Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 33.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while ODFL trades at $158.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 6.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while TFII trades at $82.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 6.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while SAIA trades at $260.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while KNX trades at $42.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 45.15. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, YATRY has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while YATRY trades at $13.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas YATRY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to YATRY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to YATRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while SNDR trades at $22.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 32.37. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, YATRF has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while YATRF trades at $11.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas YATRF's P/E ratio is 29.71. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to YATRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to YATRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, SEOTF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while SEOTF trades at $15.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas SEOTF's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to SEOTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to SEOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 2.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while RXO trades at $14.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 1.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while WERN trades at $26.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is 90.41. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to WERN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while ARCB trades at $61.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while MRTN trades at $13.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 50.46. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, MLLGF has a market cap of 842.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while MLLGF trades at $9.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas MLLGF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to MLLGF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to MLLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 664.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while HTLD trades at $8.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -22.86. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 613.32M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while ULH trades at $23.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to ULH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 557.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while CVLG trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.55M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while PTSI trades at $19.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while DSKE trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 356.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while PAMT trades at $16.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.45M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while USX trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 99.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while YGMZ trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, TSPH has a market cap of 76.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while TSPH trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TSPH's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to TSPH's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to TSPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while PATI trades at $16.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while TSP trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while YELL trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.86M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while BEST trades at $2.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to BEST's ROE of +8.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, YELLQ has a market cap of 31.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while YELLQ trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas YELLQ's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to YELLQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to YELLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 30.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while TOPP trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is 173.00. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to TOPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 22.55M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while HXHX trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to HXHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, TLSS has a market cap of 1.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while TLSS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TLSS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to TLSS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to TLSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, NXTN has a market cap of 996660.00. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while NXTN trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas NXTN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to NXTN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to NXTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, MYFT has a market cap of 9162.00. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while MYFT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas MYFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to MYFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to MYFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, CGIP has a market cap of 3008.00. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while CGIP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas CGIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to CGIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to CGIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, TEAH has a market cap of 189.00. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while TEAH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas TEAH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to TEAH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is less volatile compared to TEAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.

RRTS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRTS stands at 123.68M. In comparison, USAK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, RRTS is priced at $3.23, while USAK trades at $31.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRTS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.32, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, RRTS's ROE is +2.05%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RRTS is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRTS.