Rightscorp, Inc.
Rightscorp, Inc. RIHT Peers
See (RIHT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Infrastructure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RIHT | $0.01 | +46.99% | 2.9M | -0.17 | -$0.07 | N/A |
| ADYEY | $18.21 | -0.71% | 57.4B | 55.18 | $0.33 | N/A |
| ADYYF | $1,799.00 | -0.33% | 56.7B | 52.91 | $34.00 | N/A |
| BSQKZ | $58.50 | N/A | 36.1B | 14.20 | $4.12 | N/A |
| KAKZF | $97.10 | +4.97% | 20.7B | 10.86 | $8.94 | +4.28% |
| TOITF | $126.90 | -1.63% | 10.5B | 91.96 | $1.38 | N/A |
| TMICY | $75.70 | -1.73% | 10.1B | 44.01 | $1.72 | +1.23% |
| TMICF | $70.00 | N/A | 9.2B | 40.23 | $1.74 | +1.66% |
| NEXXY | $6.00 | N/A | 7.4B | 37.50 | $0.16 | +4.17% |
| NEXPF | $6.09 | -0.08% | 7.4B | 38.03 | $0.16 | +4.13% |
Stock Comparison
RIHT vs ADYEY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while ADYEY trades at $18.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 55.18. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs ADYYF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while ADYYF trades at $1,799.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 52.91. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs BSQKZ Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while BSQKZ trades at $58.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to BSQKZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs KAKZF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to KAKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TOITF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TOITF trades at $126.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 91.96. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TMICY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TMICY trades at $75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TMICF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TMICF trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TMICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs NEXXY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while NEXXY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs NEXPF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while NEXPF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 38.03. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to NEXPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DRKTY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DRKTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs GMYTF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while GMYTF trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 37.65. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to GMYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SWDAF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs STWRY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while STWRY trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to STWRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs OVHFF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while OVHFF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 177.78. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to OVHFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CIOXY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs EXNWF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to EXNWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs WWLNF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while WWLNF trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to WWLNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DRKTF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DRKTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs WRDLY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while WRDLY trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to WRDLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SPNUF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SPNUF trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 125.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SPNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SANP Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SANP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs MGPPF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while MGPPF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is 233.33. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PHPYF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to PHPYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs EXOD Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EXOD has a market cap of 735.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while EXOD trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EXOD's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXOD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to EXOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CPLFF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CPLFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PRTHU Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 658.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PRTHU trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -18.37. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to PRTHU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FNCHF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 592.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FNCHF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to FNCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PYPTF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 557.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PYPTF trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to PYPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DYNDF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 495.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DYNDF trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs YHEKF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 448.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while YHEKF trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to YHEKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TDCSF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TDCSF trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TDCSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs HISNF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 415.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while HISNF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to HISNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SPMYY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SPMYY trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 111.33. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs NFONF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while NFONF trades at $21.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to NFONF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CORZQ Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TYPMF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 283.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TYPMF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TYPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FMZNF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FMZNF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to FMZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs OTPMF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to OTPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs ABANF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while ABANF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to ABANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SERKF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 220.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SERKF trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SERKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SEEMF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SEEMF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SEEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FFPP Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FFPP trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to FFPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FSOYF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FSOYF trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -16.31. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to FSOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs GIVXF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to GIVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CGAAY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CGAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PYFRF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to PYFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs WHEN Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 110.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while WHEN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WHEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to WHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs ERDLF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while ERDLF trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -29.13. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to ERDLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FCLOF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to FCLOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs VRSSF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while VRSSF trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of -3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs BGOPF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 96M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while BGOPF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to BGOPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs HAIVF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while HAIVF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is 54.17. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CORZR Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CORZR trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to CORZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CROTF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CROTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CROTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CROTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DGGXF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DGGXF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -4.30. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DGGXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SKKY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SKKY trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKKY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs QBITF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while QBITF trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to QBITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs NTTCF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NTTCF has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while NTTCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NTTCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NTTCF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to NTTCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs JGHG Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while JGHG trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to JGHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs NOWVF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while NOWVF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -49.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs APGT Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while APGT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to APGT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs ISDCF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CLOQ Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CLOQ trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -23.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CLOQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TFLM Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TFLM trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to TFLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs POTTF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while POTTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to POTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PLCKF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PLCKF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +5.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CLPMF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CLPMF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CLPMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs CYBNY Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to CYBNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SDCH Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SDCH trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs QFEEF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to QFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs EPXGF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to EPXGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DLTXF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DLTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DSAIF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DSAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FOBIF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FOBIF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs IPNFF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while IPNFF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DRKOF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +5.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DRKOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SFIIF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SFIIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -5.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to SFIIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PKKFF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PKKFF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to PKKFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs DVPNF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to DVPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TGCB Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TGCB trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs NBVAF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while NBVAF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to NBVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs OVTZ Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while OVTZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs VENZF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while VENZF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VENZF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to VENZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs TONR Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while TONR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TONR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs PKLBF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, PKLBF has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while PKLBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas PKLBF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PKLBF's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to PKLBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs ATCHW Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, ATCHW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while ATCHW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas ATCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ATCHW's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to ATCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs MODGF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while MODGF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to MODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SCYRF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SCYRF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SCYRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs KCRD Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while KCRD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to KCRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs RKNEF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while RKNEF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs MBLMF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, MBLMF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while MBLMF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas MBLMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MBLMF's ROE of +17.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to MBLMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FUAPF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FUAPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to FUAPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SLXXF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -7.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to SLXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs VISM Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while VISM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs RCWDF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, RCWDF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while RCWDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas RCWDF's P/E ratio is 0.54. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RCWDF's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to RCWDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs INOTF Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 771K. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while INOTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs INAR Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, INAR has a market cap of 769.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while INAR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas INAR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to INAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs FSRDQ Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, FSRDQ has a market cap of 683.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while FSRDQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas FSRDQ's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FSRDQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to FSRDQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.
RIHT vs SMKG Comparison
RIHT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RIHT stands at 2.9M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 574.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RIHT is priced at $0.01, while SMKG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RIHT currently has a P/E ratio of -0.17, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RIHT's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMKG's ROE of -6.99%. Regarding short-term risk, RIHT is more volatile compared to SMKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RIHT.