RightCrowd Limited

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ADYYF has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ADYYF trades at $1,088.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ADYYF's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ADYYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to ADYYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check ADYYF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ADYEY has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ADYEY trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ADYEY's P/E ratio is 30.78. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ADYEY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to ADYEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check ADYEY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BSQKZ has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while BSQKZ trades at $56.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas BSQKZ's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BSQKZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and BSQKZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BSQKZ's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KAKZF has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while KAKZF trades at $97.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KAKZF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to KAKZF's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and KAKZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KAKZF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TOITF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TOITF trades at $63.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TOITF's P/E ratio is 176.70. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TOITF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to TOITF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check TOITF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TMICF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TMICF trades at $36.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TMICF's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TMICF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and TMICF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMICF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GMYTF has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while GMYTF trades at $62.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas GMYTF's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GMYTF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and GMYTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMYTF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NEXPF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while NEXPF trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NEXPF's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NEXPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and NEXPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NEXPF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DRKTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DRKTY trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DRKTY's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DRKTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DRKTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NEXXY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while NEXXY trades at $3.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NEXXY's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NEXXY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to NEXXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check NEXXY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TMICY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TMICY trades at $32.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TMICY's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TMICY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to TMICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check TMICY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SWDAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SWDAF trades at $38.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SWDAF's P/E ratio is 153.80. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SWDAF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to SWDAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check SWDAF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, STWRY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while STWRY trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas STWRY's P/E ratio is -210.25. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to STWRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and STWRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check STWRY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CIOXY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CIOXY trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CIOXY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CIOXY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to CIOXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check CIOXY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EXNWF has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while EXNWF trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas EXNWF's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EXNWF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and EXNWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXNWF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DRKTF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DRKTF trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DRKTF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DRKTF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DRKTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKTF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, OVHFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while OVHFF trades at $11.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas OVHFF's P/E ratio is 126.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to OVHFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and OVHFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OVHFF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SPNUF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SPNUF trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SPNUF's P/E ratio is 268.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SPNUF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SPNUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SPNUF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SPMYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SPMYY trades at $10.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SPMYY's P/E ratio is 210.60. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SPMYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to SPMYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check SPMYY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SANP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SANP trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SANP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SANP's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to SANP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check SANP's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FFPP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FFPP trades at $40.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FFPP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FFPP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and FFPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FFPP's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MGPPF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while MGPPF trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MGPPF's P/E ratio is -64.44. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MGPPF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to MGPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check MGPPF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PHPYF has a market cap of 992.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while PHPYF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PHPYF's P/E ratio is 41.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PHPYF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and PHPYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHPYF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FNCHF has a market cap of 731.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FNCHF trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FNCHF's P/E ratio is -216.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FNCHF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and FNCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNCHF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CPLFF has a market cap of 700.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CPLFF trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CPLFF's P/E ratio is -49.44. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CPLFF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CPLFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPLFF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WWLNF has a market cap of 516.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while WWLNF trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WWLNF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to WWLNF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and WWLNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WWLNF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PYPTF has a market cap of 451.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while PYPTF trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PYPTF's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PYPTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and PYPTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYPTF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WRDLY has a market cap of 444.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while WRDLY trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WRDLY's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to WRDLY's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and WRDLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WRDLY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FMZNF has a market cap of 428.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FMZNF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FMZNF's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FMZNF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and FMZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FMZNF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, YHEKF has a market cap of 403.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while YHEKF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas YHEKF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to YHEKF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and YHEKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check YHEKF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PRTHU has a market cap of 395.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while PRTHU trades at $5.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PRTHU's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PRTHU's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and PRTHU have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PRTHU's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TDCSF has a market cap of 376.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TDCSF trades at $7.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TDCSF's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TDCSF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and TDCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TDCSF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NFONF has a market cap of 357.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while NFONF trades at $21.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NFONF's P/E ratio is -196.32. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NFONF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and NFONF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NFONF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CORZQ has a market cap of 343.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CORZQ trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CORZQ's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CORZQ's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to CORZQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check CORZQ's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TYPMF has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TYPMF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TYPMF's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TYPMF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and TYPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYPMF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FSOYF has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FSOYF trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FSOYF's P/E ratio is -23.14. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FSOYF's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and FSOYF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FSOYF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SEEMF has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SEEMF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SEEMF's P/E ratio is -5.91. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SEEMF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SEEMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SEEMF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ABANF has a market cap of 272.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ABANF trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ABANF's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ABANF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and ABANF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ABANF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, OTPMF has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while OTPMF trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas OTPMF's P/E ratio is 36.83. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to OTPMF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and OTPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OTPMF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SERKF has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SERKF trades at $1.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SERKF's P/E ratio is -14.54. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SERKF's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SERKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SERKF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ERDLF has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ERDLF trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ERDLF's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ERDLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and ERDLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ERDLF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HAIVF has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while HAIVF trades at $7.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HAIVF's P/E ratio is -178.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HAIVF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to HAIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check HAIVF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DYNDF has a market cap of 181.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DYNDF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DYNDF's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DYNDF's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to DYNDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check DYNDF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GIVXF has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while GIVXF trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas GIVXF's P/E ratio is -107.45. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GIVXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and GIVXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GIVXF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CGAAY has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CGAAY trades at $2.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CGAAY's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CGAAY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CGAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CGAAY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PYFRF has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while PYFRF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PYFRF's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PYFRF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and PYFRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PYFRF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FCLOF has a market cap of 102.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FCLOF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FCLOF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FCLOF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and FCLOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FCLOF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, BGOPF has a market cap of 93.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while BGOPF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas BGOPF's P/E ratio is -40.67. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to BGOPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and BGOPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGOPF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EXLGF has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while EXLGF trades at $2.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas EXLGF's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EXLGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and EXLGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EXLGF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, HISNF has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while HISNF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas HISNF's P/E ratio is 1.17. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to HISNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and HISNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HISNF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, JGHG has a market cap of 55.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while JGHG trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas JGHG's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to JGHG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and JGHG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JGHG's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, WHEN has a market cap of 53.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while WHEN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas WHEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to WHEN's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and WHEN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHEN's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, QBITF has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while QBITF trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas QBITF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to QBITF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and QBITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QBITF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, APGT has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while APGT trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas APGT's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to APGT's ROE of +2.88%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to APGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check APGT's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DGGXF has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DGGXF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DGGXF's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DGGXF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DGGXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DGGXF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ISDCF has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ISDCF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ISDCF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ISDCF's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to ISDCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check ISDCF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CLOQ has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CLOQ trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CLOQ's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CLOQ's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CLOQ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLOQ's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, POTTF has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while POTTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas POTTF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to POTTF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and POTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check POTTF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TMNA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TMNA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TMNA's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TMNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and TMNA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TMNA's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NOWVF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while NOWVF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NOWVF's P/E ratio is -17.92. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NOWVF's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to NOWVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check NOWVF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SKKY has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SKKY trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SKKY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SKKY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SKKY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKKY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CLPMF has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CLPMF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CLPMF's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CLPMF's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CLPMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLPMF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CYBNY has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CYBNY trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CYBNY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CYBNY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CYBNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CYBNY's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CORZR has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CORZR trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CORZR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CORZR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CORZR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CORZR's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, QFEEF has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while QFEEF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas QFEEF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to QFEEF's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and QFEEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check QFEEF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SDCH has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SDCH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SDCH's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SDCH's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to SDCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check SDCH's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PLCKF has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while PLCKF trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PLCKF's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PLCKF's ROE of +2.87%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to PLCKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check PLCKF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, EPXGF has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while EPXGF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas EPXGF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to EPXGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and EPXGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EPXGF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, NBVAF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while NBVAF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas NBVAF's P/E ratio is -6.43. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to NBVAF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and NBVAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NBVAF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KSIH has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while KSIH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to KSIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and KSIH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSIH's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DLTXF has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DLTXF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DLTXF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DLTXF's ROE of -21.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DLTXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DLTXF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TGCB has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TGCB trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TGCB's P/E ratio is -2.29. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TGCB's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to TGCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check TGCB's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VRSSF has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while VRSSF trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas VRSSF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VRSSF's ROE of +3.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to VRSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check VRSSF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DSAIF has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DSAIF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DSAIF's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DSAIF's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DSAIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DSAIF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ZVLO has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ZVLO trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ZVLO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ZVLO's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and ZVLO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZVLO's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SFIIF has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SFIIF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SFIIF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SFIIF's ROE of -2.50%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SFIIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SFIIF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VENZF has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while VENZF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas VENZF's P/E ratio is -10.18. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VENZF's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and VENZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VENZF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MKTDF has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while MKTDF trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MKTDF's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MKTDF's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and MKTDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKTDF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FUAPF has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FUAPF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FUAPF's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FUAPF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and FUAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FUAPF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DVPNF has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DVPNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DVPNF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DVPNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DVPNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DVPNF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, PKKFF has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while PKKFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas PKKFF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to PKKFF's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and PKKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PKKFF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, FOBIF has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while FOBIF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas FOBIF's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to FOBIF's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to FOBIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check FOBIF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, IPNFF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while IPNFF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas IPNFF's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to IPNFF's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to IPNFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check IPNFF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, MODGF has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while MODGF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas MODGF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to MODGF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and MODGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MODGF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, OVTZ has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while OVTZ trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas OVTZ's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to OVTZ's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to OVTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check OVTZ's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, KCRD has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while KCRD trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas KCRD's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to KCRD's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and KCRD have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KCRD's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, DRKOF has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while DRKOF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas DRKOF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to DRKOF's ROE of +1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and DRKOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DRKOF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SMKG has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SMKG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SMKG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SMKG's ROE of +16.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SMKG have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SMKG's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, ITNF has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while ITNF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas ITNF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to ITNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and ITNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ITNF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SCYRF has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SCYRF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SCYRF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SCYRF's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SCYRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SCYRF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RIHT has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while RIHT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas RIHT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to RIHT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and RIHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RIHT's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, INOTF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while INOTF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas INOTF's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to INOTF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to INOTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check INOTF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, VISM has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while VISM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas VISM's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to VISM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to VISM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check VISM's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, GMTH has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while GMTH trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas GMTH's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to GMTH's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and GMTH have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GMTH's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TONR has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TONR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TONR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TONR's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to TONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check TONR's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, RKNEF has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while RKNEF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas RKNEF's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to RKNEF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF is less volatile compared to RKNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCWDF.Check RKNEF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, SLXXF has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while SLXXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas SLXXF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to SLXXF's ROE of -12.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and SLXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLXXF's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, TFLM has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while TFLM trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas TFLM's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to TFLM's ROE of +18.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and TFLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFLM's competition here

RCWDF plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RCWDF stands at 1.4M. In comparison, CROTF has a market cap of 875.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RCWDF is priced at $0.01, while CROTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RCWDF currently has a P/E ratio of 0.54, whereas CROTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCWDF's ROE is -0.65%, compared to CROTF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RCWDF and CROTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CROTF's competition here