Quinton Group Inc.
Quinton Group Inc. QUGB Peers
See (QUGB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Shell Companies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUGB | $0.00 | +0.00% | 141 | -0.00 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| QMIS | $0.25 | +0.00% | 30.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| GSHN | $22.70 | +2.71% | 9.3B | -2270.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| KATX | $1.05 | +0.00% | 1.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| CCYC | $11.25 | +0.00% | 1.7B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ZSYC | $2.00 | +0.00% | 1B | -2.12 | -$0.95 | N/A |
| WPCBF | $0.00 | +100.00% | 700.3M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| NOTR | $13.00 | +0.00% | 570.9M | -433.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| WCHS | $5.01 | +0.00% | 531.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| FZRO | $2.00 | N/A | 346.2M | -0.00 | -$4,243,300.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QUGB vs QMIS Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, QMIS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while QMIS trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas QMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to QMIS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and QMIS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs GSHN Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, GSHN has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while GSHN trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GSHN's P/E ratio is -2270.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GSHN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and GSHN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs KATX Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, KATX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while KATX trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KATX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KATX's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to KATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CCYC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CCYC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CCYC trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CCYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CCYC's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and CCYC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ZSYC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ZSYC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ZSYC trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZSYC's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZSYC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ZSYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs WPCBF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WPCBF has a market cap of 700.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WPCBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WPCBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WPCBF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and WPCBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs NOTR Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NOTR has a market cap of 570.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NOTR trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NOTR's P/E ratio is -433.33. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NOTR's ROE of -65.90%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to NOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs WCHS Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WCHS has a market cap of 531.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WCHS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WCHS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WCHS's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to WCHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs FZRO Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, FZRO has a market cap of 346.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while FZRO trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FZRO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FZRO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and FZRO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs RGLG Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, RGLG has a market cap of 342.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while RGLG trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RGLG's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RGLG's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to RGLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CINV Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CINV has a market cap of 338.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CINV trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CINV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CINV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and CINV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs DVTC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, DVTC has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while DVTC trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DVTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DVTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and DVTC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs AMRR Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AMRR has a market cap of 250.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AMRR trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMRR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMRR's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and AMRR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs BTOW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, BTOW has a market cap of 192.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while BTOW trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BTOW's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BTOW's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and BTOW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs KAST Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, KAST has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while KAST trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KAST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KAST's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to KAST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs RMGCF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, RMGCF has a market cap of 164.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while RMGCF trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RMGCF's P/E ratio is -26.52. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RMGCF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and RMGCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs SCGX Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, SCGX has a market cap of 138M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while SCGX trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SCGX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SCGX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and SCGX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs TRFE Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, TRFE has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while TRFE trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TRFE's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRFE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and TRFE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs NMTT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NMTT has a market cap of 90.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NMTT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NMTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NMTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and NMTT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs AWCA Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AWCA has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AWCA trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AWCA's P/E ratio is -22.54. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AWCA's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to AWCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs WAYS Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WAYS has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WAYS trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WAYS's P/E ratio is -49.72. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and WAYS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs TGLO Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, TGLO has a market cap of 83.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while TGLO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TGLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TGLO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to TGLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs ATAQF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ATAQF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ATAQF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATAQF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATAQF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ATAQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs WWHC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WWHC has a market cap of 80.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WWHC trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WWHC's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WWHC's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and WWHC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs CHAAW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CHAAW has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CHAAW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHAAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHAAW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and CHAAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs CMCAF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CMCAF has a market cap of 76.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CMCAF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CMCAF's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMCAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and CMCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs XITO Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, XITO has a market cap of 76M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while XITO trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XITO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XITO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to XITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CREEF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CREEF has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CREEF trades at $10.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CREEF's P/E ratio is 36.47. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CREEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to CREEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs SSHT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, SSHT has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while SSHT trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SSHT's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSHT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and SSHT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs AASP Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AASP has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AASP trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AASP's P/E ratio is -20.69. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASP's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and AASP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs PTCP Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, PTCP has a market cap of 56.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while PTCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PTCP's P/E ratio is -27.78. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PTCP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and PTCP have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ATMS Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ATMS has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ATMS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATMS's P/E ratio is -8.30. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATMS's ROE of +1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and ATMS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs CAHO Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CAHO has a market cap of 55.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CAHO trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CAHO's P/E ratio is -150.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAHO's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to CAHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs GGAAF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, GGAAF has a market cap of 50.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while GGAAF trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GGAAF's P/E ratio is -133.33. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GGAAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to GGAAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs JMTM Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, JMTM has a market cap of 48M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while JMTM trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas JMTM's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JMTM's ROE of +4.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to JMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs MDWK Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, MDWK has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while MDWK trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MDWK's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDWK's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and MDWK have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs KWACW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, KWACW has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while KWACW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KWACW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWACW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and KWACW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs KWAC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, KWAC has a market cap of 46.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while KWAC trades at $13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas KWAC's P/E ratio is -23.75. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KWAC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and KWAC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs PMVCW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, PMVCW has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while PMVCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PMVCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PMVCW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and PMVCW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs XTPT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, XTPT has a market cap of 40.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while XTPT trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XTPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XTPT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to XTPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs WBQNL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WBQNL has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WBQNL trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WBQNL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WBQNL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and WBQNL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs GWIN Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, GWIN has a market cap of 36.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while GWIN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GWIN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GWIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and GWIN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs CNXX Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CNXX has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CNXX trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CNXX's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CNXX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and CNXX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs IDIG Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, IDIG has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while IDIG trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas IDIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IDIG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and IDIG have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs AVNI Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AVNI has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AVNI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AVNI's P/E ratio is -25.10. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVNI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to AVNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs NPFC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NPFC has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NPFC trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NPFC's P/E ratio is -17.86. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NPFC's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and NPFC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ATMH Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ATMH has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ATMH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ATMH's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ATMH's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ATMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CBBB Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CBBB has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CBBB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CBBB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CBBB's ROE of +10.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to CBBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs ADCV Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ADCV has a market cap of 22M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ADCV trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADCV's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADCV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and ADCV have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs EVTK Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, EVTK has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while EVTK trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVTK's P/E ratio is -500.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EVTK's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to EVTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs FWFW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, FWFW has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while FWFW trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FWFW's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FWFW's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to FWFW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs AGSS Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AGSS has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AGSS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AGSS's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AGSS's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and AGSS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs GTVI Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, GTVI has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while GTVI trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GTVI's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GTVI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and GTVI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs PSCO Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, PSCO has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while PSCO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PSCO's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSCO's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to PSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs ACBD Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ACBD has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ACBD trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ACBD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACBD's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ACBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs ECGR Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ECGR has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ECGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ECGR's P/E ratio is -20.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECGR's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ECGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs USBL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, USBL has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while USBL trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas USBL's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USBL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to USBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs AOAO Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AOAO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AOAO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AOAO's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AOAO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and AOAO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs WRPT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WRPT has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WRPT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WRPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WRPT's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and WRPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs GIPL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, GIPL has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while GIPL trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GIPL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIPL's ROE of +3391.74%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and GIPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ELLH Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ELLH has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ELLH trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ELLH's P/E ratio is -4.79. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELLH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and ELLH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ITRX Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ITRX has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ITRX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ITRX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ITRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and ITRX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs AZRH Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AZRH has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AZRH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AZRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AZRH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to AZRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs NIHL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NIHL has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NIHL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NIHL's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NIHL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and NIHL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs STLY Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, STLY has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while STLY trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STLY's P/E ratio is -23.61. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to STLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs BOREF Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, BOREF has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while BOREF trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BOREF's P/E ratio is -21.33. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BOREF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to BOREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs SLTN Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, SLTN has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while SLTN trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SLTN's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SLTN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and SLTN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs AMLH Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, AMLH has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while AMLH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AMLH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMLH's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to AMLH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs LWLW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, LWLW has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while LWLW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LWLW's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWLW's ROE of -3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and LWLW have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs PLPL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, PLPL has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while PLPL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PLPL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLPL's ROE of +17.88%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and PLPL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs PCMC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, PCMC has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while PCMC trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PCMC's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PCMC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and PCMC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ADIA Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ADIA has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ADIA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADIA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ADIA's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ADIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CDSG Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CDSG has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CDSG trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CDSG's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDSG's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to CDSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs BDCM Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, BDCM has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while BDCM trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BDCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BDCM's ROE of +20.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to BDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs NGRC Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NGRC has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NGRC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NGRC's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NGRC's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and NGRC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs FUNR Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, FUNR has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while FUNR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FUNR's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FUNR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to FUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs XCPT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, XCPT has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while XCPT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XCPT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XCPT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and XCPT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs CHYL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CHYL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CHYL trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CHYL's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHYL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to CHYL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs NXMH Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NXMH has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NXMH trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NXMH's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NXMH's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to NXMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs TCRI Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, TCRI has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while TCRI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TCRI's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TCRI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to TCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs NRCD Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, NRCD has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while NRCD trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NRCD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and NRCD have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs LRGR Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, LRGR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while LRGR trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LRGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LRGR's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and LRGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs WHLT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WHLT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WHLT trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WHLT's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WHLT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to WHLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs ASNB Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ASNB has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ASNB trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ASNB's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ASNB's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to ASNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs FSTJ Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, FSTJ has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while FSTJ trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FSTJ's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FSTJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and FSTJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs SITS Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, SITS has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while SITS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SITS's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SITS's ROE of -3.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to SITS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs MTRI Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, MTRI has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while MTRI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MTRI's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MTRI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to MTRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CRVH Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CRVH has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CRVH trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CRVH's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRVH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and CRVH have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs WNFT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, WNFT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while WNFT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WNFT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WNFT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to WNFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs CDBT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, CDBT has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while CDBT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CDBT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CDBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to CDBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs HKBT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, HKBT has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while HKBT trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HKBT's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HKBT's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to HKBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs XSVT Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, XSVT has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while XSVT trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XSVT's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to XSVT's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and XSVT have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs GDVM Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, GDVM has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while GDVM trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GDVM's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GDVM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to GDVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs HPIL Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, HPIL has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while HPIL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HPIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HPIL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to HPIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs FORW Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, FORW has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while FORW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FORW's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FORW's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to FORW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs ENGA Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ENGA has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ENGA trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ENGA's P/E ratio is -16.00. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ENGA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and ENGA have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs INOQ Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, INOQ has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while INOQ trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas INOQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INOQ's ROE of +0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB is less volatile compared to INOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUGB.
QUGB vs HBIE Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, HBIE has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while HBIE trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HBIE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HBIE's ROE of -7.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and HBIE have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUGB vs ETER Comparison
QUGB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUGB stands at 141. In comparison, ETER has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUGB is priced at $0.00, while ETER trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUGB currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ETER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUGB's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ETER's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUGB and ETER have similar daily volatility (0.00).