Revolution Bars Group plc
Revolution Bars Group plc RBG.L Peers
See (RBG.L) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBG.L | $0.80 | -5.88% | 11.98M | -0.10 | -$0.08 | N/A |
| 0HXW.L | $50.63 | -0.80% | 68.22B | 2.11 | $24.05 | N/A |
| CPG.L | $2,690.00 | +0.11% | 45.65B | 42.03 | $0.64 | +2.06% |
| 0VFA.L | $97.08 | +0.54% | 45.03B | 27.80 | $3.49 | +3.41% |
| 0QKI.L | $516.00 | -0.80% | 26.74B | 16.29 | $31.68 | +3.87% |
| 0I77.L | $202.80 | -0.70% | 23.73B | 25.50 | $7.95 | +2.75% |
| 0M30.L | $42.82 | +0.15% | 15.99B | 21.60 | $1.98 | +1.69% |
| MAB.L | $281.50 | +1.99% | 1.67B | 11.26 | $0.25 | N/A |
| SSPG.L | $174.50 | +0.81% | 1.40B | -58.17 | -$0.03 | +2.01% |
| DOM.L | $264.60 | -1.27% | 1.04B | 11.50 | $0.23 | +4.16% |
Stock Comparison
RBG.L vs 0HXW.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0HXW.L has a market cap of 68.22B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0HXW.L trades at $50.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0HXW.L's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0HXW.L's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0HXW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs CPG.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, CPG.L has a market cap of 45.65B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while CPG.L trades at $2,690.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CPG.L's P/E ratio is 42.03. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CPG.L's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to CPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 0VFA.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0VFA.L has a market cap of 45.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0VFA.L trades at $97.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0VFA.L's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0VFA.L's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0VFA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 0QKI.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0QKI.L has a market cap of 26.74B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0QKI.L trades at $516.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0QKI.L's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0QKI.L's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0QKI.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 0I77.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0I77.L has a market cap of 23.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0I77.L trades at $202.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0I77.L's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0I77.L's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0I77.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 0M30.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0M30.L has a market cap of 15.99B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0M30.L trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0M30.L's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0M30.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0M30.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs MAB.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, MAB.L has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while MAB.L trades at $281.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MAB.L's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MAB.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to MAB.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs SSPG.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, SSPG.L has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while SSPG.L trades at $174.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas SSPG.L's P/E ratio is -58.17. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to SSPG.L's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to SSPG.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs DOM.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, DOM.L has a market cap of 1.04B. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while DOM.L trades at $264.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DOM.L's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DOM.L's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to DOM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs JDW.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, JDW.L has a market cap of 801.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while JDW.L trades at $726.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas JDW.L's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to JDW.L's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to JDW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs YNGA.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, YNGA.L has a market cap of 520.62M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while YNGA.L trades at $950.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YNGA.L's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YNGA.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to YNGA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs YNGN.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, YNGN.L has a market cap of 512.31M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while YNGN.L trades at $642.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas YNGN.L's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to YNGN.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to YNGN.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs RTN.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, RTN.L has a market cap of 499.23M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while RTN.L trades at $64.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas RTN.L's P/E ratio is -10.80. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to RTN.L's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. RBG.L has daily volatility of 18.18 and RTN.L has daily volatility of N/A.
RBG.L vs LGRS.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, LGRS.L has a market cap of 352.48M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while LGRS.L trades at $324.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas LGRS.L's P/E ratio is 32.40. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to LGRS.L's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to LGRS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 0KT6.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0KT6.L has a market cap of 351.89M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0KT6.L trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0KT6.L's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0KT6.L's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0KT6.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 53GW.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 53GW.L has a market cap of 344.64M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 53GW.L trades at $88.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 53GW.L's P/E ratio is 0.08. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 53GW.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 53GW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs FSTA.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, FSTA.L has a market cap of 333.58M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while FSTA.L trades at $620.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FSTA.L's P/E ratio is 18.24. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FSTA.L's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to FSTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs DPEU.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, DPEU.L has a market cap of 287.32M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while DPEU.L trades at $190.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DPEU.L's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DPEU.L's ROE of +1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to DPEU.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs MARS.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, MARS.L has a market cap of 258.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while MARS.L trades at $40.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MARS.L's P/E ratio is 5.10. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MARS.L's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to MARS.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs CPC.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, CPC.L has a market cap of 153.75M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while CPC.L trades at $139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas CPC.L's P/E ratio is 139.00. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to CPC.L's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to CPC.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs FUL.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, FUL.L has a market cap of 89.23M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while FUL.L trades at $14.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas FUL.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to FUL.L's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to FUL.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs DPP.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, DPP.L has a market cap of 84.80M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while DPP.L trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DPP.L's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DPP.L's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to DPP.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 54GW.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 54GW.L has a market cap of 63.26M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 54GW.L trades at $104.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 54GW.L's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 54GW.L's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 54GW.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs VARE.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, VARE.L has a market cap of 23.63M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while VARE.L trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas VARE.L's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to VARE.L's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to VARE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs MEX.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, MEX.L has a market cap of 14.85M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while MEX.L trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MEX.L's P/E ratio is -19.20. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MEX.L's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to MEX.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs HVTA.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, HVTA.L has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while HVTA.L trades at $175.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HVTA.L's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HVTA.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to HVTA.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs HVT.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, HVT.L has a market cap of 8.11M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while HVT.L trades at $215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas HVT.L's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to HVT.L's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to HVT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs NGHT.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, NGHT.L has a market cap of 6.71M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while NGHT.L trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas NGHT.L's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to NGHT.L's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is less volatile compared to NGHT.L. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs PIER.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, PIER.L has a market cap of 4.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while PIER.L trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas PIER.L's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to PIER.L's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to PIER.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs COM.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, COM.L has a market cap of 3.99M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while COM.L trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas COM.L's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to COM.L's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to COM.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs TAST.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, TAST.L has a market cap of 1.28M. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while TAST.L trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas TAST.L's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to TAST.L's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to TAST.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs DVT.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, DVT.L has a market cap of 567375.00. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while DVT.L trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas DVT.L's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to DVT.L's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to DVT.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs MORE.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, MORE.L has a market cap of 195497.00. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while MORE.L trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas MORE.L's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to MORE.L's ROE of -16.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to MORE.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.
RBG.L vs 0RR0.L Comparison
RBG.L plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBG.L stands at 11.98M. In comparison, 0RR0.L has a market cap of 122506.00. Regarding current trading prices, RBG.L is priced at $0.80, while 0RR0.L trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBG.L currently has a P/E ratio of -0.10, whereas 0RR0.L's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, RBG.L's ROE is +0.58%, compared to 0RR0.L's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RBG.L is more volatile compared to 0RR0.L. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBG.L.