Star Phoenix Group Ltd
Star Phoenix Group Ltd RGRLF Peers
See (RGRLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGRLF | $0.22 | +3.44% | 16.2B | -8.57 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| NSTKF | $22.29 | +0.00% | 66.8B | 9.49 | $2.35 | N/A |
| WOPEF | $16.11 | +0.00% | 30.5B | 8.61 | $1.87 | +7.60% |
| PEXNY | $9.76 | -11.11% | 19.4B | 8.20 | $1.19 | +5.42% |
| TRMLF | $45.45 | +0.69% | 17.6B | 18.47 | $2.46 | +4.27% |
| DETNF | $26.92 | +0.00% | 17B | 19.12 | $1.41 | N/A |
| IPXHY | $14.14 | +0.16% | 17B | 5.95 | $2.38 | +3.78% |
| SSLZY | $5.10 | -1.16% | 16.5B | 13.42 | $0.38 | +1.75% |
| STOSF | $5.10 | -1.21% | 16.5B | 13.41 | $0.38 | +4.60% |
| IPXHF | $13.50 | +0.00% | 16.2B | 5.67 | $2.38 | +4.19% |
Stock Comparison
RGRLF vs NSTKF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, NSTKF has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while NSTKF trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas NSTKF's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NSTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to NSTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs WOPEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, WOPEF has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while WOPEF trades at $16.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas WOPEF's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WOPEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to WOPEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PEXNY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PEXNY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PEXNY trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PEXNY's P/E ratio is 8.20. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to PEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs TRMLF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TRMLF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while TRMLF trades at $45.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas TRMLF's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TRMLF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to TRMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs DETNF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, DETNF has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while DETNF trades at $26.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DETNF's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DETNF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to DETNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs IPXHY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, IPXHY has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while IPXHY trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas IPXHY's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPXHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to IPXHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SSLZY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SSLZY has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SSLZY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SSLZY's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SSLZY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to SSLZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs STOSF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, STOSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while STOSF trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas STOSF's P/E ratio is 13.41. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to STOSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to STOSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs IPXHF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, IPXHF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while IPXHF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas IPXHF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPXHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to IPXHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs AETUF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, AETUF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while AETUF trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas AETUF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AETUF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to AETUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs NOVKY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, NOVKY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while NOVKY trades at $38.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas NOVKY's P/E ratio is 1.60. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NOVKY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to NOVKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SPGYF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SPGYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SPGYF trades at $7.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SPGYF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SPGYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to SPGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PTRRY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PTRRY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PTRRY trades at $7.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PTRRY's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRRY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PTRRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs DKDRF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, DKDRF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while DKDRF trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DKDRF's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DKDRF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to DKDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs MEGEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, MEGEF has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while MEGEF trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas MEGEF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEGEF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to MEGEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs VSOGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, VSOGF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while VSOGF trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas VSOGF's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to VSOGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to VSOGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PREKF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PREKF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PREKF trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PREKF's P/E ratio is 26.07. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PREKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PREKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs DELKY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, DELKY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while DELKY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DELKY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DELKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to DELKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs HBRIY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HBRIY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while HBRIY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas HBRIY's P/E ratio is -27.25. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HBRIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to HBRIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs DLKGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, DLKGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while DLKGF trades at $213.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DLKGF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DLKGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to DLKGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PMOIF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PMOIF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PMOIF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PMOIF's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PMOIF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PMOIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs OASPW Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, OASPW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while OASPW trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas OASPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to OASPW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to OASPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PEYUF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PEYUF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PEYUF trades at $14.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PEYUF's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEYUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PEYUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs EFVIF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, EFVIF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while EFVIF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas EFVIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to EFVIF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to EFVIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs EERGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, EERGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while EERGF trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas EERGF's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to EERGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to EERGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PRMRF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PRMRF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PRMRF trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PRMRF's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRMRF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PRMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs BTEGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BTEGF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while BTEGF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BTEGF's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BTEGF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to BTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs BEPTF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BEPTF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while BEPTF trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BEPTF's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BEPTF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to BEPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ATHOF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ATHOF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ATHOF trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ATHOF's P/E ratio is 6.40. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATHOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to ATHOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs NUVSF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, NUVSF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while NUVSF trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas NUVSF's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to NUVSF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to NUVSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PTGIF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PTGIF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PTGIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PTGIF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTGIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PTGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs BCHEY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BCHEY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while BCHEY trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BCHEY's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BCHEY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to BCHEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs IPCFF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, IPCFF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while IPCFF trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas IPCFF's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPCFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to IPCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs MEYYY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, MEYYY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while MEYYY trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas MEYYY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to MEYYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to MEYYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs JPTXF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, JPTXF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while JPTXF trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas JPTXF's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to JPTXF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to JPTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs FRHLF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, FRHLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while FRHLF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas FRHLF's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FRHLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to FRHLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs BIREF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BIREF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while BIREF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BIREF's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BIREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to BIREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs AAVVF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, AAVVF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while AAVVF trades at $8.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas AAVVF's P/E ratio is -61.84. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAVVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to AAVVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs CDDRF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CDDRF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while CDDRF trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CDDRF's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CDDRF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to CDDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs DTNOF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, DTNOF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while DTNOF trades at $1.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.20. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DTNOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to DTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs CRCQW Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CRCQW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while CRCQW trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CRCQW's P/E ratio is 2.64. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRCQW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to CRCQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs WLLAW Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, WLLAW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while WLLAW trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas WLLAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to WLLAW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to WLLAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PARXF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PARXF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PARXF trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PARXF's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PARXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PARXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs KELTF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, KELTF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while KELTF trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas KELTF's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KELTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to KELTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs KRNGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, KRNGF has a market cap of 916.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while KRNGF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas KRNGF's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to KRNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs UNEGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, UNEGF has a market cap of 898.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while UNEGF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas UNEGF's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to UNEGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to UNEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs AOIFF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, AOIFF has a market cap of 894.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while AOIFF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas AOIFF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AOIFF's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to AOIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SQZZF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SQZZF has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SQZZF trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SQZZF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SQZZF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to SQZZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs CWEGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CWEGF has a market cap of 866.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while CWEGF trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CWEGF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CWEGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to CWEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs CRLFF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CRLFF has a market cap of 856.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while CRLFF trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CRLFF's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to CRLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs BWEFF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BWEFF has a market cap of 774.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while BWEFF trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BWEFF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BWEFF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to BWEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs DALXF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, DALXF has a market cap of 679.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while DALXF trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas DALXF's P/E ratio is 42.43. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to DALXF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to DALXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs KWTEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, KWTEF has a market cap of 677.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while KWTEF trades at $15.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas KWTEF's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KWTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to KWTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs AAGEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, AAGEF has a market cap of 569.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while AAGEF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas AAGEF's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to AAGEF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to AAGEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs RCKHF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, RCKHF has a market cap of 549.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while RCKHF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas RCKHF's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to RCKHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to RCKHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ZPTAF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZPTAF has a market cap of 522.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ZPTAF trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ZPTAF's P/E ratio is -17.56. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZPTAF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to ZPTAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs GUKYF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, GUKYF has a market cap of 516.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while GUKYF trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas GUKYF's P/E ratio is 79.33. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GUKYF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to GUKYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs GFKSY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, GFKSY has a market cap of 509.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while GFKSY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas GFKSY's P/E ratio is 2.05. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GFKSY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to GFKSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PTALF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PTALF has a market cap of 472.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PTALF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PTALF's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTALF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PTALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SHASF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SHASF has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SHASF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SHASF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SHASF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to SHASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs COPJF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, COPJF has a market cap of 424.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while COPJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas COPJF's P/E ratio is -5.33. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to COPJF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to COPJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs KRNGY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, KRNGY has a market cap of 421.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while KRNGY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas KRNGY's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KRNGY's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to KRNGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs TBNRF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TBNRF has a market cap of 414M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while TBNRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas TBNRF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TBNRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to TBNRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PTHRF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PTHRF has a market cap of 396.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PTHRF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PTHRF's P/E ratio is -32.00. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTHRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PTHRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs BKBEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, BKBEF has a market cap of 384.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while BKBEF trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas BKBEF's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to BKBEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to BKBEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ATUUF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ATUUF has a market cap of 365.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ATUUF trades at $13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ATUUF's P/E ratio is -40.27. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUUF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to ATUUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PRYGF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PRYGF has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PRYGF trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PRYGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PRYGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to PRYGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PEGIY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PEGIY has a market cap of 350.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PEGIY trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PEGIY's P/E ratio is 5.27. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PEGIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to PEGIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ENQUF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ENQUF has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ENQUF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ENQUF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ENQUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to ENQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs FECCF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, FECCF has a market cap of 326.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while FECCF trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas FECCF's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to FECCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to FECCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs TUWLF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TUWLF has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while TUWLF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas TUWLF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUWLF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to TUWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs CEIEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CEIEF has a market cap of 321.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while CEIEF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CEIEF's P/E ratio is -30.12. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CEIEF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to CEIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs OILSF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, OILSF has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while OILSF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas OILSF's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to OILSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to OILSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs TUWOY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, TUWOY has a market cap of 276.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while TUWOY trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas TUWOY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to TUWOY's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to TUWOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs EXCE Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, EXCE has a market cap of 260.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while EXCE trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas EXCE's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to EXCE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to EXCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PESAF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PESAF has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PESAF trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PESAF's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PESAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to PESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs GEGYF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, GEGYF has a market cap of 251.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while GEGYF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas GEGYF's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGYF's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to GEGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ZNOG Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ZNOG has a market cap of 223.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ZNOG trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ZNOG's P/E ratio is -20.25. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ZNOG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to ZNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs IPOOF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, IPOOF has a market cap of 212.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while IPOOF trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas IPOOF's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to IPOOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to IPOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs HZNFF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HZNFF has a market cap of 211.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while HZNFF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas HZNFF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HZNFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to HZNFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PIFYF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PIFYF has a market cap of 200.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PIFYF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PIFYF's P/E ratio is -13.99. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PIFYF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PIFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ITEEF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ITEEF has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ITEEF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ITEEF's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ITEEF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to ITEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs CRNZF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, CRNZF has a market cap of 195.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while CRNZF trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas CRNZF's P/E ratio is -17.81. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to CRNZF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to CRNZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SEUSF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SEUSF has a market cap of 188.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SEUSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SEUSF's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SEUSF's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to SEUSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PSHIF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PSHIF has a market cap of 186.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PSHIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PSHIF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PSHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to PSHIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs GASXF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, GASXF has a market cap of 184.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while GASXF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas GASXF's P/E ratio is -7.95. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GASXF's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to GASXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs EEGUF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, EEGUF has a market cap of 184.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while EEGUF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas EEGUF's P/E ratio is -14.92. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to EEGUF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to EEGUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs HRCXF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HRCXF has a market cap of 184M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while HRCXF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas HRCXF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HRCXF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to HRCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs RECWF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, RECWF has a market cap of 169.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while RECWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas RECWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to RECWF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to RECWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs ALVOF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, ALVOF has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while ALVOF trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas ALVOF's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to ALVOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to ALVOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs GEGYY Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, GEGYY has a market cap of 157.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while GEGYY trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas GEGYY's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to GEGYY's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to GEGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SVNNF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SVNNF has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SVNNF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SVNNF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SVNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to SVNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PNWRF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PNWRF has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PNWRF trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PNWRF's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PNWRF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to PNWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs KGEIF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, KGEIF has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while KGEIF trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas KGEIF's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to KGEIF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to KGEIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs LNDNF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, LNDNF has a market cap of 148.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while LNDNF trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas LNDNF's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to LNDNF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is less volatile compared to LNDNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs PTRUF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, PTRUF has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while PTRUF trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas PTRUF's P/E ratio is 107.29. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to PTRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to PTRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs RUBLF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, RUBLF has a market cap of 138.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while RUBLF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas RUBLF's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to RUBLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to RUBLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs HMENF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, HMENF has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while HMENF trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas HMENF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to HMENF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to HMENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.
RGRLF vs SLGYF Comparison
RGRLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGRLF stands at 16.2B. In comparison, SLGYF has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, RGRLF is priced at $0.22, while SLGYF trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGRLF currently has a P/E ratio of -8.57, whereas SLGYF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RGRLF's ROE is N/A, compared to SLGYF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGRLF is more volatile compared to SLGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGRLF.