Quick Heal Technologies Limited
Quick Heal Technologies Limited (QUICKHEAL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QUICKHEAL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUICKHEAL.NS | ₹181.56 | +0.00% | 9.7B | 175.30 | ₹1.02 | N/A |
| TATAELXSI.NS | ₹4,839.50 | +0.00% | 302.7B | 52.08 | ₹93.30 | +1.54% |
| TATAELXSI.BO | ₹4,839.90 | +0.00% | 302.6B | 52.09 | ₹93.27 | +1.54% |
| KFINTECH.NS | ₹1,015.90 | +0.00% | 173.8B | 50.09 | ₹20.11 | +0.74% |
| KFINTECH.BO | ₹1,016.30 | +0.00% | 173.7B | 50.12 | ₹20.09 | +0.74% |
| BLACKBUCK.NS | ₹613.75 | +0.02% | 109.2B | 28.74 | ₹20.93 | N/A |
| INTELLECT.BO | ₹700.45 | +0.00% | 98.2B | 27.55 | ₹25.57 | +0.99% |
| INTELLECT.NS | ₹700.90 | +0.00% | 98.2B | 27.53 | ₹25.58 | +0.99% |
| BBOX.NS | ₹515.35 | +0.00% | 87.5B | 41.25 | ₹12.45 | +0.19% |
| BBOX.BO | ₹516.30 | +0.00% | 87.3B | 41.14 | ₹12.46 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TATAELXSI.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TATAELXSI.NS has a market cap of 302.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TATAELXSI.NS trades at ₹4,839.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TATAELXSI.NS's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATAELXSI.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to TATAELXSI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TATAELXSI.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TATAELXSI.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TATAELXSI.BO has a market cap of 302.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TATAELXSI.BO trades at ₹4,839.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TATAELXSI.BO's P/E ratio is 52.09. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TATAELXSI.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to TATAELXSI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TATAELXSI.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KFINTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KFINTECH.NS has a market cap of 173.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KFINTECH.NS trades at ₹1,015.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KFINTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 50.09. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KFINTECH.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to KFINTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KFINTECH.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KFINTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KFINTECH.BO has a market cap of 173.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KFINTECH.BO trades at ₹1,016.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KFINTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 50.12. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KFINTECH.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to KFINTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KFINTECH.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs BLACKBUCK.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BLACKBUCK.NS has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while BLACKBUCK.NS trades at ₹613.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas BLACKBUCK.NS's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLACKBUCK.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to BLACKBUCK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check BLACKBUCK.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs INTELLECT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INTELLECT.BO has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while INTELLECT.BO trades at ₹700.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas INTELLECT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INTELLECT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to INTELLECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check INTELLECT.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs INTELLECT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INTELLECT.NS has a market cap of 98.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while INTELLECT.NS trades at ₹700.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas INTELLECT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INTELLECT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to INTELLECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check INTELLECT.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs BBOX.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BBOX.NS has a market cap of 87.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while BBOX.NS trades at ₹515.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas BBOX.NS's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBOX.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to BBOX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check BBOX.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs BBOX.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BBOX.BO has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while BBOX.BO trades at ₹516.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas BBOX.BO's P/E ratio is 41.14. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBOX.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to BBOX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check BBOX.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs NEWGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NEWGEN.BO has a market cap of 78.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while NEWGEN.BO trades at ₹621.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas NEWGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWGEN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to NEWGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check NEWGEN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs NEWGEN.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NEWGEN.NS has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while NEWGEN.NS trades at ₹622.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas NEWGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NEWGEN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to NEWGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check NEWGEN.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs RATEGAIN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RATEGAIN.BO has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while RATEGAIN.BO trades at ₹543.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas RATEGAIN.BO's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RATEGAIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to RATEGAIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check RATEGAIN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs RATEGAIN.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RATEGAIN.NS has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while RATEGAIN.NS trades at ₹544.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas RATEGAIN.NS's P/E ratio is 36.12. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RATEGAIN.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to RATEGAIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check RATEGAIN.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs MAPMYINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MAPMYINDIA.BO has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while MAPMYINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,116.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas MAPMYINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 46.44. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAPMYINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to MAPMYINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check MAPMYINDIA.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs MAPMYINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MAPMYINDIA.NS has a market cap of 60.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while MAPMYINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,118.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas MAPMYINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 46.31. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAPMYINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to MAPMYINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check MAPMYINDIA.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TANLA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TANLA.BO has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TANLA.BO trades at ₹457.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TANLA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TANLA.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to TANLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TANLA.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TANLA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TANLA.NS has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TANLA.NS trades at ₹457.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TANLA.NS's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TANLA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to TANLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TANLA.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs EMUDHRA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, EMUDHRA.NS has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while EMUDHRA.NS trades at ₹464.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas EMUDHRA.NS's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMUDHRA.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to EMUDHRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check EMUDHRA.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs EMUDHRA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, EMUDHRA.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while EMUDHRA.BO trades at ₹466.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas EMUDHRA.BO's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EMUDHRA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to EMUDHRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check EMUDHRA.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs NPST.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NPST.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while NPST.NS trades at ₹1,177.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas NPST.NS's P/E ratio is 88.13. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NPST.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to NPST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check NPST.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs NUCLEUS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NUCLEUS.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while NUCLEUS.BO trades at ₹846.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas NUCLEUS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NUCLEUS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to NUCLEUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check NUCLEUS.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs NUCLEUS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NUCLEUS.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while NUCLEUS.NS trades at ₹848.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas NUCLEUS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NUCLEUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to NUCLEUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check NUCLEUS.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs INFOBEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INFOBEAN.BO has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while INFOBEAN.BO trades at ₹868.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas INFOBEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INFOBEAN.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to INFOBEAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check INFOBEAN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs INFOBEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INFOBEAN.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while INFOBEAN.NS trades at ₹868.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas INFOBEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INFOBEAN.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to INFOBEAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check INFOBEAN.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs RAMCOSYS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RAMCOSYS.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while RAMCOSYS.BO trades at ₹515.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas RAMCOSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 85.42. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAMCOSYS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMCOSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check RAMCOSYS.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs RAMCOSYS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RAMCOSYS.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while RAMCOSYS.NS trades at ₹517.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas RAMCOSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 85.73. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAMCOSYS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMCOSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check RAMCOSYS.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KERNEX.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KERNEX.BO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KERNEX.BO trades at ₹1,099.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KERNEX.BO's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KERNEX.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to KERNEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KERNEX.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KERNEX.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KERNEX.NS has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KERNEX.NS trades at ₹1,099.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KERNEX.NS's P/E ratio is 34.45. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KERNEX.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to KERNEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KERNEX.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs MEGASOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MEGASOFT.NS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while MEGASOFT.NS trades at ₹183.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas MEGASOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MEGASOFT.NS's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to MEGASOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check MEGASOFT.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs GENESYS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GENESYS.BO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while GENESYS.BO trades at ₹311.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas GENESYS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.82. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GENESYS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to GENESYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check GENESYS.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs GENESYS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, GENESYS.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while GENESYS.NS trades at ₹310.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas GENESYS.NS's P/E ratio is 32.88. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GENESYS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to GENESYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check GENESYS.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs IZMO.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IZMO.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while IZMO.BO trades at ₹865.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas IZMO.BO's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IZMO.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to IZMO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check IZMO.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs IZMO.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IZMO.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while IZMO.NS trades at ₹864.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas IZMO.NS's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IZMO.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to IZMO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check IZMO.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs UNIECOM.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, UNIECOM.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while UNIECOM.NS trades at ₹113.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas UNIECOM.NS's P/E ratio is 67.20. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNIECOM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to UNIECOM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check UNIECOM.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KELLTONTEC.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KELLTONTEC.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KELLTONTEC.NS trades at ₹19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KELLTONTEC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KELLTONTEC.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to KELLTONTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KELLTONTEC.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KELLTONTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KELLTONTEC.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KELLTONTEC.BO trades at ₹19.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KELLTONTEC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KELLTONTEC.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to KELLTONTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KELLTONTEC.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs QUICKHEAL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, QUICKHEAL.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while QUICKHEAL.BO trades at ₹181.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas QUICKHEAL.BO's P/E ratio is 175.39. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QUICKHEAL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to QUICKHEAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check QUICKHEAL.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs INNOVANA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INNOVANA.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while INNOVANA.NS trades at ₹431.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas INNOVANA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INNOVANA.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to INNOVANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check INNOVANA.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KSOLVES.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KSOLVES.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KSOLVES.NS trades at ₹326.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KSOLVES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KSOLVES.NS's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to KSOLVES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KSOLVES.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KSOLVES.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KSOLVES.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KSOLVES.BO trades at ₹327.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KSOLVES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KSOLVES.BO's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to KSOLVES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KSOLVES.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs VEEFIN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VEEFIN.BO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while VEEFIN.BO trades at ₹281.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas VEEFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VEEFIN.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to VEEFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check VEEFIN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs IRIS.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IRIS.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while IRIS.NS trades at ₹270.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas IRIS.NS's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRIS.NS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to IRIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check IRIS.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SUBEXLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SUBEXLTD.NS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SUBEXLTD.NS trades at ₹9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SUBEXLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 493.50. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SUBEXLTD.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to SUBEXLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SUBEXLTD.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs ABMKNO.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ABMKNO.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while ABMKNO.BO trades at ₹250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas ABMKNO.BO's P/E ratio is 43.86. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABMKNO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to ABMKNO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check ABMKNO.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SOFTTECH.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SOFTTECH.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SOFTTECH.NS trades at ₹301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SOFTTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 321.42. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFTTECH.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SOFTTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SOFTTECH.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SOFTTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SOFTTECH.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SOFTTECH.BO trades at ₹316.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SOFTTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 310.00. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFTTECH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SOFTTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SOFTTECH.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs XTGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, XTGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while XTGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas XTGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.37. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XTGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to XTGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check XTGLOBAL.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TRACXN.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TRACXN.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TRACXN.NS trades at ₹33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TRACXN.NS's P/E ratio is -27.40. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRACXN.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to TRACXN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TRACXN.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TRACXN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TRACXN.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TRACXN.BO trades at ₹33.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TRACXN.BO's P/E ratio is -27.29. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRACXN.BO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to TRACXN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TRACXN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TREJHARA.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TREJHARA.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TREJHARA.BO trades at ₹208.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TREJHARA.BO's P/E ratio is 82.84. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TREJHARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to TREJHARA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TREJHARA.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TREJHARA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TREJHARA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TREJHARA.NS trades at ₹206.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TREJHARA.NS's P/E ratio is 79.18. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TREJHARA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to TREJHARA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TREJHARA.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs DANLAW.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, DANLAW.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while DANLAW.BO trades at ₹624.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas DANLAW.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DANLAW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to DANLAW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check DANLAW.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs AVANCE.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AVANCE.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while AVANCE.BO trades at ₹1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas AVANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 116.00. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AVANCE.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to AVANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check AVANCE.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs VIAANINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VIAANINDUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while VIAANINDUS.BO trades at ₹1,940.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas VIAANINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is -250.65. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIAANINDUS.BO's ROE of +2.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to VIAANINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check VIAANINDUS.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs VIRINCHI.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VIRINCHI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while VIRINCHI.BO trades at ₹20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas VIRINCHI.BO's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIRINCHI.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to VIRINCHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check VIRINCHI.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs VIRINCHI.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VIRINCHI.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while VIRINCHI.NS trades at ₹20.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas VIRINCHI.NS's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIRINCHI.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to VIRINCHI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check VIRINCHI.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs 7SEASL.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, 7SEASL.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while 7SEASL.BO trades at ₹76.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas 7SEASL.BO's P/E ratio is 80.21. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to 7SEASL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to 7SEASL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check 7SEASL.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs CNIRESLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CNIRESLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while CNIRESLTD.BO trades at ₹10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas CNIRESLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -23.89. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNIRESLTD.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to CNIRESLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check CNIRESLTD.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs CURAA.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CURAA.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while CURAA.NS trades at ₹85.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas CURAA.NS's P/E ratio is -365.22. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CURAA.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to CURAA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check CURAA.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs CALSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CALSOFT.BO has a market cap of 891M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while CALSOFT.BO trades at ₹14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas CALSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 145.60. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CALSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to CALSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check CALSOFT.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs CALSOFT.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CALSOFT.NS has a market cap of 875.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while CALSOFT.NS trades at ₹14.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas CALSOFT.NS's P/E ratio is 143.10. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CALSOFT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to CALSOFT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check CALSOFT.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs ORCHASP.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ORCHASP.NS has a market cap of 837.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while ORCHASP.NS trades at ₹2.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas ORCHASP.NS's P/E ratio is -65.50. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ORCHASP.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to ORCHASP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check ORCHASP.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs ODYSSEY.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ODYSSEY.BO has a market cap of 811.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while ODYSSEY.BO trades at ₹50.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas ODYSSEY.BO's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ODYSSEY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to ODYSSEY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check ODYSSEY.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SOFCOM.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SOFCOM.BO has a market cap of 781.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SOFCOM.BO trades at ₹31.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SOFCOM.BO's P/E ratio is 48.21. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SOFCOM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SOFCOM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SOFCOM.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SECURKLOUD.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SECURKLOUD.NS has a market cap of 747.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SECURKLOUD.NS trades at ₹21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SECURKLOUD.NS's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SECURKLOUD.NS's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SECURKLOUD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SECURKLOUD.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SECURKLOUD.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SECURKLOUD.BO has a market cap of 738M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SECURKLOUD.BO trades at ₹21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SECURKLOUD.BO's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SECURKLOUD.BO's ROE of -8.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SECURKLOUD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SECURKLOUD.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs AMRAPLIN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AMRAPLIN.BO has a market cap of 737.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while AMRAPLIN.BO trades at ₹14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas AMRAPLIN.BO's P/E ratio is 37.76. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMRAPLIN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to AMRAPLIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check AMRAPLIN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SGLRES.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SGLRES.BO has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SGLRES.BO trades at ₹2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SGLRES.BO's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SGLRES.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SGLRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SGLRES.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs VIRTUALS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VIRTUALS.BO has a market cap of 691.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while VIRTUALS.BO trades at ₹20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas VIRTUALS.BO's P/E ratio is -14.77. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIRTUALS.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to VIRTUALS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check VIRTUALS.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs CRANESSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CRANESSOFT.BO has a market cap of 685.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while CRANESSOFT.BO trades at ₹4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas CRANESSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRANESSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to CRANESSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check CRANESSOFT.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs AEONXDIGI.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AEONXDIGI.BO has a market cap of 605.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while AEONXDIGI.BO trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas AEONXDIGI.BO's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEONXDIGI.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to AEONXDIGI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check AEONXDIGI.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SAGARSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SAGARSOFT.BO has a market cap of 559.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SAGARSOFT.BO trades at ₹89.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SAGARSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 243.00. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAGARSOFT.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SAGARSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SAGARSOFT.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs NETLINK.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, NETLINK.BO has a market cap of 485.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while NETLINK.BO trades at ₹194.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas NETLINK.BO's P/E ratio is 468.29. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NETLINK.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to NETLINK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check NETLINK.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TELECANOR.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TELECANOR.BO has a market cap of 485.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TELECANOR.BO trades at ₹44.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TELECANOR.BO's P/E ratio is -124.99. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TELECANOR.BO's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to TELECANOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TELECANOR.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs RAMINFO.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, RAMINFO.BO has a market cap of 468.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while RAMINFO.BO trades at ₹61.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas RAMINFO.BO's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAMINFO.