Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc.
Rocky Mountain High Brands, Inc. RMHB Peers
See (RMHB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMHB | $0.00 | +25.00% | 1.9M | -0.16 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| NNFSF | $4.84 | N/A | 54.4B | 32.27 | $0.15 | +2.18% |
| CCHGY | $52.64 | +0.21% | 19.1B | 20.64 | $2.55 | +2.13% |
| CCHBF | $51.70 | +41.64% | 18.8B | 20.27 | $2.55 | +2.12% |
| EMBVF | $10.71 | -1.02% | 18.4B | 15.98 | $0.67 | +1.17% |
| ITONF | $61.41 | N/A | 13.5B | 87.73 | $0.70 | +0.30% |
| BTVCY | $29.51 | N/A | 7.3B | 23.99 | $1.23 | +2.76% |
| YKLTF | $20.32 | N/A | 6.1B | 19.53 | $1.04 | +1.11% |
| YKLTY | $9.99 | -0.99% | 6B | 19.21 | $0.52 | +0.75% |
| COCSF | $9.96 | +7.12% | 5.6B | 17.18 | $0.58 | +3.35% |
Stock Comparison
RMHB vs NNFSF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NNFSF has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while NNFSF trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NNFSF's P/E ratio is 32.27. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to NNFSF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to NNFSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs CCHGY Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCHGY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while CCHGY trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CCHGY's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CCHGY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to CCHGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs CCHBF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCHBF has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while CCHBF trades at $51.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CCHBF's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CCHBF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to CCHBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs EMBVF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EMBVF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while EMBVF trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas EMBVF's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to EMBVF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to EMBVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs ITONF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ITONF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while ITONF trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ITONF's P/E ratio is 87.73. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ITONF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to ITONF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs BTVCY Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BTVCY has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while BTVCY trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BTVCY's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BTVCY's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to BTVCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs YKLTF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, YKLTF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while YKLTF trades at $20.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas YKLTF's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to YKLTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to YKLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs YKLTY Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, YKLTY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while YKLTY trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas YKLTY's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to YKLTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to YKLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs COCSF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, COCSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while COCSF trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas COCSF's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to COCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to COCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs UPCHY Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, UPCHY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while UPCHY trades at $119.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas UPCHY's P/E ratio is 20.07. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to UPCHY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to UPCHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs BTVCF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BTVCF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while BTVCF trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BTVCF's P/E ratio is 26.89. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BTVCF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to BTVCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs UNPSF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, UNPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while UNPSF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas UNPSF's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to UNPSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to UNPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs CCOJY Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCOJY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while CCOJY trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CCOJY's P/E ratio is 123.86. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CCOJY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to CCOJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs YNAJF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, YNAJF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while YNAJF trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas YNAJF's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to YNAJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to YNAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs CCOJF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CCOJF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while CCOJF trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CCOJF's P/E ratio is 67.79. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CCOJF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to CCOJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs ITOEF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ITOEF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while ITOEF trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ITOEF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ITOEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to ITOEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs AQPW Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AQPW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while AQPW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas AQPW's P/E ratio is -26.94. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to AQPW's ROE of -7.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to AQPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs OSOPF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, OSOPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while OSOPF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas OSOPF's P/E ratio is 31.57. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to OSOPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to OSOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs FQVTF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FQVTF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while FQVTF trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FQVTF's P/E ratio is 41.77. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FQVTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to FQVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs LSDAF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LSDAF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while LSDAF trades at $160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas LSDAF's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to LSDAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to LSDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs BAGFF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BAGFF has a market cap of 734.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while BAGFF trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BAGFF's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BAGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to BAGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs NJMVF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NJMVF has a market cap of 697.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while NJMVF trades at $19.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NJMVF's P/E ratio is 106.06. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to NJMVF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to NJMVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs HAATF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HAATF has a market cap of 202M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while HAATF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas HAATF's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HAATF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to HAATF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs CHFHY Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CHFHY has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while CHFHY trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CHFHY's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CHFHY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to CHFHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs PDPG Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PDPG has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while PDPG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PDPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to PDPG's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to PDPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs JSDA Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, JSDA has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while JSDA trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas JSDA's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to JSDA's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to JSDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs MOJO Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MOJO has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while MOJO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MOJO's P/E ratio is -16.33. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MOJO's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to MOJO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs KRTL Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KRTL has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while KRTL trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas KRTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to KRTL's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to KRTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs RVBR Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RVBR has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while RVBR trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas RVBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to RVBR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to RVBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs DRNK Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DRNK has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while DRNK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas DRNK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to DRNK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to DRNK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs APRU Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, APRU has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while APRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas APRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to APRU's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to APRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs FLWBF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FLWBF has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while FLWBF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FLWBF's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FLWBF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to FLWBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs HIRU Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HIRU has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while HIRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas HIRU's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HIRU's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to HIRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs NTEI Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NTEI has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while NTEI trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NTEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to NTEI's ROE of -3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to NTEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs PLVFF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PLVFF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while PLVFF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PLVFF's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to PLVFF's ROE of -4.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to PLVFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs INKW Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, INKW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while INKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas INKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to INKW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to INKW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs PURT Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PURT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while PURT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PURT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to PURT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to PURT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs FBEC Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FBEC has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while FBEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FBEC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FBEC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to FBEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs ASII Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ASII has a market cap of 796K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while ASII trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ASII's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ASII's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to ASII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs FMBV Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FMBV has a market cap of 509.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while FMBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FMBV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FMBV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to FMBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs HSEEF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HSEEF has a market cap of 412.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while HSEEF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas HSEEF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HSEEF's ROE of -19.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to HSEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs VGID Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VGID has a market cap of 378.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while VGID trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas VGID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to VGID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to VGID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs KGKG Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KGKG has a market cap of 245.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while KGKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas KGKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to KGKG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to KGKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs HFBG Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HFBG has a market cap of 223.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while HFBG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas HFBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HFBG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to HFBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs FHBC Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FHBC has a market cap of 199.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while FHBC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FHBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FHBC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to FHBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs EQLB Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, EQLB has a market cap of 185.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while EQLB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas EQLB's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to EQLB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to EQLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs DNAX Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DNAX has a market cap of 171.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while DNAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas DNAX's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to DNAX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to DNAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs GHMP Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GHMP has a market cap of 155.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while GHMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GHMP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to GHMP's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to GHMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs MLHC Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MLHC has a market cap of 120K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while MLHC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MLHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MLHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to MLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs DNDT Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DNDT has a market cap of 119.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while DNDT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas DNDT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to DNDT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to DNDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs NBVG Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NBVG has a market cap of 25.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while NBVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas NBVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to NBVG's ROE of -3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to NBVG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs STZU Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, STZU has a market cap of 22.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while STZU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas STZU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to STZU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to STZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs KRED Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, KRED has a market cap of 22.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while KRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas KRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to KRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to KRED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs PPBV Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PPBV has a market cap of 22.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while PPBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas PPBV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to PPBV's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to PPBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs FGFT Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FGFT has a market cap of 22.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while FGFT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas FGFT's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to FGFT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to FGFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs BGEM Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BGEM has a market cap of 15.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while BGEM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BGEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BGEM's ROE of -3.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to BGEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs BVNNF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BVNNF has a market cap of 12.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while BVNNF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BVNNF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BVNNF's ROE of +6.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to BVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs ALKM Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ALKM has a market cap of 8.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while ALKM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ALKM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ALKM's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to ALKM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs TBEV Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TBEV has a market cap of 4K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while TBEV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas TBEV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to TBEV's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to TBEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs SWRI Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SWRI has a market cap of 1.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while SWRI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas SWRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to SWRI's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to SWRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs HKBV Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, HKBV has a market cap of 1.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while HKBV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas HKBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to HKBV's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to HKBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs MCHA Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, MCHA has a market cap of 505. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while MCHA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas MCHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to MCHA's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to MCHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs BBDA Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BBDA has a market cap of 287. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while BBDA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas BBDA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to BBDA's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to BBDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs AQUI Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AQUI has a market cap of 20. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while AQUI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas AQUI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to AQUI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to AQUI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs ABVG Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ABVG has a market cap of 3. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while ABVG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas ABVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to ABVG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to ABVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs CLCL Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLCL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while CLCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas CLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to CLCL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to CLCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs GGGRF Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, GGGRF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while GGGRF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas GGGRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to GGGRF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is more volatile compared to GGGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.
RMHB vs RMIL Comparison
RMHB plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMHB stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RMIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RMHB is priced at $0.00, while RMIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMHB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.16, whereas RMIL's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RMHB's ROE is -1.00%, compared to RMIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMHB is less volatile compared to RMIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMHB.