Robertet SA
Robertet SA (RBTEF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBTEF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBTEF | $1,020.00 | +0.00% | 2B | 18.32 | $55.69 | +1.15% |
| SHECY | $18.39 | -1.39% | 69.8B | 22.17 | $0.84 | +1.50% |
| SHECF | $36.83 | -1.29% | 66.2B | 20.90 | $1.69 | +1.90% |
| BASFY | $14.33 | +0.00% | 51.6B | 144.40 | $0.10 | +4.37% |
| BFFAF | $55.20 | -2.87% | 49.3B | 138.00 | $0.40 | +4.41% |
| SLMNP | $870.00 | +0.00% | 25.7B | 956.04 | $0.91 | +6.90% |
| GNENF | $8.10 | +2.92% | 22.8B | -83.70 | -$0.10 | +0.27% |
| TYNPF | $37.16 | -3.90% | 16.3B | 23.22 | $1.62 | +0.97% |
| AHKSY | $23.04 | +2.35% | 15.3B | 16.70 | $1.35 | +2.11% |
| AHKSF | $10.64 | -8.67% | 14.5B | 15.65 | $0.68 | +2.51% |
Stock Comparison
RBTEF vs SHECY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SHECY has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SHECY trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SHECY's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHECY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to SHECY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check SHECY's competition here
RBTEF vs SHECF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SHECF has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SHECF trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SHECF's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHECF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to SHECF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check SHECF's competition here
RBTEF vs BASFY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BASFY has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BASFY trades at $14.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BASFY's P/E ratio is 144.40. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BASFY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to BASFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check BASFY's competition here
RBTEF vs BFFAF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BFFAF has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BFFAF trades at $55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BFFAF's P/E ratio is 138.00. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFFAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and BFFAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BFFAF's competition here
RBTEF vs SLMNP Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SLMNP has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SLMNP trades at $870.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SLMNP's P/E ratio is 956.04. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLMNP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and SLMNP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SLMNP's competition here
RBTEF vs GNENF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, GNENF has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while GNENF trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas GNENF's P/E ratio is -83.70. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNENF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to GNENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check GNENF's competition here
RBTEF vs TYNPF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, TYNPF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while TYNPF trades at $37.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TYNPF's P/E ratio is 23.22. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TYNPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to TYNPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check TYNPF's competition here
RBTEF vs AHKSY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, AHKSY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while AHKSY trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AHKSY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHKSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to AHKSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check AHKSY's competition here
RBTEF vs AHKSF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, AHKSF has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while AHKSF trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AHKSF's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AHKSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to AHKSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check AHKSF's competition here
RBTEF vs SHWDY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SHWDY has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SHWDY trades at $69.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SHWDY's P/E ratio is 70.43. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHWDY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and SHWDY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SHWDY's competition here
RBTEF vs GNENY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, GNENY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while GNENY trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas GNENY's P/E ratio is -82.20. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GNENY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to GNENY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check GNENY's competition here
RBTEF vs SHWDF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SHWDF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SHWDF trades at $69.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SHWDF's P/E ratio is 65.74. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHWDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to SHWDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check SHWDF's competition here
RBTEF vs MTLHF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, MTLHF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while MTLHF trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MTLHF's P/E ratio is 42.65. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTLHF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and MTLHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLHF's competition here
RBTEF vs MTLHY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, MTLHY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while MTLHY trades at $33.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MTLHY's P/E ratio is 39.42. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTLHY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and MTLHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MTLHY's competition here
RBTEF vs PECGF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, PECGF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while PECGF trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PECGF's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PECGF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and PECGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PECGF's competition here
RBTEF vs SOMMY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SOMMY has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SOMMY trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SOMMY's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOMMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to SOMMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check SOMMY's competition here
RBTEF vs IMCDY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, IMCDY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while IMCDY trades at $49.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas IMCDY's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMCDY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to IMCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check IMCDY's competition here
RBTEF vs NNCHY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, NNCHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while NNCHY trades at $45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NNCHY's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NNCHY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and NNCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NNCHY's competition here
RBTEF vs TOSCF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, TOSCF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while TOSCF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TOSCF's P/E ratio is 19.28. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOSCF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to TOSCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check TOSCF's competition here
RBTEF vs SOMMF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SOMMF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SOMMF trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SOMMF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SOMMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and SOMMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SOMMF's competition here
RBTEF vs BCHMF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BCHMF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BCHMF trades at $60.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BCHMF's P/E ratio is 26.08. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BCHMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to BCHMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check BCHMF's competition here
RBTEF vs INDOY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, INDOY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while INDOY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas INDOY's P/E ratio is -43.67. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INDOY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and INDOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INDOY's competition here
RBTEF vs PCHUY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, PCHUY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while PCHUY trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PCHUY's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PCHUY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and PCHUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PCHUY's competition here
RBTEF vs KURRY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, KURRY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while KURRY trades at $34.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KURRY's P/E ratio is 75.15. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KURRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and KURRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRY's competition here
RBTEF vs KOYJF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, KOYJF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while KOYJF trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KOYJF's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KOYJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to KOYJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check KOYJF's competition here
RBTEF vs SVYSF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SVYSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SVYSF trades at $32.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SVYSF's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SVYSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and SVYSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SVYSF's competition here
RBTEF vs SLVYY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SLVYY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SLVYY trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SLVYY's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SLVYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to SLVYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check SLVYY's competition here
RBTEF vs KURRF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, KURRF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while KURRF trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KURRF's P/E ratio is 67.83. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KURRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and KURRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KURRF's competition here
RBTEF vs KPLUY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, KPLUY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while KPLUY trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas KPLUY's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KPLUY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to KPLUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check KPLUY's competition here
RBTEF vs PTGCF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, PTGCF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while PTGCF trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PTGCF's P/E ratio is -4.33. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PTGCF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and PTGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTGCF's competition here
RBTEF vs MXCHF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, MXCHF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while MXCHF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MXCHF's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MXCHF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and MXCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MXCHF's competition here
RBTEF vs DENKF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, DENKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while DENKF trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas DENKF's P/E ratio is -20.49. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DENKF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to DENKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check DENKF's competition here
RBTEF vs NPKYY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, NPKYY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while NPKYY trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NPKYY's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NPKYY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and NPKYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NPKYY's competition here
RBTEF vs NPKYF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, NPKYF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while NPKYF trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NPKYF's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NPKYF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to NPKYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check NPKYF's competition here
RBTEF vs VYTPF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, VYTPF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while VYTPF trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VYTPF's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VYTPF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and VYTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VYTPF's competition here
RBTEF vs LNZNF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, LNZNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while LNZNF trades at $32.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LNZNF's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LNZNF's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and LNZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LNZNF's competition here
RBTEF vs FRRSF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, FRRSF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while FRRSF trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FRRSF's P/E ratio is -605.00. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRRSF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to FRRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check FRRSF's competition here
RBTEF vs MXCHY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, MXCHY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while MXCHY trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MXCHY's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MXCHY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to MXCHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check MXCHY's competition here
RBTEF vs TOAGF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, TOAGF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while TOAGF trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TOAGF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TOAGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to TOAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check TOAGF's competition here
RBTEF vs BRGAY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BRGAY has a market cap of 876.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BRGAY trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BRGAY's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRGAY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and BRGAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BRGAY's competition here
RBTEF vs SGLFF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, SGLFF has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while SGLFF trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas SGLFF's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGLFF's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to SGLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check SGLFF's competition here
RBTEF vs CDSAF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, CDSAF has a market cap of 387.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while CDSAF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CDSAF's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDSAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and CDSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CDSAF's competition here
RBTEF vs NNXPF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, NNXPF has a market cap of 279.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while NNXPF trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NNXPF's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NNXPF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to NNXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check NNXPF's competition here
RBTEF vs CRDE Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, CRDE has a market cap of 277.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while CRDE trades at $19,000.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CRDE's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRDE's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RBTEF has daily volatility of 0.00 and CRDE has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRDE's competition here
RBTEF vs TYGIF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, TYGIF has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while TYGIF trades at $32.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas TYGIF's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TYGIF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and TYGIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TYGIF's competition here
RBTEF vs CNSJF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, CNSJF has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while CNSJF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CNSJF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNSJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and CNSJF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CNSJF's competition here
RBTEF vs HZRGF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, HZRGF has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while HZRGF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas HZRGF's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HZRGF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to HZRGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check HZRGF's competition here
RBTEF vs BNOW Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BNOW has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BNOW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BNOW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and BNOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BNOW's competition here
RBTEF vs BLGO Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BLGO has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BLGO trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BLGO's P/E ratio is -5.55. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLGO's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to BLGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check BLGO's competition here
RBTEF vs FGPHF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, FGPHF has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while FGPHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FGPHF's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FGPHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to FGPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check FGPHF's competition here
RBTEF vs BSWGF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BSWGF has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BSWGF trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BSWGF's P/E ratio is -7.32. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BSWGF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to BSWGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check BSWGF's competition here
RBTEF vs PLYR Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, PLYR has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while PLYR trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas PLYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PLYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to PLYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check PLYR's competition here
RBTEF vs CHHYF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, CHHYF has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while CHHYF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CHHYF's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHHYF's ROE of +2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to CHHYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check CHHYF's competition here
RBTEF vs FHELF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, FHELF has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while FHELF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FHELF's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FHELF's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to FHELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check FHELF's competition here
RBTEF vs EESE Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, EESE has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while EESE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas EESE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EESE's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and EESE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EESE's competition here
RBTEF vs AGTT Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, AGTT has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while AGTT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AGTT's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AGTT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and AGTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AGTT's competition here
RBTEF vs OPCGF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, OPCGF has a market cap of 420.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while OPCGF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas OPCGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OPCGF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and OPCGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check OPCGF's competition here
RBTEF vs CHCC Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, CHCC has a market cap of 165.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while CHCC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas CHCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHCC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and CHCC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHCC's competition here
RBTEF vs AFPW Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, AFPW has a market cap of 141.1K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while AFPW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas AFPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AFPW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to AFPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check AFPW's competition here
RBTEF vs FLRE Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, FLRE has a market cap of 25K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while FLRE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FLRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLRE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and FLRE have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FLRE's competition here
RBTEF vs LBTI Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, LBTI has a market cap of 18.6K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while LBTI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas LBTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LBTI's ROE of -30.83%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and LBTI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LBTI's competition here
RBTEF vs VULC Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, VULC has a market cap of 9.8K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while VULC trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas VULC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VULC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to VULC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check VULC's competition here
RBTEF vs NUEC Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, NUEC has a market cap of 2.4K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while NUEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas NUEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NUEC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to NUEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check NUEC's competition here
RBTEF vs MKDTY Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, MKDTY has a market cap of 1.2K. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while MKDTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas MKDTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MKDTY's ROE of +7.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and MKDTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MKDTY's competition here
RBTEF vs RKTE Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, RKTE has a market cap of 511. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while RKTE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas RKTE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RKTE's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to RKTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check RKTE's competition here
RBTEF vs BMRK Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, BMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while BMRK trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas BMRK's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BMRK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and BMRK have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BMRK's competition here
RBTEF vs ADKIL Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, ADKIL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while ADKIL trades at $430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ADKIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADKIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF is less volatile compared to ADKIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBTEF.Check ADKIL's competition here
RBTEF vs ADKCF Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, ADKCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while ADKCF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas ADKCF's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADKCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and ADKCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ADKCF's competition here
RBTEF vs FIND Comparison February 2026
RBTEF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBTEF stands at 2B. In comparison, FIND has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBTEF is priced at $1,020.00, while FIND trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBTEF currently has a P/E ratio of 18.32, whereas FIND's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBTEF's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FIND's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBTEF and FIND have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FIND's competition here