Renault SA
Renault SA RNLSY Peers
See (RNLSY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNLSY | $10.97 | +0.18% | 15.84B | 17.98 | $0.61 | +5.59% |
| TOYOF | $18.20 | -1.03% | 237.49B | 7.46 | $2.44 | +3.38% |
| BYDDF | $55.70 | -0.10% | 167.36B | 26.03 | $2.14 | +0.78% |
| BYDDY | $111.05 | -0.20% | 82.88B | 26.01 | $4.27 | +0.77% |
| VWAGY | $11.82 | +1.37% | 59.45B | 5.68 | $2.08 | +9.94% |
| VLKPF | $115.07 | +1.95% | 58.87B | 5.54 | $20.76 | +13.37% |
| VWAPY | $11.39 | -0.44% | 58.39B | 5.48 | $2.08 | +9.55% |
| VLKAF | $115.00 | -0.37% | 57.52B | 5.54 | $20.75 | +12.97% |
| MBGAF | $59.25 | +0.94% | 57.05B | 5.84 | $10.14 | +9.14% |
| MBGYY | $14.80 | +1.09% | 57.00B | 5.83 | $2.54 | +5.47% |
Stock Comparison
RNLSY vs TOYOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 237.49B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while TOYOF trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BYDDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 167.36B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BYDDF trades at $55.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BYDDY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 82.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BYDDY trades at $111.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VWAGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 59.45B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while VWAGY trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLKPF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 58.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while VLKPF trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VWAPY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 58.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while VWAPY trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLKAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 57.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while VLKAF trades at $115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MBGAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 57.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while MBGAF trades at $59.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MBGYY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 57.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while MBGYY trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.83. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BAMXF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 54.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BAMXF trades at $88.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BYMOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 53.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BYMOF trades at $76.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DRPRF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 47.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while DRPRF trades at $52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MAHMF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 42.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while MAHMF trades at $33.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HNDAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 41.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while HNDAF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs TYIDY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 38.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while TYIDY trades at $126.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs TYIDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 37.90B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while TYIDF trades at $125.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HYMTF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 33.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while HYMTF trades at $52.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GELYF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 24.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GELYF trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GELYY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 24.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GELYY trades at $49.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SZKMY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 24.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while SZKMY trades at $50.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SZKMF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 23.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while SZKMF trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GWLLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 23.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GWLLF trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DRPRY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 23.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while DRPRY trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HYMLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 22.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs XPNGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 21.79B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while XPNGF trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -27.29. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs EXXRF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while EXXRF trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.31. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BMWYY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.66B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FOVSY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 17.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while FOVSY trades at $124.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 103.26. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs RNSDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 14.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while RNSDF trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FUJHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 13.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while FUJHF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GWLLY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GWLLY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs POAHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while POAHF trades at $42.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FUJHY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 13.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while FUJHY trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YAMHY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ISUZF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 11.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ISUZF trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GNZUF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GNZUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ISUZY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ISUZY trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NSANF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NSANF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NSANY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NSANY trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs JCYGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while JCYGY trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NIOIF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 7.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NIOIF trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YMHAY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while YMHAY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YAMHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.27B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while YAMHF trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs JCYCF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 7.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while JCYCF trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs POAHY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 6.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while POAHY trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLVOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 6.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while VLVOF trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLVCY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while VLVCY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 4.23. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs IVCGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 4.98B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while IVCGF trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY and IVCGF have similar daily volatility (0.37).
RNLSY vs DNFGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 4.36B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while DNFGY trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 532.20. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DNFGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MMTOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while MMTOF trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YADGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while YADGF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 21.67. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MZDAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while MZDAF trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MZDAY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while MZDAY trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SMEBF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while SMEBF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BCCMY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BCCMY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BMCLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HINOY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while HINOY trades at $31.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BCAUF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while BCAUF trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HINOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.64B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while HINOF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NFYEF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NFYEF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -339.33. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs AMGDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while AMGDF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ARGGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 999.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ARGGY trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NSNHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs PIAGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 714.23M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while PIAGF trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs KRSOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs RIDEQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FHYDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 25.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while FHYDF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SEVCF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 21.50M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while SEVCF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is 3.65. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NRDE Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 20.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NRDE trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELMWQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELMSQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 6.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ELMSQ trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs LFEV Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while LFEV trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GKIT Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 3.81M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GKIT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs EVTGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FSRNQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELEK Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ELEK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELCR Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681583.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs TUGAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 386816.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs RONN Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 228179.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GACR Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104560.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs CSBI Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 32318.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELIO Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14196.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NVYAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8693.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ARVLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 5513.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NDVR Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 15.84B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892.00. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $10.97, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 17.98, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.