Sirius XM Holdings Inc.

RDO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDO.DE stands at 17.05B. In comparison, 639.DE has a market cap of 113.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RDO.DE is priced at $4.44, while 639.DE trades at $564.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 639.DE's P/E ratio is 100.34. In terms of profitability, RDO.DE's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 639.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDO.DE is more volatile compared to 639.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDO.DE.

RDO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDO.DE stands at 17.05B. In comparison, ERT.DE has a market cap of 34.94B. Regarding current trading prices, RDO.DE is priced at $4.44, while ERT.DE trades at $134.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERT.DE's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, RDO.DE's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ERT.DE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDO.DE is more volatile compared to ERT.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDO.DE.

RDO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDO.DE stands at 17.05B. In comparison, 3LN.DE has a market cap of 29.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RDO.DE is priced at $4.44, while 3LN.DE trades at $144.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas 3LN.DE's P/E ratio is -475.08. In terms of profitability, RDO.DE's ROE is -0.22%, compared to 3LN.DE's ROE of +11.83%. Regarding short-term risk, RDO.DE is more volatile compared to 3LN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDO.DE.

RDO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDO.DE stands at 17.05B. In comparison, WBAH.DE has a market cap of 684.76M. Regarding current trading prices, RDO.DE is priced at $4.44, while WBAH.DE trades at $28.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WBAH.DE's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, RDO.DE's ROE is -0.22%, compared to WBAH.DE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDO.DE is more volatile compared to WBAH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDO.DE.

RDO.DE plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RDO.DE stands at 17.05B. In comparison, EMH.DE has a market cap of 19.41M. Regarding current trading prices, RDO.DE is priced at $4.44, while EMH.DE trades at $2.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RDO.DE currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMH.DE's P/E ratio is -72.25. In terms of profitability, RDO.DE's ROE is -0.22%, compared to EMH.DE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDO.DE is more volatile compared to EMH.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDO.DE.