ProShares RAFI Long/Short

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FIYY has a market cap of 241.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FIYY trades at $103.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIYY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FIYY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS and FIYY have similar daily volatility (0.53).

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FFEU has a market cap of 212.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FFEU trades at $90.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FFEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FFEU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to FFEU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VTAPX has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VTAPX trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTAPX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VTAPX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VTAPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VTIP has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VTIP trades at $49.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VTIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VTIP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VFSUX has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VFSUX trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSUX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VFSUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VFSTX has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VFSTX trades at $10.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VFSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VFSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VGSH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VGSH trades at $58.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VGSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VGSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VGSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VSBSX has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VSBSX trades at $19.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSBSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VSBSX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VSBSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VWSTX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VWSTX trades at $15.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VWSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VWSTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VWSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, MINT has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while MINT trades at $100.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MINT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to MINT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to MINT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ASBFX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while ASBFX trades at $9.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASBFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASBFX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to ASBFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SCHO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SCHO trades at $24.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SCHO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to SCHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, PTSHX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while PTSHX trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTSHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to PTSHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to PTSHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FTSM has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FTSM trades at $59.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FTSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VFISX has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VFISX trades at $9.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VFISX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VFISX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VFISX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SPXL has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SPXL trades at $177.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXL's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SPXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SPTS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SPTS trades at $29.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPTS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to SPTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TMF has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TMF trades at $36.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TMF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to TMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VSGBX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VSGBX trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGBX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGBX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VSGBX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, VSGDX has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while VSGDX trades at $10.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VSGDX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to VSGDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to VSGDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, JSDHX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while JSDHX trades at $9.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSDHX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSDHX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to JSDHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FLVCX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FLVCX trades at $43.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLVCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FLVCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FLVCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, BITX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while BITX trades at $64.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BITX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to BITX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to BITX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TECL has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TECL trades at $95.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECL's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TECL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to TECL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FAS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FAS trades at $165.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAS's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FAS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to FAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TBLL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TBLL trades at $105.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TBLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TBLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to TBLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FSTTX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FSTTX trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSTTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FSTTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FSTTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, PAIAX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while PAIAX trades at $9.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAIAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to PAIAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to PAIAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DIAYX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DIAYX trades at $29.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DIAYX's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DIAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to DIAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DHLSX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DHLSX trades at $29.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHLSX's P/E ratio is 20.79. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to DHLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DHFCX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DHFCX trades at $23.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHFCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHFCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to DHFCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FNGU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FNGU trades at $23.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGU's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to FNGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DWT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DWT trades at $14.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DWT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DWT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to DWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ORSTX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while ORSTX trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORSTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to ORSTX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to ORSTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, BULZ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while BULZ trades at $180.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULZ's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to BULZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to BULZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, PRFSX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while PRFSX trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRFSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to PRFSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to PRFSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SH has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SH trades at $39.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS and SH have similar daily volatility (0.53).

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, BASOX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while BASOX trades at $10.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BASOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to BASOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to BASOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ACSNX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while ACSNX trades at $9.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACSNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to ACSNX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to ACSNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, RYVYX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while RYVYX trades at $602.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to RYVYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, CPLSX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while CPLSX trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPLSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to CPLSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to CPLSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, RYCCX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while RYCCX trades at $421.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYCCX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to RYCCX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to RYCCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, RYVLX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while RYVLX trades at $602.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RYVLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to RYVLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to RYVLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TAFI has a market cap of 785M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TAFI trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TAFI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TAFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to TAFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, NVDX has a market cap of 783.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while NVDX trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVDX's P/E ratio is 53.71. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to NVDX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to NVDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SOXS has a market cap of 762.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SOXS trades at $7.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SOXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SOXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, EMAIX has a market cap of 742.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while EMAIX trades at $9.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMAIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to EMAIX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to EMAIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, EXMAX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while EXMAX trades at $9.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXMAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to EXMAX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to EXMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DPST has a market cap of 679M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DPST trades at $102.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DPST's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DPST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to DPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TUA has a market cap of 669.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TUA trades at $21.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TUA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to TUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, JSCP has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while JSCP trades at $47.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JSCP's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to JSCP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to JSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, GDXU has a market cap of 570M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while GDXU trades at $73.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDXU's P/E ratio is 22.13. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to GDXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to GDXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, NUGT has a market cap of 545.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while NUGT trades at $75.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NUGT's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to NUGT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to NUGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, BPIRX has a market cap of 522.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while BPIRX trades at $14.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPIRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to BPIRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to BPIRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, BPRRX has a market cap of 522.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while BPRRX trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BPRRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to BPRRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to BPRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FNGO has a market cap of 513.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FNGO trades at $107.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FNGO's P/E ratio is 41.57. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FNGO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to FNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, GIYAX has a market cap of 505.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while GIYAX trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GIYAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to GIYAX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to GIYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SPXU has a market cap of 502.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SPXU trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SPXU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DGAZ has a market cap of 497.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DGAZ trades at $452.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DGAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DGAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to DGAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, PSQ has a market cap of 487.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while PSQ trades at $33.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to PSQ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to PSQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DXQLX has a market cap of 483.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DXQLX trades at $101.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DXQLX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DXQLX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to DXQLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FSMB has a market cap of 456.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FSMB trades at $19.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FSMB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FSMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SDHY has a market cap of 409.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SDHY trades at $16.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDHY's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SDHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SDHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, KOLD has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while KOLD trades at $26.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KOLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to KOLD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to KOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SDS has a market cap of 399.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SDS trades at $16.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SDS's ROE of +5.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SEMRX has a market cap of 371.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SEMRX trades at $9.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SEMRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to SEMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FSHSX has a market cap of 367.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FSHSX trades at $10.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSHSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FSHSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FSHSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SPXS has a market cap of 363.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SPXS trades at $4.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SVIX has a market cap of 350.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SVIX trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVIX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVIX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SVIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, GGLL has a market cap of 340.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while GGLL trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GGLL's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to GGLL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to GGLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DUST has a market cap of 325.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DUST trades at $24.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DUST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to DUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SVXY has a market cap of 321.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SVXY trades at $43.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, UVXY has a market cap of 314.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while UVXY trades at $17.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UVXY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to UVXY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to UVXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, MRRL has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while MRRL trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MRRL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to MRRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to MRRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FLGE has a market cap of 295.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FLGE trades at $809.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLGE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FLGE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to FLGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, NAIL has a market cap of 290.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while NAIL trades at $62.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NAIL's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to NAIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, JNUG has a market cap of 285.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while JNUG trades at $81.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JNUG's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to JNUG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to JNUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, MORL has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while MORL trades at $0.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MORL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to MORL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to MORL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SMB has a market cap of 272.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SMB trades at $17.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to SMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, UUP has a market cap of 265.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while UUP trades at $27.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UUP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to UUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to UUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, GUSH has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while GUSH trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GUSH's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to GUSH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to GUSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, DFEN has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while DFEN trades at $52.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DFEN's P/E ratio is 38.59. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to DFEN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to DFEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TZA has a market cap of 246.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TZA trades at $10.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TZA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TZA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to TZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, QID has a market cap of 241.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while QID trades at $25.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QID's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to QID's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to QID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, AMZU has a market cap of 240.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while AMZU trades at $38.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMZU's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to AMZU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to AMZU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, STOT has a market cap of 235.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while STOT trades at $47.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STOT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to STOT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to STOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TENG has a market cap of 229.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TENG trades at $14.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TENG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TENG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to TENG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, ERX has a market cap of 225.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while ERX trades at $56.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERX's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to ERX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to ERX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, AAPU has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while AAPU trades at $23.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAPU's P/E ratio is 36.86. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to AAPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to AAPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FTSD has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FTSD trades at $90.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FTSD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FTSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, REML has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while REML trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REML's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to REML's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to REML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TWUSX has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TWUSX trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWUSX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TWUSX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to TWUSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, FUMB has a market cap of 199.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while FUMB trades at $20.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUMB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to FUMB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to FUMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, SDOW has a market cap of 194M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while SDOW trades at $40.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SDOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to SDOW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to SDOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, EMNT has a market cap of 186.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while EMNT trades at $98.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EMNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to EMNT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to EMNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, CLSE has a market cap of 184.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while CLSE trades at $23.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLSE's P/E ratio is 19.03. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to CLSE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to CLSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, TMV has a market cap of 183.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while TMV trades at $39.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to TMV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to TMV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, CVSB has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while CVSB trades at $50.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVSB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to CVSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is more volatile compared to CVSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.

RALS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, RALS stands at 6.7M. In comparison, RWM has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RALS is priced at $33.18, while RWM trades at $18.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

RALS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RALS's ROE is N/A, compared to RWM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RALS is less volatile compared to RWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RALS.