Roku, Inc.
Roku, Inc. ROKU Peers
See (ROKU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROKU | $71.41 | +0.82% | 10.47B | -97.82 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| NFLX | $1,192.02 | +0.03% | 507.29B | 56.20 | $21.21 | N/A |
| DIS | $112.35 | -0.28% | 201.97B | 22.93 | $4.90 | +0.85% |
| LYV | $146.36 | -1.31% | 33.92B | 49.61 | $2.95 | N/A |
| FWONA | $89.30 | +0.08% | 31.01B | 1786.00 | $0.05 | N/A |
| FWONK | $96.84 | +0.26% | 30.98B | 1614.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| FOXA | $56.50 | +1.24% | 24.40B | 13.99 | $4.04 | +0.96% |
| FOX | $52.16 | +0.95% | 24.35B | 12.91 | $4.04 | +0.96% |
| WBD | $9.23 | +1.99% | 22.84B | -2.10 | -$4.40 | N/A |
| VIAC | $29.58 | -17.81% | 19.43B | 5.78 | $5.12 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
ROKU vs NFLX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, NFLX has a market cap of 507.29B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while NFLX trades at $1,192.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas NFLX's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NFLX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NFLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs DIS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, DIS has a market cap of 201.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while DIS trades at $112.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas DIS's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DIS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to DIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LYV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LYV has a market cap of 33.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LYV trades at $146.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LYV's P/E ratio is 49.61. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYV's ROE of +7.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LYV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FWONA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, FWONA has a market cap of 31.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while FWONA trades at $89.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas FWONA's P/E ratio is 1786.00. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWONA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FWONA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FWONK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, FWONK has a market cap of 30.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while FWONK trades at $96.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas FWONK's P/E ratio is 1614.00. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FWONK's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FWONK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FOXA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, FOXA has a market cap of 24.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while FOXA trades at $56.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas FOXA's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOXA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FOXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs FOX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, FOX has a market cap of 24.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while FOX trades at $52.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas FOX's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FOX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to FOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs WBD Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, WBD has a market cap of 22.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while WBD trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas WBD's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WBD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to WBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs VIAC Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, VIAC has a market cap of 19.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while VIAC trades at $29.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas VIAC's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIAC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to VIAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NWSA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, NWSA has a market cap of 16.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while NWSA trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas NWSA's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NWSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NWS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, NWS has a market cap of 16.83B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while NWS trades at $32.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas NWS's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NWS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs WMG Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, WMG has a market cap of 14.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while WMG trades at $27.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas WMG's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WMG's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to WMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs TKO Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, TKO has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while TKO trades at $162.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas TKO's P/E ratio is 82.20. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TKO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to TKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs EDR Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, EDR has a market cap of 9.52B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while EDR trades at $29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas EDR's P/E ratio is -23.78. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EDR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to EDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PARA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, PARA has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while PARA trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas PARA's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PARA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to PARA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PARAA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, PARAA has a market cap of 8.43B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while PARAA trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas PARAA's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PARAA's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to PARAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PARAP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, PARAP has a market cap of 8.39B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while PARAP trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas PARAP's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PARAP's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to PARAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs WWE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, WWE has a market cap of 8.37B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while WWE trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas WWE's P/E ratio is 47.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WWE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to WWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs SIRI Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, SIRI has a market cap of 7.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while SIRI trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas SIRI's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SIRI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to SIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LLYVK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LLYVK has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LLYVK trades at $77.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LLYVK's P/E ratio is 276.68. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LLYVK's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LLYVK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LLYVA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LLYVA has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LLYVA trades at $76.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LLYVA's P/E ratio is 283.74. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LLYVA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LLYVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NXST Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, NXST has a market cap of 5.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while NXST trades at $175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas NXST's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXST's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to NXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MSGS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, MSGS has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while MSGS trades at $196.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas MSGS's P/E ratio is 983.30. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSGS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MSGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CNK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CNK has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CNK trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CNK's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to CNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BATRK Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, BATRK has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while BATRK trades at $41.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas BATRK's P/E ratio is -125.18. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BATRK's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BATRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BATRA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, BATRA has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while BATRA trades at $44.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas BATRA's P/E ratio is -134.97. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BATRA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BATRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MANU Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, MANU has a market cap of 2.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while MANU trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas MANU's P/E ratio is -13.40. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MANU's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MANU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs APE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, APE has a market cap of 2.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while APE trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas APE's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to APE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LION Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LION has a market cap of 2.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LION trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LION's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LION's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LGF-A Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LGF-A has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LGF-A trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LGF-A's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGF-A's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LGF-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LGF-B Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LGF-B has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LGF-B trades at $7.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LGF-B's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LGF-B's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LGF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MSGE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, MSGE has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while MSGE trades at $37.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas MSGE's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSGE's ROE of -10.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MSGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BOWL Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, BOWL has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while BOWL trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas BOWL's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to BOWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs IMAX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, IMAX has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while IMAX trades at $27.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas IMAX's P/E ratio is 58.89. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to IMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs SPHR Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, SPHR has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while SPHR trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas SPHR's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPHR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to SPHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AMC Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, AMC has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while AMC trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas AMC's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs SBGI Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, SBGI has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while SBGI trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas SBGI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBGI's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to SBGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HUYA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, HUYA has a market cap of 823.