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to RAMINFO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check RAMINFO.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs JUPITERIN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, JUPITERIN.BO has a market cap of 435.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while JUPITERIN.BO trades at ₹46.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas JUPITERIN.BO's P/E ratio is -24.42. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JUPITERIN.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to JUPITERIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check JUPITERIN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs SAWABUSI.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, SAWABUSI.BO has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while SAWABUSI.BO trades at ₹0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas SAWABUSI.BO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SAWABUSI.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to SAWABUSI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check SAWABUSI.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs WESTLEIRES.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, WESTLEIRES.BO has a market cap of 335.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while WESTLEIRES.BO trades at ₹110.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas WESTLEIRES.BO's P/E ratio is -323.53. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WESTLEIRES.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to WESTLEIRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check WESTLEIRES.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs TELESYS.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, TELESYS.BO has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while TELESYS.BO trades at ₹13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas TELESYS.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TELESYS.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to TELESYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check TELESYS.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs KASHYAP.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, KASHYAP.BO has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while KASHYAP.BO trades at ₹5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas KASHYAP.BO's P/E ratio is -140.00. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KASHYAP.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to KASHYAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check KASHYAP.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs AHASOLAR.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AHASOLAR.BO has a market cap of 246.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while AHASOLAR.BO trades at ₹78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas AHASOLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AHASOLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to AHASOLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check AHASOLAR.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs ERPSOFT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, ERPSOFT.BO has a market cap of 244.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while ERPSOFT.BO trades at ₹64.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas ERPSOFT.BO's P/E ratio is 71.79. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ERPSOFT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to ERPSOFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check ERPSOFT.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs COSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, COSYN.BO has a market cap of 177.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while COSYN.BO trades at ₹24.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas COSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 102.70. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COSYN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to COSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check COSYN.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs CONTCHM.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, CONTCHM.BO has a market cap of 176.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while CONTCHM.BO trades at ₹78.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas CONTCHM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CONTCHM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to CONTCHM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check CONTCHM.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs IFINSER.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, IFINSER.BO has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while IFINSER.BO trades at ₹16.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas IFINSER.BO's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IFINSER.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to IFINSER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check IFINSER.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs OTCO.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, OTCO.BO has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while OTCO.BO trades at ₹7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas OTCO.BO's P/E ratio is -46.81. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OTCO.BO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to OTCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check OTCO.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs MELSTAR.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MELSTAR.NS has a market cap of 71.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while MELSTAR.NS trades at ₹4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas MELSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MELSTAR.NS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to MELSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check MELSTAR.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs MAHAVEER.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MAHAVEER.BO has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while MAHAVEER.BO trades at ₹8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas MAHAVEER.BO's P/E ratio is 225.50. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAHAVEER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to MAHAVEER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check MAHAVEER.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs BGLOBAL.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, BGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 45.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while BGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas BGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BGLOBAL.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to BGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check BGLOBAL.NS's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs VIRGOGLOB.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, VIRGOGLOB.BO has a market cap of 41.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while VIRGOGLOB.BO trades at ₹4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas VIRGOGLOB.BO's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIRGOGLOB.BO's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to VIRGOGLOB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check VIRGOGLOB.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs INTEGHIT.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, INTEGHIT.BO has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while INTEGHIT.BO trades at ₹3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas INTEGHIT.BO's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to INTEGHIT.BO's ROE of -6.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to INTEGHIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check INTEGHIT.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs MELSTAR.BO Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, MELSTAR.BO has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while MELSTAR.BO trades at ₹4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas MELSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MELSTAR.BO's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is less volatile compared to MELSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check MELSTAR.BO's competition here
QUICKHEAL.NS vs AGCNET.NS Comparison February 2026
QUICKHEAL.NS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUICKHEAL.NS stands at 9.7B. In comparison, AGCNET.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUICKHEAL.NS is priced at ₹181.56, while AGCNET.NS trades at ₹906.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUICKHEAL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 175.30, whereas AGCNET.NS's P/E ratio is 37.32. In terms of profitability, QUICKHEAL.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AGCNET.NS's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, QUICKHEAL.NS is more volatile compared to AGCNET.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUICKHEAL.NS.Check AGCNET.NS's competition here