Redrow plc
Redrow plc (RDWWF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDWWF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Residential Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDWWF | $6.15 | -28.07% | 2B | 5.49 | $1.12 | N/A |
| SKHSY | $21.64 | +2.71% | 14B | 10.42 | $2.08 | +3.67% |
| SKHSF | $20.85 | -3.92% | 13.5B | 9.88 | $2.11 | +4.50% |
| BTDPF | $4.85 | +0.00% | 6.9B | 34.64 | $0.14 | +4.70% |
| SMFRF | $10.42 | +6.54% | 6B | 7.82 | $1.25 | +11.45% |
| PSMMF | $17.56 | +0.00% | 5.6B | 15.97 | $1.10 | +4.43% |
| PSMMY | $30.76 | +1.08% | 4.9B | 13.92 | $2.21 | +5.25% |
| BKGFF | $49.58 | +0.00% | 4.8B | 10.04 | $4.94 | +7.35% |
| TWODY | $13.49 | +0.30% | 4.8B | 42.31 | $0.32 | +9.02% |
| BKGFY | $9.65 | +1.05% | 4.8B | 9.73 | $0.99 | +5.68% |
Stock Comparison
RDWWF vs SKHSY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, SKHSY has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while SKHSY trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SKHSY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKHSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to SKHSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check SKHSY's competition here
RDWWF vs SKHSF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, SKHSF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while SKHSF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SKHSF's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKHSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to SKHSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check SKHSF's competition here
RDWWF vs BTDPF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BTDPF has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BTDPF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BTDPF's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTDPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to BTDPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check BTDPF's competition here
RDWWF vs SMFRF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, SMFRF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while SMFRF trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SMFRF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SMFRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and SMFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMFRF's competition here
RDWWF vs PSMMF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, PSMMF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while PSMMF trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas PSMMF's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSMMF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to PSMMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check PSMMF's competition here
RDWWF vs PSMMY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, PSMMY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while PSMMY trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas PSMMY's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSMMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to PSMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check PSMMY's competition here
RDWWF vs BKGFF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BKGFF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BKGFF trades at $49.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BKGFF's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKGFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to BKGFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check BKGFF's competition here
RDWWF vs TWODY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, TWODY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while TWODY trades at $13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas TWODY's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWODY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to TWODY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check TWODY's competition here
RDWWF vs BKGFY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BKGFY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BKGFY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BKGFY's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKGFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to BKGFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check BKGFY's competition here
RDWWF vs TWODF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, TWODF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while TWODF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas TWODF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWODF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and TWODF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TWODF's competition here
RDWWF vs ANTOF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, ANTOF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while ANTOF trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ANTOF's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to ANTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check ANTOF's competition here
RDWWF vs BLWYF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BLWYF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BLWYF trades at $32.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BLWYF's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLWYF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to BLWYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check BLWYF's competition here
RDWWF vs BLWYY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BLWYY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BLWYY trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BLWYY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLWYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and BLWYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BLWYY's competition here
RDWWF vs BTDPY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BTDPY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BTDPY trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BTDPY's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTDPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to BTDPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check BTDPY's competition here
RDWWF vs BVHMF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, BVHMF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while BVHMF trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BVHMF's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BVHMF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to BVHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check BVHMF's competition here
RDWWF vs CYRBY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, CYRBY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while CYRBY trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas CYRBY's P/E ratio is 5.42. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CYRBY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to CYRBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check CYRBY's competition here
RDWWF vs NNRHF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, NNRHF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while NNRHF trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NNRHF's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNRHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to NNRHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check NNRHF's competition here
RDWWF vs GLVHF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, GLVHF has a market cap of 914.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while GLVHF trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas GLVHF's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GLVHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to GLVHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check GLVHF's competition here
RDWWF vs HOVVB Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, HOVVB has a market cap of 817.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while HOVVB trades at $105.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas HOVVB's P/E ratio is 3.72. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HOVVB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to HOVVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check HOVVB's competition here
RDWWF vs CNRFF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, CNRFF has a market cap of 207.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while CNRFF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas CNRFF's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNRFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to CNRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check CNRFF's competition here
RDWWF vs ASNXF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, ASNXF has a market cap of 118.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while ASNXF trades at $12.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ASNXF's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASNXF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and ASNXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASNXF's competition here
RDWWF vs NOBH Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, NOBH has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while NOBH trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NOBH's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOBH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and NOBH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOBH's competition here
RDWWF vs RKGXF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, RKGXF has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while RKGXF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RKGXF's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RKGXF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to RKGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check RKGXF's competition here
RDWWF vs GFASY Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, GFASY has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while GFASY trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas GFASY's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFASY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to GFASY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check GFASY's competition here
RDWWF vs STHI Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, STHI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while STHI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas STHI's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STHI's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and STHI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STHI's competition here
RDWWF vs AVOT Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, AVOT has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while AVOT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AVOT's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVOT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and AVOT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVOT's competition here
RDWWF vs DREM Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, DREM has a market cap of 964.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while DREM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas DREM's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to DREM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check DREM's competition here
RDWWF vs DHHXF Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, DHHXF has a market cap of 294.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while DHHXF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas DHHXF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DHHXF's ROE of -2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and DHHXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DHHXF's competition here
RDWWF vs RNVT Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, RNVT has a market cap of 78.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while RNVT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RNVT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RNVT's ROE of -3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF is less volatile compared to RNVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDWWF.Check RNVT's competition here
RDWWF vs EGBB Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, EGBB has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while EGBB trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas EGBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EGBB's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and EGBB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EGBB's competition here
RDWWF vs ASCK Comparison August 2025
RDWWF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDWWF stands at 2B. In comparison, ASCK has a market cap of 8.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RDWWF is priced at $6.15, while ASCK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDWWF currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ASCK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RDWWF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASCK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDWWF and ASCK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASCK's competition here