Aretto Wellness Inc.

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, UVRBY has a market cap of 249.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while UVRBY trades at $14.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UVRBY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to UVRBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to UVRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check UVRBY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NSRGY has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NSRGY trades at $87.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSRGY's P/E ratio is 17.62. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NSRGY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to NSRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check NSRGY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NSRGF has a market cap of 219.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NSRGF trades at $87.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSRGF's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NSRGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to NSRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check NSRGF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GPDNF has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GPDNF trades at $84.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GPDNF's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GPDNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to GPDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check GPDNF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, DANOY has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while DANOY trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DANOY's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to DANOY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to DANOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check DANOY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, JBSAY has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while JBSAY trades at $13.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JBSAY's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to JBSAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to JBSAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check JBSAY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, AJINF has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while AJINF trades at $27.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AJINF's P/E ratio is 117.39. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to AJINF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to AJINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check AJINF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ASBFF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ASBFF trades at $31.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASBFF's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ASBFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and ASBFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASBFF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ASBFY has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ASBFY trades at $29.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ASBFY's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ASBFY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to ASBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check ASBFY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, KRYAY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while KRYAY trades at $93.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KRYAY's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to KRYAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to KRYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check KRYAY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, KRYAF has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while KRYAF trades at $103.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KRYAF's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to KRYAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to KRYAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check KRYAF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, AJINY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while AJINY trades at $27.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AJINY's P/E ratio is 113.29. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to AJINY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to AJINY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check AJINY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, JDEPF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while JDEPF trades at $27.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas JDEPF's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to JDEPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and JDEPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JDEPF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GRBMF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GRBMF trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRBMF's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GRBMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to GRBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check GRBMF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, WHGLY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while WHGLY trades at $20.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WHGLY's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to WHGLY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to WHGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check WHGLY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, WHGRF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while WHGRF trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WHGRF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to WHGRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to WHGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check WHGRF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, BMBOY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while BMBOY trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BMBOY's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to BMBOY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and BMBOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMBOY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ORKLY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ORKLY trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORKLY's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ORKLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to ORKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check ORKLY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ORKLF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ORKLF trades at $10.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ORKLF's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ORKLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and ORKLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ORKLF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, BRZL has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while BRZL trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BRZL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to BRZL's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to BRZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check BRZL's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CIADF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CIADF trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CIADF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CIADF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and CIADF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIADF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TTAZF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TTAZF trades at $7.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TTAZF's P/E ratio is 77.60. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TTAZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and TTAZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TTAZF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, WWNTF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while WWNTF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WWNTF's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to WWNTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to WWNTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check WWNTF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, KIKOY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while KIKOY trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KIKOY's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to KIKOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and KIKOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KIKOY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, SAPIF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while SAPIF trades at $20.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SAPIF's P/E ratio is -69.37. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to SAPIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and SAPIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SAPIF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, PIFFY has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while PIFFY trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PIFFY's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to PIFFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to PIFFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check PIFFY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, KIKOF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while KIKOF trades at $8.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KIKOF's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to KIKOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to KIKOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check KIKOF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TYCMY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TYCMY trades at $28.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TYCMY's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TYCMY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TYCMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TYCMY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TCYMF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TCYMF trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TCYMF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TCYMF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and TCYMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TCYMF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CIADY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CIADY trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CIADY's P/E ratio is 508.75. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CIADY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and CIADY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CIADY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ARHUF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ARHUF trades at $27.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARHUF's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ARHUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and ARHUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARHUF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, SDPNF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while SDPNF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDPNF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to SDPNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to SDPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check SDPNF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TATYY has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TATYY trades at $28.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TATYY's P/E ratio is 46.31. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TATYY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TATYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TATYY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, DLLFF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while DLLFF trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DLLFF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to DLLFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and DLLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLLFF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TSUKY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TSUKY trades at $65.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TSUKY's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TSUKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TSUKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TSUKY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GCHOY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GCHOY trades at $10.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GCHOY's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GCHOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to GCHOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check GCHOY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TSUKF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TSUKF trades at $62.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TSUKF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TSUKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TSUKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TSUKF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, LOTBY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while LOTBY trades at $76.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LOTBY's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to LOTBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to LOTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check LOTBY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, MEJHY has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while MEJHY trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MEJHY's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to MEJHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to MEJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check MEJHY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NFPDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NFPDF trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NFPDF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NFPDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and NFPDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFPDF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GPAGF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GPAGF trades at $14.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GPAGF's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GPAGF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to GPAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check GPAGF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, MEJHF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while MEJHF trades at $20.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MEJHF's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to MEJHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to MEJHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check MEJHF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CFEIY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CFEIY trades at $5.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CFEIY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CFEIY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to CFEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check CFEIY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, EMLZF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while EMLZF trades at $1,000.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EMLZF's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to EMLZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to EMLZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check EMLZF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CHFLF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CHFLF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHFLF's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CHFLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to CHFLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check CHFLF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, SMPFF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while SMPFF trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMPFF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to SMPFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and SMPFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMPFF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, IOIOF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while IOIOF trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IOIOF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to IOIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and IOIOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IOIOF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, PIFMY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while PIFMY trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PIFMY's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to PIFMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to PIFMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check PIFMY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NSLYF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NSLYF trades at $17.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSLYF's P/E ratio is 44.87. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NSLYF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and NSLYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSLYF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, PIFMF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while PIFMF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PIFMF's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to PIFMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and PIFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PIFMF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GLAPY has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GLAPY trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLAPY's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GLAPY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and GLAPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLAPY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GLAPF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GLAPF trades at $14.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GLAPF's P/E ratio is 23.52. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GLAPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to GLAPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check GLAPF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, MRRTY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while MRRTY trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MRRTY's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to MRRTY's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to MRRTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check MRRTY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ACOPF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ACOPF trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACOPF's P/E ratio is 35.71. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ACOPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and ACOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACOPF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, YMZBY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while YMZBY trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YMZBY's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to YMZBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to YMZBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check YMZBY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, FPAFY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while FPAFY trades at $4.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FPAFY's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to FPAFY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to FPAFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check FPAFY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NIPMY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NIPMY trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NIPMY's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NIPMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to NIPMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check NIPMY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CRWKF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CRWKF trades at $63.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CRWKF's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CRWKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to CRWKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check CRWKF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, FPAFF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while FPAFF trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FPAFF's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to FPAFF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and FPAFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPAFF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NSFMF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NSFMF trades at $11.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NSFMF's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NSFMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and NSFMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NSFMF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NHFOF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NHFOF trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NHFOF's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NHFOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to NHFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check NHFOF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, UVRBF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while UVRBF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UVRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to UVRBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and UVRBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UVRBF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TATYF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TATYF trades at $6.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TATYF's P/E ratio is 46.33. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TATYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TATYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TATYF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NCHEY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NCHEY trades at $12.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NCHEY's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NCHEY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to NCHEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check NCHEY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, PRBZF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while PRBZF trades at $64.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRBZF's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to PRBZF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and PRBZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRBZF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CBCFF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CBCFF trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CBCFF's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CBCFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to CBCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check CBCFF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, LYSFF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while LYSFF trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LYSFF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to LYSFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to LYSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check LYSFF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, EBRPY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while EBRPY trades at $17.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EBRPY's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to EBRPY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and EBRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRPY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, EBRPF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while EBRPF trades at $17.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EBRPF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to EBRPF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and EBRPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EBRPF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TBLMF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TBLMF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TBLMF's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TBLMF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TBLMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TBLMF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, LYSFY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while LYSFY trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LYSFY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to LYSFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to LYSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check LYSFY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, SUEZF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while SUEZF trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUEZF's P/E ratio is -10.40. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to SUEZF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and SUEZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUEZF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ARZTY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ARZTY trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARZTY's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ARZTY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to ARZTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check ARZTY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, MLFNF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while MLFNF trades at $21.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MLFNF's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to MLFNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and MLFNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLFNF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, ARZTF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while ARZTF trades at $82.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ARZTF's P/E ratio is 690.00. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to ARZTF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to ARZTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check ARZTF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, SUEZY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while SUEZY trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SUEZY's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to SUEZY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and SUEZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SUEZY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, PFODF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while PFODF trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PFODF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to PFODF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to PFODF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check PFODF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, SGLJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while SGLJF trades at $15.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGLJF's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to SGLJF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to SGLJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check SGLJF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, PRRFY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while PRRFY trades at $12.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRRFY's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to PRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to PRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check PRRFY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, CLBEY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while CLBEY trades at $4.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CLBEY's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to CLBEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to CLBEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check CLBEY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GRPBF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GRPBF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GRPBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GRPBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and GRPBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRPBF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, FTROF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while FTROF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FTROF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to FTROF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to FTROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check FTROF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, HOFJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while HOFJF trades at $19.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HOFJF's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to HOFJF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to HOFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check HOFJF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TBLMY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TBLMY trades at $10.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TBLMY's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TBLMY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and TBLMY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TBLMY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, FSRCY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while FSRCY trades at $109.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FSRCY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to FSRCY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to FSRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check FSRCY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, AVSFY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while AVSFY trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVSFY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to AVSFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and AVSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVSFY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GNCGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GNCGY trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNCGY's P/E ratio is 0.26. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GNCGY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and GNCGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNCGY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TUFUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TUFUF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TUFUF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TUFUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TUFUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TUFUF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, FNEVF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while FNEVF trades at $0.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FNEVF's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to FNEVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and FNEVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNEVF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, HLFGY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while HLFGY trades at $15.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLFGY's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to HLFGY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to HLFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check HLFGY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GNCGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GNCGF trades at $3.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GNCGF's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GNCGF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and GNCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GNCGF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, NISUY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while NISUY trades at $42.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NISUY's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to NISUY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to NISUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check NISUY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, FNEVY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while FNEVY trades at $4.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FNEVY's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to FNEVY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to FNEVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check FNEVY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, VTSYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while VTSYF trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VTSYF's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to VTSYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to VTSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check VTSYF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, TUFBY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while TUFBY trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TUFBY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to TUFBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to TUFBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check TUFBY's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, YNNHF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while YNNHF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas YNNHF's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to YNNHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and YNNHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YNNHF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, AKEJF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while AKEJF trades at $35.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AKEJF's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to AKEJF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF is less volatile compared to AKEJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RRSFF.Check AKEJF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, GBFBF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while GBFBF trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GBFBF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to GBFBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and GBFBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GBFBF's competition here

RRSFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RRSFF stands at 243.3K. In comparison, HLTFF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RRSFF is priced at $0.01, while HLTFF trades at $11.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RRSFF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLTFF's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, RRSFF's ROE is -29.36%, compared to HLTFF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RRSFF and HLTFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HLTFF's competition here