Resona Holdings, Inc.

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CIHKY has a market cap of 160.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CIHKY trades at $31.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CIHKY's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIHKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIHKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIHKY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CIHHF has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CIHHF trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CIHHF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIHHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIHHF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, UNCFF has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while UNCFF trades at $86.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas UNCFF's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNCFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UNCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UNCFF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, UNCRY has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while UNCRY trades at $42.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas UNCRY's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UNCRY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UNCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UNCRY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DBSDY has a market cap of 130B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while DBSDY trades at $182.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas DBSDY's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBSDY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DBSDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DBSDY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SBKFF has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SBKFF trades at $128.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SBKFF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBKFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SBKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SBKFF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DBSDF has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while DBSDF trades at $45.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas DBSDF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DBSDF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DBSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DBSDF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BNPQY has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BNPQY trades at $55.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BNPQY's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNPQY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNPQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNPQY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BNPQF has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BNPQF trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BNPQF's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNPQF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNPQF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, IITSF has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while IITSF trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas IITSF's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IITSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to IITSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check IITSF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MZHOF has a market cap of 118B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while MZHOF trades at $45.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas MZHOF's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MZHOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MZHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MZHOF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, KBCSY has a market cap of 110B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while KBCSY trades at $68.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas KBCSY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KBCSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to KBCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check KBCSY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, EBKDY has a market cap of 97.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while EBKDY trades at $62.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas EBKDY's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBKDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EBKDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EBKDY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CIXPF has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CIXPF trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CIXPF's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIXPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIXPF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CAIXY has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CAIXY trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CAIXY's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAIXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CAIXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CAIXY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LLDTF has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while LLDTF trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas LLDTF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLDTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to LLDTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check LLDTF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, OVCHY has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while OVCHY trades at $33.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas OVCHY's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OVCHY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to OVCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check OVCHY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BREJY has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BREJY trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BREJY's P/E ratio is 44.20. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BREJY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BREJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BREJY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, OVCHF has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while OVCHF trades at $16.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas OVCHF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OVCHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to OVCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check OVCHF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NBNKF has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while NBNKF trades at $20.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas NBNKF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBNKF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to NBNKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check NBNKF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JPPTY has a market cap of 70.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while JPPTY trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas JPPTY's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPPTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to JPPTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPPTY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CHBJF has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CHBJF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CHBJF's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHBJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CHBJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CHBJF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JPSTF has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while JPSTF trades at $19.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas JPSTF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to JPSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPSTF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PSTVY has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PSTVY trades at $12.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PSTVY's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSTVY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PSTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSTVY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, NRDBY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while NRDBY trades at $19.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas NRDBY's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRDBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to NRDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check NRDBY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SCGLY has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SCGLY trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SCGLY's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCGLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SCGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SCGLY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CRARF has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CRARF trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CRARF's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRARF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRARF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRARF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AKSJF has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while AKSJF trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas AKSJF's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AKSJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to AKSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check AKSJF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CRARY has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CRARY trades at $10.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CRARY's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRARY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRARY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, LLOBF has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while LLOBF trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas LLOBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LLOBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to LLOBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check LLOBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SCGLF has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SCGLF trades at $85.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SCGLF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCGLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SCGLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SCGLF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PSBKF has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PSBKF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PSBKF's P/E ratio is 5.46. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PSBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSBKF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CHCJY has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CHCJY trades at $18.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CHCJY's P/E ratio is 5.55. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHCJY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CHCJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CHCJY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BHKLY has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BHKLY trades at $110.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BHKLY's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHKLY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BHKLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BHKLY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BNKHF has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BNKHF trades at $5.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BNKHF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNKHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNKHF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, KBCSF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while KBCSF trades at $138.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas KBCSF's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KBCSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to KBCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check KBCSF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PBCRY has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PBCRY trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PBCRY's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBCRY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PBCRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PBCRY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, UOVEF has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while UOVEF trades at $31.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas UOVEF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UOVEF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UOVEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UOVEF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, UOVEY has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while UOVEY trades at $60.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas UOVEY's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UOVEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to UOVEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check UOVEY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, EBKOF has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while EBKOF trades at $126.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas EBKOF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBKOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EBKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EBKOF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MLYBY has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while MLYBY trades at $6.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas MLYBY's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLYBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MLYBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MLYBY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DNBBF has a market cap of 49.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while DNBBF trades at $32.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas DNBBF's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNBBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNBBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PBCRF has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PBCRF trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PBCRF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBCRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PBCRF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DNBBY has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while DNBBY trades at $31.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas DNBBY's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNBBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNBBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNBBY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, STNDF has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while STNDF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas STNDF's P/E ratio is 34.09. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STNDF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to STNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check STNDF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CRZBY has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CRZBY trades at $40.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CRZBY's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRZBY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRZBY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DNKEY has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while DNKEY trades at $26.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas DNKEY's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNKEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNKEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNKEY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, DNSKF has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while DNSKF trades at $54.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas DNSKF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DNSKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to DNSKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check DNSKF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SWDBY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SWDBY trades at $38.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SWDBY's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWDBY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SWDBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SWDBY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CRZBF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CRZBF trades at $38.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CRZBF's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CRZBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CRZBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CRZBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SWDBF has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SWDBF trades at $38.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SWDBF's P/E ratio is 11.73. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWDBF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SWDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SWDBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SVKEF has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SVKEF trades at $21.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SVKEF's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVKEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SVKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SVKEF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JPPHY has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while JPPHY trades at $12.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas JPPHY's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPPHY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to JPPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPPHY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, HSNGY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while HSNGY trades at $19.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas HSNGY's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSNGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to HSNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check HSNGY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BLMIF has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BLMIF trades at $24.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BLMIF's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLMIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BLMIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BLMIF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKRKF has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKRKF trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKRKF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRKF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRKF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PSZKY has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PSZKY trades at $26.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PSZKY's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSZKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to PSZKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSZKY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SBGOF has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SBGOF trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SBGOF's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBGOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SBGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SBGOF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKHYY has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKHYY trades at $130.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKHYY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKHYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is less volatile compared to BKHYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKHYY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKRKY has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKRKY trades at $11.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKRKY's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRKY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRKY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CKHGY has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CKHGY trades at $148.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CKHGY's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKHGY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CKHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CKHGY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, OTPBF has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while OTPBF trades at $105.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas OTPBF's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OTPBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to OTPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check OTPBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, JPHLF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while JPHLF trades at $11.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas JPHLF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPHLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to JPHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check JPHLF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PSZKF has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PSZKF trades at $26.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PSZKF's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSZKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PSZKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PSZKF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKHPF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKHPF trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKHPF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKHPF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKHPF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SGBLY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SGBLY trades at $20.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SGBLY's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SGBLY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SGBLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SGBLY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GBOOY has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while GBOOY trades at $57.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas GBOOY's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBOOY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to GBOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check GBOOY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, GBOOF has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while GBOOF trades at $11.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas GBOOF's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GBOOF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to GBOOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check GBOOF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PPERF has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PPERF trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PPERF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPERF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PPERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PPERF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MLYNF has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while MLYNF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas MLYNF's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MLYNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MLYNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MLYNF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, HSNGF has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while HSNGF trades at $15.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas HSNGF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HSNGF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to HSNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check HSNGF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BDORY has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BDORY trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BDORY's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BDORY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BDORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BDORY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PPERY has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PPERY trades at $11.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PPERY's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PPERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PPERY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CIMDF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CIMDF trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CIMDF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIMDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CIMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CIMDF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CEBCF has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CEBCF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CEBCF's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEBCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CEBCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CEBCF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, SUTNY has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while SUTNY trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas SUTNY's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUTNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to SUTNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check SUTNY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, FCNCB has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while FCNCB trades at $1,670.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas FCNCB's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FCNCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to FCNCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check FCNCB's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CMTDF has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CMTDF trades at $34.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CMTDF's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CMTDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CMTDF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BNCZF has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BNCZF trades at $14.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BNCZF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNCZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNCZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNCZF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BPXXY has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BPXXY trades at $28.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BPXXY's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BPXXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BPXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BPXXY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CMAKY has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CMAKY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CMAKY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMAKY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CMAKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CMAKY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AIBGY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while AIBGY trades at $20.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas AIBGY's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIBGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to AIBGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check AIBGY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, AIBRF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while AIBRF trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas AIBRF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIBRF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to AIBRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check AIBRF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CGMBF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CGMBF trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CGMBF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGMBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CGMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CGMBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MZTFF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while MZTFF trades at $80.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas MZTFF's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MZTFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MZTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MZTFF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, ISNPY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while ISNPY trades at $40.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas ISNPY's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ISNPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to ISNPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check ISNPY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, CKHGF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while CKHGF trades at $166.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas CKHGF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKHGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to CKHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check CKHGF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKRIF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKRIF trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKRIF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRIF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MDIBF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while MDIBF trades at $23.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas MDIBF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDIBF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MDIBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MDIBF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKRIY has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKRIY trades at $19.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKRIY's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKRIY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKRIY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, MDIBY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while MDIBY trades at $22.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas MDIBY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MDIBY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to MDIBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check MDIBY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, PBLOF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while PBLOF trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas PBLOF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PBLOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to PBLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check PBLOF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, EGFEF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while EGFEF trades at $4.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas EGFEF's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGFEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to EGFEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check EGFEF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKPKF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKPKF trades at $64.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKPKF's P/E ratio is 9.22. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKPKF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKPKF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BKZHF has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BKZHF trades at $45.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BKZHF's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BKZHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BKZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BKZHF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RAIFY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while RAIFY trades at $12.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas RAIFY's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAIFY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to RAIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check RAIFY's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, RAIFF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while RAIFF trades at $49.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas RAIFF's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RAIFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to RAIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check RAIFF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, BNMDF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while BNMDF trades at $22.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas BNMDF's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BNMDF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to BNMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check BNMDF's competition here

RSNHF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RSNHF stands at 29.5B. In comparison, TKGBY has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RSNHF is priced at $12.42, while TKGBY trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RSNHF currently has a P/E ratio of 19.19, whereas TKGBY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, RSNHF's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TKGBY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RSNHF is more volatile compared to TKGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RSNHF.Check TKGBY's competition here