Roku, Inc.
Roku, Inc. R35.F Peers
See (R35.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R35.F | €68.40 | +5.09% | 9.9B | -106.87 | -€0.64 | N/A |
| NFC.DE | €1,089.40 | -0.87% | 463.6B | 58.66 | €18.57 | N/A |
| WDP.F | €99.75 | +0.31% | 179.3B | 23.31 | €4.28 | +0.81% |
| WDP.DE | €99.73 | +0.29% | 179.3B | 23.14 | €4.31 | +0.79% |
| MGG.DE | €37.48 | +13.99% | 11.4B | 13.78 | €2.72 | N/A |
| EVD.DE | €107.20 | -1.74% | 10.3B | 34.58 | €3.10 | +1.55% |
| VVU.DE | €2.88 | -0.28% | 2.9B | -15.99 | -€0.18 | +1.39% |
| BVB.DE | €3.81 | +1.33% | 420.5M | 47.63 | €0.08 | +1.57% |
| EDL.DE | €4.06 | N/A | 86.4M | 7.81 | €0.52 | +7.39% |
| LOUD.DE | €3.16 | N/A | 68.2M | 9.49 | €0.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
R35.F vs NFC.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, NFC.DE has a market cap of 463.6B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while NFC.DE trades at €1,089.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas NFC.DE's P/E ratio is 58.66. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NFC.DE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to NFC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs WDP.F Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WDP.F has a market cap of 179.3B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while WDP.F trades at €99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas WDP.F's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDP.F's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WDP.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs WDP.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WDP.DE has a market cap of 179.3B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while WDP.DE trades at €99.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas WDP.DE's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDP.DE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WDP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs MGG.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, MGG.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while MGG.DE trades at €37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas MGG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MGG.DE's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to MGG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs EVD.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EVD.DE has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while EVD.DE trades at €107.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas EVD.DE's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVD.DE's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to EVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs VVU.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, VVU.DE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while VVU.DE trades at €2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas VVU.DE's P/E ratio is -15.99. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VVU.DE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to VVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs BVB.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, BVB.DE has a market cap of 420.5M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while BVB.DE trades at €3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas BVB.DE's P/E ratio is 47.63. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BVB.DE's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to BVB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs EDL.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, EDL.DE has a market cap of 86.4M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while EDL.DE trades at €4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas EDL.DE's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EDL.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to EDL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs LOUD.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, LOUD.DE has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while LOUD.DE trades at €3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas LOUD.DE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LOUD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to LOUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs HLG.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, HLG.DE has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while HLG.DE trades at €1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas HLG.DE's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HLG.DE's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to HLG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs PAL.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, PAL.DE has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while PAL.DE trades at €1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas PAL.DE's P/E ratio is -9.08. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAL.DE's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to PAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs CLIQ.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, CLIQ.DE has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while CLIQ.DE trades at €4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas CLIQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CLIQ.DE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to CLIQ.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs SPM.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, SPM.DE has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while SPM.DE trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas SPM.DE's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPM.DE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to SPM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs ITN.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ITN.DE has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while ITN.DE trades at €0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas ITN.DE's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ITN.DE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to ITN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs IQ50.F Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, IQ50.F has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while IQ50.F trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas IQ50.F's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IQ50.F's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to IQ50.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs ERO1.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, ERO1.DE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while ERO1.DE trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas ERO1.DE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERO1.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to ERO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.
R35.F vs WIG1.DE Comparison
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 9.9B. In comparison, WIG1.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €68.40, while WIG1.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of -106.87, whereas WIG1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIG1.DE's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to WIG1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.