Resona Holdings, Inc.
Resona Holdings, Inc. (RSNHF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RSNHF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RSNHF | $9.85 | +5.69% | 22.6B | 15.63 | $0.63 | +1.73% |
| CAIXY | $3.07 | -0.65% | 196.8B | 9.55 | $0.32 | +5.42% |
| CIHKY | $33.48 | -0.68% | 159.2B | 8.54 | $3.92 | +3.53% |
| CIHHF | $6.50 | +0.00% | 154.1B | 8.33 | $0.78 | +4.29% |
| UNCFF | $72.35 | -2.23% | 115.1B | 10.45 | $7.07 | +6.19% |
| UNCRY | $36.22 | +0.89% | 112.8B | 10.23 | $3.54 | +5.05% |
| DBSDY | $153.40 | -0.12% | 108.9B | 12.53 | $12.23 | +3.59% |
| DBSDF | $36.16 | -5.98% | 108.8B | 12.61 | $3.05 | +4.46% |
| IITSF | $5.97 | -1.97% | 106B | 10.11 | $0.59 | +6.23% |
| BNPQY | $46.51 | +0.74% | 105.2B | 8.34 | $5.58 | +5.65% |
Stock Comparison
RSNHF vs CAIXY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CAIXY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CAIXY's competition here
RSNHF vs CIHKY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CIHKY trades at $33.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIHKY's competition here
RSNHF vs CIHHF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CIHHF trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIHHF's competition here
RSNHF vs UNCFF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 115.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while UNCFF trades at $72.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UNCFF's competition here
RSNHF vs UNCRY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while UNCRY trades at $36.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UNCRY's competition here
RSNHF vs DBSDY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while DBSDY trades at $153.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DBSDY's competition here
RSNHF vs DBSDF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while DBSDF trades at $36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DBSDF's competition here
RSNHF vs IITSF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 106B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while IITSF trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check IITSF's competition here
RSNHF vs BNPQY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 105.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BNPQY trades at $46.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 8.34. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNPQY's competition here
RSNHF vs BNPQF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BNPQF trades at $93.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 8.42. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNPQF's competition here
RSNHF vs SBKFF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SBKFF trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SBKFF's competition here
RSNHF vs KBCSY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 84.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while KBCSY trades at $53.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check KBCSY's competition here
RSNHF vs BREJY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BREJY trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BREJY's competition here
RSNHF vs MZHOF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while MZHOF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MZHOF's competition here
RSNHF vs EBKDY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 71.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while EBKDY trades at $46.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EBKDY's competition here
RSNHF vs LLDTF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while LLDTF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check LLDTF's competition here
RSNHF vs PBCRF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 69.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PBCRF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PBCRF's competition here
RSNHF vs AKSJF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check AKSJF's competition here
RSNHF vs PBCRY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PBCRY trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PBCRY's competition here
RSNHF vs CIXPF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 63.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CIXPF trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIXPF's competition here
RSNHF vs LLOBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while LLOBF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check LLOBF's competition here
RSNHF vs CHBJF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CHBJF's competition here
RSNHF vs OVCHY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 61.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while OVCHY trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check OVCHY's competition here
RSNHF vs OVCHF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while OVCHF trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check OVCHF's competition here
RSNHF vs PSBKF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 59.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PSBKF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSBKF's competition here
RSNHF vs CRARY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CRARY trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRARY's competition here
RSNHF vs CRARF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CRARF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRARF's competition here
RSNHF vs CHCJY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CHCJY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CHCJY's competition here
RSNHF vs NRDBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while NRDBY trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check NRDBY's competition here
RSNHF vs NBNKF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while NBNKF trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check NBNKF's competition here
RSNHF vs UOVEF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while UOVEF trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UOVEF's competition here
RSNHF vs UOVEY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while UOVEY trades at $58.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UOVEY's competition here
RSNHF vs BHKLY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BHKLY trades at $91.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BHKLY's competition here
RSNHF vs BNKHF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BNKHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNKHF's competition here
RSNHF vs SCGLY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SCGLY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SCGLY's competition here
RSNHF vs STNDF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while STNDF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check STNDF's competition here
RSNHF vs BKRKF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKRKF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRKF's competition here
RSNHF vs CWESF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CWESF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CWESF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CWESF's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CWESF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to CWESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CWESF's competition here
RSNHF vs SCGLF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SCGLF trades at $60.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SCGLF's competition here
RSNHF vs CRZBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CRZBY trades at $35.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRZBY's competition here
RSNHF vs DNBBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while DNBBF trades at $26.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNBBF's competition here
RSNHF vs CRZBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CRZBF trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRZBF's competition here
RSNHF vs KBCSF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while KBCSF trades at $99.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check KBCSF's competition here
RSNHF vs JPSTF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while JPSTF trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPSTF's competition here
RSNHF vs DNBBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while DNBBY trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNBBY's competition here
RSNHF vs SVKEF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SVKEF trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SVKEF's competition here
RSNHF vs EBKOF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while EBKOF trades at $91.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EBKOF's competition here
RSNHF vs BKRKY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKRKY trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRKY's competition here
RSNHF vs CEBCF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CEBCF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CEBCF's competition here
