Restaurant Brands Asia Limited
Restaurant Brands Asia Limited (RBA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBA.BO | ₹59.95 | -1.95% | 35.7B | -17.05 | -₹3.59 | N/A |
| JUBLFOOD.NS | ₹439.95 | -3.14% | 297B | 93.49 | ₹4.83 | +0.27% |
| JUBLFOOD.BO | ₹439.55 | -3.23% | 296.9B | 92.88 | ₹4.86 | +0.27% |
| DEVYANI.NS | ₹98.96 | -6.26% | 128.4B | -325.53 | -₹0.32 | N/A |
| DEVYANI.BO | ₹98.90 | -6.26% | 128.2B | -325.00 | -₹0.32 | N/A |
| WESTLIFE.NS | ₹406.05 | -5.80% | 68B | 215.54 | ₹2.03 | +0.17% |
| WESTLIFE.BO | ₹406.05 | -5.77% | 68B | 215.42 | ₹2.03 | +0.17% |
| SAPPHIRE.BO | ₹154.05 | -5.37% | 51.5B | -291.45 | -₹0.55 | N/A |
| SAPPHIRE.NS | ₹154.58 | -5.23% | 51.5B | -291.15 | -₹0.55 | N/A |
| RBA.NS | ₹59.94 | -1.96% | 35.6B | -17.03 | -₹3.59 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RBA.BO vs JUBLFOOD.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, JUBLFOOD.NS has a market cap of 297B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while JUBLFOOD.NS trades at ₹439.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas JUBLFOOD.NS's P/E ratio is 93.49. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JUBLFOOD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLFOOD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check JUBLFOOD.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs JUBLFOOD.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, JUBLFOOD.BO has a market cap of 296.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while JUBLFOOD.BO trades at ₹439.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas JUBLFOOD.BO's P/E ratio is 92.88. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to JUBLFOOD.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLFOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check JUBLFOOD.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs DEVYANI.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, DEVYANI.NS has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while DEVYANI.NS trades at ₹98.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas DEVYANI.NS's P/E ratio is -325.53. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DEVYANI.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to DEVYANI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check DEVYANI.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs DEVYANI.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, DEVYANI.BO has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while DEVYANI.BO trades at ₹98.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas DEVYANI.BO's P/E ratio is -325.00. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DEVYANI.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to DEVYANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check DEVYANI.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs WESTLIFE.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, WESTLIFE.NS has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while WESTLIFE.NS trades at ₹406.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas WESTLIFE.NS's P/E ratio is 215.54. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WESTLIFE.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to WESTLIFE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check WESTLIFE.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs WESTLIFE.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, WESTLIFE.BO has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while WESTLIFE.BO trades at ₹406.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas WESTLIFE.BO's P/E ratio is 215.42. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to WESTLIFE.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to WESTLIFE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check WESTLIFE.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs SAPPHIRE.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, SAPPHIRE.BO has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while SAPPHIRE.BO trades at ₹154.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas SAPPHIRE.BO's P/E ratio is -291.45. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SAPPHIRE.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is more volatile compared to SAPPHIRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check SAPPHIRE.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs SAPPHIRE.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, SAPPHIRE.NS has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while SAPPHIRE.NS trades at ₹154.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas SAPPHIRE.NS's P/E ratio is -291.15. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SAPPHIRE.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is more volatile compared to SAPPHIRE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check SAPPHIRE.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs RBA.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, RBA.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while RBA.NS trades at ₹59.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas RBA.NS's P/E ratio is -17.03. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to RBA.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to RBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check RBA.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs UFBL.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, UFBL.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while UFBL.BO trades at ₹223.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas UFBL.BO's P/E ratio is -13.97. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UFBL.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to UFBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check UFBL.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs UFBL.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, UFBL.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while UFBL.NS trades at ₹222.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas UFBL.NS's P/E ratio is -13.94. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to UFBL.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to UFBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check UFBL.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs BARBEQUE.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, BARBEQUE.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while BARBEQUE.BO trades at ₹225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas BARBEQUE.BO's P/E ratio is -22.34. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BARBEQUE.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is more volatile compared to BARBEQUE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check BARBEQUE.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs BARBEQUE.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, BARBEQUE.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while BARBEQUE.NS trades at ₹224.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas BARBEQUE.NS's P/E ratio is -22.35. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BARBEQUE.NS's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is more volatile compared to BARBEQUE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check BARBEQUE.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs COFFEEDAY.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, COFFEEDAY.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while COFFEEDAY.BO trades at ₹22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas COFFEEDAY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to COFFEEDAY.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to COFFEEDAY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check COFFEEDAY.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs COFFEEDAY.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, COFFEEDAY.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while COFFEEDAY.NS trades at ₹22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas COFFEEDAY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to COFFEEDAY.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to COFFEEDAY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check COFFEEDAY.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs SPECIALITY.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, SPECIALITY.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while SPECIALITY.NS trades at ₹90.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas SPECIALITY.NS's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPECIALITY.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to SPECIALITY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check SPECIALITY.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs SPECIALITY.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, SPECIALITY.BO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while SPECIALITY.BO trades at ₹89.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas SPECIALITY.BO's P/E ratio is 22.19. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to SPECIALITY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to SPECIALITY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check SPECIALITY.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs DANGEE.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, DANGEE.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while DANGEE.NS trades at ₹2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas DANGEE.NS's P/E ratio is -92.33. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to DANGEE.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to DANGEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check DANGEE.NS's competition here
RBA.BO vs GOURMET.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, GOURMET.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while GOURMET.BO trades at ₹7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas GOURMET.BO's P/E ratio is -402.00. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GOURMET.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to GOURMET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check GOURMET.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs VIDLI.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, VIDLI.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while VIDLI.BO trades at ₹75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas VIDLI.BO's P/E ratio is 93.75. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to VIDLI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to VIDLI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check VIDLI.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs GCKL.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, GCKL.BO has a market cap of 831.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while GCKL.BO trades at ₹16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas GCKL.BO's P/E ratio is 79.52. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to GCKL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to GCKL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check GCKL.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs INDRANIB.BO Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, INDRANIB.BO has a market cap of 364.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while INDRANIB.BO trades at ₹7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas INDRANIB.BO's P/E ratio is -25.81. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to INDRANIB.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to INDRANIB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check INDRANIB.BO's competition here
RBA.BO vs BURGERKING.NS Comparison March 2026
RBA.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA.BO stands at 35.7B. In comparison, BURGERKING.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA.BO is priced at ₹59.95, while BURGERKING.NS trades at ₹139.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -17.05, whereas BURGERKING.NS's P/E ratio is -50.56. In terms of profitability, RBA.BO's ROE is -0.26%, compared to BURGERKING.NS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA.BO is less volatile compared to BURGERKING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.BO.Check BURGERKING.NS's competition here