Pernod Ricard SA

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, DGE.PA has a market cap of 91.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while DGE.PA trades at €40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas DGE.PA's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGE.PA's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to DGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, RCO.PA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while RCO.PA trades at €47.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas RCO.PA's P/E ratio is 14.79. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RCO.PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is less volatile compared to RCO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, SBT.PA has a market cap of 603.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while SBT.PA trades at €9.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas SBT.PA's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SBT.PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to SBT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, LPE.PA has a market cap of 568.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while LPE.PA trades at €96.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas LPE.PA's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LPE.PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is less volatile compared to LPE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, MBWS.PA has a market cap of 361.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while MBWS.PA trades at €3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas MBWS.PA's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MBWS.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to MBWS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, BOLS.AS has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while BOLS.AS trades at €18.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas BOLS.AS's P/E ratio is 38.40. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOLS.AS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to BOLS.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, ALLAN.PA has a market cap of 244.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while ALLAN.PA trades at €36.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas ALLAN.PA's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALLAN.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to ALLAN.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, VRAP.PA has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while VRAP.PA trades at €12.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas VRAP.PA's P/E ratio is 121.50. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VRAP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to VRAP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, ADVI.PA has a market cap of 77.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while ADVI.PA trades at €20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas ADVI.PA's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ADVI.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is less volatile compared to ADVI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, ALAVI.PA has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while ALAVI.PA trades at €13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas ALAVI.PA's P/E ratio is 221.67. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALAVI.PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is less volatile compared to ALAVI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.

RI.PA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RI.PA stands at 22.9B. In comparison, MLCAC.PA has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RI.PA is priced at €91.02, while MLCAC.PA trades at €16.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RI.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 20.88, whereas MLCAC.PA's P/E ratio is 835.00. In terms of profitability, RI.PA's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLCAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RI.PA is more volatile compared to MLCAC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RI.PA.