Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd.
Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd. RKVA.F Peers
See (RKVA.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKVA.F | €11.40 | -2.23% | 1.8B | 14.94 | €0.78 | N/A |
| NMM.DE | €50.30 | +2.65% | 55.4B | 13.06 | €3.81 | +1.89% |
| ABR.DE | €16.99 | +0.46% | 29.2B | 14.40 | €1.18 | +2.07% |
| KIN2.DE | €13.12 | +0.50% | 16.2B | 15.55 | €0.85 | +0.82% |
| RNY.DE | €5.39 | +0.00% | 5.2B | -5.74 | -€0.94 | N/A |
| CDM1.DE | €7.47 | -0.51% | 4.9B | 30.42 | €0.25 | N/A |
| HCL.DE | €5.15 | +2.55% | 3.2B | 50.58 | €0.10 | +0.67% |
| 1A9.F | €0.97 | +0.00% | 463.6M | -7.71 | -€0.12 | N/A |
| V46.F | €1.34 | +0.00% | 271.3M | -13.30 | -€0.10 | N/A |
| 1I1.F | €0.73 | +4.29% | 141.1M | -35.10 | -€0.02 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RKVA.F vs NMM.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NMM.DE has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while NMM.DE trades at €50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas NMM.DE's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to NMM.DE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to NMM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs ABR.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABR.DE has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while ABR.DE trades at €16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas ABR.DE's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to ABR.DE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to ABR.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs KIN2.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, KIN2.DE has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while KIN2.DE trades at €13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas KIN2.DE's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to KIN2.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to KIN2.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs RNY.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RNY.DE has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while RNY.DE trades at €5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas RNY.DE's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to RNY.DE's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to RNY.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs CDM1.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CDM1.DE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while CDM1.DE trades at €7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas CDM1.DE's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to CDM1.DE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to CDM1.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs HCL.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, HCL.DE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while HCL.DE trades at €5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas HCL.DE's P/E ratio is 50.58. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to HCL.DE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to HCL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs 1A9.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1A9.F has a market cap of 463.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while 1A9.F trades at €0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas 1A9.F's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1A9.F's ROE of -23.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to 1A9.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs V46.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, V46.F has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while V46.F trades at €1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas V46.F's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to V46.F's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to V46.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs 1I1.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1I1.F has a market cap of 141.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while 1I1.F trades at €0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas 1I1.F's P/E ratio is -35.10. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1I1.F's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to 1I1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs BBDB.DE Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BBDB.DE has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while BBDB.DE trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas BBDB.DE's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to BBDB.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is less volatile compared to BBDB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs 0GC0.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0GC0.F has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while 0GC0.F trades at €0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas 0GC0.F's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0GC0.F's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to 0GC0.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs 1ET.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 1ET.F has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while 1ET.F trades at €0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas 1ET.F's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 1ET.F's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to 1ET.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs T23A.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, T23A.F has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while T23A.F trades at €0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas T23A.F's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to T23A.F's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to T23A.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.
RKVA.F vs 0MZ.F Comparison
RKVA.F plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKVA.F stands at 1.8B. In comparison, 0MZ.F has a market cap of 630.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RKVA.F is priced at €11.40, while 0MZ.F trades at €0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKVA.F currently has a P/E ratio of 14.94, whereas 0MZ.F's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, RKVA.F's ROE is +0.27%, compared to 0MZ.F's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RKVA.F is more volatile compared to 0MZ.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKVA.F.