Rio Tinto Group
Rio Tinto Group RIO.L Peers
See (RIO.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIO.L | £4,719.50 | -0.25% | 80.4B | 9.02 | £5.23 | +6.57% |
| BHP.L | £2,002.00 | -1.14% | 101.6B | 12.06 | £1.66 | +4.57% |
| 0L5V.L | £339.21 | -0.75% | 85B | 49.25 | £6.89 | +0.89% |
| 0R2J.L | £162.72 | -0.04% | 82.3B | 69.48 | £2.34 | +1.19% |
| 0L8B.L | £99.51 | -0.01% | 80B | 22.51 | £4.42 | +2.68% |
| 0IFA.L | £269.24 | -0.24% | 76.4B | 70.17 | £3.84 | +0.93% |
| 0HBH.L | £297.93 | +0.09% | 66.3B | 29.67 | £10.04 | +2.40% |
| GLEN.L | £322.75 | -1.13% | 38.3B | -32.27 | -£0.10 | +2.70% |
| 0Z4C.L | £231.20 | -2.78% | 32.8B | 35.01 | £6.60 | +1.74% |
| 0K9L.L | £141.37 | -2.70% | 32.6B | 5.08 | £27.80 | +1.55% |
Stock Comparison
RIO.L vs BHP.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while BHP.L trades at £2,002.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0L5V.L trades at £339.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 49.25. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R2J.L trades at £162.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 69.48. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0L8B.L trades at £99.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0IFA.L trades at £269.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 70.17. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0HBH.L trades at £297.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 29.67. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while GLEN.L trades at £322.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -32.27. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0Z4C.L trades at £231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0K9L.L trades at £141.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 5.08. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0NHS.L trades at £60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0KEI.L trades at £115.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs AAL.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while AAL.L trades at £2,326.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -10.92. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0EDD.L trades at £60.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0HQU.L trades at £93.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0UGS.L trades at £34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -81.85. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R07.L trades at £40.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 35.99. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0K3B.L trades at £37.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 5.31. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0LVK.L trades at £84.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 4.30. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0LJ9.L trades at £54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0KXS.L trades at £156.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0HC7.L trades at £83.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 35.09. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0IF3.L trades at £78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0HCB.L trades at £31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs S32.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while S32.L trades at £151.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -37.85. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0U6C.L trades at £30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0QYN.L trades at £4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0HUR.L trades at £57.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R0U.L trades at £9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -88.40. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0I0H.L trades at £11.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.65. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0AHJ.L trades at £13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -23.13. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0IK3.L trades at £42.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VBE.L trades at £27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -179.90. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0L45.L trades at £69.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R0A.L trades at £6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 207.00. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VGM.L trades at £13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 62.69. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VL5.L trades at £44.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VGE.L trades at £17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0QYM.L trades at £9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 35.39. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0TWH.L trades at £10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RIO.L has daily volatility of 1.39 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
RIO.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VOA.L trades at £17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R2C.L trades at £7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 76.62. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VHI.L trades at £16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0HWG.L trades at £14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0KW8.L trades at £21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0NZN.L trades at £794.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0QZ2.L trades at £6.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R11.L trades at £2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 988.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while ADT1.L trades at £286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 742.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VIK.L trades at £3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 707.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0G5B.L trades at £124.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0JZT.L trades at £11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -82.10. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 514.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0O6D.L trades at £14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 492.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R20.L trades at £1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 433.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0KD1.L trades at £3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -37.64. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs GFM.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 327.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while GFM.L trades at £178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs KMR.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 287.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while KMR.L trades at £325.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs PRE.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while PRE.L trades at £81.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -40.70. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while SOLG.L trades at £7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs SVML.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while SVML.L trades at £35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 220.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0UYN.L trades at £1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 192.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0P07.L trades at £0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 186.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while CAPD.L trades at £95.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0RRC.L trades at £5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 184.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while ECOR.L trades at £74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -24.67. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0V46.L trades at £0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs BSE.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while BSE.L trades at £12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs TRR.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while TRR.L trades at £48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0VNO.L trades at £1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -9.28. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs KP2.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 109.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while KP2.L trades at £2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs MKA.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 107.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while MKA.L trades at £32.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -32.75. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs JLP.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while JLP.L trades at £3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 3.21. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while CUSN.L trades at £7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs RBW.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, RBW.L has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while RBW.L trades at £13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas RBW.L's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RBW.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to RBW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs SAV.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while SAV.L trades at £3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0UIK.L trades at £0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0IYS.L trades at £0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 70.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0QQR.L trades at £15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs KOD.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while KOD.L trades at £0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0R0D.L trades at £1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0QVG.L trades at £5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs ATM.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while ATM.L trades at £3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs ALL.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while ALL.L trades at £7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while AFRK.L trades at £20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs HE1.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while HE1.L trades at £0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs MET1.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while MET1.L trades at £8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0ICI.L trades at £6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0UYO.L trades at £0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0QPH.L trades at £1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs KAV.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while KAV.L trades at £1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs FAR.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 35.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while FAR.L trades at £7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs ARS.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while ARS.L trades at £1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 0UVX.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 0UVX.L has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 0UVX.L trades at £1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 0UVX.L's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 0UVX.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 0UVX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while ZNWD.L trades at £5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs NMT.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while NMT.L trades at £3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 25.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while 1SN.L trades at £5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs CRCL.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, CRCL.L has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while CRCL.L trades at £0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas CRCL.L's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRCL.L's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to CRCL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs GSP.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while GSP.L trades at £5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs TUN.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, TUN.L has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while TUN.L trades at £10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas TUN.L's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TUN.L's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to TUN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.
RIO.L vs POW.L Comparison
RIO.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIO.L stands at 80.4B. In comparison, POW.L has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, RIO.L is priced at £4,719.50, while POW.L trades at £14.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIO.L currently has a P/E ratio of 9.02, whereas POW.L's P/E ratio is 14.70. In terms of profitability, RIO.L's ROE is +0.19%, compared to POW.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RIO.L is less volatile compared to POW.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIO.L.