RELX PLC

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, ROU.BR has a market cap of 192.40M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while ROU.BR trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ROU.BR's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ROU.BR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is more volatile compared to ROU.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, BRILL.AS has a market cap of 51.36M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while BRILL.AS trades at $27.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas BRILL.AS's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to BRILL.AS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is more volatile compared to BRILL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, PRC.PA has a market cap of 20.95M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while PRC.PA trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas PRC.PA's P/E ratio is 24.22. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to PRC.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is less volatile compared to PRC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, ALSEI.PA has a market cap of 7.55M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while ALSEI.PA trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ALSEI.PA's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ALSEI.PA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is less volatile compared to ALSEI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, ALENR.PA has a market cap of 5.06M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while ALENR.PA trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas ALENR.PA's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to ALENR.PA's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is more volatile compared to ALENR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, MLIMP.PA has a market cap of 4.72M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while MLIMP.PA trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MLIMP.PA's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to MLIMP.PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is more volatile compared to MLIMP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, CFN.LS has a market cap of 2.12M. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while CFN.LS trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas CFN.LS's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to CFN.LS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is less volatile compared to CFN.LS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, MLIML.PA has a market cap of 858678.00. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while MLIML.PA trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MLIML.PA's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to MLIML.PA's ROE of +14.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is less volatile compared to MLIML.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.

REN.AS plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, REN.AS stands at 88.59B. In comparison, MLEDS.PA has a market cap of 199500.00. Regarding current trading prices, REN.AS is priced at $48.10, while MLEDS.PA trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

REN.AS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.75, whereas MLEDS.PA's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, REN.AS's ROE is +0.57%, compared to MLEDS.PA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, REN.AS is more volatile compared to MLEDS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REN.AS.