Ralph Lauren Corporation
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL Peers
See (RL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RL | $289.87 | -0.24% | 17.6B | 24.96 | $11.61 | +1.45% |
| LEVI | $19.73 | +1.70% | 7.8B | 21.94 | $0.90 | +3.22% |
| GIL | $51.31 | +1.50% | 7.8B | 20.12 | $2.55 | +2.08% |
| VFC | $12.93 | +3.77% | 5B | 71.81 | $0.18 | +3.49% |
| KTB | $70.51 | +1.82% | 3.9B | 17.33 | $4.07 | +3.61% |
| PVH | $74.30 | +2.36% | 3.6B | 10.48 | $7.09 | +0.25% |
| COLM | $63.57 | +0.60% | 3.5B | 16.47 | $3.86 | +1.88% |
| UAA | $7.08 | +2.16% | 2.9B | -15.07 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| UA | $6.65 | +0.76% | 2.9B | -14.14 | -$0.47 | N/A |
| ZGN | $9.12 | +1.90% | 2.3B | 26.03 | $0.35 | +1.51% |
Stock Comparison
RL vs LEVI Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, LEVI has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while LEVI trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas LEVI's P/E ratio is 21.94. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LEVI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to LEVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs GIL Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, GIL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while GIL trades at $51.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas GIL's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GIL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to GIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs VFC Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VFC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while VFC trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas VFC's P/E ratio is 71.81. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VFC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to VFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs KTB Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KTB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while KTB trades at $70.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas KTB's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KTB's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to KTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs PVH Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PVH has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while PVH trades at $74.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas PVH's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PVH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to PVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs COLM Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, COLM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while COLM trades at $63.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas COLM's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to COLM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to COLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs UAA Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, UAA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while UAA trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas UAA's P/E ratio is -15.07. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UAA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to UAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs UA Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, UA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while UA trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas UA's P/E ratio is -14.14. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to UA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs ZGN Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, ZGN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while ZGN trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas ZGN's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to ZGN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to ZGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs AIN Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, AIN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while AIN trades at $71.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas AIN's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to AIN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is more volatile compared to AIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs HBI Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, HBI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while HBI trades at $4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas HBI's P/E ratio is -31.53. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to HBI's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to HBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs GOOS Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, GOOS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while GOOS trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas GOOS's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GOOS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to GOOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs GIII Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, GIII has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while GIII trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas GIII's P/E ratio is 5.58. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to GIII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to GIII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs FIGS Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, FIGS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while FIGS trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas FIGS's P/E ratio is 616.00. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to FIGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to FIGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs OXM Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, OXM has a market cap of 732.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while OXM trades at $49.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas OXM's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to OXM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to OXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs SGC Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SGC has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while SGC trades at $11.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas SGC's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SGC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to SGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs LAKE Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, LAKE has a market cap of 136M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while LAKE trades at $14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas LAKE's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LAKE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to LAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs UFI Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, UFI has a market cap of 90M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while UFI trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas UFI's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to UFI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is more volatile compared to UFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs CULP Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, CULP has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while CULP trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas CULP's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to CULP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to CULP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs NCI Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, NCI has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while NCI trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas NCI's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to NCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to NCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs JRSH Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, JRSH has a market cap of 40.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while JRSH trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas JRSH's P/E ratio is -47.14. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JRSH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is more volatile compared to JRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs JL Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, JL has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while JL trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas JL's P/E ratio is 0.91. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to JL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs VNCE Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, VNCE has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while VNCE trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas VNCE's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to VNCE's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to VNCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs LLL Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, LLL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while LLL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas LLL's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to LLL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to LLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs PMNT Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, PMNT has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while PMNT trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas PMNT's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to PMNT's ROE of -6.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to PMNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs DXYN Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, DXYN has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while DXYN trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas DXYN's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DXYN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to DXYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs JXJT Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, JXJT has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while JXJT trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas JXJT's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to JXJT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to JXJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs XELB Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, XELB has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while XELB trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas XELB's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to XELB's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to XELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs DLA Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, DLA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while DLA trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas DLA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to DLA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to DLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs SQBG Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, SQBG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while SQBG trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas SQBG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to SQBG's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to SQBG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs KBSF Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, KBSF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while KBSF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas KBSF's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to KBSF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to KBSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.
RL vs EVK Comparison
RL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RL stands at 17.6B. In comparison, EVK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RL is priced at $289.87, while EVK trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RL currently has a P/E ratio of 24.96, whereas EVK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RL's ROE is +0.30%, compared to EVK's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RL is less volatile compared to EVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RL.