Lyxor MSCI Russia UCITS ETF Acc
Lyxor MSCI Russia UCITS ETF Acc RUS.PA Peers
See (RUS.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUS.PA | €7.01 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IWDA.AS | €102.31 | +0.12% | 94.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €102.52 | +0.12% | 56.8B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| VWRL.AS | €130.38 | +0.14% | 32.9B | N/A | N/A | +1.57% |
| SP5C.PA | €388.77 | +0.11% | 19.1B | 26.79 | €14.51 | N/A |
| SP5H.PA | €312.80 | +0.61% | 18.8B | 27.74 | €11.27 | +1.99% |
| IUSA.AS | €53.89 | +0.12% | 15.6B | N/A | N/A | +1.31% |
| AMUN.PA | €71.85 | +0.14% | 14.6B | 11.28 | €6.37 | +5.92% |
| ISFA.AS | €10.13 | +0.21% | 14.4B | N/A | N/A | +3.49% |
| HAL.AS | €125.40 | +0.64% | 11.3B | 9.37 | €13.39 | +4.29% |
Stock Comparison
RUS.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while IWDA.AS trades at €102.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while VUSA.AS trades at €102.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while VWRL.AS trades at €130.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while SP5C.PA trades at €388.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while SP5H.PA trades at €312.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while IUSA.AS trades at €53.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while AMUN.PA trades at €71.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ISFA.AS trades at €10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while HAL.AS trades at €125.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while WLDH.PA trades at €223.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while WLD.PA trades at €349.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 23.40. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while SOF.BR trades at €278.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CSH2.PA trades at €107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while MEUD.PA trades at €261.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while IMEU.AS trades at €34.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while GBLB.BR trades at €74.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 310.00. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs I500.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while I500.AS trades at €10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while I50D.AS trades at €7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while GOLD.PA trades at €115.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while IWRD.AS trades at €74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CC4.PA trades at €225.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs 500.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while 500.PA trades at €106.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while VHYL.AS trades at €64.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while AEME.PA trades at €72.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CW8.PA trades at €558.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 23.38. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while PHAU.AS trades at €270.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while IJPA.AS trades at €51.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs UST.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while UST.PA trades at €80.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while S500H.PA trades at €88.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs S500.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while S500.PA trades at €153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while REINA.AS trades at €26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while KBCA.BR trades at €61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ALLFG.AS trades at €7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -27.14. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while VEUR.AS trades at €42.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs RF.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while RF.PA trades at €63.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while IEMM.AS trades at €42.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while USAC.PA trades at €546.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 32.28. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs USA.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while USA.PA trades at €504.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 31.68. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EUEA.AS trades at €54.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ICHD.AS trades at €5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while 500X.AS trades at €38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while C50U.PA trades at €163.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CACC.PA trades at €38.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CAC.PA trades at €78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs MF.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while MF.PA trades at €92.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -31.60. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while MSE.PA trades at €59.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs C50.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while C50.PA trades at €139.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ROLA.AS trades at €64.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CD5.PA trades at €86.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while TKO.PA trades at €20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while BREB.BR trades at €114.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while VERX.AS trades at €42.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CB3.PA trades at €221.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while WESE.PA trades at €72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while SEMD.AS trades at €5.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EEUE.PA trades at €17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ESE.PA trades at €27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.78. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EUSRI.PA trades at €84.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 21.87. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while TNOW.PA trades at €874.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ANX.PA trades at €226.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EPAB.PA trades at €35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EXCH.AS trades at €6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while TDIV.AS trades at €42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ANTIN.PA trades at €11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs PABW.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while PABW.PA trades at €78.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ACWI.PA trades at €483.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while PEUG.PA trades at €77.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CMUD.PA trades at €67.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while BNKE.PA trades at €246.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while PHAG.AS trades at €30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs WAT.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while WAT.PA trades at €68.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.88. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while AASI.PA trades at €40.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs GIMB.BR Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while GIMB.BR trades at €42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs MPAB.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while MPAB.AS trades at €5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EMPA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EMPA.AS trades at €6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs CG1.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while CG1.PA trades at €431.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs TFG.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while TFG.AS trades at €17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs LWCR.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while LWCR.PA trades at €507.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to LWCR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs INR.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while INR.PA trades at €28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while BNK.PA trades at €46.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EGRI.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EGRI.PA trades at €45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while EXA1.AS trades at €13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs WQDA.AS Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while WQDA.AS trades at €9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs DAX.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while DAX.PA trades at €222.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ESGH.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ESGH.PA trades at €25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ESGE.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ESGE.PA trades at €34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.
RUS.PA vs ESEH.PA Comparison
RUS.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUS.PA stands at 0. In comparison, ESEH.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUS.PA is priced at €7.01, while ESEH.PA trades at €20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUS.PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ESEH.PA's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, RUS.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESEH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUS.PA is more volatile compared to ESEH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUS.PA.