.93. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MDALF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MDALF trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs CMGMY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while CMGMY trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 32.80. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs CMGMF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while CMGMF trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 25.68. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs AUTLF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while AUTLF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 77.50. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs GGRGF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs LSIIF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while LSIIF trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs CZGZF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while CZGZF trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 34.14. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ATROB Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ATROB trades at $33.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -302.73. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MIESY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SNIRF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 812.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SNIRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MIESF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs HERXF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs AVNBF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 718.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while AVNBF trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 115.24. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MALJF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 705.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MALJF trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ASTGY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs AERG Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 554.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while AERG trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -63.50. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AERG's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs JMCCF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 372.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while JMCCF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs EOPSF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while EOPSF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs FTGFF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 205.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while FTGFF trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BUKS Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 122M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BUKS trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SAFS Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs NORSF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while NORSF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs CNRD Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while CNRD trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 315.00. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ACCMF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ACCMF trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -52.78. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs TIPGF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs VLTTF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -7.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs STTLF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs NRPI Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while NRPI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs QCKSF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs OPST Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while OPST trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ETCC Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ETCC trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -7.35. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MAXQF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MAXQF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs AKRRF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while AKRRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs NEXD Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while NEXD trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs FLYLF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs TIKK Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while TIKK trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs XERI Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SNAVF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs OBTEF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while OBTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs USDR Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to USDR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MSNVF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs DEWY Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while DEWY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -8.85. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs HWKE Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while HWKE trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs LLLI Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 838.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while LLLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs PMEA Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs MDEX Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs DLRWF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RYCEF has daily volatility of 2.13 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
RYCEF vs RNWR Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs PSSR Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 123.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while PSSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to PSSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs CFFMF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs DSUS Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs UITA Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ASAV Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs LNGT Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs ADFS Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs SDSS Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs EPEO Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BANT Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BANT has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BANT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BANT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BANT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is more volatile compared to BANT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs BRSI Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs HSFI Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.
RYCEF vs RDEGF Comparison
RYCEF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RYCEF stands at 101.6B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, RYCEF is priced at $12.00, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RYCEF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.00, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RYCEF's ROE is -1.46%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RYCEF is less volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RYCEF.