Everest Re Group, Ltd.
Everest Re Group, Ltd. RE Peers
See (RE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Reinsurance Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RE | $351.28 | +2.93% | 15.3B | 20.75 | $16.93 | +2.37% |
| EG | $337.48 | +1.03% | 14.4B | 17.04 | $19.80 | +2.37% |
| RGA | $197.79 | +0.87% | 13.1B | 16.69 | $11.85 | +1.80% |
| RZB | $24.78 | +0.04% | 13.1B | 4.07 | $6.09 | +1.80% |
| RNR-PF | $21.57 | +0.28% | 12.2B | -5.54 | -$3.90 | +0.66% |
| RNR | $240.90 | +2.15% | 11.7B | 7.64 | $31.55 | +0.66% |
| BNRE | $47.12 | -0.80% | 6.9B | 4.90 | $9.61 | +0.17% |
| BNRE-A | $50.01 | +1.38% | 6.9B | 5.20 | $9.61 | +0.17% |
| SPNT-PB | $25.39 | +0.16% | 2.4B | -12.03 | -$2.11 | N/A |
| SPNT | $19.80 | +2.17% | 2.3B | 19.04 | $1.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RE vs EG Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, EG has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while EG trades at $337.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas EG's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to EG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RGA Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RGA has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RGA trades at $197.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RGA's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RZB Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RZB has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RZB trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RZB's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RZB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR-PF Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PF has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PF trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PF's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR-PF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR trades at $240.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs BNRE Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BNRE has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BNRE trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BNRE's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs BNRE-A Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BNRE-A has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BNRE-A trades at $50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BNRE-A's P/E ratio is 5.20. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BNRE-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BNRE-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs SPNT-PB Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SPNT-PB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while SPNT-PB trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPNT-PB's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPNT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to SPNT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs SPNT Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SPNT has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while SPNT trades at $19.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas SPNT's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPNT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to SPNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs HG Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, HG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while HG trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas HG's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to HG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs BAMR Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BAMR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while BAMR trades at $33.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas BAMR's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BAMR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to BAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR-PG Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PG has a market cap of 777.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PG trades at $15.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PG's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR-PG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs GLRE Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GLRE has a market cap of 494.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while GLRE trades at $14.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas GLRE's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GLRE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to GLRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MHLD Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MHLD has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MHLD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MHLD's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MHLD's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs PRE-PJ Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PRE-PJ has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while PRE-PJ trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas PRE-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRE-PJ's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to PRE-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs OXBRW Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OXBRW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while OXBRW trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OXBRW's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OXBRW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to OXBRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs OXBR Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OXBR has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while OXBR trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas OXBR's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to OXBR's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to OXBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MH-PD Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PD trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MH-PD's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to MH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RNR-PE Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RNR-PE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RNR-PE trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RNR-PE's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RNR-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RNR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MH-PA Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PA trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MH-PA's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs MH-PC Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, MH-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while MH-PC trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas MH-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MH-PC's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is less volatile compared to MH-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.
RE vs RZA Comparison
RE plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RE stands at 15.3B. In comparison, RZA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RE is priced at $351.28, while RZA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RE currently has a P/E ratio of 20.75, whereas RZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RE's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RZA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RE is more volatile compared to RZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RE.