Roadside Real Estate plc
Roadside Real Estate plc ROAD.L Peers
See (ROAD.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Development Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROAD.L | £42.80 | +3.38% | 61.5M | -10.70 | -£0.04 | N/A |
| HKLD.L | £7.41 | N/A | 16.3B | -11.76 | -£0.63 | +4.21% |
| HKLB.L | £7.41 | N/A | 11.6B | -49.40 | -£0.15 | +4.21% |
| HKLJ.L | £7.41 | N/A | 11.4B | -49.40 | -£0.15 | +4.21% |
| DAR.L | £9.08 | +0.28% | 1.6B | 113.44 | £0.08 | N/A |
| HWG.L | £170.00 | N/A | 551M | 10.00 | £0.17 | +0.95% |
| 0QN6.L | £96.70 | +1.36% | 328.2M | 8.00 | £12.09 | +3.79% |
| MOH.L | £17.50 | -12.50% | 49.8M | -17.50 | -£0.01 | N/A |
| ASPL.L | £0.09 | +13.33% | 20.5M | -1.42 | -£0.06 | N/A |
| INLZ.L | £54.10 | +1.12% | 11.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ROAD.L vs HKLD.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, HKLD.L has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while HKLD.L trades at £7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas HKLD.L's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to HKLD.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is less volatile compared to HKLD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs HKLB.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, HKLB.L has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while HKLB.L trades at £7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas HKLB.L's P/E ratio is -49.40. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to HKLB.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to HKLB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs HKLJ.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, HKLJ.L has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while HKLJ.L trades at £7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas HKLJ.L's P/E ratio is -49.40. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to HKLJ.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to HKLJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs DAR.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, DAR.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while DAR.L trades at £9.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas DAR.L's P/E ratio is 113.44. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to DAR.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is less volatile compared to DAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs HWG.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, HWG.L has a market cap of 551M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while HWG.L trades at £170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas HWG.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to HWG.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs 0QN6.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, 0QN6.L has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while 0QN6.L trades at £96.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas 0QN6.L's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to 0QN6.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to 0QN6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs MOH.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, MOH.L has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while MOH.L trades at £17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas MOH.L's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to MOH.L's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to MOH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs ASPL.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, ASPL.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while ASPL.L trades at £0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas ASPL.L's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to ASPL.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is less volatile compared to ASPL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs INLZ.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, INLZ.L has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while INLZ.L trades at £54.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas INLZ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to INLZ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to INLZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs INL.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, INL.L has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while INL.L trades at £2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas INL.L's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to INL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to INL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs 0RFZ.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, 0RFZ.L has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while 0RFZ.L trades at £0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas 0RFZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to 0RFZ.L's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to 0RFZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs PLAZ.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, PLAZ.L has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while PLAZ.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas PLAZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to PLAZ.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to PLAZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs OHG.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, OHG.L has a market cap of 796.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while OHG.L trades at £2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas OHG.L's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to OHG.L's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to OHG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs TRAF.L Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, TRAF.L has a market cap of 400.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while TRAF.L trades at £0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas TRAF.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to TRAF.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to TRAF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.
ROAD.L vs ETLN.IL Comparison
ROAD.L plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ROAD.L stands at 61.5M. In comparison, ETLN.IL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ROAD.L is priced at £42.80, while ETLN.IL trades at £0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ROAD.L currently has a P/E ratio of -10.70, whereas ETLN.IL's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, ROAD.L's ROE is +5.54%, compared to ETLN.IL's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ROAD.L is more volatile compared to ETLN.IL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROAD.L.