Everest Re Group, Ltd.
Everest Re Group, Ltd. (RE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Reinsurance Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE | $351.28 | +2.93% | 15.3B | 20.75 | $16.93 | +1.88% |
| RGA | $222.82 | +0.00% | 14.7B | 12.66 | $17.68 | +1.64% |
| EG | $342.93 | +0.00% | 14.4B | 9.06 | $37.80 | +2.34% |
| RNR | $300.00 | +0.00% | 13B | 5.34 | $56.02 | +0.54% |
| RZB | $25.18 | +0.00% | 12.7B | 4.13 | $6.09 | +5.71% |
| RNR-PF | $22.84 | +0.00% | 7.1B | -5.87 | -$3.90 | +0.54% |
| BNRE | $47.12 | -0.80% | 6.9B | 4.90 | $9.61 | +0.64% |
| BNRE-A | $50.01 | +1.38% | 6.9B | 5.20 | $9.61 | +0.64% |
| HG | $29.31 | +0.00% | 3.1B | 7.21 | $4.22 | N/A |
| SPNT | $22.01 | +0.00% | 2.5B | 13.07 | $1.64 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RE vs RGA Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RGA has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RGA trades at $222.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RGA's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RGA's competition here
RE vs EG Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, EG has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while EG trades at $342.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EG's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to EG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check EG's competition here
RE vs RNR Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RNR's competition here
RE vs RZB Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RZB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RZB trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RZB's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RZB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RZB's competition here
RE vs RNR-PF Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PF trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PF's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNR-PF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RNR-PF's competition here
RE vs BNRE Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BNRE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BNRE trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BNRE's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check BNRE's competition here
RE vs BNRE-A Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BNRE-A has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BNRE-A trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BNRE-A's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNRE-A's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BNRE-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check BNRE-A's competition here
RE vs HG Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, HG has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while HG trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas HG's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to HG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check HG's competition here
RE vs SPNT Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SPNT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while SPNT trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPNT's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPNT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to SPNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check SPNT's competition here
RE vs SPNT-PB Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SPNT-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while SPNT-PB trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPNT-PB's P/E ratio is -12.07. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPNT-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to SPNT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check SPNT-PB's competition here
RE vs BAMR Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BAMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BAMR trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BAMR's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BAMR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check BAMR's competition here
RE vs RNR-PG Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PG has a market cap of 756.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PG trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PG's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNR-PG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RNR-PG's competition here
RE vs GLRE Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GLRE has a market cap of 482.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while GLRE trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GLRE's P/E ratio is -353.75. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLRE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to GLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check GLRE's competition here
RE vs MHLD Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MHLD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MHLD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MHLD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHLD's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check MHLD's competition here
RE vs KG Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, KG has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while KG trades at $12.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas KG's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KG's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to KG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check KG's competition here
RE vs PRE-PJ Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PRE-PJ has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while PRE-PJ trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PRE-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRE-PJ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to PRE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check PRE-PJ's competition here
RE vs OXBR Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OXBR has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while OXBR trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OXBR's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OXBR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to OXBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check OXBR's competition here
RE vs OXBRW Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OXBRW has a market cap of 843.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while OXBRW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OXBRW's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OXBRW's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to OXBRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check OXBRW's competition here
RE vs RZA Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RZA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RZA's competition here
RE vs MH-PD Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PD trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MH-PD's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to MH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check MH-PD's competition here
RE vs MH-PC Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PC trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MH-PC's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check MH-PC's competition here
RE vs MH-PA Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PA trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MH-PA's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check MH-PA's competition here
RE vs RNR-PE Comparison February 2026
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PE trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PE's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RNR-PE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.Check RNR-PE's competition here