Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company
Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company ROSN.L Peers
See (ROSN.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROSN.L | £0.75 | N/A | 807.2M | 0.49 | £1.53 | N/A |
| SHEL.L | £2,445.00 | -0.06% | 145.8B | 15.09 | £1.62 | +4.39% |
| TTE.L | £54.20 | +5.14% | 120.4B | 10.32 | £5.25 | +5.21% |
| BP.L | £358.25 | -0.50% | 56.2B | -71.65 | -£0.05 | +6.78% |
| BP-A.L | £149.00 | N/A | 55.4B | -0.02 | -£71.50 | +3.97% |
| BP-B.L | £158.00 | -3.66% | 54.8B | -0.02 | -£71.50 | +4.06% |
| SNGR.L | £10.50 | N/A | 43.3B | 75.00 | £0.14 | N/A |
| 0N9S.IL | £13.04 | -0.18% | 38.4B | 4.90 | £2.66 | +7.69% |
| SGGD.L | £0.65 | N/A | 20B | 0.39 | £1.65 | N/A |
| ATAD.IL | £7.50 | N/A | 13.4B | 1.00 | £7.50 | +14.88% |
Stock Comparison
ROSN.L vs SHEL.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, SHEL.L has a market cap of 145.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while SHEL.L trades at £2,445.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas SHEL.L's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHEL.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to SHEL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs TTE.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, TTE.L has a market cap of 120.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while TTE.L trades at £54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas TTE.L's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TTE.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to TTE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs BP.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, BP.L has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while BP.L trades at £358.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas BP.L's P/E ratio is -71.65. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BP.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to BP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs BP-A.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, BP-A.L has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while BP-A.L trades at £149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas BP-A.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BP-A.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to BP-A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs BP-B.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, BP-B.L has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while BP-B.L trades at £158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas BP-B.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BP-B.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to BP-B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs SNGR.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, SNGR.L has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while SNGR.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas SNGR.L's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNGR.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and SNGR.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs 0N9S.IL Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, 0N9S.IL has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while 0N9S.IL trades at £13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas 0N9S.IL's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0N9S.IL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to 0N9S.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs SGGD.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, SGGD.L has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while SGGD.L trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas SGGD.L's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGGD.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and SGGD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs ATAD.IL Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, ATAD.IL has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while ATAD.IL trades at £7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ATAD.IL's P/E ratio is 1.00. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATAD.IL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and ATAD.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs PETB.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, PETB.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while PETB.L trades at £15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas PETB.L's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PETB.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and PETB.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs ATAD.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, ATAD.L has a market cap of 881.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while ATAD.L trades at £2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ATAD.L's P/E ratio is 0.30. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATAD.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and ATAD.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs 0GEA.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, 0GEA.L has a market cap of 623.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while 0GEA.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas 0GEA.L's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to 0GEA.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to 0GEA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs WG.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, WG.L has a market cap of 126.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while WG.L trades at £18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas WG.L's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WG.L's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and WG.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs QED.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, QED.L has a market cap of 90.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while QED.L trades at £4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas QED.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QED.L's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to QED.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs QFI.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, QFI.L has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while QFI.L trades at £1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas QFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QFI.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and QFI.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs ECHO.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, ECHO.L has a market cap of 960.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while ECHO.L trades at £0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ECHO.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ECHO.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and ECHO.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs VOG.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, VOG.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while VOG.L trades at £3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas VOG.L's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOG.L's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to VOG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs LKOD.IL Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, LKOD.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while LKOD.IL trades at £0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas LKOD.IL's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LKOD.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and LKOD.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs SGGD.IL Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, SGGD.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while SGGD.IL trades at £0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas SGGD.IL's P/E ratio is 0.34. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGGD.IL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and SGGD.IL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs RDSB.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, RDSB.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while RDSB.L trades at £1,894.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RDSB.L's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RDSB.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to RDSB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs RDSA.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, RDSA.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while RDSA.L trades at £1,895.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas RDSA.L's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RDSA.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to RDSA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs LKOH.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, LKOH.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while LKOH.L trades at £55.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas LKOH.L's P/E ratio is 3.13. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LKOH.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and LKOH.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).
ROSN.L vs ROSN.IL Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, ROSN.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while ROSN.IL trades at £2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas ROSN.IL's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROSN.IL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L is less volatile compared to ROSN.IL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROSN.L.
ROSN.L vs SNP.L Comparison
ROSN.L plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROSN.L stands at 807.2M. In comparison, SNP.L has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROSN.L is priced at £0.75, while SNP.L trades at £45.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROSN.L currently has a P/E ratio of 0.49, whereas SNP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROSN.L's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SNP.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROSN.L and SNP.L have similar daily volatility (0.00).