Raffles Education Corporation Limited
Raffles Education Corporation Limited RFLFF Peers
See (RFLFF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Education & Training Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFLFF | $0.01 | -75.00% | 13.90M | -1.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KLTHF | $4.55 | +868.09% | 4.76B | -20.68 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| IDPUF | $8.35 | N/A | 2.32B | 37.95 | $0.22 | +1.79% |
| BSEFF | $20.25 | -19.32% | 1.95B | 2025.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| CEGHF | $0.42 | -58.50% | 1.16B | 20.75 | $0.02 | N/A |
| COGNY | $0.48 | +16.11% | 858.93M | 5.94 | $0.08 | +1.80% |
| RFLFY | $0.49 | N/A | 683.97M | -3.28 | -$0.15 | N/A |
| DTLIF | $10.53 | +3.85% | 574.82M | 22.89 | $0.46 | N/A |
| YDUQY | $1.50 | +15.89% | 471.42M | -49.83 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| UMEWF | $0.25 | -37.50% | 27.95M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RFLFF vs KLTHF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, KLTHF has a market cap of 4.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while KLTHF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KLTHF's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KLTHF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to KLTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs IDPUF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, IDPUF has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while IDPUF trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IDPUF's P/E ratio is 37.95. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IDPUF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to IDPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs BSEFF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, BSEFF has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while BSEFF trades at $20.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BSEFF's P/E ratio is 2025.00. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSEFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to BSEFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs CEGHF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, CEGHF has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while CEGHF trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CEGHF's P/E ratio is 20.75. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CEGHF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to CEGHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs COGNY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, COGNY has a market cap of 858.93M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while COGNY trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas COGNY's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to COGNY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to COGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs RFLFY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, RFLFY has a market cap of 683.97M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while RFLFY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RFLFY's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RFLFY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to RFLFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs DTLIF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, DTLIF has a market cap of 574.82M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while DTLIF trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DTLIF's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DTLIF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to DTLIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs YDUQY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, YDUQY has a market cap of 471.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while YDUQY trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas YDUQY's P/E ratio is -49.83. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YDUQY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to YDUQY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs UMEWF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, UMEWF has a market cap of 27.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while UMEWF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UMEWF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UMEWF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to UMEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs EXDW Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, EXDW has a market cap of 12.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while EXDW trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EXDW's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXDW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to EXDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs ZMENY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, ZMENY has a market cap of 9.51M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while ZMENY trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZMENY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZMENY's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to ZMENY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs FHSEY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, FHSEY has a market cap of 8.38M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while FHSEY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas FHSEY's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FHSEY's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to FHSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs MNMT Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, MNMT has a market cap of 4.06M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while MNMT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MNMT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MNMT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to MNMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs LTRE Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, LTRE has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while LTRE trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LTRE's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTRE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to LTRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs MBAIF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, MBAIF has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while MBAIF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MBAIF's P/E ratio is -3.52. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MBAIF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to MBAIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs QOEG Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, QOEG has a market cap of 1.67M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while QOEG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas QOEG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to QOEG's ROE of +1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to QOEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs BRWC Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, BRWC has a market cap of 1.45M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while BRWC trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BRWC's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BRWC's ROE of -6.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to BRWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs BTTUF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, BTTUF has a market cap of 1.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while BTTUF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BTTUF's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BTTUF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to BTTUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs NAUH Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, NAUH has a market cap of 739500.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while NAUH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NAUH's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NAUH's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to NAUH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs PBYA Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, PBYA has a market cap of 395165.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while PBYA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PBYA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PBYA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to PBYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs VCTL Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, VCTL has a market cap of 42252.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while VCTL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VCTL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VCTL's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to VCTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs EDMCQ Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, EDMCQ has a market cap of 12606.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while EDMCQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EDMCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EDMCQ's ROE of +38.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to EDMCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs CHNUF Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, CHNUF has a market cap of 4737.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while CHNUF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CHNUF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHNUF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to CHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs LEAI Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, LEAI has a market cap of 3939.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while LEAI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LEAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LEAI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to LEAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs ZVOI Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, ZVOI has a market cap of 3422.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while ZVOI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ZVOI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ZVOI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to ZVOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs TIGE Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, TIGE has a market cap of 3197.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while TIGE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas TIGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TIGE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to TIGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs ESINQ Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, ESINQ has a market cap of 2399.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while ESINQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ESINQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ESINQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to ESINQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs NEWYY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, NEWYY has a market cap of 1747.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while NEWYY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NEWYY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEWYY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to NEWYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs VRED Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, VRED has a market cap of 639.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while VRED trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VRED's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VRED's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is less volatile compared to VRED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs MMTS Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, MMTS has a market cap of 379.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while MMTS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MMTS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MMTS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to MMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs BSEFY Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, BSEFY has a market cap of 91.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while BSEFY trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BSEFY's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BSEFY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to BSEFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs CCHZ Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, CCHZ has a market cap of 62.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while CCHZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CCHZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CCHZ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to CCHZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.
RFLFF vs YYYH Comparison
RFLFF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFLFF stands at 13.90M. In comparison, YYYH has a market cap of 45.00. Regarding current trading prices, RFLFF is priced at $0.01, while YYYH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFLFF currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas YYYH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFLFF's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YYYH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RFLFF is more volatile compared to YYYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFLFF.