RM Infrastructure Income PLC
RM Infrastructure Income PLC (RMII.L) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RMII.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Income Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMII.L | £66.75 | -2.55% | 65.1M | 22.25 | £0.03 | +8.24% |
| UINC.L | £2,468.00 | -2.39% | 33.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.06% |
| DEMS.L | £2,254.25 | -0.45% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DEM.L | £1,211.25 | -0.72% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.99% |
| EEIP.L | £1,878.20 | -0.91% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| EEI.L | £1,143.30 | -1.07% | 5.7B | N/A | N/A | +5.60% |
| JGGI.L | £563.00 | -2.43% | 3.3B | 5.74 | £0.98 | +4.05% |
| GINC.L | £3,912.50 | -1.05% | 2.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.16% |
| FUSA.L | £13.51 | -1.87% | 2.1B | 24.16 | £0.56 | N/A |
| FUSP.L | £10.70 | -1.72% | 1.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RMII.L vs UINC.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, UINC.L has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while UINC.L trades at £2,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas UINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UINC.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to UINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check UINC.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DEMS.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DEMS.L has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DEMS.L trades at £2,254.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DEMS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEMS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DEMS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DEMS.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DEM.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DEM.L has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DEM.L trades at £1,211.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DEM.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEM.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DEM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DEM.L's competition here
RMII.L vs EEIP.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, EEIP.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while EEIP.L trades at £1,878.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas EEIP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EEIP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to EEIP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check EEIP.L's competition here
RMII.L vs EEI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, EEI.L has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while EEI.L trades at £1,143.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas EEI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EEI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to EEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check EEI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JGGI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JGGI.L has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JGGI.L trades at £563.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JGGI.L's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JGGI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JGGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JGGI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs GINC.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, GINC.L has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while GINC.L trades at £3,912.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas GINC.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GINC.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to GINC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check GINC.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FUSA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FUSA.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FUSA.L trades at £13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FUSA.L's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FUSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FUSA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FUSP.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FUSP.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FUSP.L trades at £10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FUSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUSP.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FUSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FUSP.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FUSD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FUSD.L has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FUSD.L trades at £11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FUSD.L's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUSD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FUSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FUSD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FGT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FGT.L has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FGT.L trades at £904.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FGT.L's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FGT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SEQI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SEQI.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SEQI.L trades at £80.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SEQI.L's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEQI.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to SEQI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SEQI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JSET.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JSET.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JSET.L trades at £94.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JSET.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JSET.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JSET.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JSET.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FUSI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FUSI.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FUSI.L trades at £853.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FUSI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUSI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FUSI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FUSI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FUQA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FUQA.L has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FUQA.L trades at £1,019.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FUQA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUQA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FUQA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FUQA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs WUKD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, WUKD.L has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while WUKD.L trades at £464.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas WUKD.L's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WUKD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to WUKD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check WUKD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MUT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MUT.L has a market cap of 859.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MUT.L trades at £878.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MUT.L's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MUT.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MUT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MUT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs TFIF.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, TFIF.L has a market cap of 857.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while TFIF.L trades at £111.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas TFIF.L's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TFIF.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to TFIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check TFIF.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FGQP.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FGQP.L has a market cap of 855.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FGQP.L trades at £8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FGQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FGQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FGQP.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SOI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SOI.L has a market cap of 690.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SOI.L trades at £298.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SOI.L's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOI.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to SOI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SOI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FGQD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FGQD.L has a market cap of 645.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FGQD.L trades at £715.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FGQD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JPST.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JPST.L has a market cap of 629.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JPST.L trades at £101.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JPST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPST.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JPST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JPST.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JPSA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JPSA.L has a market cap of 629.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JPSA.L trades at £120.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JPSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JPSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JPSA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SEIT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SEIT.L has a market cap of 626.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SEIT.L trades at £57.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SEIT.L's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEIT.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to SEIT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SEIT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs BSIF.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, BSIF.L has a market cap of 563.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while BSIF.L trades at £95.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas BSIF.L's P/E ratio is -47.60. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BSIF.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to BSIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check BSIF.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JEGI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JEGI.L has a market cap of 516.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JEGI.L trades at £122.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JEGI.L's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JEGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JEGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JEGI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JPAS.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JPAS.L has a market cap of 475.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JPAS.L trades at £91.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JPAS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JPAS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JPAS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JPAS.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JETI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JETI.L has a market cap of 447.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JETI.L trades at £175.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JETI.L's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JETI.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to JETI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JETI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs UIND.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, UIND.L has a market cap of 416.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while UIND.L trades at £32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas UIND.L's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UIND.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to UIND.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check UIND.L's competition here
RMII.L vs HFEL.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HFEL.L has a market cap of 408.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while HFEL.L trades at £225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas HFEL.L's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HFEL.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to HFEL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check HFEL.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JEMI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JEMI.L has a market cap of 403.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JEMI.L trades at £149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JEMI.L's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JEMI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JEMI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JEMI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs NAIT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, NAIT.L has a market cap of 403.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while NAIT.L trades at £336.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas NAIT.L's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NAIT.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to NAIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check NAIT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs BIPS.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, BIPS.L has a market cap of 375.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while BIPS.L trades at £171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas BIPS.L's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIPS.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to BIPS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check BIPS.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DIG.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DIG.L has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DIG.L trades at £294.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DIG.L's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIG.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DIG.L's competition here
RMII.L vs HINT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HINT.L has a market cap of 343.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while HINT.L trades at £175.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas HINT.L's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HINT.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to HINT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check HINT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs AAIF.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, AAIF.L has a market cap of 333.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while AAIF.L trades at £231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas AAIF.L's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AAIF.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to AAIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check AAIF.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CTUK.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CTUK.L has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CTUK.L trades at £335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CTUK.L's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTUK.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to CTUK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CTUK.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CMHY.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CMHY.L has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CMHY.L trades at £176.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CMHY.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMHY.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to CMHY.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CMHY.L's competition here
RMII.L vs HHI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HHI.L has a market cap of 306.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while HHI.L trades at £179.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas HHI.L's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HHI.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to HHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check HHI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JAGI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JAGI.L has a market cap of 269M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JAGI.L trades at £389.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JAGI.L's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JAGI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JAGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JAGI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CCJI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CCJI.L has a market cap of 266.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CCJI.L trades at £198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CCJI.L's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCJI.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to CCJI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CCJI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SMIF.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SMIF.L has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SMIF.L trades at £86.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SMIF.L's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMIF.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to SMIF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SMIF.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DIVI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DIVI.L has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DIVI.L trades at £101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DIVI.L's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DIVI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to DIVI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DIVI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JGSA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JGSA.L has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JGSA.L trades at £116.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JGSA.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JGSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JGSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JGSA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JGST.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JGST.L has a market cap of 224.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JGST.L trades at £101.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JGST.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JGST.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JGST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JGST.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FA17.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FA17.L has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FA17.L trades at £0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FA17.L's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FA17.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to FA17.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FA17.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FAIR.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FAIR.L has a market cap of 217.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FAIR.L trades at £0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FAIR.L's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FAIR.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FAIR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FAIR.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SCF.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SCF.L has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SCF.L trades at £312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SCF.L's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCF.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to SCF.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SCF.L's competition here
RMII.L vs HEIT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HEIT.L has a market cap of 209.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while HEIT.L trades at £92.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas HEIT.L's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HEIT.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to HEIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check HEIT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs TORO.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, TORO.L has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while TORO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas TORO.L's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TORO.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to TORO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check TORO.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CCJS.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CCJS.L has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CCJS.L trades at £0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CCJS.L's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCJS.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to CCJS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CCJS.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JCGI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JCGI.L has a market cap of 206.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JCGI.L trades at £249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JCGI.L's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JCGI.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to JCGI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JCGI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs AERI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, AERI.L has a market cap of 205.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while AERI.L trades at £0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas AERI.L's P/E ratio is -6.79. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AERI.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to AERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check AERI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs IGV.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, IGV.L has a market cap of 203.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while IGV.L trades at £62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas IGV.L's P/E ratio is 62.50. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IGV.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to IGV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check IGV.L's competition here
RMII.L vs ASLI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ASLI.L has a market cap of 196.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while ASLI.L trades at £47.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas ASLI.L's P/E ratio is 47.70. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASLI.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to ASLI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check ASLI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs AEI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, AEI.L has a market cap of 176.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while AEI.L trades at £364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas AEI.L's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AEI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to AEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check AEI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MGCI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MGCI.L has a market cap of 176.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MGCI.L trades at £94.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MGCI.L's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGCI.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MGCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MGCI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs ASIZ.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ASIZ.L has a market cap of 175.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while ASIZ.L trades at £126.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas ASIZ.L's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIZ.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to ASIZ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check ASIZ.L's competition here
RMII.L vs IVPG.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, IVPG.L has a market cap of 171.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while IVPG.L trades at £272.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas IVPG.L's P/E ratio is 38.86. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IVPG.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to IVPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check IVPG.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SGQD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SGQD.L has a market cap of 170.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SGQD.L trades at £329.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SGQD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SGQD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to SGQD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SGQD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DEMD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DEMD.L has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DEMD.L trades at £16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DEMD.L's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEMD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DEMD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MIX.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MIX.L has a market cap of 167M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MIX.L trades at £50.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MIX.L's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIX.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MIX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MIX.L's competition here
RMII.L vs TIGT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, TIGT.L has a market cap of 161.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while TIGT.L trades at £69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas TIGT.L's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIGT.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to TIGT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check TIGT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs ASIT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ASIT.L has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while ASIT.L trades at £83.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas ASIT.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIT.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to ASIT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check ASIT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DHSD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DHSD.L has a market cap of 157.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DHSD.L trades at £25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DHSD.L's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHSD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DHSD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DHSD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs PGOO.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, PGOO.L has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while PGOO.L trades at £46.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas PGOO.L's P/E ratio is -23.35. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGOO.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to PGOO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check PGOO.L's competition here
RMII.L vs ADIG.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ADIG.L has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while ADIG.L trades at £48.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas ADIG.L's P/E ratio is 24.20. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADIG.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to ADIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check ADIG.L's competition here
RMII.L vs BRSA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, BRSA.L has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while BRSA.L trades at £202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas BRSA.L's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRSA.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to BRSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check BRSA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MCT.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MCT.L has a market cap of 143.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MCT.L trades at £134.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MCT.L's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MCT.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L and MCT.L have similar daily volatility (3.75).Check MCT.L's competition here
RMII.L vs GABI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, GABI.L has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while GABI.L trades at £64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas GABI.L's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GABI.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to GABI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check GABI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs BERI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, BERI.L has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while BERI.L trades at £119.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas BERI.L's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BERI.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to BERI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check BERI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CVCG.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CVCG.L has a market cap of 136.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CVCG.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CVCG.L's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CVCG.L's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to CVCG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CVCG.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CYN.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CYN.L has a market cap of 134.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CYN.L trades at £209.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CYN.L's P/E ratio is -29.86. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CYN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to CYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CYN.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FEMD.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FEMD.L has a market cap of 125.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FEMD.L trades at £4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FEMD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEMD.L's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FEMD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FEMD.L's competition here
