RTL Group S.A.
RTL Group S.A. (RGLXF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RGLXF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGLXF | $41.00 | +2.47% | 6.3B | 16.80 | $2.44 | +6.10% |
| FJTNF | $27.73 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -42.66 | -$0.65 | +1.24% |
| NPTVF | $21.77 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 17.27 | $1.26 | +1.24% |
| RGLXY | $3.47 | +0.00% | 5.4B | 13.88 | $0.25 | +8.13% |
| FJTNY | $11.60 | -0.17% | 5B | -36.25 | -$0.32 | +1.36% |
| ITVPF | $1.11 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 15.86 | $0.07 | +5.88% |
| ITVPY | $10.85 | +0.00% | 4.1B | 16.69 | $0.65 | +6.02% |
| SGBAF | $6.80 | +0.00% | 2.8B | -56.67 | -$0.12 | +8.20% |
| TKOBF | $16.09 | +0.00% | 2.6B | 21.17 | $0.76 | +1.19% |
| TVFCF | $10.20 | +0.00% | 2.2B | 10.00 | $1.02 | +6.69% |
Stock Comparison
RGLXF vs FJTNF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FJTNF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while FJTNF trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas FJTNF's P/E ratio is -42.66. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FJTNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to FJTNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check FJTNF's competition here
RGLXF vs NPTVF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, NPTVF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while NPTVF trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas NPTVF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NPTVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to NPTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check NPTVF's competition here
RGLXF vs RGLXY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, RGLXY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while RGLXY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas RGLXY's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RGLXY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and RGLXY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RGLXY's competition here
RGLXF vs FJTNY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FJTNY has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while FJTNY trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas FJTNY's P/E ratio is -36.25. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FJTNY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and FJTNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FJTNY's competition here
RGLXF vs ITVPF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ITVPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while ITVPF trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ITVPF's P/E ratio is 15.86. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITVPF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and ITVPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITVPF's competition here
RGLXF vs ITVPY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ITVPY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while ITVPY trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ITVPY's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITVPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to ITVPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check ITVPY's competition here
RGLXF vs SGBAF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SGBAF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while SGBAF trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas SGBAF's P/E ratio is -56.67. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGBAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and SGBAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SGBAF's competition here
RGLXF vs TKOBF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TKOBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TKOBF trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TKOBF's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TKOBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TKOBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKOBF's competition here
RGLXF vs TVFCF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TVFCF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TVFCF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TVFCF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVFCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVFCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVFCF's competition here
RGLXF vs PBSFY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PBSFY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while PBSFY trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PBSFY's P/E ratio is -14.09. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBSFY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to PBSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check PBSFY's competition here
RGLXF vs THDDY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, THDDY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while THDDY trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas THDDY's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to THDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check THDDY's competition here
RGLXF vs TVAHF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TVAHF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TVAHF trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TVAHF's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVAHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVAHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVAHF's competition here
RGLXF vs MTPVY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MTPVY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while MTPVY trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MTPVY's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTPVY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to MTPVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check MTPVY's competition here
RGLXF vs PBSFF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PBSFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while PBSFF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PBSFF's P/E ratio is -10.29. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PBSFF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to PBSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check PBSFF's competition here
RGLXF vs GETVF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GETVF has a market cap of 980.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while GETVF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas GETVF's P/E ratio is 4.79. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GETVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and GETVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETVF's competition here
RGLXF vs SKPJY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SKPJY has a market cap of 513.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while SKPJY trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas SKPJY's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SKPJY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and SKPJY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKPJY's competition here
RGLXF vs STGYF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, STGYF has a market cap of 504.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while STGYF trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas STGYF's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to STGYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to STGYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check STGYF's competition here
RGLXF vs BECVY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, BECVY has a market cap of 422M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while BECVY trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas BECVY's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BECVY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to BECVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check BECVY's competition here
RGLXF vs TVBCY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TVBCY has a market cap of 238.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TVBCY trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TVBCY's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVBCY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVBCY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVBCY's competition here
RGLXF vs TVBCF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TVBCF has a market cap of 182.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TVBCF trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TVBCF's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVBCF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TVBCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TVBCF's competition here
RGLXF vs AZTEF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AZTEF has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while AZTEF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AZTEF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZTEF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and AZTEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AZTEF's competition here
RGLXF vs TLDE Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TLDE has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TLDE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TLDE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLDE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TLDE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLDE's competition here
RGLXF vs TVAGF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TVAGF has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TVAGF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TVAGF's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVAGF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to TVAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check TVAGF's competition here
RGLXF vs EMMS Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, EMMS has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while EMMS trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas EMMS's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EMMS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to EMMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check EMMS's competition here
RGLXF vs LUDG Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LUDG has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while LUDG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas LUDG's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LUDG's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and LUDG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LUDG's competition here
RGLXF vs AOECF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AOECF has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while AOECF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AOECF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AOECF's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and AOECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AOECF's competition here
RGLXF vs PEGX Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PEGX has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while PEGX trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PEGX's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEGX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to PEGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check PEGX's competition here
RGLXF vs INCT Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, INCT has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while INCT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas INCT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INCT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to INCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check INCT's competition here
RGLXF vs AITVF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AITVF has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while AITVF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AITVF's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AITVF's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and AITVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AITVF's competition here
RGLXF vs TVTV Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TVTV has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TVTV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TVTV's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVTV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to TVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check TVTV's competition here
RGLXF vs FHLD Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FHLD has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while FHLD trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas FHLD's P/E ratio is 0.29. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FHLD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to FHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check FHLD's competition here
RGLXF vs SBSAA Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, SBSAA has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while SBSAA trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas SBSAA's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBSAA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to SBSAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check SBSAA's competition here
RGLXF vs AUDAQ Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, AUDAQ has a market cap of 785.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while AUDAQ trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas AUDAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUDAQ's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to AUDAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check AUDAQ's competition here
RGLXF vs TFBN Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TFBN has a market cap of 648.5K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TFBN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TFBN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TFBN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and TFBN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFBN's competition here
RGLXF vs LPTV Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, LPTV has a market cap of 482.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while LPTV trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas LPTV's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPTV's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to LPTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check LPTV's competition here
RGLXF vs PSRU Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, PSRU has a market cap of 348.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while PSRU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas PSRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSRU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and PSRU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PSRU's competition here
RGLXF vs MEMI Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MEMI has a market cap of 155K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while MEMI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MEMI's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to MEMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check MEMI's competition here
RGLXF vs FONU Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, FONU has a market cap of 84.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while FONU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas FONU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FONU's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to FONU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check FONU's competition here
RGLXF vs TMGI Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, TMGI has a market cap of 84.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while TMGI trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas TMGI's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TMGI's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to TMGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check TMGI's competition here
RGLXF vs WTKN Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WTKN has a market cap of 59.9K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while WTKN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas WTKN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTKN's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF is less volatile compared to WTKN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGLXF.Check WTKN's competition here
RGLXF vs WNRC Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, WNRC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while WNRC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas WNRC's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNRC's ROE of +3.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and WNRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WNRC's competition here
RGLXF vs MNIZ Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MNIZ has a market cap of 932. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while MNIZ trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MNIZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MNIZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and MNIZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MNIZ's competition here
RGLXF vs ALLN Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, ALLN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while ALLN trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas ALLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALLN's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and ALLN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALLN's competition here
RGLXF vs GETVY Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, GETVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while GETVY trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas GETVY's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GETVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and GETVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GETVY's competition here
RGLXF vs MCTZF Comparison August 2025
RGLXF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGLXF stands at 6.3B. In comparison, MCTZF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RGLXF is priced at $41.00, while MCTZF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGLXF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.80, whereas MCTZF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, RGLXF's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCTZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGLXF and MCTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MCTZF's competition here