QVC, Inc. 6.375% Senior Secured
QVC, Inc. 6.375% Senior Secured QVCD Peers
See (QVCD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Broadcasting Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVCD | $8.58 | -0.23% | N/A | N/A | N/A | +18.48% |
| CCZ | $62.31 | +7.90% | 59.02B | 53.17 | $1.17 | +3.54% |
| LSXMK | $22.29 | -1.15% | 7.28B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMA | $22.29 | -1.20% | 7.28B | 8.74 | $2.55 | N/A |
| LSXMB | $22.51 | -4.62% | 7.28B | 8.83 | $2.55 | N/A |
| TGNA | $17.33 | +0.23% | 2.79B | 6.12 | $2.83 | +2.88% |
| NMAX | $23.00 | -10.92% | 2.05B | -37.10 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| FUBO | $3.33 | -0.93% | 1.14B | 16.64 | $0.20 | N/A |
| GTN-A | $7.62 | -4.03% | 447.53M | 3.26 | $2.34 | +7.97% |
| GTN | $4.04 | +2.41% | 372.06M | 1.72 | $2.34 | +7.97% |
Stock Comparison
QVCD vs CCZ Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, CCZ has a market cap of 59.02B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while CCZ trades at $62.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCZ's P/E ratio is 53.17. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CCZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is more volatile compared to CCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs LSXMK Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, LSXMK has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while LSXMK trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSXMK's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSXMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to LSXMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs LSXMA Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, LSXMA has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while LSXMA trades at $22.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSXMA's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSXMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to LSXMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs LSXMB Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, LSXMB has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while LSXMB trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSXMB's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to LSXMB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is more volatile compared to LSXMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs TGNA Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, TGNA has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while TGNA trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TGNA's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to TGNA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is more volatile compared to TGNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs NMAX Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, NMAX has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while NMAX trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NMAX's P/E ratio is -37.10. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to NMAX's ROE of +4.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to NMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs FUBO Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, FUBO has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while FUBO trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FUBO's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to FUBO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to FUBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs GTN-A Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, GTN-A has a market cap of 447.53M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while GTN-A trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTN-A's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GTN-A's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to GTN-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs GTN Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, GTN has a market cap of 372.06M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while GTN trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GTN's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to GTN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is more volatile compared to GTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs CURI Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, CURI has a market cap of 359.23M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while CURI trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURI's P/E ratio is -45.07. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CURI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to CURI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs SSP Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, SSP has a market cap of 199.98M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while SSP trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SSP's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SSP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to SSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs IHRT Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, IHRT has a market cap of 189.84M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while IHRT trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHRT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to IHRT's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to IHRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs EVC Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, EVC has a market cap of 171.49M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while EVC trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EVC's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to EVC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to EVC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs SGA Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, SGA has a market cap of 77.63M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while SGA trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGA's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SGA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to SGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs MDIA Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, MDIA has a market cap of 49.73M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while MDIA trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDIA's P/E ratio is -13.32. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to MDIA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to MDIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs UONE Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, UONE has a market cap of 41.83M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while UONE trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UONE's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UONE's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to UONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs UONEK Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, UONEK has a market cap of 40.57M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while UONEK trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UONEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to UONEK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to UONEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs SJ Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, SJ has a market cap of 34.40M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while SJ trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SJ's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to SJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs SALM Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, SALM has a market cap of 28.58M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while SALM trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SALM's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to SALM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to SALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs XHLD Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, XHLD has a market cap of 18.50M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while XHLD trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XHLD's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to XHLD's ROE of +6.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to XHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs AUD Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, AUD has a market cap of 16.93M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while AUD trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AUD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to AUD's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to AUD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs BBGI Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, BBGI has a market cap of 10.00M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while BBGI trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BBGI's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to BBGI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to BBGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs CURIW Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, CURIW has a market cap of 4.84M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while CURIW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CURIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CURIW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to CURIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.
QVCD vs CMLS Comparison
QVCD plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QVCD stands at N/A. In comparison, CMLS has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, QVCD is priced at $8.58, while CMLS trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QVCD currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMLS's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QVCD's ROE is -0.38%, compared to CMLS's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QVCD is less volatile compared to CMLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QVCD.