RSNHF vs DNKEY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while DNKEY trades at $20.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNKEY's competition here
RSNHF vs JPPTY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while JPPTY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPPTY's competition here
RSNHF vs CMAKY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CMAKY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CMAKY's competition here
RSNHF vs SWDBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SWDBF trades at $26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SWDBF's competition here
RSNHF vs SWDBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SWDBY trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SWDBY's competition here
RSNHF vs PSZKF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PSZKF trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSZKF's competition here
RSNHF vs HSNGY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while HSNGY trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check HSNGY's competition here
RSNHF vs MLYNF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while MLYNF trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MLYNF's competition here
RSNHF vs HSNGF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 28.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while HSNGF trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check HSNGF's competition here
RSNHF vs BLMIF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BLMIF trades at $19.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BLMIF's competition here
RSNHF vs JPPHY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while JPPHY trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPPHY's competition here
RSNHF vs DNSKF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while DNSKF trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNSKF's competition here
RSNHF vs FCNCB Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while FCNCB trades at $1,730.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check FCNCB's competition here
RSNHF vs JPHLF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while JPHLF trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPHLF's competition here
RSNHF vs GBOOF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while GBOOF trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check GBOOF's competition here
RSNHF vs MLYBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while MLYBY trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MLYBY's competition here
RSNHF vs PPERY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PPERY trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PPERY's competition here
RSNHF vs PSZKY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PSZKY trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSZKY's competition here
RSNHF vs PPERF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PPERF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PPERF's competition here
RSNHF vs GBOOY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while GBOOY trades at $45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check GBOOY's competition here
RSNHF vs BKHYY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKHYY trades at $95.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKHYY's competition here
RSNHF vs BKHPF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKHPF trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKHPF's competition here
RSNHF vs SBGOF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SBGOF trades at $14.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SBGOF's competition here
RSNHF vs CKHGY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CKHGY trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 28.99. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CKHGY's competition here
RSNHF vs CGMBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CGMBF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.11. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CGMBF's competition here
RSNHF vs SGBLY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SGBLY trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SGBLY's competition here
RSNHF vs BDORY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BDORY trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BDORY's competition here
RSNHF vs CMTDF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CMTDF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CMTDF's competition here
RSNHF vs SUTNY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SUTNY trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SUTNY's competition here
RSNHF vs CKHGF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CKHGF's competition here
RSNHF vs PBLOF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PBLOF's competition here
RSNHF vs MDIBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while MDIBY trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MDIBY's competition here
RSNHF vs ISNPY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while ISNPY trades at $35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check ISNPY's competition here
RSNHF vs BDOUF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BDOUF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BDOUF trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BDOUF's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BDOUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BDOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BDOUF's competition here
RSNHF vs MDIBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while MDIBF trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MDIBF's competition here
RSNHF vs BNCZF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BNCZF trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNCZF's competition here
RSNHF vs AIBGY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while AIBGY trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check AIBGY's competition here
RSNHF vs AIBRF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while AIBRF trades at $7.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check AIBRF's competition here
RSNHF vs CIMDF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while CIMDF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIMDF's competition here
RSNHF vs GPFOF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GPFOF has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while GPFOF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas GPFOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPFOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to GPFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check GPFOF's competition here
RSNHF vs GPFOY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, GPFOY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while GPFOY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas GPFOY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPFOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to GPFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check GPFOY's competition here
RSNHF vs BKPKF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKPKF trades at $48.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKPKF's competition here
RSNHF vs TKGBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while TKGBY trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check TKGBY's competition here
RSNHF vs BKRIY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKRIY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRIY's competition here
RSNHF vs SKCBY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, SKCBY has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while SKCBY trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas SKCBY's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKCBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SKCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SKCBY's competition here
RSNHF vs BKRIF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BKRIF trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRIF's competition here
RSNHF vs BPXXY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while BPXXY trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BPXXY's competition here
RSNHF vs OTPBF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while OTPBF trades at $50.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check OTPBF's competition here
RSNHF vs EGFEY Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EGFEY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while EGFEY trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas EGFEY's P/E ratio is 7.63. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGFEY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EGFEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EGFEY's competition here
RSNHF vs EGFEF Comparison July 2025
RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 22.6B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $9.85, while EGFEF trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 15.63, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EGFEF's competition here