Renault SA
Renault SA RNLSY Peers
See (RNLSY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RNLSY | $9.51 | -1.65% | 13.7B | 14.86 | $0.64 | +5.13% |
| TOYOF | $17.40 | -0.34% | 227.1B | 7.07 | $2.46 | +3.53% |
| BYDDF | $15.63 | +0.20% | 121.2B | 7.30 | $2.14 | +3.51% |
| BYDDY | $93.71 | +0.41% | 86.3B | 21.84 | $4.29 | +1.13% |
| MBGAF | $59.42 | -0.82% | 57.2B | 5.71 | $10.41 | +8.12% |
| MBGYY | $14.82 | -0.34% | 57.1B | 5.70 | $2.60 | +8.05% |
| BAMXF | $91.88 | -1.21% | 56.8B | 7.54 | $12.18 | +5.21% |
| VLKPF | $109.29 | +4.85% | 55B | 5.13 | $21.30 | +6.55% |
| VWAGY | $10.99 | +0.55% | 54.7B | 5.16 | $2.13 | +6.49% |
| VLKAF | $108.01 | -1.16% | 53.8B | 5.07 | $21.30 | +6.56% |
Stock Comparison
RNLSY vs TOYOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TOYOF has a market cap of 227.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while TOYOF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TOYOF's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TOYOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to TOYOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BYDDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BYDDF has a market cap of 121.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BYDDF trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BYDDF's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BYDDF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BYDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BYDDY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BYDDY has a market cap of 86.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BYDDY trades at $93.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BYDDY's P/E ratio is 21.84. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BYDDY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BYDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MBGAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MBGAF has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while MBGAF trades at $59.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MBGAF's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBGAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to MBGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MBGYY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MBGYY has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while MBGYY trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MBGYY's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MBGYY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to MBGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BAMXF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BAMXF has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BAMXF trades at $91.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BAMXF's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BAMXF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BAMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLKPF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VLKPF has a market cap of 55B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while VLKPF trades at $109.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VLKPF's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLKPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLKPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VWAGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VWAGY has a market cap of 54.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while VWAGY trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VWAGY's P/E ratio is 5.16. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VWAGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to VWAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLKAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VLKAF has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while VLKAF trades at $108.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VLKAF's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLKAF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to VLKAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VWAPY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VWAPY has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while VWAPY trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VWAPY's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VWAPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VWAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BYMOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BYMOF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BYMOF trades at $81.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BYMOF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BYMOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BYMOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MAHMF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MAHMF has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while MAHMF trades at $32.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MAHMF's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAHMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to MAHMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DRPRF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DRPRF has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while DRPRF trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DRPRF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRPRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to DRPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HNDAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, HNDAF has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while HNDAF trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas HNDAF's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HNDAF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to HNDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HYMTF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, HYMTF has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while HYMTF trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas HYMTF's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HYMTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to HYMTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs TYIDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TYIDF has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while TYIDF trades at $113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TYIDF's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYIDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to TYIDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs TYIDY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TYIDY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while TYIDY trades at $113.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TYIDY's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYIDY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to TYIDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DRPRY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DRPRY has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while DRPRY trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DRPRY's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRPRY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to DRPRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GWLLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GWLLF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GWLLF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GWLLF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GWLLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GWLLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SZKMY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SZKMY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while SZKMY trades at $46.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SZKMY's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SZKMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to SZKMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SZKMF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SZKMF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while SZKMF trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SZKMF's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SZKMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to SZKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HYMLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, HYMLF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while HYMLF trades at $89.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas HYMLF's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HYMLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to HYMLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs EXXRF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EXXRF has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while EXXRF trades at $101.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas EXXRF's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EXXRF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to EXXRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GELYY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GELYY has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GELYY trades at $42.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GELYY's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GELYY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GELYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GELYF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GELYF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GELYF trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GELYF's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GELYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GELYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BMWYY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BMWYY has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BMWYY trades at $29.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BMWYY's P/E ratio is 4.74. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMWYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BMWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs XPNGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, XPNGF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while XPNGF trades at $9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas XPNGF's P/E ratio is -26.27. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to XPNGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to XPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GWLLY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GWLLY has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GWLLY trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GWLLY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GWLLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to GWLLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs RNSDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RNSDF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while RNSDF trades at $47.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RNSDF's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RNSDF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to RNSDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FUJHY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FUJHY has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while FUJHY trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FUJHY's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUJHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to FUJHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FUJHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FUJHF has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while FUJHF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FUJHF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FUJHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to FUJHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YAMHY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, YAMHY has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while YAMHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas YAMHY's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YAMHY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to YAMHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs POAHY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, POAHY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while POAHY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas POAHY's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POAHY's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to POAHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs POAHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, POAHF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while POAHF trades at $40.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas POAHF's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to POAHF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to POAHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GNZUF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GNZUF has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GNZUF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GNZUF's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GNZUF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GNZUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ISUZF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ISUZF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ISUZF trades at $13.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ISUZF's P/E ratio is 17.90. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ISUZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ISUZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ISUZY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ISUZY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ISUZY trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ISUZY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ISUZY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ISUZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NSANY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NSANY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NSANY trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NSANY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to NSANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NSANF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NSANF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NSANF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NSANF's P/E ratio is -1.84. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSANF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NSANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs JCYCF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, JCYCF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while JCYCF trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas JCYCF's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JCYCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to JCYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs JCYGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, JCYGY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while JCYGY trades at $38.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas JCYGY's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JCYGY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to JCYGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YMHAY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, YMHAY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while YMHAY trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas YMHAY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YMHAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to YMHAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YAMHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, YAMHF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while YAMHF trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas YAMHF's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YAMHF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to YAMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NIOIF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NIOIF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NIOIF trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NIOIF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIOIF's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to NIOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLVCY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VLVCY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while VLVCY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VLVCY's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLVCY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLVCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs IVCGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, IVCGF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while IVCGF trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas IVCGF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IVCGF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to IVCGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs VLVOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, VLVOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while VLVOF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas VLVOF's P/E ratio is 3.80. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLVOF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to VLVOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DNFGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DNFGF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while DNFGF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DNFGF's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNFGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to DNFGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MMTOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MMTOF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while MMTOF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MMTOF's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMTOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to MMTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MZDAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MZDAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while MZDAF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MZDAF's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MZDAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to MZDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs MZDAY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MZDAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while MZDAY trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas MZDAY's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MZDAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to MZDAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DNFGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DNFGY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while DNFGY trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DNFGY's P/E ratio is 421.40. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNFGY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to DNFGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs YADGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, YADGF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while YADGF trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas YADGF's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YADGF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to YADGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SMEBF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SMEBF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while SMEBF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SMEBF's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMEBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to SMEBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BCAUF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BCAUF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BCAUF trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BCAUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCAUF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BCAUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BCCMY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BCCMY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BCCMY trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BCCMY's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCCMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to BCCMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs BMCLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BMCLF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while BMCLF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas BMCLF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMCLF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to BMCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NFYEF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NFYEF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NFYEF trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NFYEF's P/E ratio is -458.33. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NFYEF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NFYEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HINOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, HINOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while HINOF trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas HINOF's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HINOF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to HINOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs HINOY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, HINOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while HINOY trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas HINOY's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HINOY's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to HINOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ARGGY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ARGGY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ARGGY trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ARGGY's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARGGY's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ARGGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs AMGDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AMGDF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while AMGDF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas AMGDF's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMGDF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to AMGDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NSNHF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NSNHF has a market cap of 866.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NSNHF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NSNHF's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NSNHF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to NSNHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs PIAGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PIAGF has a market cap of 841M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while PIAGF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas PIAGF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PIAGF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to PIAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FOVSY Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FOVSY has a market cap of 772M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while FOVSY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FOVSY's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FOVSY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to FOVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs KRSOF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KRSOF has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while KRSOF trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas KRSOF's P/E ratio is 49.40. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KRSOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to KRSOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FHYDF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FHYDF has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while FHYDF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FHYDF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FHYDF's ROE of +3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to FHYDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs RIDEQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RIDEQ has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while RIDEQ trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RIDEQ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RIDEQ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to RIDEQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NRDE Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NRDE has a market cap of 21.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NRDE trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NRDE's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NRDE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NRDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELMSQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ELMSQ has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ELMSQ trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ELMSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELMSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ELMSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs SEVCF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SEVCF has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while SEVCF trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas SEVCF's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SEVCF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to SEVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELMWQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ELMWQ has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ELMWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ELMWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELMWQ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ELMWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs LFEV Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, LFEV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while LFEV trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas LFEV's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LFEV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to LFEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs EVTGF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EVTGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while EVTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas EVTGF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVTGF's ROE of -1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to EVTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELEK Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ELEK has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ELEK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ELEK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELEK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ELEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs FSRNQ Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FSRNQ has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while FSRNQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas FSRNQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FSRNQ's ROE of -4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to FSRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELCR Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ELCR has a market cap of 681.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ELCR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ELCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELCR's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ELCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GKIT Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GKIT has a market cap of 546.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GKIT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GKIT's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GKIT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to GKIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs TUGAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TUGAF has a market cap of 337.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while TUGAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas TUGAF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TUGAF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to TUGAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs RONN Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RONN has a market cap of 114.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while RONN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas RONN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RONN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to RONN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs GACR Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GACR has a market cap of 104.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while GACR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas GACR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GACR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to GACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs CSBI Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CSBI has a market cap of 15.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while CSBI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas CSBI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CSBI's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to CSBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ELIO Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ELIO has a market cap of 14.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ELIO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ELIO's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELIO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to ELIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NVYAF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NVYAF has a market cap of 8.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NVYAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NVYAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NVYAF's ROE of -16.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NVYAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs ARVLF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ARVLF has a market cap of 5.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while ARVLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas ARVLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVLF's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to ARVLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs NDVR Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NDVR has a market cap of 892. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while NDVR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas NDVR's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NDVR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is more volatile compared to NDVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.
RNLSY vs DDAIF Comparison
RNLSY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RNLSY stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DDAIF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RNLSY is priced at $9.51, while DDAIF trades at $62.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RNLSY currently has a P/E ratio of 14.86, whereas DDAIF's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, RNLSY's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DDAIF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RNLSY is less volatile compared to DDAIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RNLSY.