Roku, Inc.
Roku, Inc. ROKU Peers
See (ROKU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROKU | $82.17 | +10.43% | 12.1B | -112.56 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,225.11 | +1.07% | 521.4B | 58.84 | $20.82 | N/A |
| DIS | $119.49 | +1.32% | 214.8B | 24.44 | $4.89 | +0.80% |
| LYV | $142.34 | +3.01% | 33B | 48.09 | $2.96 | N/A |
| FWONA | $87.97 | +1.08% | 30.7B | 1759.40 | $0.05 | N/A |
| FWONK | $97.50 | +0.81% | 30.6B | 1625.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| WBD | $10.76 | +7.28% | 26.6B | -2.45 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| FOXA | $55.32 | +3.04% | 23.8B | 13.69 | $4.04 | +0.98% |
| FOX | $50.79 | +3.02% | 23.8B | 12.57 | $4.04 | +0.98% |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.4B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +2.09% |
Stock Comparison
ROKU vs NFLX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 521.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while NFLX trades at $1,225.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 58.84. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs DIS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 214.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while DIS trades at $119.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LYV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LYV trades at $142.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 48.09. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FWONA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while FWONA trades at $87.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1759.40. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FWONK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while FWONK trades at $97.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 1625.00. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs WBD Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while WBD trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FOXA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while FOXA trades at $55.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FOX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while FOX trades at $50.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs VIAC Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NWSA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while NWSA trades at $28.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NWS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while NWS trades at $32.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 39.37. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs WMG Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while WMG trades at $26.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs TKO Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while TKO trades at $168.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 85.52. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs EDR Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PARA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while PARA trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PARAA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while PARAA trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PARAP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs WWE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs SIRI Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while SIRI trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LLYVK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LLYVK trades at $76.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 282.11. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LLYVA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LLYVA trades at $75.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 277.85. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NXST Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while NXST trades at $169.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MSGS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while MSGS trades at $190.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 908.29. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CNK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CNK trades at $31.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MANU Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while MANU trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -33.77. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BATRA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while BATRA trades at $45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -138.06. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BATRK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while BATRK trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -130.27. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs APE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LGF-B Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LGF-A Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LION Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LION trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BOWL Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MSGE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while MSGE trades at $36.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs IQ Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while IQ trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 44.25. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs IMAX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while IMAX trades at $29.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs SPHR Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while SPHR trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AMC Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while AMC trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PLAY Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while PLAY trades at $32.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs SBGI Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 922.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while SBGI trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HUYA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 888.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while HUYA trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -56.79. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MCS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 529.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while MCS trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -42.22. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RSVR Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 486.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while RSVR trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 62.08. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AMCX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 277.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while AMCX trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LIVX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AENT Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while AENT trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs GAIA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 130.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while GAIA trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -24.86. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AGAE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while AGAE trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs GNUS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LVO Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LVO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -7.85. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RSVRW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 80.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while RSVRW trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CNVS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CNVS trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -3.68. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CIDM Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RDI Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while RDI trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDI's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RDIB Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while RDIB trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -44.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NIPG Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while NIPG trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs TOON Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while TOON trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ANGH Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while ANGH trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ANGHW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ADD Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while ADD trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MMV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs DLPN Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while DLPN trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSCW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BREA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while BREA trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs KUKE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while KUKE trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CPOP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CPOP trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AENTW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while AENTW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HOFV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while HOFV trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSEN Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSEP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BZFDW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while BZFDW trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BLMZ Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while BLMZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSEL Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HOFVW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HMTV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, HMTV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while HMTV trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas HMTV's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HMTV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to HMTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs DISCK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DISCK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while DISCK trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas DISCK's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DISCK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to DISCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RDBXW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RDBXW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while RDBXW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas RDBXW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDBXW's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RDBXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RDBX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, RDBX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while RDBX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas RDBX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDBX's ROE of +6.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RDBX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ESGC Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, ESGC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while ESGC trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas ESGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESGC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to ESGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MSGN Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, MSGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while MSGN trades at $14.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas MSGN's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSGN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MSGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs VIACP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, VIACP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while VIACP trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas VIACP's P/E ratio is 10.23. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIACP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to VIACP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs VIACA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, VIACA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while VIACA trades at $32.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas VIACA's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIACA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to VIACA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs EMWP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, EMWP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while EMWP trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas EMWP's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EMWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to EMWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AESE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, AESE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while AESE trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas AESE's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AESE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to AESE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LVOPP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, LVOPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while LVOPP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas LVOPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LVOPP's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ROKU has daily volatility of 5.42 and LVOPP has daily volatility of N/A.
ROKU vs DISCB Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 12.1B. In comparison, DISCB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $82.17, while DISCB trades at $24.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -112.56, whereas DISCB's P/E ratio is 17.74. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DISCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to DISCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.