Rand Worldwide, Inc.
Rand Worldwide, Inc. (RWWI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RWWI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWWI | $16.25 | +1.50% | 551.2M | 33.47 | $0.49 | +3.11% |
| SAPGF | $197.19 | -0.09% | 238.5B | 27.83 | $7.36 | +1.29% |
| INVUP | $24.99 | +0.00% | 44.7B | -1600.00 | -$0.02 | +13.54% |
| CNSWF | $1,728.99 | -3.91% | 40.4B | 58.98 | $32.35 | +0.21% |
| DASTY | $20.53 | -3.93% | 28.6B | 20.51 | $1.06 | +1.36% |
| DASTF | $20.08 | -3.69% | 27.6B | 19.80 | $1.06 | +1.40% |
| DIDIY | $4.45 | +0.68% | 21.7B | -224.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| OBIIF | $32.17 | +0.02% | 14B | 31.53 | $1.02 | +1.56% |
| WIGBY | $31.17 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 69.39 | $0.49 | +0.37% |
| SGPYY | $42.59 | -2.23% | 10.8B | 21.97 | $2.05 | +2.43% |
Stock Comparison
RWWI vs SAPGF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SAPGF has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SAPGF trades at $197.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SAPGF's P/E ratio is 27.83. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SAPGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to SAPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SAPGF's competition here
RWWI vs INVUP Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, INVUP has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while INVUP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas INVUP's P/E ratio is -1600.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to INVUP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to INVUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check INVUP's competition here
RWWI vs CNSWF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, CNSWF has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while CNSWF trades at $1,728.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CNSWF's P/E ratio is 58.98. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to CNSWF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to CNSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check CNSWF's competition here
RWWI vs DASTY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, DASTY has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while DASTY trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DASTY's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to DASTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to DASTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check DASTY's competition here
RWWI vs DASTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, DASTF has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while DASTF trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DASTF's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to DASTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to DASTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check DASTF's competition here
RWWI vs DIDIY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, DIDIY has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while DIDIY trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DIDIY's P/E ratio is -224.50. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to DIDIY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to DIDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check DIDIY's competition here
RWWI vs OBIIF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, OBIIF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while OBIIF trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas OBIIF's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to OBIIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to OBIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check OBIIF's competition here
RWWI vs WIGBY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, WIGBY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while WIGBY trades at $31.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas WIGBY's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to WIGBY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to WIGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check WIGBY's competition here
RWWI vs SGPYY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SGPYY has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SGPYY trades at $42.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SGPYY's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SGPYY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to SGPYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SGPYY's competition here
RWWI vs WTCHF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, WTCHF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while WTCHF trades at $31.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas WTCHF's P/E ratio is 63.98. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to WTCHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to WTCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check WTCHF's competition here
RWWI vs SGGEF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SGGEF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SGGEF trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SGGEF's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SGGEF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to SGGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SGGEF's competition here
RWWI vs NEMKY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NEMKY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NEMKY trades at $15.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NEMKY's P/E ratio is 39.88. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NEMKY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NEMKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NEMKY's competition here
RWWI vs NEMTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NEMTF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NEMTF trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NEMTF's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NEMTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NEMTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NEMTF's competition here
RWWI vs XROLF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, XROLF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while XROLF trades at $48.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas XROLF's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to XROLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to XROLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check XROLF's competition here
RWWI vs OCLCF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, OCLCF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while OCLCF trades at $60.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas OCLCF's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to OCLCF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to OCLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check OCLCF's competition here
RWWI vs TMSNY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TMSNY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TMSNY trades at $85.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMSNY's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TMSNY's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to TMSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TMSNY's competition here
RWWI vs ALMFF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ALMFF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ALMFF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ALMFF's P/E ratio is 92.31. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ALMFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to ALMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ALMFF's competition here
RWWI vs NCSYF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NCSYF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NCSYF trades at $95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NCSYF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NCSYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NCSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NCSYF's competition here
RWWI vs TMNSF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TMNSF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TMNSF trades at $82.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMNSF's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TMNSF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TMNSF's competition here
RWWI vs FNOXF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, FNOXF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while FNOXF trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas FNOXF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to FNOXF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to FNOXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check FNOXF's competition here
RWWI vs THNOF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, THNOF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while THNOF trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas THNOF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to THNOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to THNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check THNOF's competition here
RWWI vs LIFX Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, LIFX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while LIFX trades at $22.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LIFX's P/E ratio is 190.92. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to LIFX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to LIFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check LIFX's competition here
RWWI vs KGDEY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, KGDEY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while KGDEY trades at $133.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas KGDEY's P/E ratio is -1245.95. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to KGDEY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to KGDEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check KGDEY's competition here
RWWI vs SMCYY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SMCYY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SMCYY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SMCYY's P/E ratio is 39.44. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SMCYY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to SMCYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SMCYY's competition here
RWWI vs SICRF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SICRF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SICRF trades at $103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SICRF's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SICRF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to SICRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SICRF's competition here
RWWI vs IPEU Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, IPEU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while IPEU trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IPEU's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to IPEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to IPEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check IPEU's competition here
RWWI vs ASOZY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ASOZY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ASOZY trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ASOZY's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ASOZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to ASOZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ASOZY's competition here
RWWI vs ASOZF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ASOZF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ASOZF trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ASOZF's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ASOZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to ASOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ASOZF's competition here
RWWI vs KXSCF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, KXSCF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while KXSCF trades at $86.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas KXSCF's P/E ratio is 78.92. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to KXSCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to KXSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check KXSCF's competition here
RWWI vs BCTCF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BCTCF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BCTCF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BCTCF's P/E ratio is 270.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BCTCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to BCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BCTCF's competition here
RWWI vs SRBEF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SRBEF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SRBEF trades at $136.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SRBEF's P/E ratio is -146.81. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SRBEF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to SRBEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SRBEF's competition here
RWWI vs SWONF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SWONF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SWONF trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SWONF's P/E ratio is -51.26. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SWONF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to SWONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SWONF's competition here
RWWI vs KHOTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, KHOTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while KHOTF trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas KHOTF's P/E ratio is 360.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to KHOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to KHOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check KHOTF's competition here
RWWI vs ESKEF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ESKEF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ESKEF trades at $280.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ESKEF's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ESKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to ESKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ESKEF's competition here
RWWI vs TMOAY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TMOAY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TMOAY trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMOAY's P/E ratio is -101.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TMOAY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TMOAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TMOAY's competition here
RWWI vs VOBIF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, VOBIF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while VOBIF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas VOBIF's P/E ratio is 56.22. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to VOBIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to VOBIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check VOBIF's competition here
RWWI vs MAGTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, MAGTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while MAGTF trades at $31.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas MAGTF's P/E ratio is 354.22. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to MAGTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to MAGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check MAGTF's competition here
RWWI vs WEMXF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, WEMXF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while WEMXF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas WEMXF's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to WEMXF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to WEMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check WEMXF's competition here
RWWI vs KNNNF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, KNNNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while KNNNF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas KNNNF's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to KNNNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to KNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check KNNNF's competition here
RWWI vs ABXXF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ABXXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ABXXF trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ABXXF's P/E ratio is -23.77. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ABXXF's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to ABXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ABXXF's competition here
RWWI vs TMVWF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TMVWF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TMVWF trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMVWF's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TMVWF's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TMVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TMVWF's competition here
RWWI vs LTTHF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, LTTHF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while LTTHF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LTTHF's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to LTTHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to LTTHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check LTTHF's competition here
RWWI vs ESIGF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ESIGF has a market cap of 952.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ESIGF trades at $166.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ESIGF's P/E ratio is -725.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ESIGF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to ESIGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ESIGF's competition here
RWWI vs TMOAF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TMOAF has a market cap of 901.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TMOAF trades at $7.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMOAF's P/E ratio is -120.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TMOAF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TMOAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TMOAF's competition here
RWWI vs BHPA Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BHPA has a market cap of 820.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BHPA trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BHPA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BHPA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to BHPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BHPA's competition here
RWWI vs TMVWY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TMVWY has a market cap of 813.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TMVWY trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TMVWY's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TMVWY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TMVWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TMVWY's competition here
RWWI vs QTGPF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, QTGPF has a market cap of 786.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while QTGPF trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas QTGPF's P/E ratio is 15.81. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to QTGPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to QTGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check QTGPF's competition here
RWWI vs PXPHF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, PXPHF has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while PXPHF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PXPHF's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to PXPHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to PXPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check PXPHF's competition here
RWWI vs SLVFF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SLVFF has a market cap of 723.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SLVFF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SLVFF's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SLVFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to SLVFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SLVFF's competition here
RWWI vs EGHSF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, EGHSF has a market cap of 706.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while EGHSF trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas EGHSF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to EGHSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI and EGHSF have similar daily volatility (1.53).Check EGHSF's competition here
RWWI vs BTRCF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BTRCF has a market cap of 681.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BTRCF trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BTRCF's P/E ratio is 24.83. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BTRCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to BTRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BTRCF's competition here
RWWI vs IRLTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, IRLTF has a market cap of 664.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while IRLTF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IRLTF's P/E ratio is -110.01. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to IRLTF's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to IRLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check IRLTF's competition here
RWWI vs XMMRF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, XMMRF has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while XMMRF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas XMMRF's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to XMMRF's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to XMMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check XMMRF's competition here
RWWI vs GBGPF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, GBGPF has a market cap of 617.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while GBGPF trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas GBGPF's P/E ratio is 52.40. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to GBGPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to GBGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check GBGPF's competition here
RWWI vs FREKF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, FREKF has a market cap of 604.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while FREKF trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas FREKF's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to FREKF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to FREKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check FREKF's competition here
RWWI vs CHNVF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, CHNVF has a market cap of 585.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while CHNVF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CHNVF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to CHNVF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to CHNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check CHNVF's competition here
RWWI vs NPACF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NPACF has a market cap of 549.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NPACF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NPACF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NPACF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NPACF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NPACF's competition here
RWWI vs NPACY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NPACY has a market cap of 493M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NPACY trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NPACY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NPACY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NPACY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NPACY's competition here
RWWI vs TSVNF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TSVNF has a market cap of 489.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TSVNF trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TSVNF's P/E ratio is -113.33. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TSVNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TSVNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TSVNF's competition here
RWWI vs NSWEF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NSWEF has a market cap of 480.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NSWEF trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NSWEF's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NSWEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NSWEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NSWEF's competition here
RWWI vs BRDLF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BRDLF has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BRDLF trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BRDLF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BRDLF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to BRDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BRDLF's competition here
RWWI vs BVSFF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BVSFF has a market cap of 448.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BVSFF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BVSFF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BVSFF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to BVSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BVSFF's competition here
RWWI vs CRSM Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, CRSM has a market cap of 428.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while CRSM trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CRSM's P/E ratio is 2.93. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to CRSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to CRSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check CRSM's competition here
RWWI vs IQGLF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, IQGLF has a market cap of 415.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while IQGLF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IQGLF's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to IQGLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to IQGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check IQGLF's competition here
RWWI vs BLKLF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BLKLF has a market cap of 412.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BLKLF trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BLKLF's P/E ratio is -69.43. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BLKLF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to BLKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BLKLF's competition here
RWWI vs JAPPF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, JAPPF has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while JAPPF trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas JAPPF's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to JAPPF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to JAPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check JAPPF's competition here
RWWI vs RPGHF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, RPGHF has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while RPGHF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RPGHF's P/E ratio is 56.33. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to RPGHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to RPGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check RPGHF's competition here
RWWI vs PSSWF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, PSSWF has a market cap of 368.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while PSSWF trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PSSWF's P/E ratio is -475.85. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to PSSWF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to PSSWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check PSSWF's competition here
RWWI vs RTME Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, RTME has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while RTME trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RTME's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to RTME's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to RTME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check RTME's competition here
RWWI vs ELMFF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, ELMFF has a market cap of 335.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while ELMFF trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas ELMFF's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to ELMFF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to ELMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check ELMFF's competition here
RWWI vs NXLLF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NXLLF has a market cap of 334.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NXLLF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NXLLF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NXLLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NXLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NXLLF's competition here
RWWI vs RLLMF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, RLLMF has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while RLLMF trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas RLLMF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to RLLMF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to RLLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check RLLMF's competition here
RWWI vs IVUFF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, IVUFF has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while IVUFF trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IVUFF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to IVUFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to IVUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check IVUFF's competition here
RWWI vs CIGMF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, CIGMF has a market cap of 295.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while CIGMF trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CIGMF's P/E ratio is -155.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to CIGMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to CIGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check CIGMF's competition here
RWWI vs LCHTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, LCHTF has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while LCHTF trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LCHTF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to LCHTF's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to LCHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check LCHTF's competition here
RWWI vs TZROP Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TZROP has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TZROP trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TZROP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TZROP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to TZROP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TZROP's competition here
RWWI vs EXMXF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, EXMXF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while EXMXF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas EXMXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to EXMXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to EXMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check EXMXF's competition here
RWWI vs TCYSF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TCYSF has a market cap of 268.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TCYSF trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TCYSF's P/E ratio is 69.49. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TCYSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TCYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TCYSF's competition here
RWWI vs SMTEF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, SMTEF has a market cap of 255.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while SMTEF trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas SMTEF's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to SMTEF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to SMTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check SMTEF's competition here
RWWI vs PSHPF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, PSHPF has a market cap of 243M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while PSHPF trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PSHPF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to PSHPF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to PSHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check PSHPF's competition here
RWWI vs CMDXF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, CMDXF has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while CMDXF trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CMDXF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to CMDXF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to CMDXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check CMDXF's competition here
RWWI vs IARGF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, IARGF has a market cap of 236.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while IARGF trades at $18.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas IARGF's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to IARGF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to IARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check IARGF's competition here
RWWI vs DOTDF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, DOTDF has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while DOTDF trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DOTDF's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to DOTDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to DOTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check DOTDF's competition here
RWWI vs BAINF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, BAINF has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while BAINF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas BAINF's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to BAINF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to BAINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check BAINF's competition here
RWWI vs EXSPF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, EXSPF has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while EXSPF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas EXSPF's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to EXSPF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to EXSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check EXSPF's competition here
RWWI vs DAHLF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, DAHLF has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while DAHLF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DAHLF's P/E ratio is -42.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to DAHLF's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to DAHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check DAHLF's competition here
RWWI vs PLDIF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, PLDIF has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while PLDIF trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas PLDIF's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to PLDIF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to PLDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check PLDIF's competition here
RWWI vs FXSRF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, FXSRF has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while FXSRF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas FXSRF's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to FXSRF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to FXSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check FXSRF's competition here
RWWI vs FBSFF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, FBSFF has a market cap of 201.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while FBSFF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas FBSFF's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to FBSFF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to FBSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check FBSFF's competition here
RWWI vs MCAP Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, MCAP has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while MCAP trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas MCAP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to MCAP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to MCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check MCAP's competition here
RWWI vs TCIIF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, TCIIF has a market cap of 166.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while TCIIF trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas TCIIF's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to TCIIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to TCIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check TCIIF's competition here
RWWI vs LOQPF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, LOQPF has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while LOQPF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas LOQPF's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to LOQPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to LOQPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check LOQPF's competition here
RWWI vs NEOJF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, NEOJF has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while NEOJF trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas NEOJF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to NEOJF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to NEOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check NEOJF's competition here
RWWI vs WONDF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, WONDF has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while WONDF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas WONDF's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to WONDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to WONDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check WONDF's competition here
RWWI vs CBSZF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, CBSZF has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while CBSZF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas CBSZF's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to CBSZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to CBSZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check CBSZF's competition here
RWWI vs WECMF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, WECMF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while WECMF trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas WECMF's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to WECMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to WECMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check WECMF's competition here
RWWI vs DLEXY Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, DLEXY has a market cap of 135.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while DLEXY trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas DLEXY's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to DLEXY's ROE of +8.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is more volatile compared to DLEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check DLEXY's competition here
RWWI vs VCTTF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, VCTTF has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while VCTTF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas VCTTF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to VCTTF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to VCTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check VCTTF's competition here
RWWI vs URLOF Comparison February 2026
RWWI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWWI stands at 551.2M. In comparison, URLOF has a market cap of 124.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWWI is priced at $16.25, while URLOF trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWWI currently has a P/E ratio of 33.47, whereas URLOF's P/E ratio is 142.00. In terms of profitability, RWWI's ROE is +0.84%, compared to URLOF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RWWI is less volatile compared to URLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWWI.Check URLOF's competition here