Redbubble Limited
Redbubble Limited (RDBBY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDBBY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDBBY | $4.48 | +63.50% | 129.2M | -2.17 | -$2.06 | N/A |
| BABAF | $18.68 | +0.00% | 397.6B | 22.15 | $0.94 | +1.20% |
| MPNGF | $10.30 | +1.98% | 67.5B | 15.76 | $0.68 | N/A |
| MPNGY | $20.89 | +0.00% | 63.3B | 15.41 | $1.36 | N/A |
| NCLTY | $10.62 | +0.00% | 59.4B | 22.85 | $0.46 | +0.89% |
| ANCTF | $61.37 | +0.00% | 57.9B | 22.28 | $2.75 | +0.94% |
| JDCMF | $14.15 | +0.00% | 41.4B | 7.95 | $1.78 | +3.53% |
| XXLLY | $739.00 | +0.00% | 23.4B | -100.00 | -$7.39 | +0.12% |
| YAHOY | $4.85 | +0.00% | 16.7B | 12.63 | $0.38 | +2.04% |
| HKTGF | $287.34 | +3.73% | 12.6B | 13.83 | $20.78 | +1.69% |
Stock Comparison
RDBBY vs BABAF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BABAF has a market cap of 397.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BABAF trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BABAF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BABAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to BABAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BABAF's competition here
RDBBY vs MPNGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MPNGF has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MPNGF trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MPNGF's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MPNGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MPNGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MPNGF's competition here
RDBBY vs MPNGY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MPNGY has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MPNGY trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MPNGY's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MPNGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MPNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MPNGY's competition here
RDBBY vs NCLTY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, NCLTY has a market cap of 59.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while NCLTY trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NCLTY's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NCLTY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to NCLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check NCLTY's competition here
RDBBY vs ANCTF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ANCTF has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ANCTF trades at $61.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ANCTF's P/E ratio is 22.28. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ANCTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ANCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ANCTF's competition here
RDBBY vs JDCMF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JDCMF has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JDCMF trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JDCMF's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JDCMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JDCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JDCMF's competition here
RDBBY vs XXLLY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, XXLLY has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while XXLLY trades at $739.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas XXLLY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to XXLLY's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to XXLLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check XXLLY's competition here
RDBBY vs YAHOY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, YAHOY has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while YAHOY trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas YAHOY's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YAHOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to YAHOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check YAHOY's competition here
RDBBY vs HKTGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HKTGF has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HKTGF trades at $287.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HKTGF's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HKTGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HKTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HKTGF's competition here
RDBBY vs NCLTF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, NCLTF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while NCLTF trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NCLTF's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NCLTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to NCLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check NCLTF's competition here
RDBBY vs RKUNF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, RKUNF has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while RKUNF trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas RKUNF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RKUNF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to RKUNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check RKUNF's competition here
RDBBY vs RKUNY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, RKUNY has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while RKUNY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas RKUNY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RKUNY's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to RKUNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check RKUNY's competition here
RDBBY vs MTTRY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MTTRY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MTTRY trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MTTRY's P/E ratio is -47.50. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MTTRY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MTTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MTTRY's competition here
RDBBY vs DUFRY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DUFRY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DUFRY trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DUFRY's P/E ratio is 66.12. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DUFRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DUFRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DUFRY's competition here
RDBBY vs ALEGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ALEGF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ALEGF trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ALEGF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ALEGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ALEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ALEGF's competition here
RDBBY vs DFRYF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DFRYF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DFRYF trades at $61.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DFRYF's P/E ratio is 59.92. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DFRYF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DFRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DFRYF's competition here
RDBBY vs SNROF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SNROF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SNROF trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SNROF's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SNROF's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to SNROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SNROF's competition here
RDBBY vs ELPQF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ELPQF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ELPQF trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ELPQF's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ELPQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ELPQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ELPQF's competition here
RDBBY vs ZLDSF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ZLDSF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ZLDSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ZLDSF's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZLDSF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ZLDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ZLDSF's competition here
RDBBY vs DLVHF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DLVHF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DLVHF trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DLVHF's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DLVHF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DLVHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DLVHF's competition here
RDBBY vs PETRY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, PETRY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while PETRY trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas PETRY's P/E ratio is 3.46. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PETRY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to PETRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check PETRY's competition here
RDBBY vs SATLF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SATLF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SATLF trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SATLF's P/E ratio is 24.85. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SATLF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to SATLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SATLF's competition here
RDBBY vs CDNAF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, CDNAF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while CDNAF trades at $133.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CDNAF's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CDNAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to CDNAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check CDNAF's competition here
RDBBY vs MONOF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MONOF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MONOF trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MONOF's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MONOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MONOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MONOF's competition here
RDBBY vs DELHY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DELHY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DELHY trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DELHY's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DELHY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DELHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DELHY's competition here
RDBBY vs MONOY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MONOY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MONOY trades at $13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MONOY's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MONOY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MONOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MONOY's competition here
RDBBY vs JBHIF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JBHIF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JBHIF trades at $60.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JBHIF's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JBHIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JBHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JBHIF's competition here
RDBBY vs SRTTY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SRTTY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SRTTY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SRTTY's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SRTTY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to SRTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SRTTY's competition here
RDBBY vs ZLNDY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ZLNDY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ZLNDY trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ZLNDY's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZLNDY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ZLNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ZLNDY's competition here
RDBBY vs CDNTF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, CDNTF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while CDNTF trades at $157.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CDNTF's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CDNTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to CDNTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check CDNTF's competition here
RDBBY vs JDSPY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JDSPY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JDSPY trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JDSPY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JDSPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JDSPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JDSPY's competition here
RDBBY vs JDDSF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JDDSF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JDDSF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JDDSF's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JDDSF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JDDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JDDSF's competition here
RDBBY vs TKAYF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, TKAYF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while TKAYF trades at $24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas TKAYF's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TKAYF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to TKAYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check TKAYF's competition here
RDBBY vs JTKWY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JTKWY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JTKWY trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JTKWY's P/E ratio is -9.91. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JTKWY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JTKWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JTKWY's competition here
RDBBY vs MCARY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MCARY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MCARY trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MCARY's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MCARY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MCARY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MCARY's competition here
RDBBY vs JUMSY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JUMSY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JUMSY trades at $29.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JUMSY's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JUMSY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JUMSY's competition here
RDBBY vs SDIPF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SDIPF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SDIPF trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SDIPF's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SDIPF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to SDIPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SDIPF's competition here
RDBBY vs ZLPSF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ZLPSF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ZLPSF trades at $536.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ZLPSF's P/E ratio is -623.70. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZLPSF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to ZLPSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ZLPSF's competition here
RDBBY vs JUMSF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, JUMSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while JUMSF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas JUMSF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JUMSF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to JUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check JUMSF's competition here
RDBBY vs DROOF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DROOF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DROOF trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DROOF's P/E ratio is -244.25. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DROOF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DROOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DROOF's competition here
RDBBY vs ZOPLY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ZOPLY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ZOPLY trades at $122.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ZOPLY's P/E ratio is -210.38. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZOPLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ZOPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ZOPLY's competition here
RDBBY vs HNORY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HNORY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HNORY trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HNORY's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HNORY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HNORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HNORY's competition here
RDBBY vs DNLMY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DNLMY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DNLMY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DNLMY's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DNLMY's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DNLMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DNLMY's competition here
RDBBY vs MTAGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MTAGF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MTAGF trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MTAGF's P/E ratio is 557.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MTAGF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MTAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MTAGF's competition here
RDBBY vs MRCIF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MRCIF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MRCIF trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MRCIF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MRCIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MRCIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MRCIF's competition here
RDBBY vs DSITF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DSITF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DSITF trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DSITF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DSITF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to DSITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DSITF's competition here
RDBBY vs YMDAF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, YMDAF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while YMDAF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas YMDAF's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YMDAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to YMDAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check YMDAF's competition here
RDBBY vs GPGNF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, GPGNF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while GPGNF trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GPGNF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GPGNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to GPGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check GPGNF's competition here
RDBBY vs MGLUY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MGLUY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MGLUY trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MGLUY's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MGLUY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to MGLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MGLUY's competition here
RDBBY vs BTOOY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BTOOY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BTOOY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BTOOY's P/E ratio is -23.63. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BTOOY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to BTOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BTOOY's competition here
RDBBY vs FHNGY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, FHNGY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while FHNGY trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas FHNGY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FHNGY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to FHNGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check FHNGY's competition here
RDBBY vs MIZUF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MIZUF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MIZUF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MIZUF's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MIZUF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MIZUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MIZUF's competition here
RDBBY vs LEFUF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, LEFUF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while LEFUF trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LEFUF's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LEFUF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to LEFUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check LEFUF's competition here
RDBBY vs PAHGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, PAHGF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while PAHGF trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas PAHGF's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PAHGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to PAHGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check PAHGF's competition here
RDBBY vs WHTPF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, WHTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while WHTPF trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas WHTPF's P/E ratio is -29.82. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WHTPF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to WHTPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check WHTPF's competition here
RDBBY vs MKRMF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MKRMF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MKRMF trades at $235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MKRMF's P/E ratio is -136.63. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MKRMF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MKRMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MKRMF's competition here
RDBBY vs GRUPF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, GRUPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while GRUPF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GRUPF's P/E ratio is 15.90. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GRUPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to GRUPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check GRUPF's competition here
RDBBY vs FNXTF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, FNXTF has a market cap of 995.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while FNXTF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas FNXTF's P/E ratio is 13.70. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FNXTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to FNXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check FNXTF's competition here
RDBBY vs SCCAF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SCCAF has a market cap of 875M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SCCAF trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SCCAF's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SCCAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to SCCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SCCAF's competition here
RDBBY vs DTCB Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, DTCB has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while DTCB trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas DTCB's P/E ratio is -6.34. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DTCB's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to DTCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check DTCB's competition here
RDBBY vs HWGC Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HWGC has a market cap of 596.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HWGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HWGC's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HWGC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HWGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HWGC's competition here
RDBBY vs THGPF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, THGPF has a market cap of 594.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while THGPF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas THGPF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to THGPF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to THGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check THGPF's competition here
RDBBY vs ASOMF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ASOMF has a market cap of 475.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ASOMF trades at $3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ASOMF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASOMF's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ASOMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ASOMF's competition here
RDBBY vs BHOOY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BHOOY has a market cap of 466.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BHOOY trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BHOOY's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BHOOY's ROE of -102.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to BHOOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BHOOY's competition here
RDBBY vs ASOMY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ASOMY has a market cap of 451.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ASOMY trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ASOMY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASOMY's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ASOMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ASOMY's competition here
RDBBY vs KTYCF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, KTYCF has a market cap of 434.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while KTYCF trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas KTYCF's P/E ratio is 112.75. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KTYCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to KTYCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check KTYCF's competition here
RDBBY vs HLFDY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HLFDY has a market cap of 420.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HLFDY trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HLFDY's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HLFDY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HLFDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HLFDY's competition here
RDBBY vs BHHOF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BHHOF has a market cap of 415.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BHHOF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BHHOF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BHHOF's ROE of -100.84%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to BHHOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BHHOF's competition here
RDBBY vs HLFDF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HLFDF has a market cap of 403.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HLFDF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HLFDF's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HLFDF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HLFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HLFDF's competition here
RDBBY vs SSILF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SSILF has a market cap of 370.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SSILF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SSILF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SSILF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to SSILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SSILF's competition here
RDBBY vs THGHY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, THGHY has a market cap of 356.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while THGHY trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas THGHY's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to THGHY's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to THGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check THGHY's competition here
RDBBY vs CRFCF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, CRFCF has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while CRFCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CRFCF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CRFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to CRFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check CRFCF's competition here
RDBBY vs NBRNF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, NBRNF has a market cap of 251.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while NBRNF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NBRNF's P/E ratio is 53.84. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NBRNF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to NBRNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check NBRNF's competition here
RDBBY vs HMAGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HMAGF has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HMAGF trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HMAGF's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HMAGF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HMAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HMAGF's competition here
RDBBY vs SAXJY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SAXJY has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SAXJY trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SAXJY's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SAXJY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to SAXJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check SAXJY's competition here
RDBBY vs KGGNF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, KGGNF has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while KGGNF trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas KGGNF's P/E ratio is -7.71. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KGGNF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to KGGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check KGGNF's competition here
RDBBY vs BJURF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BJURF has a market cap of 193M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BJURF trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BJURF's P/E ratio is -9.97. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BJURF's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to BJURF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BJURF's competition here
RDBBY vs BNNNF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BNNNF has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BNNNF trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BNNNF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BNNNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to BNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BNNNF's competition here
RDBBY vs WCRS Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, WCRS has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while WCRS trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas WCRS's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WCRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to WCRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check WCRS's competition here
RDBBY vs HKTVY Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, HKTVY has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while HKTVY trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas HKTVY's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HKTVY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to HKTVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check HKTVY's competition here
RDBBY vs AHAHF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, AHAHF has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while AHAHF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas AHAHF's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AHAHF's ROE of +5.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is less volatile compared to AHAHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check AHAHF's competition here
RDBBY vs YUMSF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, YUMSF has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while YUMSF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas YUMSF's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to YUMSF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to YUMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check YUMSF's competition here
RDBBY vs IGDFF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, IGDFF has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while IGDFF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas IGDFF's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IGDFF's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to IGDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check IGDFF's competition here
RDBBY vs RDBBF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, RDBBF has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while RDBBF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas RDBBF's P/E ratio is -8.33. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RDBBF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to RDBBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check RDBBF's competition here
RDBBY vs MHCRF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, MHCRF has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while MHCRF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MHCRF's P/E ratio is 3.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MHCRF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to MHCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check MHCRF's competition here
RDBBY vs SPGZ Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, SPGZ has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while SPGZ trades at $21,500.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SPGZ's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SPGZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RDBBY has daily volatility of 4.33 and SPGZ has daily volatility of N/A.Check SPGZ's competition here
RDBBY vs ADBGF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ADBGF has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ADBGF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ADBGF's P/E ratio is 65.00. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ADBGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ADBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ADBGF's competition here
RDBBY vs ACEHF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ACEHF has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ACEHF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ACEHF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ACEHF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ACEHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ACEHF's competition here
RDBBY vs PXHI Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, PXHI has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while PXHI trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas PXHI's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PXHI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to PXHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check PXHI's competition here
RDBBY vs IDGBF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, IDGBF has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while IDGBF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas IDGBF's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IDGBF's ROE of -12.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to IDGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check IDGBF's competition here
RDBBY vs ARTZF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, ARTZF has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while ARTZF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ARTZF's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ARTZF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to ARTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check ARTZF's competition here
RDBBY vs GLHD Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, GLHD has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while GLHD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GLHD's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GLHD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to GLHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check GLHD's competition here
RDBBY vs CNVAF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, CNVAF has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while CNVAF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CNVAF's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CNVAF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to CNVAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check CNVAF's competition here
RDBBY vs TWRKF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, TWRKF has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while TWRKF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas TWRKF's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TWRKF's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to TWRKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check TWRKF's competition here
RDBBY vs FDIT Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, FDIT has a market cap of 30.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while FDIT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas FDIT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FDIT's ROE of +6.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to FDIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check FDIT's competition here
RDBBY vs GMELF Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, GMELF has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while GMELF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GMELF's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GMELF's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to GMELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check GMELF's competition here
RDBBY vs RLAB Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, RLAB has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while RLAB trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas RLAB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to RLAB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to RLAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check RLAB's competition here
RDBBY vs BWTL Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, BWTL has a market cap of 14.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while BWTL trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BWTL's P/E ratio is -21.61. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BWTL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to BWTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check BWTL's competition here
RDBBY vs PSPX Comparison February 2026
RDBBY plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDBBY stands at 129.2M. In comparison, PSPX has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RDBBY is priced at $4.48, while PSPX trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDBBY currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas PSPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDBBY's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PSPX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDBBY is more volatile compared to PSPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDBBY.Check PSPX's competition here