RMII.L vs HDIV.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, HDIV.L has a market cap of 121.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while HDIV.L trades at £66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas HDIV.L's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HDIV.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RMII.L has daily volatility of 3.75 and HDIV.L has daily volatility of N/A.Check HDIV.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DHS.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DHS.L has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DHS.L trades at £1,893.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DHS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHS.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DHS.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DHSA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DHSA.L has a market cap of 118.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DHSA.L trades at £30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DHSA.L's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHSA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DHSA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DHSA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs SHRS.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, SHRS.L has a market cap of 109.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while SHRS.L trades at £274.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas SHRS.L's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHRS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to SHRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check SHRS.L's competition here
RMII.L vs CMPI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, CMPI.L has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while CMPI.L trades at £120.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas CMPI.L's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CMPI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to CMPI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check CMPI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FEMQ.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FEMQ.L has a market cap of 94M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FEMQ.L trades at £5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FEMQ.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEMQ.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FEMQ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FEMQ.L's competition here
RMII.L vs GRIW.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, GRIW.L has a market cap of 89.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while GRIW.L trades at £19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas GRIW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRIW.L's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to GRIW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check GRIW.L's competition here
RMII.L vs DHSP.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, DHSP.L has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while DHSP.L trades at £2,333.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas DHSP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DHSP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to DHSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check DHSP.L's competition here
RMII.L vs VIP.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, VIP.L has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while VIP.L trades at £211.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas VIP.L's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIP.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to VIP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check VIP.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MAV4.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MAV4.L has a market cap of 80M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MAV4.L trades at £51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MAV4.L's P/E ratio is 25.75. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAV4.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MAV4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MAV4.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MIG4.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MIG4.L has a market cap of 75.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MIG4.L trades at £68.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MIG4.L's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIG4.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MIG4.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MIG4.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MATE.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MATE.L has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MATE.L trades at £103.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MATE.L's P/E ratio is -17.18. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MATE.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MATE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MATE.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MIG5.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MIG5.L has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MIG5.L trades at £28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MIG5.L's P/E ratio is 28.80. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIG5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MIG5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MIG5.L's competition here
RMII.L vs EEIA.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, EEIA.L has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while EEIA.L trades at £21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas EEIA.L's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EEIA.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to EEIA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check EEIA.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MIG1.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MIG1.L has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MIG1.L trades at £34.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MIG1.L's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIG1.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MIG1.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MIG1.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MIG3.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MIG3.L has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MIG3.L trades at £44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MIG3.L's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIG3.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MIG3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MIG3.L's competition here
RMII.L vs JEFI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, JEFI.L has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while JEFI.L trades at £94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas JEFI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JEFI.L's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to JEFI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check JEFI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs ASCI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ASCI.L has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while ASCI.L trades at £238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas ASCI.L's P/E ratio is -13.22. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASCI.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to ASCI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check ASCI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs MIG.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, MIG.L has a market cap of 55.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while MIG.L trades at £57.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas MIG.L's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MIG.L's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to MIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check MIG.L's competition here
RMII.L vs RCOI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, RCOI.L has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while RCOI.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas RCOI.L's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RCOI.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is less volatile compared to RCOI.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check RCOI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FEQP.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FEQP.L has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FEQP.L trades at £8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FEQP.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEQP.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FEQP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FEQP.L's competition here
RMII.L vs BRIG.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, BRIG.L has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while BRIG.L trades at £208.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas BRIG.L's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRIG.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to BRIG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check BRIG.L's competition here
RMII.L vs FEUI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, FEUI.L has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while FEUI.L trades at £5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas FEUI.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FEUI.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to FEUI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check FEUI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs ALAI.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, ALAI.L has a market cap of 35M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while ALAI.L trades at £62.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas ALAI.L's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALAI.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to ALAI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check ALAI.L's competition here
RMII.L vs EDIV.L Comparison August 2025
RMII.L plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMII.L stands at 65.1M. In comparison, EDIV.L has a market cap of 23.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMII.L is priced at £66.75, while EDIV.L trades at £10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMII.L currently has a P/E ratio of 22.25, whereas EDIV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMII.L's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EDIV.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMII.L is more volatile compared to EDIV.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMII.L.Check EDIV.L's competition here