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while HUYA trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas HUYA's P/E ratio is -52.64. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HUYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to HUYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs PLAY Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, PLAY has a market cap of 743.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while PLAY trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas PLAY's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to PLAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MCS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, MCS has a market cap of 519.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while MCS trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas MCS's P/E ratio is -41.40. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MCS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to MCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RSVR Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, RSVR has a market cap of 496.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while RSVR trades at $7.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas RSVR's P/E ratio is 63.42. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RSVR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RSVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AMCX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, AMCX has a market cap of 290.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while AMCX trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas AMCX's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMCX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AMCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LIVX Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LIVX has a market cap of 267.40M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LIVX trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LIVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LIVX's ROE of -83.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to LIVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs IQ Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, IQ has a market cap of 255.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while IQ trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas IQ's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to IQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AENT Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, AENT has a market cap of 153.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while AENT trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas AENT's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AENT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AENT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs GAIA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, GAIA has a market cap of 111.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while GAIA trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas GAIA's P/E ratio is -21.10. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GAIA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to GAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs GNUS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, GNUS has a market cap of 104.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while GNUS trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas GNUS's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GNUS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to GNUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AGAE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, AGAE has a market cap of 89.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while AGAE trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas AGAE's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AGAE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AGAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs LVO Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, LVO has a market cap of 80.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while LVO trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas LVO's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LVO's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to LVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RSVRW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, RSVRW has a market cap of 67.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while RSVRW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas RSVRW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RSVRW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RSVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CNVS Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CNVS has a market cap of 55.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CNVS trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CNVS's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CNVS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CNVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CIDM Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CIDM has a market cap of 55.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CIDM trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CIDM's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CIDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CIDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RDIB Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, RDIB has a market cap of 48.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while RDIB trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas RDIB's P/E ratio is -6.89. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDIB's ROE of -33.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to RDIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs RDI Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, RDI has a market cap of 46.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while RDI trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas RDI's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDI's ROE of -33.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to RDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs TOON Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, TOON has a market cap of 42.54M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while TOON trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas TOON's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TOON's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to TOON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ANGH Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, ANGH has a market cap of 35.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while ANGH trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas ANGH's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGH's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to ANGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ANGHW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, ANGHW has a market cap of 24.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while ANGHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas ANGHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANGHW's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to ANGHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs NIPG Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, NIPG has a market cap of 23.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while NIPG trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas NIPG's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NIPG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to NIPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs ADD Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, ADD has a market cap of 20.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while ADD trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas ADD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADD's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to ADD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs MMV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, MMV has a market cap of 17.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while MMV trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas MMV's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MMV's ROE of +5.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to MMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs KUKE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, KUKE has a market cap of 14.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while KUKE trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas KUKE's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KUKE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to KUKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs DLPN Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, DLPN has a market cap of 12.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while DLPN trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas DLPN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLPN's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to DLPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSCW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CSCW has a market cap of 10.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CSCW trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CSCW's P/E ratio is -8.93. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSCW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CPOP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CPOP has a market cap of 8.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CPOP trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CPOP's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPOP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs AENTW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, AENTW has a market cap of 8.66M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while AENTW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas AENTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AENTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to AENTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BREA Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, BREA has a market cap of 7.23M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while BREA trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas BREA's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BREA's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to BREA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HOFV Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, HOFV has a market cap of 5.86M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while HOFV trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas HOFV's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOFV's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is more volatile compared to HOFV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BZFDW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, BZFDW has a market cap of 2.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while BZFDW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas BZFDW's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BZFDW's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to BZFDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSE Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CSSE has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CSSE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CSSE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSEN Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CSSEN has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CSSEN trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CSSEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSEN's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSEP Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CSSEP has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CSSEP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CSSEP's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSEP's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs BLMZ Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 2.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while BLMZ trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs CSSEL Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, CSSEL has a market cap of 258051.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while CSSEL trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas CSSEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CSSEL's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to CSSEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.
ROKU vs HOFVW Comparison
ROKU plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROKU stands at 10.47B. In comparison, HOFVW has a market cap of 16748.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROKU is priced at $71.41, while HOFVW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROKU currently has a P/E ratio of -97.82, whereas HOFVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROKU's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOFVW's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ROKU is less volatile compared to HOFVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROKU.