Roku, Inc.
Roku, Inc. (R35.F) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (R35.F) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Entertainment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R35.F | €82.16 | -2.45% | 12.2B | 162.12 | €0.51 | N/A |
| NFC.DE | €79.72 | -0.76% | 336.9B | 36.43 | €2.19 | N/A |
| WDP.DE | €83.25 | -2.37% | 148.9B | 14.34 | €5.86 | +1.27% |
| WDP.F | €83.29 | -2.01% | 147.9B | 14.22 | €5.87 | +1.28% |
| MGG.DE | €37.11 | +12.86% | 11.4B | 13.78 | €2.72 | N/A |
| EVD.DE | €64.50 | +1.98% | 6.1B | 21.19 | €2.99 | +2.62% |
| VVU.DE | €1.72 | +1.65% | 1.7B | 84.40 | €0.02 | +2.37% |
| BVB.DE | €3.02 | +1.68% | 328.4M | 18.59 | €0.16 | +2.02% |
| EDL.DE | €5.60 | +6.67% | 121.3M | 9.50 | €0.60 | +5.26% |
| LOUD.DE | €3.16 | +0.00% | 68.2M | 9.49 | €0.33 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
R35.F vs NFC.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, NFC.DE has a market cap of 336.9B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while NFC.DE trades at €79.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas NFC.DE's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NFC.DE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to NFC.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check NFC.DE's competition here
R35.F vs WDP.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WDP.DE has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while WDP.DE trades at €83.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas WDP.DE's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDP.DE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WDP.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check WDP.DE's competition here
R35.F vs WDP.F Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WDP.F has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while WDP.F trades at €83.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas WDP.F's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WDP.F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WDP.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check WDP.F's competition here
R35.F vs MGG.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, MGG.DE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while MGG.DE trades at €37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas MGG.DE's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGG.DE's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to MGG.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check MGG.DE's competition here
R35.F vs EVD.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EVD.DE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while EVD.DE trades at €64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas EVD.DE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVD.DE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to EVD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check EVD.DE's competition here
R35.F vs VVU.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, VVU.DE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while VVU.DE trades at €1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas VVU.DE's P/E ratio is 84.40. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VVU.DE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to VVU.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check VVU.DE's competition here
R35.F vs BVB.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, BVB.DE has a market cap of 328.4M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while BVB.DE trades at €3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas BVB.DE's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BVB.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to BVB.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check BVB.DE's competition here
R35.F vs EDL.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, EDL.DE has a market cap of 121.3M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while EDL.DE trades at €5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas EDL.DE's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EDL.DE's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to EDL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check EDL.DE's competition here
R35.F vs LOUD.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, LOUD.DE has a market cap of 68.2M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while LOUD.DE trades at €3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas LOUD.DE's P/E ratio is 9.49. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOUD.DE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to LOUD.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check LOUD.DE's competition here
R35.F vs HLG.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, HLG.DE has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while HLG.DE trades at €1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas HLG.DE's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HLG.DE's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to HLG.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check HLG.DE's competition here
R35.F vs PAL.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, PAL.DE has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while PAL.DE trades at €0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas PAL.DE's P/E ratio is -8.59. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAL.DE's ROE of +1.83%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to PAL.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check PAL.DE's competition here
R35.F vs CLIQ.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, CLIQ.DE has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while CLIQ.DE trades at €2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas CLIQ.DE's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CLIQ.DE's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to CLIQ.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check CLIQ.DE's competition here
R35.F vs SPM.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, SPM.DE has a market cap of 12.1M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while SPM.DE trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas SPM.DE's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPM.DE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to SPM.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check SPM.DE's competition here
R35.F vs ITN.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ITN.DE has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while ITN.DE trades at €0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas ITN.DE's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ITN.DE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to ITN.DE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check ITN.DE's competition here
R35.F vs IQ50.F Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, IQ50.F has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while IQ50.F trades at €0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas IQ50.F's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IQ50.F's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to IQ50.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check IQ50.F's competition here
R35.F vs ERO1.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, ERO1.DE has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while ERO1.DE trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas ERO1.DE's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ERO1.DE's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to ERO1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check ERO1.DE's competition here
R35.F vs WIG1.DE Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WIG1.DE has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while WIG1.DE trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas WIG1.DE's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIG1.DE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is less volatile compared to WIG1.DE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check WIG1.DE's competition here
R35.F vs WIG1.F Comparison March 2026
R35.F plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, R35.F stands at 12.2B. In comparison, WIG1.F has a market cap of 88.6K. Regarding current trading prices, R35.F is priced at €82.16, while WIG1.F trades at €0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
R35.F currently has a P/E ratio of 162.12, whereas WIG1.F's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, R35.F's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WIG1.F's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, R35.F is more volatile compared to WIG1.F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for R35.F.Check WIG1.F's competition here