Rheinmetall AG
Rheinmetall AG RNMBY Peers
See (RNMBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNMBY | $356.90 | -6.72% | 77.51B | 88.34 | $4.04 | +0.34% |
| EADSY | $44.00 | -1.23% | 138.57B | 27.67 | $1.59 | +1.64% |
| EADSF | $175.00 | -2.09% | 137.78B | 27.60 | $6.34 | +1.97% |
| SAFRY | $69.63 | -0.34% | 117.30B | -154.73 | -$0.45 | +0.83% |
| SAFRF | $275.48 | -2.16% | 114.81B | -152.20 | -$1.81 | +0.86% |
| RLLCF | $0.01 | N/A | 89.17B | 0.36 | $0.02 | N/A |
| RYCEF | $10.41 | -1.33% | 88.18B | 26.03 | $0.40 | +0.58% |
| RYCEY | $10.42 | -0.95% | 88.14B | 26.05 | $0.40 | +0.55% |
| RNMBF | $1,785.00 | -7.27% | 81.24B | 88.32 | $20.21 | +0.35% |
| BAESY | $88.67 | -2.03% | 66.22B | 26.08 | $3.40 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
RNMBY vs EADSY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, EADSY has a market cap of 138.57B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while EADSY trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas EADSY's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EADSY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to EADSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EADSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, EADSF has a market cap of 137.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while EADSF trades at $175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas EADSF's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EADSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to EADSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAFRY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SAFRY has a market cap of 117.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SAFRY trades at $69.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SAFRY's P/E ratio is -154.73. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAFRY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SAFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAFRF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SAFRF has a market cap of 114.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SAFRF trades at $275.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SAFRF's P/E ratio is -152.20. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAFRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RLLCF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, RLLCF has a market cap of 89.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while RLLCF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas RLLCF's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RLLCF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to RLLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RYCEF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, RYCEF has a market cap of 88.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while RYCEF trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas RYCEF's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYCEF's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to RYCEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RYCEY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, RYCEY has a market cap of 88.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while RYCEY trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas RYCEY's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RYCEY's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to RYCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RNMBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, RNMBF has a market cap of 81.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while RNMBF trades at $1,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas RNMBF's P/E ratio is 88.32. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RNMBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to RNMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BAESY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BAESY has a market cap of 66.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BAESY trades at $88.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BAESY's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAESY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BAESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BAESF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BAESF has a market cap of 64.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BAESF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BAESF's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAESF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BAESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FINMY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, FINMY has a market cap of 57.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while FINMY trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas FINMY's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FINMY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FINMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs THLLY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, THLLY has a market cap of 54.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while THLLY trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas THLLY's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THLLY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to THLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs THLEF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, THLEF has a market cap of 54.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while THLEF trades at $264.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas THLEF's P/E ratio is 47.74. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to THLEF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to THLEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FINMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, FINMF has a market cap of 28.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while FINMF trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas FINMF's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FINMF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to FINMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NSKFF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, NSKFF has a market cap of 26.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while NSKFF trades at $148.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas NSKFF's P/E ratio is 53.07. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NSKFF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to NSKFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DUAVF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, DUAVF has a market cap of 25.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while DUAVF trades at $330.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas DUAVF's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DUAVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to DUAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAABY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SAABY has a market cap of 23.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SAABY trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SAABY's P/E ratio is 49.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAABY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SAABY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAABF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SAABF has a market cap of 23.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SAABF trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SAABF's P/E ratio is 49.20. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAABF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SAABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MTUAF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MTUAF has a market cap of 19.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MTUAF trades at $365.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MTUAF's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTUAF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MTUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MTUAY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MTUAY has a market cap of 19.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MTUAY trades at $181.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MTUAY's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MTUAY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MTUAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SGGKF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SGGKF has a market cap of 18.53B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SGGKF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SGGKF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGGKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SGGKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HAGHY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, HAGHY has a market cap of 16.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while HAGHY trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas HAGHY's P/E ratio is 69.62. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HAGHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to HAGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SGGKY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SGGKY has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SGGKY trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SGGKY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SGGKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SGGKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HNSDF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, HNSDF has a market cap of 9.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while HNSDF trades at $84.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas HNSDF's P/E ratio is 80.24. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HNSDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to HNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs YSHLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, YSHLF has a market cap of 6.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while YSHLF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas YSHLF's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YSHLF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to YSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BDRBF has a market cap of 6.33B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BDRBF trades at $64.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BDRBF's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BDRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BOMBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BOMBF has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BOMBF trades at $10.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BOMBF's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BOMBF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BOMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRPF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BDRPF has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BDRPF trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BDRPF's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRPF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BDRPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRXF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BDRXF has a market cap of 6.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BDRXF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BDRXF's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BDRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BDRAF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BDRAF has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BDRAF trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BDRAF's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BDRAF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to BDRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ACLLY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ACLLY has a market cap of 5.27B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ACLLY trades at $56.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ACLLY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACLLY's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ACLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SMBMY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SMBMY has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SMBMY trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SMBMY's P/E ratio is 42.46. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMBMY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SMBMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SMBMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SMBMF has a market cap of 5.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SMBMF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SMBMF's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SMBMF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to SMBMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FNCNF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, FNCNF has a market cap of 4.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while FNCNF trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas FNCNF's P/E ratio is 93.71. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FNCNF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to FNCNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ACLIF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ACLIF has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ACLIF trades at $48.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ACLIF's P/E ratio is 26.52. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACLIF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to ACLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AVIJF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, AVIJF has a market cap of 4.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while AVIJF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas AVIJF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVIJF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to AVIJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs QNTQF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, QNTQF has a market cap of 3.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while QNTQF trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas QNTQF's P/E ratio is 17.31. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QNTQF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to QNTQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs QNTQY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, QNTQY has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while QNTQY trades at $22.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas QNTQY's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QNTQY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to QNTQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MDALF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MDALF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MDALF trades at $17.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MDALF's P/E ratio is 39.97. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDALF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MDALF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CMGMY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, CMGMY has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while CMGMY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas CMGMY's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMGMY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to CMGMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CMGMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, CMGMF has a market cap of 1.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while CMGMF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas CMGMF's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CMGMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to CMGMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AUTLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, AUTLF has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while AUTLF trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas AUTLF's P/E ratio is 67.60. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AUTLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to AUTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs LSIIF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, LSIIF has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while LSIIF trades at $29.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas LSIIF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LSIIF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to LSIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CZGZF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, CZGZF has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while CZGZF trades at $31.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas CZGZF's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CZGZF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to CZGZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MIESY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MIESY has a market cap of 1.02B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MIESY trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MIESY's P/E ratio is 2.72. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIESY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MIESY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ATROB Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ATROB has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ATROB trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ATROB's P/E ratio is -61.96. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATROB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ATROB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs GGRGF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, GGRGF has a market cap of 864.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while GGRGF trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas GGRGF's P/E ratio is -212.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GGRGF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to GGRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SNIRF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SNIRF has a market cap of 823.65M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SNIRF trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SNIRF's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNIRF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SNIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MIESF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MIESF has a market cap of 744.55M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MIESF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MIESF's P/E ratio is 2.15. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MIESF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MIESF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HERXF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, HERXF has a market cap of 736.10M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while HERXF trades at $21.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas HERXF's P/E ratio is 20.43. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HERXF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to HERXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MALJF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MALJF has a market cap of 618.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MALJF trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MALJF's P/E ratio is 24.07. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MALJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MALJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ASTGY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ASTGY has a market cap of 562.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ASTGY trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ASTGY's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASTGY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ASTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AVNBF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, AVNBF has a market cap of 523.37M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while AVNBF trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas AVNBF's P/E ratio is 176.20. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AVNBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to AVNBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs JMCCF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, JMCCF has a market cap of 372.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while JMCCF trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas JMCCF's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JMCCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to JMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AERG Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, AERG has a market cap of 163.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while AERG trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas AERG's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AERG's ROE of -7.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to AERG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FTGFF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, FTGFF has a market cap of 162.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while FTGFF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas FTGFF's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FTGFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FTGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EOPSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, EOPSF has a market cap of 150.02M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while EOPSF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas EOPSF's P/E ratio is -5.98. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EOPSF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to EOPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BUKS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BUKS has a market cap of 123.98M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BUKS trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BUKS's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BUKS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BUKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SAFS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SAFS has a market cap of 116.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SAFS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SAFS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SAFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SAFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NORSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, NORSF has a market cap of 96.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while NORSF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas NORSF's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NORSF's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to NORSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CNRD Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, CNRD has a market cap of 61.61M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while CNRD trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas CNRD's P/E ratio is 301.25. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNRD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to CNRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ACCMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ACCMF has a market cap of 55.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ACCMF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ACCMF's P/E ratio is -93.45. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ACCMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ACCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs TIPGF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, TIPGF has a market cap of 49.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while TIPGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas TIPGF's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIPGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to TIPGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs OPXS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 47.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while OPXS trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs VLTTF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, VLTTF has a market cap of 42.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while VLTTF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas VLTTF's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VLTTF's ROE of -3.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to VLTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs STTLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, STTLF has a market cap of 30.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while STTLF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas STTLF's P/E ratio is -19.29. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to STTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to STTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NRPI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, NRPI has a market cap of 18.74M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while NRPI trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas NRPI's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NRPI's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to NRPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs AKRRF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, AKRRF has a market cap of 18.53M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while AKRRF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas AKRRF's P/E ratio is -76.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AKRRF's ROE of +14.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to AKRRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs OPST Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, OPST has a market cap of 17.46M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while OPST trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas OPST's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to OPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ETCC Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ETCC has a market cap of 13.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ETCC trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ETCC's P/E ratio is -6.17. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ETCC's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to ETCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MAXQF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MAXQF has a market cap of 9.82M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MAXQF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MAXQF's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MAXQF's ROE of +8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MAXQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs NEXD Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, NEXD has a market cap of 9.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while NEXD trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas NEXD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NEXD's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to NEXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs FLYLF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, FLYLF has a market cap of 9.45M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while FLYLF trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas FLYLF's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FLYLF's ROE of +7.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to FLYLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs TIKK Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, TIKK has a market cap of 9.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while TIKK trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas TIKK's P/E ratio is -7.42. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TIKK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to TIKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs XERI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, XERI has a market cap of 8.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while XERI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas XERI's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XERI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to XERI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SNAVF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SNAVF has a market cap of 7.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SNAVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SNAVF's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNAVF's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SNAVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs OBTEF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, OBTEF has a market cap of 6.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while OBTEF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas OBTEF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OBTEF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to OBTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs USDR Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, USDR has a market cap of 5.96M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while USDR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas USDR's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to USDR's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to USDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MSNVF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MSNVF has a market cap of 5.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MSNVF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MSNVF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSNVF's ROE of -20.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to MSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DEWY Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, DEWY has a market cap of 2.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while DEWY trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas DEWY's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DEWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to DEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs LLLI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, LLLI has a market cap of 770545.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while LLLI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas LLLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LLLI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to LLLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs PMEA Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, PMEA has a market cap of 752829.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while PMEA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas PMEA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PMEA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to PMEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HWKE Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, HWKE has a market cap of 609474.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while HWKE trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas HWKE's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HWKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to HWKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs MDEX Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, MDEX has a market cap of 320620.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while MDEX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas MDEX's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDEX's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to MDEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DLRWF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, DLRWF has a market cap of 272202.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while DLRWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas DLRWF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DLRWF's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RNMBY has daily volatility of 3.50 and DLRWF has daily volatility of N/A.
RNMBY vs RNWR Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, RNWR has a market cap of 139522.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while RNWR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas RNWR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RNWR's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to RNWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs CFFMF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, CFFMF has a market cap of 118407.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while CFFMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas CFFMF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CFFMF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to CFFMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs DSUS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, DSUS has a market cap of 114300.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while DSUS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas DSUS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSUS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to DSUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs QCKSF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, QCKSF has a market cap of 78899.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while QCKSF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas QCKSF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to QCKSF's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to QCKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs UITA Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, UITA has a market cap of 38610.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while UITA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas UITA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UITA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to UITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EKSN Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, EKSN has a market cap of 20000.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while EKSN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas EKSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EKSN's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to EKSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs ASAV Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, ASAV has a market cap of 11935.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while ASAV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas ASAV's P/E ratio is -103.64. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASAV's ROE of +7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is more volatile compared to ASAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs LNGT Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, LNGT has a market cap of 11360.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while LNGT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas LNGT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNGT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to LNGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs SDSS Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, SDSS has a market cap of 8263.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while SDSS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas SDSS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SDSS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to SDSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs EPEO Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, EPEO has a market cap of 5603.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while EPEO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas EPEO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EPEO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to EPEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs BRSI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, BRSI has a market cap of 1133.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while BRSI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas BRSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BRSI's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to BRSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs HSFI Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, HSFI has a market cap of 1104.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while HSFI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas HSFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HSFI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to HSFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs RDEGF Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, RDEGF has a market cap of 1026.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while RDEGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas RDEGF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDEGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to RDEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.
RNMBY vs UMAV Comparison
RNMBY plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNMBY stands at 77.51B. In comparison, UMAV has a market cap of 776.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNMBY is priced at $356.90, while UMAV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNMBY currently has a P/E ratio of 88.34, whereas UMAV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RNMBY's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UMAV's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RNMBY is less volatile compared to UMAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNMBY.