Redefy Corporation
Redefy Corporation RDCO Peers
See (RDCO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDCO | $0.03 | -86.84% | 478.3K | -3.03 | -$0.01 | N/A |
RNHEF | $0.05 | +12400.02% | 93.9B | -2.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
VONOY | $16.36 | -4.47% | 26.9B | -32.07 | -$0.51 | +3.59% |
CLNXF | $37.90 | +1.87% | 26.7B | -473.75 | -$0.08 | +0.19% |
VNNVF | $31.58 | -3.45% | 26B | -30.96 | -$1.02 | +3.51% |
VTAGY | $20.36 | N/A | 20.6B | 42.42 | $0.48 | +3.54% |
SURDF | $41.20 | +17.59% | 19.4B | 14.51 | $2.84 | +1.15% |
VTWRF | $33.00 | -17.72% | 16.7B | 33.00 | $1.00 | +3.97% |
SURYY | $13.05 | -23.24% | 12.3B | 9.19 | $1.42 | N/A |
SWPFF | $2.05 | +28.93% | 11.8B | -102.50 | -$0.02 | +6.89% |
Stock Comparison
RDCO vs RNHEF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, RNHEF has a market cap of 93.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while RNHEF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas RNHEF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to RNHEF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is less volatile compared to RNHEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs VONOY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, VONOY has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while VONOY trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas VONOY's P/E ratio is -32.07. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to VONOY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to VONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CLNXF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CLNXF trades at $37.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -473.75. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs VNNVF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, VNNVF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while VNNVF trades at $31.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas VNNVF's P/E ratio is -30.96. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to VNNVF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to VNNVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs VTAGY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, VTAGY has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while VTAGY trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas VTAGY's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to VTAGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to VTAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SURDF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SURDF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SURDF trades at $41.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SURDF's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SURDF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SURDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs VTWRF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, VTWRF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while VTWRF trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas VTWRF's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to VTWRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to VTWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SURYY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SURYY has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SURYY trades at $13.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SURYY's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SURYY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SURYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SWPFF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SWPFF has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SWPFF trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SWPFF's P/E ratio is -102.50. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SWPFF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SWPFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs IFSUF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, IFSUF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while IFSUF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas IFSUF's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to IFSUF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to IFSUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CLILF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CLILF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CLILF trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CLILF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CLILF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CLILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs AZRGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, AZRGF has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while AZRGF trades at $69.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas AZRGF's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to AZRGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to AZRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SWPRF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SWPRF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SWPRF trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SWPRF's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SWPRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SWPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs WRFRF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, WRFRF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while WRFRF trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas WRFRF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to WRFRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to WRFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs HULCF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, HULCF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while HULCF trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas HULCF's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to HULCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to HULCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs LEGIF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, LEGIF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while LEGIF trades at $87.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas LEGIF's P/E ratio is 33.29. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to LEGIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to LEGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs NXDCF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, NXDCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while NXDCF trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas NXDCF's P/E ratio is -143.71. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to NXDCF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to NXDCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ESRCF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ESRCF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ESRCF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ESRCF's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ESRCF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ESRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SCOTF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SCOTF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SCOTF trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SCOTF's P/E ratio is 32.39. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SCOTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SCOTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs NMEHF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, NMEHF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while NMEHF trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas NMEHF's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to NMEHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to NMEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs FBGGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, FBGGF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while FBGGF trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas FBGGF's P/E ratio is 136.64. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to FBGGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to FBGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs HLPPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, HLPPF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while HLPPF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas HLPPF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to HLPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to HLPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SSSAF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SSSAF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SSSAF trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SSSAF's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SSSAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SSSAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CWSRF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CWSRF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CWSRF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CWSRF's P/E ratio is 90.62. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CWSRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CWSRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs HLPPY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, HLPPY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while HLPPY trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas HLPPY's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to HLPPY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to HLPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs TYTMF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, TYTMF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while TYTMF trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TYTMF's P/E ratio is 7.89. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to TYTMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to TYTMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs AANNF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, AANNF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while AANNF trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas AANNF's P/E ratio is 49.00. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to AANNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to AANNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SSHLY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SSHLY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SSHLY trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SSHLY's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SSHLY's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SSHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs FBGBY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, FBGBY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while FBGBY trades at $18.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas FBGBY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to FBGBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to FBGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs IWGFF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, IWGFF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while IWGFF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas IWGFF's P/E ratio is 130.03. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to IWGFF's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to IWGFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs VGPBF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, VGPBF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while VGPBF trades at $94.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas VGPBF's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to VGPBF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to VGPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CGSHY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CGSHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CGSHY trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CGSHY's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CGSHY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CGSHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SRRLF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SRRLF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SRRLF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SRRLF's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SRRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs TAGOF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, TAGOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while TAGOF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TAGOF's P/E ratio is 19.70. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to TAGOF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to TAGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs EVGPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, EVGPF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while EVGPF trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas EVGPF's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to EVGPF's ROE of +4.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to EVGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CNPPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CNPPF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CNPPF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CNPPF's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CNPPF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CNPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CTRGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CTRGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CTRGF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CTRGF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CTRGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CTRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs GRGTF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, GRGTF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while GRGTF trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas GRGTF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to GRGTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to GRGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs TAGYY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, TAGYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while TAGYY trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TAGYY's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to TAGYY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to TAGYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs HYSNF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, HYSNF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while HYSNF trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas HYSNF's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to HYSNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to HYSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs GRNNF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, GRNNF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while GRNNF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas GRNNF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to GRNNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to GRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs WIHLY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, WIHLY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while WIHLY trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas WIHLY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to WIHLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to WIHLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs DUSCF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, DUSCF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while DUSCF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas DUSCF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to DUSCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to DUSCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs GRDDY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, GRDDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while GRDDY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas GRDDY's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to GRDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to GRDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ASGTF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ASGTF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ASGTF trades at $39.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ASGTF's P/E ratio is 496.42. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ASGTF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ASGTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SVLPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SVLPF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SVLPF trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SVLPF's P/E ratio is 25.06. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SVLPF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SVLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs LGMMY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, LGMMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while LGMMY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas LGMMY's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to LGMMY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to LGMMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ENTOF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ENTOF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ENTOF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ENTOF's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ENTOF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ENTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ICHIF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ICHIF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ICHIF trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ICHIF's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ICHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ICHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MEQYF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MEQYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MEQYF trades at $137.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MEQYF's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MEQYF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MEQYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SVAUF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SVAUF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SVAUF trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SVAUF's P/E ratio is -43.57. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SVAUF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SVAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs VIBVY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, VIBVY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while VIBVY trades at $33.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas VIBVY's P/E ratio is 14.63. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to VIBVY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to VIBVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ACNDF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ACNDF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ACNDF trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ACNDF's P/E ratio is 3.10. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ACNDF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ACNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs GRMHF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, GRMHF has a market cap of 985.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while GRMHF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas GRMHF's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to GRMHF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to GRMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs RLHPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, RLHPF has a market cap of 962.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while RLHPF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas RLHPF's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to RLHPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to RLHPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs HYSNY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, HYSNY has a market cap of 834.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while HYSNY trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas HYSNY's P/E ratio is 325.00. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to HYSNY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to HYSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MMHTF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MMHTF has a market cap of 780.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MMHTF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MMHTF's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MMHTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MMHTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs PTLKF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, PTLKF has a market cap of 666.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while PTLKF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas PTLKF's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to PTLKF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to PTLKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SSHLF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SSHLF has a market cap of 513.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SSHLF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SSHLF's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SSHLF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SSHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs GBCEY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, GBCEY has a market cap of 488.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while GBCEY trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas GBCEY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to GBCEY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to GBCEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs KWLGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, KWLGF has a market cap of 470.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while KWLGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas KWLGF's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to KWLGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to KWLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs JPPSF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, JPPSF has a market cap of 447.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while JPPSF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas JPPSF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to JPPSF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to JPPSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SHMSF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SHMSF has a market cap of 441.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SHMSF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SHMSF's P/E ratio is -8.99. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SHMSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SHMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs AGGHF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, AGGHF has a market cap of 363.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while AGGHF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas AGGHF's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to AGGHF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is less volatile compared to AGGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs LSLPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, LSLPF has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while LSLPF trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas LSLPF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to LSLPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to LSLPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SOHOF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SOHOF has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SOHOF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SOHOF's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SOHOF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SOHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MDTWF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MDTWF has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MDTWF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MDTWF's P/E ratio is 7.41. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MDTWF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MDTWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs FXTGY Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, FXTGY has a market cap of 314.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while FXTGY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas FXTGY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to FXTGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to FXTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MDPCF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MDPCF has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MDPCF trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MDPCF's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MDPCF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MDPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs NTPIF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, NTPIF has a market cap of 239M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while NTPIF trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas NTPIF's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to NTPIF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to NTPIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs SDWHF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, SDWHF has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while SDWHF trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas SDWHF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to SDWHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to SDWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs FCRIF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, FCRIF has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while FCRIF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas FCRIF's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to FCRIF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to FCRIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs TPRP Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, TPRP has a market cap of 153M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while TPRP trades at $25,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TPRP's P/E ratio is 463.64. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to TPRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to TPRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MRFGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MRFGF has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MRFGF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MRFGF's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MRFGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MRFGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs DLMI Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, DLMI has a market cap of 132M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while DLMI trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas DLMI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to DLMI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to DLMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs BREUF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, BREUF has a market cap of 101.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while BREUF trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas BREUF's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to BREUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to BREUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs AZLCZ Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, AZLCZ has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while AZLCZ trades at $1,045.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas AZLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to AZLCZ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to AZLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs OJOC Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, OJOC has a market cap of 93.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while OJOC trades at $335.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas OJOC's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to OJOC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to OJOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs BVERS Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, BVERS has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while BVERS trades at $3,400.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas BVERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to BVERS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to BVERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MHIVF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MHIVF has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MHIVF trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MHIVF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MHIVF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MHIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CRSS Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CRSS has a market cap of 74.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CRSS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CRSS's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CRSS's ROE of +18.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CRSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs CPTP Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, CPTP has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while CPTP trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas CPTP's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to CPTP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to CPTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs PKTEF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, PKTEF has a market cap of 58M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while PKTEF trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas PKTEF's P/E ratio is -26.40. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to PKTEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to PKTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs TNHDF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, TNHDF has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while TNHDF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TNHDF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to TNHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to TNHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ADPPF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ADPPF has a market cap of 41.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ADPPF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ADPPF's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ADPPF's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ADPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MDICF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MDICF has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MDICF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MDICF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MDICF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MDICF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs PCPDF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, PCPDF has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while PCPDF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas PCPDF's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to PCPDF's ROE of +4.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to PCPDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs LGYSF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, LGYSF has a market cap of 27.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while LGYSF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas LGYSF's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to LGYSF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to LGYSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ABCP Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ABCP has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ABCP trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ABCP's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ABCP's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ABCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MNGGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MNGGF has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MNGGF trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MNGGF's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MNGGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs DIVVZ Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, DIVVZ has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while DIVVZ trades at $404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas DIVVZ's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to DIVVZ's ROE of +15.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to DIVVZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs BCKMF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, BCKMF has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while BCKMF trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas BCKMF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to BCKMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to BCKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs HHBT Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, HHBT has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while HHBT trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas HHBT's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to HHBT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is less volatile compared to HHBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ATTGF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ATTGF has a market cap of 15.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ATTGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ATTGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ATTGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is less volatile compared to ATTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ASPZ Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ASPZ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ASPZ trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ASPZ's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ASPZ's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ASPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs TRPTF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, TRPTF has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while TRPTF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas TRPTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to TRPTF's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to TRPTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs MGAG Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, MGAG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while MGAG trades at $300.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas MGAG's P/E ratio is 48.08. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to MGAG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to MGAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs WETH Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while WETH trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.
RDCO vs ADHLF Comparison
RDCO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDCO stands at 478.3K. In comparison, ADHLF has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDCO is priced at $0.03, while ADHLF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDCO currently has a P/E ratio of -3.03, whereas ADHLF's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RDCO's ROE is -9.71%, compared to ADHLF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDCO is more volatile compared to ADHLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDCO.