RELX Plc
RELX Plc RLXXF Peers
See (RLXXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Publishing Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLXXF | $53.35 | -0.74% | 97.8B | 38.38 | $1.39 | +1.56% |
| IFJPY | $22.35 | -0.11% | 14.5B | 37.25 | $0.60 | +2.31% |
| IFPJF | $10.63 | +0.00% | 13.8B | 35.43 | $0.30 | +2.41% |
| PSORF | $14.01 | +3.32% | 9.5B | 16.48 | $0.85 | +2.21% |
| SBBTF | $32.99 | +0.00% | 7.8B | 32.34 | $1.02 | +2.49% |
| SBSNY | $35.30 | -1.99% | 7.6B | 34.27 | $1.03 | +2.86% |
| SBSNF | $27.37 | +0.00% | 6.2B | 27.37 | $1.00 | +0.36% |
| KDKWF | $27.00 | +0.00% | 4B | 75.00 | $0.36 | +0.01% |
| SHXWF | $1.08 | +0.00% | 1.7B | 6.00 | $0.18 | +7.74% |
| CNGO | $20.75 | +6.41% | 1.3B | -19.00 | -$1.09 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RLXXF vs IFJPY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, IFJPY has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while IFJPY trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas IFJPY's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IFJPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IFJPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs IFPJF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, IFPJF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while IFPJF trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas IFPJF's P/E ratio is 35.43. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IFPJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IFPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PSORF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PSORF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while PSORF trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas PSORF's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PSORF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and PSORF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs SBBTF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SBBTF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SBBTF trades at $32.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SBBTF's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBBTF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and SBBTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs SBSNY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SBSNY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SBSNY trades at $35.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SBSNY's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBSNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and SBSNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs SBSNF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SBSNF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SBSNF trades at $27.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SBSNF's P/E ratio is 27.37. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SBSNF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SBSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs KDKWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, KDKWF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while KDKWF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas KDKWF's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to KDKWF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to KDKWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SHXWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SHXWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SHXWF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SHXWF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SHXWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and SHXWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs CNGO Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CNGO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while CNGO trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas CNGO's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CNGO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to CNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FRNWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FRNWF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while FRNWF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas FRNWF's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FRNWF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FRNWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs RZSMF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, RZSMF has a market cap of 574.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while RZSMF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas RZSMF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to RZSMF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to RZSMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs MDDCF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, MDDCF has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while MDDCF trades at $37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas MDDCF's P/E ratio is 48.74. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MDDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and MDDCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs GPOPF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GPOPF has a market cap of 454.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while GPOPF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas GPOPF's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GPOPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and GPOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs STRYF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, STRYF has a market cap of 437.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while STRYF trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas STRYF's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to STRYF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to STRYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs TOCOF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, TOCOF has a market cap of 291.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while TOCOF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas TOCOF's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to TOCOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and TOCOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs GWOX Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GWOX has a market cap of 185.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while GWOX trades at $406.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas GWOX's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GWOX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to GWOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PCDAF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PCDAF has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while PCDAF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas PCDAF's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PCDAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PCDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs YLWDF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, YLWDF has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while YLWDF trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas YLWDF's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YLWDF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to YLWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs CMTX Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, CMTX has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while CMTX trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas CMTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CMTX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to CMTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SMWPY Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SMWPY has a market cap of 49.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SMWPY trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SMWPY's P/E ratio is 1.71. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SMWPY's ROE of -2.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SMWPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs HKGEF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, HKGEF has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while HKGEF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas HKGEF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HKGEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to HKGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs STAOF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, STAOF has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while STAOF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas STAOF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to STAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and STAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs IDWM Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, IDWM has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while IDWM trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas IDWM's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to IDWM's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to IDWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs SADL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SADL has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SADL trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SADL's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SADL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SADL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs GLMFF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, GLMFF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while GLMFF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas GLMFF's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to GLMFF's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to GLMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs DTRL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DTRL has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while DTRL trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas DTRL's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DTRL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to DTRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs XLMDF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, XLMDF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while XLMDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas XLMDF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to XLMDF's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and XLMDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs FPNUF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FPNUF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while FPNUF trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas FPNUF's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FPNUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FPNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs FMPR Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, FMPR has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while FMPR trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas FMPR's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FMPR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to FMPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs LEBGF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, LEBGF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while LEBGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas LEBGF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to LEBGF's ROE of +17.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and LEBGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs PEDH Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PEDH has a market cap of 44.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while PEDH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas PEDH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PEDH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PEDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs PDOS Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, PDOS has a market cap of 32.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while PDOS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas PDOS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PDOS's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to PDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs BKMP Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, BKMP has a market cap of 12.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while BKMP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas BKMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to BKMP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and BKMP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs DIGI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, DIGI has a market cap of 7.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while DIGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas DIGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DIGI's ROE of +1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and DIGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs HRDIL Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, HRDIL has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while HRDIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas HRDIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HRDIL's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and HRDIL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs HRDI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, HRDI has a market cap of 4.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while HRDI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas HRDI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HRDI's ROE of +13.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and HRDI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs ACNI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, ACNI has a market cap of 439. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while ACNI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas ACNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to ACNI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to ACNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs MAHI Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, MAHI has a market cap of 324. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while MAHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas MAHI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MAHI's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and MAHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RLXXF vs SALN Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, SALN has a market cap of 99. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while SALN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas SALN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SALN's ROE of +2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF is less volatile compared to SALN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RLXXF.
RLXXF vs YLWWF Comparison
RLXXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RLXXF stands at 97.8B. In comparison, YLWWF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RLXXF is priced at $53.35, while YLWWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RLXXF currently has a P/E ratio of 38.38, whereas YLWWF's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, RLXXF's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YLWWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RLXXF and YLWWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).