RenuEn Corporation

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while NGGTF trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ELEZY trades at $14.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.81. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 29.01B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while NSARO trades at $78.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 26.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while NSARP trades at $71.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 24.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPCO trades at $90.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.75. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CLPHY trades at $8.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 21.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HRNNF trades at $36.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 20.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while TNABY trades at $14.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 18.77. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 20.06B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CLPHF trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while TERRF trades at $9.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 19.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while TNABF trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while AILIO trades at $67.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CKISF trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CKISY trades at $32.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 12.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while EMRAF trades at $42.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 11.43B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ELIAF trades at $104.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 11.13B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while RDEIY trades at $10.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.81. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 8.26B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while EQUEY trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 8.16B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPCN trades at $75.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.62B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPEO trades at $74.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.39B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPEP trades at $72.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while FORFF trades at $14.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPCP trades at $68.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.70B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPEM trades at $65.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.54B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while TEZNY trades at $29.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.43B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while UEPEN trades at $63.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 6.42B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while IESFY trades at $145.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while EGIEY trades at $7.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.60B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while WELPM trades at $108.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while WELPP trades at $64.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while AILLM trades at $78.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while AILLN trades at $78.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while AILIN trades at $72.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HAWLM trades at $15.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while AILLP trades at $64.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 648.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 559.04M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CUPUF trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while RELFF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 382.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ABTZY trades at $6.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 313.83M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLPL trades at $52.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 312.02M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNTHP trades at $51.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 256.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNTHO trades at $42.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 245.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ABZPY trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 245.00M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 239.17M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNTHN trades at $39.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 234.05M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HAWEL trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 224.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HAWLN trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 219.38M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLHP trades at $36.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.49. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 217.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLHO trades at $36.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 217.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLTP trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 193.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLTN trades at $32.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 193.13M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLHN trades at $32.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 192.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HAWEN trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 33.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while SUME trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 6.02. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while MCPB trades at $23.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while EUSP trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 742500.00. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while HAWEM trades at $14.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while RIGH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RENU and RIGH have similar daily volatility (196.04).

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47000.00. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while USWF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENU is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RENU.

RENU plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RENU stands at 300.00. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, RENU is priced at $0.00, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RENU currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RENU's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RENU and EPGRQ have similar daily volatility (196.04).