Credit Suisse X-Links Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Mortgage REIT ETN
Credit Suisse X-Links Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Mortgage REIT ETN REML Peers
See (REML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management - Leveraged Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REML | $5.99 | +0.17% | 207.39M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FIYY | $103.26 | -0.72% | 241.84B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FFEU | $90.85 | +0.48% | 212.78B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VTIP | $49.77 | +0.00% | 58.54B | N/A | N/A | +2.77% |
| VTAPX | $24.96 | +0.08% | 58.51B | N/A | N/A | +2.75% |
| VFSTX | $10.36 | N/A | 52.45B | N/A | N/A | +3.88% |
| VFSUX | $10.36 | N/A | 52.45B | N/A | N/A | +3.97% |
| VSBSX | $19.48 | N/A | 27.62B | N/A | N/A | +4.16% |
| VGSH | $58.35 | -0.10% | 27.60B | N/A | N/A | +4.19% |
| VWSTX | $15.75 | +0.06% | 15.24B | N/A | N/A | +2.94% |
Stock Comparison
REML vs FIYY Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.84B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FIYY trades at $103.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FIYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FFEU Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.78B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FFEU trades at $90.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VTIP Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.54B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VTIP trades at $49.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VTAPX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.51B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VTAPX trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VFSTX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.45B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VFSTX trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VFSUX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.45B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VFSUX trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VSBSX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 27.62B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VSBSX trades at $19.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VGSH Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.60B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VGSH trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VWSTX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.24B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VWSTX trades at $15.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs MINT Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.15B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while MINT trades at $100.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs ASBFX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.51B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while ASBFX trades at $9.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SCHO Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.36B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SCHO trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs PTSHX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.61B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while PTSHX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FTSM Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.66B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FTSM trades at $59.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FNGU Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FNGU trades at $353.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VFISX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.94B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VFISX trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SPTS Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.83B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SPTS trades at $29.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TMF Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TMF trades at $36.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SPXL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 4.53B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SPXL trades at $151.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VSGBX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VSGBX trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs VSGDX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while VSGDX trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs JSDHX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 3.96B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while JSDHX trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FLVCX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.17B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FLVCX trades at $38.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs BITX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while BITX trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TBLL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.52B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TBLL trades at $105.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FAS Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FAS trades at $157.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TECL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 2.31B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TECL trades at $75.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs PAIAX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while PAIAX trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FSTTX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FSTTX trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DHFCX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DHLSX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.89B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DHLSX trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DIAYX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DIAYX trades at $28.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DWT Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.59B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DWT trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs ORSTX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while ORSTX trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs PRFSX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while PRFSX trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs BASOX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while BASOX trades at $10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs ACSNX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while ACSNX trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs CPLSX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while CPLSX trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs BULZ Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 955.44M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while BULZ trades at $143.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 47.80. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SH Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 896.72M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SH trades at $43.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TUA Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 763.87M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TUA trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TAFI Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 733.57M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TAFI trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs EMAIX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 730.52M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while EMAIX trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs EXMAX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 729.77M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while EXMAX trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs RYVYX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 717.09M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while RYVYX trades at $527.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs RYCCX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 717.07M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while RYCCX trades at $369.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs RYVLX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 695.37M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while RYVLX trades at $527.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SOXS Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 693.95M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SOXS trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs PSQ Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 646.90M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while PSQ trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SVIX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 594.32M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SVIX trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs JSCP Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 589.83M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while JSCP trades at $46.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SVXY Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 582.56M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SVXY trades at $41.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs NVDX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 581.66M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while NVDX trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 56.37. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DPST Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 536.88M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DPST trades at $87.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs GDXU Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 525.38M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while GDXU trades at $51.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 15.33. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SPXU Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 525.33M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SPXU trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs BPRRX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 506.21M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while BPRRX trades at $13.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs BPIRX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 506.16M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while BPIRX trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DGAZ Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.20M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs KOLD Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 496.07M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while KOLD trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs GIYAX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 490.39M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while GIYAX trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs NUGT Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 466.74M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while NUGT trades at $58.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FSMB Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 447.67M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FSMB trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DUST Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 446.44M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DUST trades at $33.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DUST's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SDS Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 417.72M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SDS trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDS's ROE of +7.91%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SDHY Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 403.65M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SDHY trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FNGO Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 403.39M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FNGO trades at $92.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DXQLX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 397.22M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DXQLX trades at $90.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SPXS Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 394.72M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SPXS trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FSHSX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 366.57M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FSHSX trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SEMRX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 354.75M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SEMRX trades at $9.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs MRRL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.51M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while MRRL trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FLGE Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.09M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FLGE trades at $809.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs MORL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.84M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while MORL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs UUP Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 279.32M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while UUP trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SMB Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 265.08M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SMB trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TZA Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 258.77M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TZA trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs UVXY Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 256.13M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while UVXY trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs QID Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 248.84M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while QID trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs GGLL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 236.07M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while GGLL trades at $31.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TENG Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.88M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TENG trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs STOT Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 225.55M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while STOT trades at $46.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs NAIL Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 221.59M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while NAIL trades at $54.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs JNUG Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 218.98M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while JNUG trades at $59.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FTSD Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 215.89M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FTSD trades at $90.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SDOW Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 210.49M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SDOW trades at $48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TWUSX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 209.79M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TWUSX trades at $9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs GUSH Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 208.68M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while GUSH trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs RWM Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 202.69M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while RWM trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs ERX Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 202.40M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while ERX trades at $52.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs USDU Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, USDU has a market cap of 198.00M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while USDU trades at $26.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USDU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USDU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to USDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs FUMB Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 197.52M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while FUMB trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs AMZU Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 195.27M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while AMZU trades at $34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 42.76. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs TMV Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 176.26M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while TMV trades at $41.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs EMNT Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 171.85M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while EMNT trades at $98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs CVSB Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 168.45M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while CVSB trades at $50.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs SPDN Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, SPDN has a market cap of 168.22M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while SPDN trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPDN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to SPDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs DFEN Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 166.74M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while DFEN trades at $36.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.
REML vs CLSE Comparison
REML plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, REML stands at 207.39M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 165.03M. Regarding current trading prices, REML is priced at $5.99, while CLSE trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
REML currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, REML's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, REML is more volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for REML.