RTL Group S.A.
RTL Group S.A. RGLXF Peers
See (RGLXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGLXF | $42.92 | +29.36% | 6.6B | 17.59 | $2.44 | +7.51% |
| RGLXY | $4.00 | N/A | 6.2B | 16.67 | $0.24 | +8.01% |
| NPTVF | $23.98 | -7.13% | 6B | 18.88 | $1.27 | +0.30% |
| FJTNY | $10.17 | N/A | 4.3B | -29.91 | -$0.34 | +0.81% |
| ITVPY | $10.62 | +2.71% | 4B | 7.70 | $1.38 | +6.16% |
| ITVPF | $1.04 | +23.99% | 3.9B | 7.43 | $0.14 | +6.27% |
| FJTNF | $17.40 | -1.42% | 3.6B | -25.97 | -$0.67 | +1.97% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | +100.00% | 2.6B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
| SGBAF | $5.71 | -3.22% | 2.3B | -1.41 | -$4.05 | +8.32% |
| MTPVY | $16.06 | +16.89% | 2B | 10.36 | $1.55 | +8.87% |
Stock Comparison
RGLXF vs RGLXY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while RGLXY trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs NPTVF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while NPTVF trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and NPTVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs FJTNY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while FJTNY trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is -29.91. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and FJTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs ITVPY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while ITVPY trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 7.70. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and ITVPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs ITVPF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while ITVPF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and ITVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs FJTNF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while FJTNF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is -25.97. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and FJTNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TKOBF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs SGBAF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SGBAF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while SGBAF trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SGBAF's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGBAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and SGBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs MTPVY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while MTPVY trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and MTPVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TVAHF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TVAHF trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs BECVY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while BECVY trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and BECVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs PBSFY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while PBSFY trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -12.19. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and PBSFY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs THDDY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while THDDY trades at $16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs PBSFF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs TVFCF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TVFCF trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs SKPJY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs GETVF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs STGYF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 401.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while STGYF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is -32.78. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STGYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and STGYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TVBCF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 186.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TVBCF trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to TVBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs TVBCY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 166.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TVBCY trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to TVBCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs AZTEF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TVAGF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TVAGF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVAGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs EMMS Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while EMMS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs LUDG Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while LUDG trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to LUDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs FHLD Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while FHLD trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and FHLD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs PEGX Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while PEGX trades at $51.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs AOECF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs INCT Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs AITVF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while AITVF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +4.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to AITVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs LPTV Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while LPTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs AUDAQ Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs TVTV Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 736.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TVTV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVTV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TFBN Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TLDE Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 626.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs SBSAA Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 620.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while SBSAA trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and SBSAA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs PSRU Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs TMGI Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 345K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while TMGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to TMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs MEMI Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs FONU Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs WTKN Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.
RGLXF vs WNRC Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNRC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs MNIZ Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 317. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while MNIZ trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and MNIZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs ALLN Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, ALLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while ALLN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs MCTZF Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, MCTZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
RGLXF vs GETVY Comparison
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.6B. In comparison, GETVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $42.92, while GETVY trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 17.59, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).