Roku, Inc.
Roku, Inc. R35.F Peers
See (R35.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R35.F | $63.74 | +1.85% | 9.60B | -98.06 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| NFC.DE | $1,069.00 | +2.36% | 454.94B | 56.53 | $18.91 | N/A |
| WDP.DE | $101.26 | +1.18% | 182.04B | 23.12 | $4.38 | +0.79% |
| WDP.F | $101.20 | +0.90% | 181.93B | 36.01 | $2.81 | +0.82% |
| MGG.DE | $37.48 | +13.99% | 11.39B | 13.78 | $2.72 | N/A |
| EVD.DE | $111.90 | +2.19% | 10.74B | 33.70 | $3.32 | N/A |
| VVU.DE | $2.83 | +1.07% | 2.81B | -15.73 | -$0.18 | +1.42% |
| BVB.DE | $4.10 | +3.40% | 452.55M | 2.73 | $1.50 | +1.46% |
| EDL.DE | $4.04 | +0.99% | 85.95M | 7.77 | $0.52 | +7.43% |
| HLG.DE | $1.21 | +1.68% | 68.66M | -17.29 | -$0.07 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
R35.F vs NFC.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, NFC.DE has a market cap of 454.94B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while NFC.DE trades at $1,069.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas NFC.DE's P/E ratio is 56.53. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NFC.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to NFC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs WDP.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, WDP.DE has a market cap of 182.04B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while WDP.DE trades at $101.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas WDP.DE's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WDP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs WDP.F Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, WDP.F has a market cap of 181.93B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while WDP.F trades at $101.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas WDP.F's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDP.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WDP.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs MGG.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, MGG.DE has a market cap of 11.39B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while MGG.DE trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas MGG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to MGG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs EVD.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, EVD.DE has a market cap of 10.74B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while EVD.DE trades at $111.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas EVD.DE's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVD.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to EVD.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs VVU.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, VVU.DE has a market cap of 2.81B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while VVU.DE trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas VVU.DE's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VVU.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to VVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs BVB.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, BVB.DE has a market cap of 452.55M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while BVB.DE trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas BVB.DE's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BVB.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to BVB.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs EDL.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, EDL.DE has a market cap of 85.95M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while EDL.DE trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas EDL.DE's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EDL.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to EDL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs HLG.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, HLG.DE has a market cap of 68.66M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while HLG.DE trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas HLG.DE's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLG.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to HLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs LOUD.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, LOUD.DE has a market cap of 68.22M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while LOUD.DE trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas LOUD.DE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LOUD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to LOUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs CLIQ.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, CLIQ.DE has a market cap of 33.86M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while CLIQ.DE trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas CLIQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLIQ.DE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to CLIQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs PAL.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, PAL.DE has a market cap of 29.40M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while PAL.DE trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas PAL.DE's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAL.DE's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to PAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs SPM.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, SPM.DE has a market cap of 12.14M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while SPM.DE trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas SPM.DE's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPM.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to SPM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs ITN.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, ITN.DE has a market cap of 8.90M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while ITN.DE trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas ITN.DE's P/E ratio is -13.65. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ITN.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to ITN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs ERO1.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, ERO1.DE has a market cap of 1.74M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while ERO1.DE trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas ERO1.DE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERO1.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to ERO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs WIG1.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.60B. In comparison, WIG1.DE has a market cap of 867900.00. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at $63.74, while WIG1.DE trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -98.06, whereas WIG1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIG1.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to WIG1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.