Royal Orchid Hotels Limited
Royal Orchid Hotels Limited (ROHLTD.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ROHLTD.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Travel Lodging Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROHLTD.NS | ₹369.60 | +0.00% | 10B | 21.53 | ₹16.85 | +0.69% |
| INDHOTEL.NS | ₹672.10 | +0.00% | 960.7B | 47.83 | ₹14.11 | +0.33% |
| INDHOTEL.BO | ₹672.10 | +0.00% | 959.8B | 56.81 | ₹11.87 | +0.33% |
| EIHOTEL.NS | ₹326.15 | +0.00% | 204.2B | 31.74 | ₹10.29 | +0.46% |
| EIHOTEL.BO | ₹326.45 | +0.00% | 204.2B | 30.71 | ₹10.63 | +0.46% |
| CHALET.NS | ₹862.10 | +0.00% | 189.1B | 31.20 | ₹27.69 | +0.12% |
| CHALET.BO | ₹865.35 | -0.00% | 188.8B | 31.11 | ₹27.71 | +0.12% |
| VENTIVE.NS | ₹721.20 | -0.01% | 165.2B | 45.01 | ₹15.72 | N/A |
| THELEELA.NS | ₹434.30 | -0.13% | 145.4B | 37.38 | ₹11.65 | N/A |
| LEMONTREE.BO | ₹120.50 | +0.00% | 92.1B | 42.92 | ₹2.71 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ROHLTD.NS vs INDHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, INDHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 960.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while INDHOTEL.NS trades at ₹672.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas INDHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to INDHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check INDHOTEL.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs INDHOTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, INDHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 959.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while INDHOTEL.BO trades at ₹672.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas INDHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.81. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to INDHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check INDHOTEL.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs EIHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, EIHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 204.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while EIHOTEL.NS trades at ₹326.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas EIHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EIHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check EIHOTEL.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs EIHOTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, EIHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 204.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while EIHOTEL.BO trades at ₹326.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas EIHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EIHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check EIHOTEL.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs CHALET.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, CHALET.NS has a market cap of 189.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while CHALET.NS trades at ₹862.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas CHALET.NS's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHALET.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CHALET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check CHALET.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs CHALET.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, CHALET.BO has a market cap of 188.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while CHALET.BO trades at ₹865.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas CHALET.BO's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHALET.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to CHALET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check CHALET.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs VENTIVE.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, VENTIVE.NS has a market cap of 165.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while VENTIVE.NS trades at ₹721.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas VENTIVE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.01. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VENTIVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to VENTIVE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check VENTIVE.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs THELEELA.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, THELEELA.NS has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while THELEELA.NS trades at ₹434.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas THELEELA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THELEELA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to THELEELA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check THELEELA.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs LEMONTREE.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, LEMONTREE.BO has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while LEMONTREE.BO trades at ₹120.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas LEMONTREE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.92. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEMONTREE.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LEMONTREE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check LEMONTREE.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs LEMONTREE.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, LEMONTREE.NS has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while LEMONTREE.NS trades at ₹120.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas LEMONTREE.NS's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LEMONTREE.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to LEMONTREE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check LEMONTREE.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs JUNIPER.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, JUNIPER.NS has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while JUNIPER.NS trades at ₹225.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas JUNIPER.NS's P/E ratio is 33.77. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JUNIPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to JUNIPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check JUNIPER.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ITDC.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ITDC.BO has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ITDC.BO trades at ₹535.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ITDC.BO's P/E ratio is 57.39. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDC.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ITDC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ITDC.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ITDC.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ITDC.NS has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ITDC.NS trades at ₹534.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ITDC.NS's P/E ratio is 57.58. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDC.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ITDC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ITDC.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs SAMHI.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, SAMHI.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while SAMHI.NS trades at ₹165.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas SAMHI.NS's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAMHI.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SAMHI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check SAMHI.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs SAMHI.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, SAMHI.BO has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while SAMHI.BO trades at ₹164.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas SAMHI.BO's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SAMHI.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SAMHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check SAMHI.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs PARKHOTELS.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, PARKHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while PARKHOTELS.NS trades at ₹127.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas PARKHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.82. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PARKHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to PARKHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check PARKHOTELS.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while BRIGHOTEL.NS trades at ₹61.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas BRIGHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.29. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs TAJGVK.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, TAJGVK.NS has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while TAJGVK.NS trades at ₹350.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas TAJGVK.NS's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAJGVK.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TAJGVK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check TAJGVK.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs TAJGVK.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, TAJGVK.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while TAJGVK.BO trades at ₹350.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas TAJGVK.BO's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TAJGVK.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TAJGVK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check TAJGVK.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs EIHAHOTELS.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, EIHAHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while EIHAHOTELS.BO trades at ₹332.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas EIHAHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIHAHOTELS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to EIHAHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check EIHAHOTELS.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs EIHAHOTELS.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, EIHAHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while EIHAHOTELS.NS trades at ₹333.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas EIHAHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIHAHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to EIHAHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check EIHAHOTELS.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ORIENTHOT.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ORIENTHOT.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ORIENTHOT.NS trades at ₹101.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ORIENTHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTHOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTHOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ORIENTHOT.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ORIENTHOT.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ORIENTHOT.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ORIENTHOT.BO trades at ₹101.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ORIENTHOT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORIENTHOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTHOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ORIENTHOT.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ROHLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ROHLTD.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ROHLTD.BO trades at ₹368.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ROHLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROHLTD.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to ROHLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ROHLTD.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs VHLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, VHLTD.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while VHLTD.NS trades at ₹143.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas VHLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VHLTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to VHLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check VHLTD.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ASIANHOTNR.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ASIANHOTNR.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ASIANHOTNR.BO trades at ₹299.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ASIANHOTNR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASIANHOTNR.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANHOTNR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ASIANHOTNR.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ASIANHOTNR.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ASIANHOTNR.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ASIANHOTNR.NS trades at ₹300.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ASIANHOTNR.NS's P/E ratio is 3.09. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASIANHOTNR.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANHOTNR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ASIANHOTNR.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs HLVLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, HLVLTD.BO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while HLVLTD.BO trades at ₹8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas HLVLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 72.50. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLVLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to HLVLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check HLVLTD.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs HLVLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, HLVLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while HLVLTD.NS trades at ₹8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas HLVLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 72.00. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLVLTD.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to HLVLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check HLVLTD.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs KAMATHOTEL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, KAMATHOTEL.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while KAMATHOTEL.NS trades at ₹186.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas KAMATHOTEL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAMATHOTEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to KAMATHOTEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check KAMATHOTEL.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs KAMATHOTEL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, KAMATHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while KAMATHOTEL.BO trades at ₹188.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas KAMATHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KAMATHOTEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to KAMATHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check KAMATHOTEL.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ADVANIHOTR.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ADVANIHOTR.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ADVANIHOTR.BO trades at ₹55.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ADVANIHOTR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.66. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADVANIHOTR.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to ADVANIHOTR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ADVANIHOTR.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs ADVANIHOTR.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, ADVANIHOTR.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while ADVANIHOTR.NS trades at ₹55.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas ADVANIHOTR.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADVANIHOTR.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to ADVANIHOTR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check ADVANIHOTR.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs SINCLAIR.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, SINCLAIR.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while SINCLAIR.NS trades at ₹75.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas SINCLAIR.NS's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SINCLAIR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to SINCLAIR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check SINCLAIR.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs RHL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, RHL.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while RHL.NS trades at ₹194.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas RHL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RHL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to RHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check RHL.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs APOLSINHOT.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, APOLSINHOT.NS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while APOLSINHOT.NS trades at ₹1,272.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas APOLSINHOT.NS's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APOLSINHOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to APOLSINHOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check APOLSINHOT.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs RHL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, RHL.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while RHL.BO trades at ₹194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas RHL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RHL.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to RHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check RHL.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs THEBYKE.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, THEBYKE.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while THEBYKE.BO trades at ₹69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas THEBYKE.BO's P/E ratio is -39.39. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THEBYKE.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to THEBYKE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check THEBYKE.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs AHLEAST.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, AHLEAST.NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while AHLEAST.NS trades at ₹160.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas AHLEAST.NS's P/E ratio is 203.24. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLEAST.NS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to AHLEAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check AHLEAST.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs AHLEAST.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, AHLEAST.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while AHLEAST.BO trades at ₹158.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas AHLEAST.BO's P/E ratio is 199.06. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLEAST.BO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to AHLEAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check AHLEAST.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs BYKE.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, BYKE.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while BYKE.NS trades at ₹48.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas BYKE.NS's P/E ratio is 48.28. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BYKE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to BYKE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check BYKE.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs CCHHL.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, CCHHL.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while CCHHL.BO trades at ₹13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas CCHHL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCHHL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CCHHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check CCHHL.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs CCHHL.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, CCHHL.NS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while CCHHL.NS trades at ₹13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas CCHHL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.12. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CCHHL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to CCHHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check CCHHL.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs AHLWEST.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, AHLWEST.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while AHLWEST.NS trades at ₹144.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas AHLWEST.NS's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLWEST.NS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to AHLWEST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check AHLWEST.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs HAVISHA.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, HAVISHA.BO has a market cap of 539.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while HAVISHA.BO trades at ₹1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas HAVISHA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAVISHA.BO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to HAVISHA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check HAVISHA.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs HAVISHA.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, HAVISHA.NS has a market cap of 518.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while HAVISHA.NS trades at ₹1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas HAVISHA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAVISHA.NS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to HAVISHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check HAVISHA.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs MACH.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, MACH.BO has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while MACH.BO trades at ₹84.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas MACH.BO's P/E ratio is 168.13. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MACH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to MACH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check MACH.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs BLUECOAST.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, BLUECOAST.BO has a market cap of 444.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while BLUECOAST.BO trades at ₹25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas BLUECOAST.BO's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUECOAST.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to BLUECOAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check BLUECOAST.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs BLUECOAST.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, BLUECOAST.NS has a market cap of 423.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while BLUECOAST.NS trades at ₹23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas BLUECOAST.NS's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUECOAST.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECOAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check BLUECOAST.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs TGBHOTELS.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, TGBHOTELS.NS has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while TGBHOTELS.NS trades at ₹9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas TGBHOTELS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TGBHOTELS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is less volatile compared to TGBHOTELS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check TGBHOTELS.NS's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs TGBHOTELS.BO Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, TGBHOTELS.BO has a market cap of 275.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while TGBHOTELS.BO trades at ₹9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas TGBHOTELS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TGBHOTELS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to TGBHOTELS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check TGBHOTELS.BO's competition here
ROHLTD.NS vs VICEROY.NS Comparison February 2026
ROHLTD.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROHLTD.NS stands at 10B. In comparison, VICEROY.NS has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ROHLTD.NS is priced at ₹369.60, while VICEROY.NS trades at ₹3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROHLTD.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 21.53, whereas VICEROY.NS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ROHLTD.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VICEROY.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROHLTD.NS is more volatile compared to VICEROY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROHLTD.NS.Check VICEROY.NS's competition here