Rinnai Corporation
Rinnai Corporation RINIF Peers
See (RINIF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RINIF | $23.44 | +3.20% | 3.30B | 14.93 | $1.57 | +1.20% |
| HSHCY | $12.64 | +2.68% | 33.06B | 10.99 | $1.15 | +3.54% |
| HRSHF | $3.17 | +5.15% | 32.22B | 10.91 | $0.29 | +3.37% |
| QIHCF | $1.95 | +22.64% | 30.03B | 6.72 | $0.29 | +5.90% |
| RINIY | $12.00 | N/A | 8.44B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HWDJY | $52.56 | N/A | 7.20B | 22.56 | $2.33 | +2.07% |
| BVILY | $43.79 | +6.94% | 6.30B | 42.93 | $1.02 | +1.04% |
| HWDJF | $10.60 | N/A | 5.81B | 17.67 | $0.60 | +2.60% |
| HISEF | $3.10 | N/A | 4.94B | 8.86 | $0.35 | +4.83% |
| SEBYF | $82.00 | N/A | 4.48B | 17.12 | $4.79 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RINIF vs HSHCY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, HSHCY has a market cap of 33.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while HSHCY trades at $12.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas HSHCY's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HSHCY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to HSHCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs HRSHF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, HRSHF has a market cap of 32.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while HRSHF trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas HRSHF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HRSHF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to HRSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs QIHCF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, QIHCF has a market cap of 30.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while QIHCF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas QIHCF's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QIHCF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and QIHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs RINIY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, RINIY has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while RINIY trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas RINIY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RINIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to RINIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs HWDJY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, HWDJY has a market cap of 7.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while HWDJY trades at $52.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas HWDJY's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWDJY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to HWDJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs BVILY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, BVILY has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while BVILY trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas BVILY's P/E ratio is 42.93. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVILY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to BVILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs HWDJF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, HWDJF has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while HWDJF trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas HWDJF's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWDJF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to HWDJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs HISEF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, HISEF has a market cap of 4.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while HISEF trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas HISEF's P/E ratio is 8.86. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HISEF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to HISEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs SEBYF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, SEBYF has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while SEBYF trades at $82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas SEBYF's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEBYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and SEBYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs BVILF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, BVILF has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while BVILF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas BVILF's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVILF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and BVILF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs MAWHY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, MAWHY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while MAWHY trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas MAWHY's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAWHY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and MAWHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs ACKAY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, ACKAY has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while ACKAY trades at $17.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ACKAY's P/E ratio is 48.06. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACKAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to ACKAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs MAWHF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, MAWHF has a market cap of 1.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while MAWHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas MAWHF's P/E ratio is 6.25. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAWHF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to MAWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs ELUXY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, ELUXY has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while ELUXY trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ELUXY's P/E ratio is -136.20. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELUXY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to ELUXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs ELRXF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, ELRXF has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while ELRXF trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ELRXF's P/E ratio is -125.60. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELRXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to ELRXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs RHUHF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, RHUHF has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while RHUHF trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas RHUHF's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHUHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to RHUHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs JGLCF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, JGLCF has a market cap of 770.86M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while JGLCF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas JGLCF's P/E ratio is 22.41. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JGLCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to JGLCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs CFSKF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, CFSKF has a market cap of 647.44M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while CFSKF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas CFSKF's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFSKF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to CFSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs RYLHF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, RYLHF has a market cap of 576.88M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while RYLHF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas RYLHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RYLHF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and RYLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs VLBOF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, VLBOF has a market cap of 533.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while VLBOF trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas VLBOF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLBOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and VLBOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs SEBYY Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, SEBYY has a market cap of 524.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while SEBYY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas SEBYY's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SEBYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to SEBYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs WTWGF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, WTWGF has a market cap of 121.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while WTWGF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas WTWGF's P/E ratio is -7.44. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTWGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to WTWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs VCCTF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, VCCTF has a market cap of 120.01M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while VCCTF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas VCCTF's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VCCTF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to VCCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs WKGBF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, WKGBF has a market cap of 104.03M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while WKGBF trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas WKGBF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WKGBF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and WKGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs IPGGF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, IPGGF has a market cap of 82.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while IPGGF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas IPGGF's P/E ratio is -11.10. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPGGF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to IPGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs DIIBF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, DIIBF has a market cap of 41.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while DIIBF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DIIBF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIIBF's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to DIIBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs RGBD Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, RGBD has a market cap of 26.45M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while RGBD trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas RGBD's P/E ratio is 39.89. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGBD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to RGBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs DGIX Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, DGIX has a market cap of 6.21M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while DGIX trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DGIX's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGIX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to DGIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs LUVU Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, LUVU has a market cap of 3.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while LUVU trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas LUVU's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUVU's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to LUVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs KMFI Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, KMFI has a market cap of 197266.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while KMFI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas KMFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KMFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to KMFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs ROWC Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, ROWC has a market cap of 3985.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while ROWC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas ROWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ROWC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and ROWC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs DIAAF Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, DIAAF has a market cap of 3692.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while DIAAF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DIAAF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIAAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and DIAAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs DEER Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, DEER has a market cap of 3359.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while DEER trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas DEER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DEER's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and DEER have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs THBD Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, THBD has a market cap of 1134.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while THBD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas THBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THBD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and THBD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs PWNX Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, PWNX has a market cap of 677.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while PWNX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas PWNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PWNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to PWNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs VUOC Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, VUOC has a market cap of 570.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while VUOC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas VUOC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VUOC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and VUOC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs PFWIQ Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, PFWIQ has a market cap of 506.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while PFWIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas PFWIQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFWIQ's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and PFWIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RINIF vs FTDL Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, FTDL has a market cap of 478.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while FTDL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas FTDL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FTDL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF is less volatile compared to FTDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RINIF.
RINIF vs AUVIQ Comparison
RINIF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RINIF stands at 3.30B. In comparison, AUVIQ has a market cap of 467.00. Regarding current trading prices, RINIF is priced at $23.44, while AUVIQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RINIF currently has a P/E ratio of 14.93, whereas AUVIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RINIF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUVIQ's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RINIF and AUVIQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).