RELX Plc
RELX Plc RLXXF Peers
See (RLXXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLXXF | $54.38 | -0.65% | 99.9B | 39.12 | $1.39 | +1.59% |
| IFJPY | $21.70 | -2.14% | 14.1B | 36.17 | $0.60 | +2.74% |
| IFPJF | $10.63 | N/A | 13.8B | 35.43 | $0.30 | +2.86% |
| PSORF | $15.73 | N/A | 10.7B | 18.29 | $0.86 | +1.97% |
| SBSNY | $33.19 | -0.18% | 8.1B | 32.22 | $1.03 | +25.57% |
| SBBTF | $32.75 | N/A | 7.8B | 31.80 | $1.03 | +25.25% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | N/A | 6.1B | 26.57 | $1.03 | +3.65% |
| KDKWF | $27.29 | +20.33% | 4B | 77.97 | $0.35 | +0.74% |
| SHXWF | $1.08 | N/A | 1.8B | 6.00 | $0.18 | +7.74% |
| CNGO | $20.75 | +6.41% | 1.3B | -19.00 | -$1.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RLXXF vs IFJPY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while IFJPY trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 36.17. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs IFPJF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while IFPJF trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PSORF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while PSORF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PSORF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SBSNY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SBSNY trades at $33.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SBBTF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SBBTF trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SBSNF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs KDKWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while KDKWF trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 77.97. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SHXWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to SHXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs CNGO Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FRNWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while FRNWF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SMWPY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 989.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs RZSMF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 610.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while RZSMF trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs MDDCF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to MDDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GPOPF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to GPOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs STRYF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs TOCOF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to TOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GWOX Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 196M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while GWOX trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PCDAF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs YLWDF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while YLWDF trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to YLWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs CMTX Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while CMTX trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HKGEF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while HKGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs STAOF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to STAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs XLMDF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while XLMDF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to XLMDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SADL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SADL trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GLMFF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while GLMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs DTRL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while DTRL trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs IDWM Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while IDWM trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FMPR Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while FMPR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FPNUF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs LEBGF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while LEBGF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PDOS Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs BKMP Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to BKMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs DIGI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to DIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HRDIL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to HRDIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HRDI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to HRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PEDH Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 447. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while PEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs ACNI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 439. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs MAHI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to MAHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SALN Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs YLWWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 99.9B. In comparison, YLWWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $54.38, while YLWWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 39.12, whereas YLWWF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YLWWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to YLWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.