Everest Re Group, Ltd.
Everest Re Group, Ltd. RE Peers
See (RE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Reinsurance Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE | $351.28 | +2.93% | 15.3B | 20.75 | $16.93 | +2.31% |
| EG | $345.96 | +0.62% | 14.7B | 17.46 | $19.81 | +2.31% |
| RGA | $206.16 | +2.40% | 13.6B | 17.43 | $11.83 | +1.73% |
| RZB | $24.46 | -0.24% | 13.2B | 4.01 | $6.09 | +1.73% |
| RNR-PF | $21.43 | +0.37% | 12.5B | -5.50 | -$3.90 | +0.64% |
| RNR | $246.82 | +1.61% | 12B | 7.83 | $31.54 | +0.64% |
| BNRE | $47.12 | -0.80% | 6.9B | 4.90 | $9.61 | +0.34% |
| BNRE-A | $50.01 | +1.38% | 6.9B | 5.20 | $9.61 | +0.34% |
| SPNT | $19.39 | +0.70% | 2.3B | 18.64 | $1.04 | N/A |
| SPNT-PB | $25.22 | -0.01% | 2.2B | -11.95 | -$2.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RE vs EG Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, EG has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while EG trades at $345.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EG's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to EG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RGA Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RGA has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RGA trades at $206.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RGA's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RZB Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RZB has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RZB trades at $24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RZB's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RZB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR-PF Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PF trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PF's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR trades at $246.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs BNRE Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BNRE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BNRE trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BNRE's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs BNRE-A Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BNRE-A has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BNRE-A trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BNRE-A's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNRE-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BNRE-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs SPNT Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SPNT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while SPNT trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPNT's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPNT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to SPNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs SPNT-PB Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SPNT-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while SPNT-PB trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPNT-PB's P/E ratio is -11.95. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPNT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to SPNT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs HG Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, HG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while HG trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas HG's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to HG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs BAMR Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BAMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BAMR trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BAMR's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR-PG Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PG has a market cap of 763.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PG trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PG's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR-PG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs GLRE Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GLRE has a market cap of 497.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while GLRE trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GLRE's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to GLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MHLD Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MHLD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MHLD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MHLD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MHLD's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs PRE-PJ Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PRE-PJ has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while PRE-PJ trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PRE-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRE-PJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to PRE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs OXBR Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OXBR has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while OXBR trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OXBR's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OXBR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to OXBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs OXBRW Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OXBRW has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while OXBRW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OXBRW's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OXBRW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to OXBRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RZA Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RZA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RZA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR-PE Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PE trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PE's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MH-PA Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PA trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MH-PA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MH-PD Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PD trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MH-PD's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to MH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MH-PC Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PC trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MH-PC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.