Rocky Mountain International Ltd.
Rocky Mountain International Ltd. (RMIL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RMIL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMIL | $0.00 | +0.00% | 0 | 0.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| NNFSF | $5.03 | +0.00% | 56.6B | 33.53 | $0.15 | +2.08% |
| CCHBF | $52.98 | +0.00% | 19.3B | 19.99 | $2.65 | +2.37% |
| CCHGY | $52.53 | +0.04% | 19.1B | 19.87 | $2.64 | +2.13% |
| EMBVF | $10.42 | +1.12% | 17.7B | 15.31 | $0.68 | +2.98% |
| ITONF | $61.41 | +0.00% | 12.6B | 87.73 | $0.70 | +0.62% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.03% |
| YKLTF | $17.79 | +0.00% | 5.1B | 17.44 | $1.02 | +1.27% |
| YKLTY | $8.04 | -6.29% | 4.8B | 15.76 | $0.51 | +1.59% |
| COCSF | $8.58 | +5.80% | 4.5B | 21.76 | $0.37 | +4.29% |
Stock Comparison
RMIL vs NNFSF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while NNFSF trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check NNFSF's competition here
RMIL vs CCHBF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while CCHBF trades at $52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 19.99. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check CCHBF's competition here
RMIL vs CCHGY Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while CCHGY trades at $52.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check CCHGY's competition here
RMIL vs EMBVF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while EMBVF trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check EMBVF's competition here
RMIL vs ITONF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check ITONF's competition here
RMIL vs BTVCY Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check BTVCY's competition here
RMIL vs YKLTF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while YKLTF trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check YKLTF's competition here
RMIL vs YKLTY Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while YKLTY trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check YKLTY's competition here
RMIL vs COCSF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while COCSF trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check COCSF's competition here
RMIL vs BTVCF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check BTVCF's competition here
RMIL vs UNPSF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check UNPSF's competition here
RMIL vs CCOJY Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while CCOJY trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 102.14. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check CCOJY's competition here
RMIL vs CCOJF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check CCOJF's competition here
RMIL vs ITOEF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check ITOEF's competition here
RMIL vs YNAJF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while YNAJF trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check YNAJF's competition here
RMIL vs OSOPF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check OSOPF's competition here
RMIL vs FQVTF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while FQVTF trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 46.14. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check FQVTF's competition here
RMIL vs LSDAF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while LSDAF trades at $156.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check LSDAF's competition here
RMIL vs BAGFF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check BAGFF's competition here
RMIL vs NJMVF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check NJMVF's competition here
RMIL vs HAATF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 194.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while HAATF trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check HAATF's competition here
RMIL vs UPCHY Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while UPCHY trades at $116.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check UPCHY's competition here
RMIL vs CHFHY Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check CHFHY's competition here
RMIL vs PDPG Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check PDPG's competition here
RMIL vs JSDA Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while JSDA trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check JSDA's competition here
RMIL vs MOJO Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while MOJO trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check MOJO's competition here
RMIL vs KRTL Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while KRTL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check KRTL's competition here
RMIL vs HIRU Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check HIRU's competition here
RMIL vs RVBR Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while RVBR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check RVBR's competition here
RMIL vs FLWBF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while FLWBF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check FLWBF's competition here
RMIL vs DRNK Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check DRNK's competition here
RMIL vs APRU Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check APRU's competition here
RMIL vs PLVFF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check PLVFF's competition here
RMIL vs RMHB Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, RMHB has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while RMHB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas RMHB's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to RMHB's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to RMHB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check RMHB's competition here
RMIL vs PURT Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check PURT's competition here
RMIL vs AQPW Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while AQPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check AQPW's competition here
RMIL vs INKW Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check INKW's competition here
RMIL vs ALKM Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 864.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check ALKM's competition here
RMIL vs FBEC Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 585.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check FBEC's competition here
RMIL vs ASII Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 530.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check ASII's competition here
RMIL vs FMBV Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to FMBV's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check FMBV's competition here
RMIL vs HSEEF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 415.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to HSEEF's ROE of +5.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check HSEEF's competition here
RMIL vs VGID Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check VGID's competition here
RMIL vs DNDT Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 337.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while DNDT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check DNDT's competition here
RMIL vs NTEI Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 272K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while NTEI trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check NTEI's competition here
RMIL vs KGKG Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check KGKG's competition here
RMIL vs FHBC Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check FHBC's competition here
RMIL vs HFBG Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 197K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check HFBG's competition here
RMIL vs DNAX Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check DNAX's competition here
RMIL vs GHMP Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check GHMP's competition here
RMIL vs MLHC Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check MLHC's competition here
RMIL vs TBEV Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 79.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check TBEV's competition here
RMIL vs EQLB Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 57.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check EQLB's competition here
RMIL vs BBDA Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 28.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check BBDA's competition here
RMIL vs NBVG Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL and NBVG have similar daily volatility (163.64).Check NBVG's competition here
RMIL vs STZU Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check STZU's competition here
RMIL vs KRED Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL and KRED have similar daily volatility (163.64).Check KRED's competition here
RMIL vs PPBV Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check PPBV's competition here
RMIL vs FGFT Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check FGFT's competition here
RMIL vs BGEM Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check BGEM's competition here
RMIL vs BVNNF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check BVNNF's competition here
RMIL vs SWRI Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check SWRI's competition here
RMIL vs HKBV Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL and HKBV have similar daily volatility (163.64).Check HKBV's competition here
RMIL vs MCHA Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check MCHA's competition here
RMIL vs AQUI Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check AQUI's competition here
RMIL vs ABVG Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check ABVG's competition here
RMIL vs GGGRF Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check GGGRF's competition here
RMIL vs CLCL Comparison July 2025
RMIL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMIL stands at 0. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMIL is priced at $0.00, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMIL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.00, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMIL's ROE is N/A, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMIL is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMIL.Check CLCL's competition here