The Rowe Companies, Inc.
The Rowe Companies, Inc. ROWC Peers
See (ROWC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROWC | $0.00 | -0.00% | 3985.00 | N/A | -$2.88 | N/A |
| HSHCY | $12.63 | +7.76% | 33.03B | 10.98 | $1.15 | +3.52% |
| HRSHF | $3.01 | +10.76% | 31.66B | 10.38 | $0.29 | +3.74% |
| QIHCF | $1.95 | N/A | 31.36B | 6.72 | $0.29 | +5.90% |
| RINIY | $12.00 | N/A | 8.27B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HWDJY | $52.56 | N/A | 7.21B | 22.56 | $2.33 | +2.07% |
| BVILY | $43.79 | +6.94% | 6.30B | 42.93 | $1.02 | +1.04% |
| HWDJF | $10.60 | -1.30% | 5.81B | 17.67 | $0.60 | +2.63% |
| HISEF | $3.10 | N/A | 4.94B | 8.86 | $0.35 | +4.83% |
| SEBYF | $82.00 | N/A | 4.48B | 17.12 | $4.79 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ROWC vs HSHCY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 33.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while HSHCY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs HRSHF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 31.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while HRSHF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs QIHCF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 31.36B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and QIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs RINIY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 8.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while RINIY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs HWDJY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs BVILY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while BVILY trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs HWDJF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while HWDJF trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs HISEF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while HISEF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs SEBYF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while SEBYF trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and SEBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs RINIF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, RINIF has a market cap of 3.13B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while RINIF trades at $22.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RINIF's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to RINIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to RINIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs BVILF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while BVILF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and BVILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs MAWHY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while MAWHY trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and MAWHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs ACKAY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while ACKAY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to ACKAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs MAWHF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while MAWHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs ELUXY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while ELUXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -135.60. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs ELRXF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs RHUHF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while RHUHF trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and RHUHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs JGLCF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs CFSKF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs RYLHF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and RYLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs VLBOF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 533.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and VLBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs SEBYY Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs WTWGF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 131.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while WTWGF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs VCCTF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 120.01M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while VCCTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs WKGBF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and WKGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs IPGGF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 78.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while IPGGF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs DIIBF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 39.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while DIIBF trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs RGBD Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while RGBD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs DGIX Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while DGIX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs LUVU Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while LUVU trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and LUVU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs KMFI Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197266.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while KMFI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs DIAAF Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3692.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to DIAAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and DIAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs DEER Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3359.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while DEER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and DEER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs THBD Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1134.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while THBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and THBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs PWNX Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while PWNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to PWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs VUOC Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while VUOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and VUOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs PFWIQ Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and PFWIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROWC vs FTDL Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while FTDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC is less volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROWC.
ROWC vs AUVIQ Comparison
ROWC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROWC stands at 3985.00. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROWC is priced at $0.00, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROWC currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROWC's ROE is N/A, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ROWC and AUVIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).