Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc RR.L Peers
See (RR.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR.L | £883.60 | -0.83% | 73.8B | 29.45 | £0.30 | +0.01% |
| 0GWL.L | £408.50 | +3.42% | 218.7B | N/A | N/A | +0.37% |
| BOE.L | £220.00 | +0.92% | 132.4B | -30.77 | -£7.15 | N/A |
| BA.L | £1,925.50 | -0.34% | 56.5B | 30.09 | £0.64 | +1.71% |
| 0IW5.L | £120.45 | -0.59% | 24.7B | N/A | N/A | +1.50% |
| QQ.L | £501.50 | -0.89% | 2.7B | -15.20 | -£0.33 | +1.68% |
| BC88.L | £97.00 | +100.00% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | +7.22% |
| CHG.L | £562.00 | -1.75% | 1.5B | 31.22 | £0.18 | +1.39% |
| 0AAI.L | £21.10 | +0.47% | 1.3B | -23.87 | -£0.88 | N/A |
| SNR.L | £170.00 | +0.83% | 702.8M | 28.33 | £0.06 | +1.41% |
Stock Comparison
RR.L vs 0GWL.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0GWL.L has a market cap of 218.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0GWL.L trades at £408.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0GWL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0GWL.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to 0GWL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs BOE.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, BOE.L has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while BOE.L trades at £220.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas BOE.L's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BOE.L's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to BOE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs BA.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, BA.L has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while BA.L trades at £1,925.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas BA.L's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BA.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to BA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0IW5.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0IW5.L has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0IW5.L trades at £120.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0IW5.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0IW5.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to 0IW5.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs QQ.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, QQ.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while QQ.L trades at £501.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas QQ.L's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to QQ.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to QQ.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs BC88.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, BC88.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while BC88.L trades at £97.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas BC88.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to BC88.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to BC88.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs CHG.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, CHG.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while CHG.L trades at £562.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas CHG.L's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CHG.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to CHG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0AAI.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0AAI.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0AAI.L trades at £21.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0AAI.L's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0AAI.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to 0AAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs SNR.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, SNR.L has a market cap of 702.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while SNR.L trades at £170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas SNR.L's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to SNR.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to SNR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs CHRT.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, CHRT.L has a market cap of 694.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while CHRT.L trades at £1,528.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas CHRT.L's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to CHRT.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to CHRT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0GFN.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0GFN.L has a market cap of 601M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0GFN.L trades at £102.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0GFN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0GFN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to 0GFN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs AVON.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, AVON.L has a market cap of 528.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while AVON.L trades at £1,778.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas AVON.L's P/E ratio is 118.53. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to AVON.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to AVON.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0HEM.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0HEM.L has a market cap of 469.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0HEM.L trades at £10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0HEM.L's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0HEM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to 0HEM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0R9S.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0R9S.L has a market cap of 294.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0R9S.L trades at £11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0R9S.L's P/E ratio is 34.93. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0R9S.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to 0R9S.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0QWN.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0QWN.L has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0QWN.L trades at £0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0QWN.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0QWN.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to 0QWN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs 0OQ2.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, 0OQ2.L has a market cap of 79M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while 0OQ2.L trades at £25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas 0OQ2.L's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to 0OQ2.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to 0OQ2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs VEL.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, VEL.L has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while VEL.L trades at £32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas VEL.L's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to VEL.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is less volatile compared to VEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs HARL.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, HARL.L has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while HARL.L trades at £8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas HARL.L's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to HARL.L's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to HARL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs MGGT.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, MGGT.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while MGGT.L trades at £798.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas MGGT.L's P/E ratio is 798.80. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to MGGT.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to MGGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.
RR.L vs ULE.L Comparison
RR.L plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RR.L stands at 73.8B. In comparison, ULE.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RR.L is priced at £883.60, while ULE.L trades at £3,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RR.L currently has a P/E ratio of 29.45, whereas ULE.L's P/E ratio is 37.23. In terms of profitability, RR.L's ROE is -0.76%, compared to ULE.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RR.L is more volatile compared to ULE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RR.L.