RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class A
RMB Mendon Financial Long/Short Fund Class A RMBFX Peers
See (RMBFX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMBFX | $6.46 | -0.09% | 79.8M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTAPX | $24.99 | +0.04% | 58.5B | N/A | N/A | +2.74% |
| VTIP | $49.84 | +0.00% | 58.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.77% |
| VFSUX | $10.46 | +0.00% | 52.7B | N/A | N/A | +4.36% |
| VFSTX | $10.46 | +0.00% | 52.5B | N/A | N/A | +4.27% |
| VGSH | $58.53 | +0.00% | 27.1B | N/A | N/A | +4.18% |
| VSBSX | $19.52 | +0.00% | 26.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.15% |
| VWSTX | $15.82 | +0.00% | 15.6B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
RMBFX vs FIYY Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs FFEU Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs VTAPX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VTAPX trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VTAPX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs VTIP Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VTIP trades at $49.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs VFSUX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VFSUX trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VFSUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs VFSTX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VFSTX trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VFSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs VGSH Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VGSH trades at $58.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs VSBSX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VSBSX trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VSBSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs VWSTX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VWSTX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VWSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs MINT Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while MINT trades at $100.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs ASBFX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while ASBFX trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and ASBFX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs SCHO Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SCHO trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs PTSHX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while PTSHX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and PTSHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs FTSM Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FTSM trades at $59.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SPXL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SPXL trades at $175.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs VFISX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VFISX trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VFISX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs SPTS Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SPTS trades at $29.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TMF Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TMF trades at $38.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs VSGBX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VSGBX trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VSGBX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs VSGDX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while VSGDX trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and VSGDX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs JSDHX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while JSDHX trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and JSDHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs FLVCX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FLVCX trades at $42.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and FLVCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs TECL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TECL trades at $93.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs BITX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while BITX trades at $55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs FAS Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FAS trades at $171.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TBLL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TBLL trades at $105.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs FSTTX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FSTTX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and FSTTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs PAIAX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while PAIAX trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and PAIAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs DHLSX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DHLSX trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and DHLSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs DIAYX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DIAYX trades at $29.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and DIAYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs DHFCX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and DHFCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs FNGU Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FNGU trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs DWT Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs ORSTX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while ORSTX trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and ORSTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs BULZ Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while BULZ trades at $169.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 58.30. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs PRFSX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while PRFSX trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and PRFSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs SH Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SH trades at $39.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs BASOX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while BASOX trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and BASOX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs ACSNX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while ACSNX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and ACSNX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs RYVLX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while RYVLX trades at $596.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and RYVLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs CPLSX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while CPLSX trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and CPLSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs RYVYX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while RYVYX trades at $596.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and RYVYX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs RYCCX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while RYCCX trades at $417.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and RYCCX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs SOXS Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 793.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SOXS trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TAFI Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 783.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TAFI trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs EMAIX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 742.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while EMAIX trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and EMAIX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs EXMAX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while EXMAX trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and EXMAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs NVDX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 733.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while NVDX trades at $14.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 50.25. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs DPST Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 690.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DPST trades at $100.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TUA Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 670.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TUA trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs JSCP Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 616.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while JSCP trades at $47.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs GDXU Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 585.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while GDXU trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs NUGT Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while NUGT trades at $76.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs FNGO Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 532.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FNGO trades at $107.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs BPRRX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 521.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while BPRRX trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and BPRRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs BPIRX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 521.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while BPIRX trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and BPIRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs GIYAX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 505.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while GIYAX trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and GIYAX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs PSQ Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 504.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while PSQ trades at $33.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SPXU Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 497.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SPXU trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs DGAZ Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs DXQLX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 476.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DXQLX trades at $100.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and DXQLX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs FSMB Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FSMB trades at $19.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SDHY Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 416.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SDHY trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SDS Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 396.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SDS trades at $16.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs KOLD Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 395.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while KOLD trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SEMRX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and SEMRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs FSHSX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 367.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FSHSX trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and FSHSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs SPXS Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 360.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SPXS trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs UVXY Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 339.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while UVXY trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs GGLL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while GGLL trades at $35.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 18.85. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SVIX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SVIX trades at $15.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs DUST Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 320.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DUST trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SVXY Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 313.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SVXY trades at $42.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs MRRL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs FLGE Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs JNUG Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while JNUG trades at $80.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs MORL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SMB Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 273.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SMB trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs NAIL Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while NAIL trades at $61.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs UUP Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while UUP trades at $26.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TZA Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TZA trades at $11.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs DFEN Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 239.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while DFEN trades at $48.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 36.92. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs GUSH Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while GUSH trades at $23.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs QID Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 238.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while QID trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs AMZU Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 237.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while AMZU trades at $36.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 38.32. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs STOT Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while STOT trades at $47.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TENG Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs AAPU Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 221.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while AAPU trades at $23.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs FTSD Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 216M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FTSD trades at $90.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs ERX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while ERX trades at $53.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs REML Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while REML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TWUSX Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 203.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TWUSX trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX and TWUSX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RMBFX vs FUMB Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while FUMB trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs SDOW Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 187.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while SDOW trades at $40.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs CLSE Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while CLSE trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs EMNT Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 186.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while EMNT trades at $98.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs TMV Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 176M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while TMV trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs CVSB Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while CVSB trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.
RMBFX vs RWM Comparison
RMBFX plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RMBFX stands at 79.8M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 173.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RMBFX is priced at $6.46, while RWM trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RMBFX currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RMBFX's ROE is N/A, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RMBFX is less volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RMBFX.