Rainbow Rare Earths Limited
Rainbow Rare Earths Limited RBW.L Peers
See (RBW.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBW.L | $11.25 | +2.18% | 72.41M | -11.25 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| BHP.L | $1,840.00 | +0.19% | 93.38B | 11.02 | $1.67 | +4.96% |
| 0L5V.L | $351.51 | -0.51% | 88.09B | 51.04 | $6.89 | +0.85% |
| 0R2J.L | $161.68 | +4.61% | 84.78B | 69.04 | $2.34 | +0.87% |
| RIO.L | $4,562.50 | -0.53% | 79.19B | 8.64 | $5.28 | +6.80% |
| 0L8B.L | $92.13 | +1.73% | 74.08B | 20.84 | $4.42 | +2.89% |
| 0IFA.L | $260.61 | +0.45% | 73.89B | 67.85 | $3.84 | +0.93% |
| 0HBH.L | $270.14 | +0.63% | 60.12B | 26.91 | $10.04 | +2.62% |
| 0Z4C.L | $231.20 | -2.78% | 32.77B | 35.01 | $6.60 | +1.65% |
| GLEN.L | $269.15 | +0.84% | 32.34B | -26.91 | -$0.10 | +2.13% |
Stock Comparison
RBW.L vs BHP.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, BHP.L has a market cap of 93.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while BHP.L trades at $1,840.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas BHP.L's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BHP.L's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to BHP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0L5V.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0L5V.L has a market cap of 88.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0L5V.L trades at $351.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0L5V.L's P/E ratio is 51.04. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0L5V.L's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0L5V.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R2J.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R2J.L has a market cap of 84.78B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R2J.L trades at $161.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R2J.L's P/E ratio is 69.04. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R2J.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R2J.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs RIO.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, RIO.L has a market cap of 79.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while RIO.L trades at $4,562.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas RIO.L's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RIO.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to RIO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0L8B.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0L8B.L has a market cap of 74.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0L8B.L trades at $92.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0L8B.L's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0L8B.L's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to 0L8B.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0IFA.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0IFA.L has a market cap of 73.89B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0IFA.L trades at $260.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0IFA.L's P/E ratio is 67.85. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IFA.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0IFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0HBH.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0HBH.L has a market cap of 60.12B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0HBH.L trades at $270.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0HBH.L's P/E ratio is 26.91. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HBH.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0HBH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0Z4C.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0Z4C.L has a market cap of 32.77B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0Z4C.L trades at $231.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0Z4C.L's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0Z4C.L's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0Z4C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs GLEN.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, GLEN.L has a market cap of 32.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while GLEN.L trades at $269.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas GLEN.L's P/E ratio is -26.91. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLEN.L's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to GLEN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0NHS.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0NHS.L has a market cap of 28.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0NHS.L trades at $58.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0NHS.L's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0NHS.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0NHS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs AAL.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, AAL.L has a market cap of 26.59B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while AAL.L trades at $2,191.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas AAL.L's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AAL.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to AAL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0K9L.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0K9L.L has a market cap of 25.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0K9L.L trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0K9L.L's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0K9L.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0K9L.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0KEI.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0KEI.L has a market cap of 24.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0KEI.L trades at $109.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0KEI.L's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KEI.L's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0KEI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0EDD.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0EDD.L has a market cap of 17.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0EDD.L trades at $55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0EDD.L's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0EDD.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0EDD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0UGS.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0UGS.L has a market cap of 14.95B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0UGS.L trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0UGS.L's P/E ratio is -80.82. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UGS.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0UGS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0HQU.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0HQU.L has a market cap of 14.38B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0HQU.L trades at $88.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0HQU.L's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HQU.L's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0HQU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R07.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R07.L has a market cap of 11.91B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R07.L trades at $32.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R07.L's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R07.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0KXS.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0KXS.L has a market cap of 11.79B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0KXS.L trades at $179.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0KXS.L's P/E ratio is 40.89. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KXS.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0KXS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0K3B.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0K3B.L has a market cap of 11.09B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0K3B.L trades at $34.