Rheinmetall AG
Rheinmetall AG RNMBY Peers
See (RNMBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNMBY | $406.48 | -0.62% | 90.7B | 94.99 | $4.28 | +0.44% |
| EADSF | $207.40 | +1.67% | 162.6B | 31.53 | $6.55 | +1.68% |
| EADSY | $51.66 | +1.59% | 162.5B | 32.04 | $1.61 | +1.67% |
| SAFRF | $316.72 | +0.62% | 132B | -172.13 | -$1.84 | +0.98% |
| SAFRY | $78.70 | +0.31% | 131.8B | -167.15 | -$0.47 | +1.04% |
| RYCEY | $12.99 | -0.61% | 109.9B | 32.48 | $0.40 | +0.58% |
| RYCEF | $12.87 | -1.15% | 108.8B | 32.17 | $0.40 | +0.62% |
| RNMBF | $2,023.00 | -1.32% | 92B | 94.57 | $21.36 | +0.39% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | -7.27% | 85.8B | 0.28 | $0.02 | N/A |
| BAESY | $102.07 | -1.48% | 75B | 29.01 | $3.52 | +1.65% |
Stock Comparison
RNMBY vs EADSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 162.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while EADSF trades at $207.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EADSY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 162.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while EADSY trades at $51.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAFRF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SAFRF trades at $316.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -172.13. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAFRY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SAFRY trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -167.15. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RYCEY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 109.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while RYCEY trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RYCEF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 108.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while RYCEF trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RNMBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while RNMBF trades at $2,023.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 94.57. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RLLCF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BAESY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 75B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BAESY trades at $102.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BAESF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BAESF trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 28.61. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FINMY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while FINMY trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs THLLY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while THLLY trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 49.78. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs THLEF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while THLEF trades at $273.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 47.81. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FINMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while FINMF trades at $54.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 25.02. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAABY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SAABY trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 55.70. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DUAVF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while DUAVF trades at $346.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 25.70. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAABF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SAABF trades at $50.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 56.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MTUAF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MTUAF trades at $440.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 33.15. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MTUAY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MTUAY trades at $216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SGGKF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SGGKF trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 36.72. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SGGKY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SGGKY trades at $64.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HAGHY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while HAGHY trades at $54.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 119.89. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HNSDF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while HNSDF trades at $107.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 119.94. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BDRBF trades at $106.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 38.42. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRAF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BDRAF trades at $105.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 38.20. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRXF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BDRXF trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -5.04. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BOMBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BOMBF trades at $11.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NSKFF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while NSKFF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 57.14. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRPF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs YSHLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while YSHLF trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ACLLY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ACLLY trades at $70.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 38.68. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ACLIF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ACLIF trades at $60.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 33.67. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FNCNF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while FNCNF trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 92.37. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SMBMY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SMBMY trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SMBMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SMBMF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs QNTQF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while QNTQF trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is -15.68. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs QNTQY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while QNTQY trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MDALF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MDALF trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AVIJF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while AVIJF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CMGMY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while CMGMY trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 31.34. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CMGMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while CMGMF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AUTLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while AUTLF trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs LSIIF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while LSIIF trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs GGRGF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while GGRGF trades at $72.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -300.46. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CZGZF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while CZGZF trades at $34.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ATROB Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ATROB trades at $32.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -294.09. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MIESY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SNIRF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 930.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SNIRF trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MALJF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MALJF trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 27.43. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AVNBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 779.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while AVNBF trades at $26.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 124.91. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MIESF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HERXF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ASTGY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AERG Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 489M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while AERG trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AERG's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EOPSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while EOPSF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs JMCCF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while JMCCF trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FTGFF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 212.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while FTGFF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NORSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while NORSF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BUKS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 120.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BUKS trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAFS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CNRD Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while CNRD trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 361.80. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ACCMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ACCMF trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs TIPGF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs VLTTF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -7.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs STTLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NRPI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while NRPI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs QCKSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while QCKSF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MAXQF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MAXQF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs OPST Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while OPST trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ETCC Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ETCC trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AKRRF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while AKRRF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -52.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs TIKK Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while TIKK trades at $3.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -9.52. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SNAVF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NEXD Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while NEXD trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.93. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FLYLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs XERI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs USDR Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MSNVF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DEWY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while DEWY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs LLLI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while LLLI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HWKE Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 967.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while HWKE trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs PMEA Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMEA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MDEX Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DLRWF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RNMBY has daily volatility of 2.05 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
RNMBY vs PSSR Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, PSSR has a market cap of 154.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while PSSR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas PSSR's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PSSR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to PSSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RNWR Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CFFMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DSUS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSUS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs OBTEF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 82.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while OBTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs UITA Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ASAV Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs LNGT Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNGT's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ADFS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, ADFS has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while ADFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas ADFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ADFS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ADFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SDSS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SDSS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EPEO Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPEO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BANT Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BANT has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BANT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BANT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BANT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BANT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BRSI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HSFI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HSFI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RDEGF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 90.7B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1K. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $406.48, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 94.99, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.