Telvantis Inc.
Telvantis Inc. (RDAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RDAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDAR | $0.00 | +6.25% | 10.8M | N/A | -$1.88 | N/A |
| DTEGY | $36.56 | +1.44% | 179B | 13.05 | $2.80 | +2.76% |
| DTEGF | $36.46 | +1.64% | 178.7B | 12.66 | $2.88 | +2.81% |
| SFTBF | $80.17 | +6.31% | 115.3B | 15.27 | $5.25 | +0.40% |
| SFTBY | $39.65 | +4.65% | 113.3B | 15.23 | $2.61 | +0.26% |
| NTTYY | $26.04 | -0.72% | 86.2B | 13.03 | $2.00 | +2.41% |
| NPPXF | $1.04 | -8.77% | 77.3B | 11.68 | $0.08 | +3.81% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| SFBQF | $1.52 | +4.11% | 71.4B | 21.43 | $0.07 | +4.01% |
| AMOVF | $1.00 | +0.00% | 66.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RDAR vs DTEGY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while DTEGY trades at $36.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 13.05. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check DTEGY's competition here
RDAR vs DTEGF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 178.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while DTEGF trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check DTEGF's competition here
RDAR vs SFTBF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 115.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SFTBF trades at $80.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SFTBF's competition here
RDAR vs SFTBY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SFTBY trades at $39.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SFTBY's competition here
RDAR vs NTTYY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while NTTYY trades at $26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check NTTYY's competition here
RDAR vs NPPXF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while NPPXF trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check NPPXF's competition here
RDAR vs AMXVF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AMXVF's competition here
RDAR vs SFBQF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SFBQF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 21.43. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SFBQF's competition here
RDAR vs AMOVF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to AMOVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AMOVF's competition here
RDAR vs KDDIY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while KDDIY trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.59. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check KDDIY's competition here
RDAR vs KDDIF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while KDDIF trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check KDDIF's competition here
RDAR vs SGAPY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SGAPY trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SGAPY's competition here
RDAR vs SNGNF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SNGNF trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SNGNF's competition here
RDAR vs CLLNY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while CLLNY trades at $17.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is 81.73. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check CLLNY's competition here
RDAR vs FNCTF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while FNCTF trades at $15.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 40.86. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check FNCTF's competition here
RDAR vs SCMWY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SCMWY trades at $71.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 20.88. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SCMWY's competition here
RDAR vs TLGPY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLGPY trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLGPY's competition here
RDAR vs TTRAF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TTRAF trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 35.11. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TTRAF's competition here
RDAR vs TEFOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TEFOF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TEFOF's competition here
RDAR vs SWZCF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SWZCF trades at $600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SWZCF's competition here
RDAR vs AVIFY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AVIFY trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 25.41. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AVIFY's competition here
RDAR vs TOWTF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TOWTF has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TOWTF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOWTF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TOWTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to TOWTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TOWTF's competition here
RDAR vs VODPF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while VODPF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check VODPF's competition here
RDAR vs BTGOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BTGOF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BTGOF's competition here
RDAR vs AVIKF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AVIKF trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to AVIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AVIKF's competition here
RDAR vs CTOWY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while CTOWY trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to CTOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check CTOWY's competition here
RDAR vs CHWRF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while CHWRF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check CHWRF's competition here
RDAR vs TELNF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TELNF trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 22.15. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TELNF's competition here
RDAR vs TELNY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TELNY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TELNY's competition here
RDAR vs RCIAF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while RCIAF trades at $36.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check RCIAF's competition here
RDAR vs KKPNY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while KKPNY trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check KKPNY's competition here
RDAR vs TLKMF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLKMF trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLKMF's competition here
RDAR vs KKPNF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while KKPNF trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check KKPNF's competition here
RDAR vs AVIVF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AVIVF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AVIVF's competition here
RDAR vs ELMUY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while ELMUY trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check ELMUY's competition here
RDAR vs MTNOY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while MTNOY trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is -29.71. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check MTNOY's competition here
RDAR vs VDMCY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while VDMCY trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check VDMCY's competition here
RDAR vs SJRWF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SJRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SJRWF's competition here
RDAR vs HLTOY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while HLTOY trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check HLTOY's competition here
RDAR vs TLSNY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLSNY trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLSNY's competition here
RDAR vs VODAF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while VODAF trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to VODAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check VODAF's competition here
RDAR vs TLSNF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLSNF trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 23.57. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLSNF's competition here
RDAR vs MTNOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while MTNOF trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is -25.34. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check MTNOF's competition here
RDAR vs BCEPF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BCEPF trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BCEPF's competition here
RDAR vs HKTTY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while HKTTY trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check HKTTY's competition here
RDAR vs BCPPF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BCPPF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BCPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BCPPF's competition here
RDAR vs TLTZF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLTZF trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLTZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLTZF's competition here
RDAR vs HKTTF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while HKTTF trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check HKTTF's competition here
RDAR vs TLTZY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLTZY trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLTZY's competition here
RDAR vs BECEF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BECEF trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BECEF's competition here
RDAR vs TIAIY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TIAIY trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is -27.68. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TIAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TIAIY's competition here
RDAR vs TIAOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TIAOF trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TIAOF's competition here
RDAR vs AAFRF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AAFRF trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AAFRF's competition here
RDAR vs TELDY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TELDY trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 32.04. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TELDY's competition here
RDAR vs BCEXF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BCEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BCEXF's competition here
RDAR vs DIGBF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to DIGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check DIGBF's competition here
RDAR vs ELMUF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while ELMUF trades at $54.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check ELMUF's competition here
RDAR vs TIAJF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TIAJF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TIAJF's competition here
RDAR vs FRTAY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while FRTAY trades at $18.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check FRTAY's competition here
RDAR vs SHNUF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SHNUF's competition here
RDAR vs SOBKY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SOBKY trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SOBKY's competition here
RDAR vs TELDF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TELDF trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TELDF's competition here
RDAR vs AARTY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AARTY trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AARTY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to AARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AARTY's competition here
RDAR vs QBCAF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, QBCAF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while QBCAF trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCAF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to QBCAF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to QBCAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check QBCAF's competition here
RDAR vs QBCRF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while QBCRF trades at $28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check QBCRF's competition here
RDAR vs MYTEF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while MYTEF trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 16.50. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check MYTEF's competition here
RDAR vs HLTOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while HLTOF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check HLTOF's competition here
RDAR vs LBRDB Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while LBRDB trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check LBRDB's competition here
RDAR vs TCPFF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TCPFF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TCPFF's competition here
RDAR vs MAXSF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to MAXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check MAXSF's competition here
RDAR vs BZQIY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BZQIY trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BZQIY's competition here
RDAR vs AXXTF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while AXXTF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check AXXTF's competition here
RDAR vs BZQIF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BZQIF trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 15.83. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BZQIF's competition here
RDAR vs PCCWY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while PCCWY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -136.00. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check PCCWY's competition here
RDAR vs TRKNY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TRKNY trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TRKNY's competition here
RDAR vs TKAGY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TKAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TKAGY's competition here
RDAR vs PCWLF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while PCWLF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -63.85. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check PCWLF's competition here
RDAR vs FRTAF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while FRTAF trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 15.56. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to FRTAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check FRTAF's competition here
RDAR vs GTMEY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while GTMEY trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check GTMEY's competition here
RDAR vs PHTCF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.08. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to PHTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check PHTCF's competition here
RDAR vs CUCSF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while CUCSF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is less volatile compared to CUCSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check CUCSF's competition here
RDAR vs TCMFF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TCMFF trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 92.50. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TCMFF's competition here
RDAR vs TFAOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TFAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TFAOF's competition here
RDAR vs IIJIF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while IIJIF trades at $20.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check IIJIF's competition here
RDAR vs CUCSY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while CUCSY trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to CUCSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check CUCSY's competition here
RDAR vs UDIRF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while UDIRF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is -54.17. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check UDIRF's competition here
RDAR vs PTITF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while PTITF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to PTITF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check PTITF's competition here
RDAR vs IIJIY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while IIJIY trades at $36.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 24.14. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check IIJIY's competition here
RDAR vs MICCF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to MICCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check MICCF's competition here
RDAR vs PTXKY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while PTXKY trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check PTXKY's competition here
RDAR vs TACYY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TACYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TACYY's competition here
RDAR vs TRKNF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TRKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TRKNF's competition here
RDAR vs TLGHY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to TLGHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check TLGHY's competition here
RDAR vs SMNUF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SMNUF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SMNUF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMNUF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SMNUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SMNUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SMNUF's competition here
RDAR vs SPKKY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, SPKKY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while SPKKY trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPKKY's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to SPKKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to SPKKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check SPKKY's competition here
RDAR vs BGAOY Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BGAOY trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BGAOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BGAOY's competition here
RDAR vs GMOYF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, GMOYF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while GMOYF trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMOYF's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to GMOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to GMOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check GMOYF's competition here
RDAR vs NZTCF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, NZTCF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while NZTCF trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NZTCF's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to NZTCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to NZTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check NZTCF's competition here
RDAR vs BGAOF Comparison August 2025
RDAR plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RDAR stands at 10.8M. In comparison, BGAOF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RDAR is priced at $0.00, while BGAOF trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RDAR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BGAOF's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, RDAR's ROE is +2.50%, compared to BGAOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RDAR is more volatile compared to BGAOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RDAR.Check BGAOF's competition here