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0K3B.L's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0K3B.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0K3B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0LJ9.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0LJ9.L has a market cap of 9.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0LJ9.L trades at $45.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0LJ9.L's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0LJ9.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to 0LJ9.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0IF3.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0IF3.L has a market cap of 9.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0IF3.L trades at $79.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0IF3.L's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IF3.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0IF3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0LVK.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0LVK.L has a market cap of 9.10B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0LVK.L trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0LVK.L's P/E ratio is 3.63. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0LVK.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0LVK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0HCB.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0HCB.L has a market cap of 7.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0HCB.L trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0HCB.L's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HCB.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0HCB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0HC7.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0HC7.L has a market cap of 6.76B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0HC7.L trades at $57.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0HC7.L's P/E ratio is 24.01. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HC7.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0HC7.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0U6C.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0U6C.L has a market cap of 6.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0U6C.L trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0U6C.L's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0U6C.L's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0U6C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs S32.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, S32.L has a market cap of 6.55B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while S32.L trades at $145.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas S32.L's P/E ratio is -36.45. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to S32.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to S32.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0QYN.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0QYN.L has a market cap of 6.05B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0QYN.L trades at $4.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QYN.L's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QYN.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0QYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0HUR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0HUR.L has a market cap of 5.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0HUR.L trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0HUR.L's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HUR.L's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0HUR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R0U.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R0U.L has a market cap of 4.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R0U.L trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R0U.L's P/E ratio is -73.58. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R0U.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R0U.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VBE.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VBE.L has a market cap of 4.79B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VBE.L trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VBE.L's P/E ratio is -164.72. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VBE.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VBE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0IK3.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0IK3.L has a market cap of 4.72B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0IK3.L trades at $37.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0IK3.L's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IK3.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0IK3.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0AHJ.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0AHJ.L has a market cap of 4.60B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0AHJ.L trades at $11.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0AHJ.L's P/E ratio is -19.49. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0AHJ.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0AHJ.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VL5.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VL5.L has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VL5.L trades at $44.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VL5.L's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VL5.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VL5.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0L45.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0L45.L has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0L45.L trades at $59.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0L45.L's P/E ratio is 8.31. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0L45.L's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0L45.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0I0H.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0I0H.L has a market cap of 3.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0I0H.L trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0I0H.L's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0I0H.L's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0I0H.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VGM.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VGM.L has a market cap of 3.37B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VGM.L trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VGM.L's P/E ratio is 55.21. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VGM.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VGM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VGE.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VGE.L has a market cap of 3.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VGE.L trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VGE.L's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VGE.L's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VGE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R0A.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R0A.L has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R0A.L trades at $5.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R0A.L's P/E ratio is 167.67. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R0A.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R0A.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0TWH.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0TWH.L has a market cap of 2.85B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0TWH.L trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0TWH.L's P/E ratio is -131.77. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0TWH.L's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RBW.L has daily volatility of 3.50 and 0TWH.L has daily volatility of N/A.
RBW.L vs 0VOA.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VOA.L has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VOA.L trades at $18.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VOA.L's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VOA.L's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VOA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0QYM.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0QYM.L has a market cap of 2.48B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0QYM.L trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QYM.L's P/E ratio is 30.22. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QYM.L's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0QYM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VHI.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VHI.L has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VHI.L trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VHI.L's P/E ratio is -95.57. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VHI.L's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VHI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0KW8.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0KW8.L has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0KW8.L trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0KW8.L's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KW8.L's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0KW8.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0NZN.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0NZN.L has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0NZN.L trades at $854.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0NZN.L's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0NZN.L's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0NZN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0HWG.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0HWG.L has a market cap of 1.56B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0HWG.L trades at $10.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0HWG.L's P/E ratio is 2.34. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0HWG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0HWG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R2C.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R2C.L has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R2C.L trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R2C.L's P/E ratio is 47.84. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R2C.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R2C.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R11.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R11.L has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R11.L trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R11.L's P/E ratio is -64.24. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R11.L's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R11.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0QZ2.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0QZ2.L has a market cap of 1.08B. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0QZ2.L trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QZ2.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QZ2.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0QZ2.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs ADT1.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, ADT1.L has a market cap of 825.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while ADT1.L trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ADT1.L's P/E ratio is -13.28. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ADT1.L's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to ADT1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0G5B.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0G5B.L has a market cap of 663.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0G5B.L trades at $117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0G5B.L's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0G5B.L's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0G5B.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0O6D.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0O6D.L has a market cap of 525.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0O6D.L trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0O6D.L's P/E ratio is 11.03. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0O6D.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0O6D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VIK.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VIK.L has a market cap of 478.50M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VIK.L trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VIK.L's P/E ratio is -9.18. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VIK.L's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0KD1.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0KD1.L has a market cap of 467.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0KD1.L trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0KD1.L's P/E ratio is -39.26. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0KD1.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to 0KD1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0JZT.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0JZT.L has a market cap of 379.53M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0JZT.L trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0JZT.L's P/E ratio is -53.44. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0JZT.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0JZT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs KMR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, KMR.L has a market cap of 338.70M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while KMR.L trades at $383.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas KMR.L's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KMR.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to KMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs GFM.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, GFM.L has a market cap of 331.72M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while GFM.L trades at $180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas GFM.L's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GFM.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to GFM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs SOLG.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, SOLG.L has a market cap of 213.68M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while SOLG.L trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas SOLG.L's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SOLG.L's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to SOLG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0UYN.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0UYN.L has a market cap of 209.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0UYN.L trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0UYN.L's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UYN.L's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0UYN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs SVML.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, SVML.L has a market cap of 203.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while SVML.L trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas SVML.L's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SVML.L's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to SVML.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0RRC.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0RRC.L has a market cap of 185.36M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0RRC.L trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0RRC.L's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0RRC.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0RRC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R20.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R20.L has a market cap of 179.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R20.L trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R20.L's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R20.L's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R20.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0P07.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0P07.L has a market cap of 175.65M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0P07.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0P07.L's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0P07.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0P07.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs KP2.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, KP2.L has a market cap of 164.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while KP2.L trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas KP2.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KP2.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to KP2.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0VNO.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0VNO.L has a market cap of 159.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0VNO.L trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0VNO.L's P/E ratio is -11.49. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0VNO.L's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0VNO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs BSE.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, BSE.L has a market cap of 154.47M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while BSE.L trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas BSE.L's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BSE.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to BSE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs ECOR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, ECOR.L has a market cap of 146.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while ECOR.L trades at $58.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ECOR.L's P/E ratio is -19.63. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ECOR.L's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to ECOR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs TRR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, TRR.L has a market cap of 142.44M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while TRR.L trades at $48.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas TRR.L's P/E ratio is 48.60. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TRR.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to TRR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0V46.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0V46.L has a market cap of 138.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0V46.L trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0V46.L's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0V46.L's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0V46.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs CAPD.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, CAPD.L has a market cap of 137.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while CAPD.L trades at $70.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas CAPD.L's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CAPD.L's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to CAPD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs JLP.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, JLP.L has a market cap of 130.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while JLP.L trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas JLP.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JLP.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to JLP.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs PRE.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, PRE.L has a market cap of 106.72M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while PRE.L trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas PRE.L's P/E ratio is -18.25. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRE.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to PRE.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs CUSN.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, CUSN.L has a market cap of 99.57M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while CUSN.L trades at $7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas CUSN.L's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CUSN.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to CUSN.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs SAV.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, SAV.L has a market cap of 94.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while SAV.L trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas SAV.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAV.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to SAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0IYS.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0IYS.L has a market cap of 82.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0IYS.L trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0IYS.L's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0IYS.L's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0IYS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0UIK.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0UIK.L has a market cap of 73.05M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0UIK.L trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0UIK.L's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UIK.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0UIK.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0QQR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0QQR.L has a market cap of 72.42M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0QQR.L trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QQR.L's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QQR.L's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0QQR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0R0D.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0R0D.L has a market cap of 65.91M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0R0D.L trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0R0D.L's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0R0D.L's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0R0D.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0QVG.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0QVG.L has a market cap of 61.65M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0QVG.L trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QVG.L's P/E ratio is 6.28. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QVG.L's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0QVG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs KOD.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, KOD.L has a market cap of 59.12M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while KOD.L trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas KOD.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KOD.L's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to KOD.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs MKA.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, MKA.L has a market cap of 53.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while MKA.L trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas MKA.L's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MKA.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to MKA.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs AFRK.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, AFRK.L has a market cap of 52.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while AFRK.L trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas AFRK.L's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AFRK.L's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to AFRK.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs ATM.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, ATM.L has a market cap of 50.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while ATM.L trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ATM.L's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ATM.L's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to ATM.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs HE1.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, HE1.L has a market cap of 48.56M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while HE1.L trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas HE1.L's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HE1.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to HE1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs ALL.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, ALL.L has a market cap of 44.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while ALL.L trades at $6.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ALL.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALL.L's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to ALL.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0ICI.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0ICI.L has a market cap of 42.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0ICI.L trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0ICI.L's P/E ratio is 217.33. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0ICI.L's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0ICI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0UYO.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0UYO.L has a market cap of 39.92M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0UYO.L trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0UYO.L's P/E ratio is -3.64. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0UYO.L's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0UYO.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs FAR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, FAR.L has a market cap of 37.27M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while FAR.L trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas FAR.L's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FAR.L's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to FAR.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0QPH.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0QPH.L has a market cap of 35.61M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0QPH.L trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0QPH.L's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0QPH.L's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0QPH.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs FOX.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, FOX.L has a market cap of 30.64M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while FOX.L trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas FOX.L's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FOX.L's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to FOX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs NMT.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, NMT.L has a market cap of 28.87M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while NMT.L trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas NMT.L's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NMT.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to NMT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs ZNWD.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, ZNWD.L has a market cap of 28.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while ZNWD.L trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ZNWD.L's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ZNWD.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to ZNWD.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs KAV.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, KAV.L has a market cap of 28.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while KAV.L trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas KAV.L's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KAV.L's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to KAV.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 1SN.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 1SN.L has a market cap of 27.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 1SN.L trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 1SN.L's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 1SN.L's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 1SN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs ARS.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, ARS.L has a market cap of 26.04M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while ARS.L trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas ARS.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARS.L's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to ARS.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs EMH.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, EMH.L has a market cap of 21.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while EMH.L trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas EMH.L's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EMH.L's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to EMH.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs GSP.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, GSP.L has a market cap of 20.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while GSP.L trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas GSP.L's P/E ratio is -5.25. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GSP.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to GSP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs 0V7X.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, 0V7X.L has a market cap of 20.17M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while 0V7X.L trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas 0V7X.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to 0V7X.L's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is more volatile compared to 0V7X.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs MET1.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, MET1.L has a market cap of 19.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while MET1.L trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas MET1.L's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MET1.L's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to MET1.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.
RBW.L vs RMR.L Comparison
RBW.L plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBW.L stands at 72.41M. In comparison, RMR.L has a market cap of 17.34M. Regarding current trading prices, RBW.L is priced at $11.25, while RMR.L trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBW.L currently has a P/E ratio of -11.25, whereas RMR.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBW.L's ROE is -0.00%, compared to RMR.L's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RBW.L is less volatile compared to RMR.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBW.L.