RELX Plc
RELX Plc RLXXF Peers
See (RLXXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLXXF | $52.09 | +0.17% | 95.94B | 38.02 | $1.37 | +1.63% |
| IFJPY | $21.37 | -2.33% | 14.01B | 36.22 | $0.59 | +2.17% |
| IFPJF | $10.16 | +12.90% | 13.29B | 35.04 | $0.29 | +1.75% |
| SBSNY | $43.68 | +30.31% | 10.71B | 22.75 | $1.92 | +18.78% |
| PSORF | $15.20 | -5.00% | 10.32B | 18.10 | $0.84 | +2.04% |
| SBBTF | $32.75 | N/A | 7.74B | 17.06 | $1.92 | +24.93% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | N/A | 6.15B | 14.26 | $1.92 | +30.49% |
| KDKWF | $27.29 | +20.33% | 3.87B | 42.64 | $0.64 | +0.73% |
| SHXWF | $1.08 | N/A | 1.72B | 6.00 | $0.18 | +7.70% |
| CNGO | $20.75 | +6.41% | 1.29B | -19.00 | -$1.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RLXXF vs IFJPY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 14.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while IFJPY trades at $21.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs IFPJF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 13.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while IFPJF trades at $10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SBSNY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 10.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SBSNY trades at $43.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to SBSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PSORF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while PSORF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to PSORF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SBBTF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SBBTF trades at $32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SBBTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SBSNF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs KDKWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 3.87B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while KDKWF trades at $27.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SHXWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to SHXWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs CNGO Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FRNWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while FRNWF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SMWPY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 989.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs RZSMF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 594.99M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while RZSMF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs MDDCF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 561.23M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to MDDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GPOPF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to GPOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs STRYF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 437.77M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs TOCOF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to TOCOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GWOX Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 193.77M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while GWOX trades at $425.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PCDAF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.66M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs YLWDF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 97.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while YLWDF trades at $7.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to YLWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs CMTX Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 90.82M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while CMTX trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CMTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HKGEF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 40.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while HKGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs STAOF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.82M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to STAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SADL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.50M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SADL trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GLMFF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 13.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while GLMFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs XLMDF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 12.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while XLMDF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to XLMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs DTRL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while DTRL trades at $305.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs IDWM Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 10.39M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while IDWM trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FMPR Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 4.48M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while FMPR trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -35.10. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FPNUF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs LEBGF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 2.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while LEBGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to LEBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PDOS Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32068.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PDOS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs BKMP Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12108.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to BKMP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to BKMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs DIGI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7068.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to DIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HRDI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4140.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HRDI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to HRDI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HRDIL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4140.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to HRDIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PEDH Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 447.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while PEDH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs ACNI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 439.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs MAHI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is more volatile compared to MAHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SALN Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 95.94B. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99.00. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $52.09, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.02, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SALN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.