B. Riley Financial, Inc.
B. Riley Financial, Inc. RILYL Peers
See (RILYL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RILYL | $4.71 | +41.92% | 150.7M | 0.82 | $6.00 | N/A |
| TPGXL | $25.69 | -0.43% | 19.6B | N/A | N/A | +3.10% |
| VOYA-PB | $24.50 | -0.46% | 7.1B | 2.92 | $8.44 | +2.46% |
| VOYA | $71.94 | -1.35% | 7.1B | 13.69 | $5.35 | +2.46% |
| BIPH | $16.43 | -0.84% | 6B | N/A | N/A | +9.44% |
| PACS | $12.69 | -1.17% | 2B | 20.98 | $0.61 | N/A |
| MSDL | $19.18 | +0.42% | 1.7B | 8.72 | $2.20 | +11.51% |
| RILYM | $25.11 | +0.00% | 753M | N/A | N/A | +6.35% |
| BEAGU | $10.68 | +0.66% | 614.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| RILYO | $25.13 | -0.02% | 573.5M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RILYL vs TPGXL Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, TPGXL has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while TPGXL trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas TPGXL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TPGXL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to TPGXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs VOYA-PB Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, VOYA-PB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while VOYA-PB trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas VOYA-PB's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to VOYA-PB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to VOYA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs VOYA Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, VOYA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while VOYA trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas VOYA's P/E ratio is 13.69. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to VOYA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to VOYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BIPH Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BIPH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BIPH trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BIPH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BIPH's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to BIPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs PACS Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PACS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while PACS trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas PACS's P/E ratio is 20.98. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PACS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to PACS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs MSDL Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, MSDL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while MSDL trades at $19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas MSDL's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to MSDL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to MSDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYM Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYM has a market cap of 753M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYM trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYM's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BEAGU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BEAGU has a market cap of 614.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BEAGU trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BEAGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BEAGU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to BEAGU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYO Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYO has a market cap of 573.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYO trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYO's ROE of +17.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs TREE Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 551.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while TREE trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is -9.84. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TREE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs ANSCU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ANSCU has a market cap of 461.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while ANSCU trades at $10.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas ANSCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ANSCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to ANSCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BACQU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BACQU has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BACQU trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BACQU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BACQU's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to BACQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs POLEU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, POLEU has a market cap of 339.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while POLEU trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas POLEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to POLEU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to POLEU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs DRDBU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, DRDBU has a market cap of 324.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while DRDBU trades at $10.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas DRDBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDBU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to DRDBU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs HVIIU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, HVIIU has a market cap of 274.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while HVIIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas HVIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVIIU's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to HVIIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs HVII Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, HVII has a market cap of 264.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while HVII trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas HVII's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVII's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to HVII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs PLMKU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PLMKU has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while PLMKU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas PLMKU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMKU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to PLMKU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs NTWOU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, NTWOU has a market cap of 253.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while NTWOU trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas NTWOU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NTWOU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to NTWOU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs FACTU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, FACTU has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while FACTU trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas FACTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FACTU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to FACTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs PLMK Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PLMK has a market cap of 249M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while PLMK trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas PLMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to PLMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs DMAAU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, DMAAU has a market cap of 239.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while DMAAU trades at $10.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas DMAAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DMAAU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to DMAAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs DRDB Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, DRDB has a market cap of 236M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while DRDB trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas DRDB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to DRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs ACOG Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ACOG has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while ACOG trades at $10.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas ACOG's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ACOG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to ACOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs TAVIU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, TAVIU has a market cap of 165.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while TAVIU trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas TAVIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TAVIU's ROE of +2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to TAVIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RANG Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RANG has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RANG trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RANG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RANG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs SVCCU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SVCCU has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while SVCCU trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas SVCCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SVCCU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to SVCCU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BSIIU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BSIIU has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BSIIU trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BSIIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BSIIU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to BSIIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYP Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYP has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYP trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYP's P/E ratio is 0.77. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYP's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to RILYP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILY Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILY has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILY trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILY's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILY's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to RILY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYT Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYT has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYT trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYT's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYN Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYN has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYN trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYN's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYG Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYG has a market cap of 117.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYG trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYG's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs SPHA Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SPHA has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while SPHA trades at $10.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas SPHA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SPHA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to SPHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYK Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYK has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYK trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYK's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs NOEM Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, NOEM has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while NOEM trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas NOEM's P/E ratio is 252.00. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NOEM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to NOEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs DTSQ Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, DTSQ has a market cap of 92.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while DTSQ trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas DTSQ's P/E ratio is 49.48. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DTSQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to DTSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RMI Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RMI has a market cap of 91.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RMI trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RMI's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RMI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs FLDD Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, FLDD has a market cap of 85.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while FLDD trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas FLDD's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FLDD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to FLDD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs CAPNU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CAPNU has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while CAPNU trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas CAPNU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to CAPNU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to CAPNU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs YHNA Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, YHNA has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while YHNA trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas YHNA's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to YHNA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to YHNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BAYAU Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BAYAU has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BAYAU trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BAYAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BAYAU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to BAYAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs COOTW Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, COOTW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while COOTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas COOTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to COOTW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to COOTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs DRDBW Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, DRDBW has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while DRDBW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas DRDBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DRDBW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to DRDBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BSLKW Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BSLKW has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BSLKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BSLKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BSLKW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to BSLKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs MLACR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, MLACR has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while MLACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas MLACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to MLACR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to MLACR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs HVIIR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, HVIIR has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while HVIIR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas HVIIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to HVIIR's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to HVIIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs PLMKW Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PLMKW has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while PLMKW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas PLMKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to PLMKW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to PLMKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs APLMW Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, APLMW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while APLMW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas APLMW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to APLMW's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to APLMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RANGR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RANGR has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RANGR trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RANGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RANGR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RANGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs TENKR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, TENKR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while TENKR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas TENKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to TENKR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to TENKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs NOEMR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, NOEMR has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while NOEMR trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas NOEMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to NOEMR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to NOEMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs YHNAR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, YHNAR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while YHNAR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas YHNAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to YHNAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to YHNAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs EURKR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, EURKR has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while EURKR trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas EURKR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to EURKR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to EURKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs DTSQR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, DTSQR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while DTSQR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas DTSQR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to DTSQR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to DTSQR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs FSHPR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, FSHPR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while FSHPR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas FSHPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to FSHPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to FSHPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs CAPNR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CAPNR has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while CAPNR trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas CAPNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to CAPNR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to CAPNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs ATMCR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ATMCR has a market cap of 819.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while ATMCR trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas ATMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to ATMCR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to ATMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BRACR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BRACR has a market cap of 536.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BRACR trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BRACR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BRACR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to BRACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs EMCGR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, EMCGR has a market cap of 516.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while EMCGR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas EMCGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to EMCGR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to EMCGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs BIPJ Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BIPJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while BIPJ trades at $23.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas BIPJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to BIPJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to BIPJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYH Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYH trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYH's P/E ratio is 43.70. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYH's ROE of +4.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs SPHAR Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SPHAR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while SPHAR trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas SPHAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to SPHAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to SPHAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs RILYI Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RILYI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while RILYI trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas RILYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to RILYI's ROE of +2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is more volatile compared to RILYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.
RILYL vs LCAAW Comparison
RILYL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RILYL stands at 150.7M. In comparison, LCAAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RILYL is priced at $4.71, while LCAAW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RILYL currently has a P/E ratio of 0.82, whereas LCAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RILYL's ROE is +4.72%, compared to LCAAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RILYL is less volatile compared to LCAAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RILYL.