BNP Paribas Easy ESG Equity Quality Europe
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Equity Quality Europe QUED.PA Peers
See (QUED.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Asset Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUED.PA | €135.58 | -0.41% | 66M | 21.31 | €6.37 | +2.14% |
| JPSR.AS | €22.99 | -0.88% | 788.4B | N/A | N/A | +2.07% |
| IWDA.AS | €100.20 | +0.05% | 92B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VUSA.AS | €99.90 | +0.12% | 55.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.12% |
| VWRL.AS | €127.60 | +0.09% | 32.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.61% |
| SP5H.PA | €306.90 | +0.31% | 19B | 27.15 | €11.27 | +1.22% |
| SP5C.PA | €378.84 | +0.11% | 18.6B | 26.05 | €14.51 | N/A |
| IUSA.AS | €52.50 | +0.12% | 15.2B | N/A | N/A | +1.09% |
| ISFA.AS | €9.89 | -0.75% | 14.2B | N/A | N/A | +3.54% |
| AMUN.PA | €68.60 | -0.15% | 13.8B | 10.68 | €6.37 | +5.42% |
Stock Comparison
QUED.PA vs JPSR.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, JPSR.AS has a market cap of 788.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while JPSR.AS trades at €22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas JPSR.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to JPSR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to JPSR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs IWDA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, IWDA.AS has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while IWDA.AS trades at €100.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas IWDA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to IWDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs VUSA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, VUSA.AS has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while VUSA.AS trades at €99.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas VUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to VUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs VWRL.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, VWRL.AS has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while VWRL.AS trades at €127.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas VWRL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VWRL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to VWRL.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs SP5H.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, SP5H.PA has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while SP5H.PA trades at €306.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas SP5H.PA's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to SP5H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs SP5C.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, SP5C.PA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while SP5C.PA trades at €378.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas SP5C.PA's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SP5C.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to SP5C.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs IUSA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, IUSA.AS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while IUSA.AS trades at €52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas IUSA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IUSA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to IUSA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ISFA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ISFA.AS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ISFA.AS trades at €9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ISFA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ISFA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ISFA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs AMUN.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, AMUN.PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while AMUN.PA trades at €68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas AMUN.PA's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AMUN.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to AMUN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs HAL.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, HAL.AS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while HAL.AS trades at €123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas HAL.AS's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HAL.AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to HAL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs PSH.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, PSH.AS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while PSH.AS trades at €51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas PSH.AS's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PSH.AS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to PSH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CSH2.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CSH2.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CSH2.PA trades at €106.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CSH2.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CSH2.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to CSH2.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs WLDH.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, WLDH.PA has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while WLDH.PA trades at €220.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas WLDH.PA's P/E ratio is 23.47. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLDH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to WLDH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs WLD.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, WLD.PA has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while WLD.PA trades at €342.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas WLD.PA's P/E ratio is 22.86. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to WLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs SOF.BR Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, SOF.BR has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while SOF.BR trades at €265.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas SOF.BR's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SOF.BR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to SOF.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs MEUD.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, MEUD.PA has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while MEUD.PA trades at €258.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas MEUD.PA's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MEUD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to MEUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs IMEU.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, IMEU.AS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while IMEU.AS trades at €33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas IMEU.AS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IMEU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to IMEU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs GBLB.BR Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, GBLB.BR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while GBLB.BR trades at €73.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas GBLB.BR's P/E ratio is 302.71. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GBLB.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to GBLB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs I500.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, I500.AS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while I500.AS trades at €10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas I500.AS's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I500.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to I500.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs I50D.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, I50D.AS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while I50D.AS trades at €6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas I50D.AS's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to I50D.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to I50D.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs LCWD.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, LCWD.PA has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while LCWD.PA trades at €19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas LCWD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LCWD.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to LCWD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs GOLD.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, GOLD.PA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while GOLD.PA trades at €112.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas GOLD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GOLD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to GOLD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs IWRD.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, IWRD.AS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while IWRD.AS trades at €72.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas IWRD.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IWRD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to IWRD.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CC4.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CC4.PA has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CC4.PA trades at €224.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CC4.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CC4.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to CC4.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ECRP.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ECRP.PA has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ECRP.PA trades at €53.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ECRP.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ECRP.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to ECRP.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs VHYL.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, VHYL.AS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while VHYL.AS trades at €63.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas VHYL.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VHYL.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to VHYL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs 500.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, 500.PA has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while 500.PA trades at €104.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas 500.PA's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to 500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs AEME.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, AEME.PA has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while AEME.PA trades at €69.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas AEME.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEME.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to AEME.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CW8.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CW8.PA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CW8.PA trades at €547.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CW8.PA's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CW8.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to CW8.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs IJPA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, IJPA.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while IJPA.AS trades at €52.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas IJPA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IJPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to IJPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs PHAU.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, PHAU.AS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while PHAU.AS trades at €264.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas PHAU.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAU.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to PHAU.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs REINA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, REINA.AS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while REINA.AS trades at €28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas REINA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to REINA.AS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to REINA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs UST.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, UST.PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while UST.PA trades at €77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas UST.PA's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to UST.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to UST.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs S500H.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, S500H.PA has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while S500H.PA trades at €87.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas S500H.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500H.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to S500H.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs S500.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, S500.PA has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while S500.PA trades at €149.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas S500.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to S500.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to S500.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs KBCA.BR Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, KBCA.BR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while KBCA.BR trades at €59.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas KBCA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to KBCA.BR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to KBCA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs VEUR.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, VEUR.AS has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while VEUR.AS trades at €41.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas VEUR.AS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VEUR.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to VEUR.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs USA.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, USA.PA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while USA.PA trades at €492.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas USA.PA's P/E ratio is 30.84. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USA.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to USA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs 500X.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, 500X.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while 500X.AS trades at €37.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas 500X.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to 500X.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to 500X.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EUEA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EUEA.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EUEA.AS trades at €54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EUEA.AS's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUEA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EUEA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs IEMM.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, IEMM.AS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while IEMM.AS trades at €40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas IEMM.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to IEMM.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to IEMM.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs USAC.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, USAC.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while USAC.PA trades at €533.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas USAC.PA's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to USAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs RF.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, RF.PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while RF.PA trades at €60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas RF.PA's P/E ratio is -10.17. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RF.PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to RF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs C50U.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, C50U.PA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while C50U.PA trades at €163.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas C50U.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50U.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to C50U.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ICHN.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ICHN.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ICHN.AS trades at €5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ICHN.AS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHN.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ICHN.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ICHD.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ICHD.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ICHD.AS trades at €4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ICHD.AS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ICHD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to ICHD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ALLFG.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ALLFG.AS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ALLFG.AS trades at €6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ALLFG.AS's P/E ratio is -23.86. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ALLFG.AS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ALLFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs WSRI.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, WSRI.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while WSRI.PA trades at €103.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas WSRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WSRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to WSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CACC.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CACC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CACC.PA trades at €38.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CACC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CACC.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to CACC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CAC.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CAC.PA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CAC.PA trades at €78.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CAC.PA's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CAC.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to CAC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs AUEM.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, AUEM.PA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while AUEM.PA trades at €6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas AUEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AUEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to AUEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs MF.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, MF.PA has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while MF.PA trades at €90.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas MF.PA's P/E ratio is -30.78. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MF.PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to MF.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs MSE.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, MSE.PA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while MSE.PA trades at €58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas MSE.PA's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MSE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to MSE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CD5.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CD5.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CD5.PA trades at €85.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CD5.PA's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CD5.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to CD5.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs C50.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, C50.PA has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while C50.PA trades at €138.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas C50.PA's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to C50.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to C50.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs BREB.BR Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, BREB.BR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while BREB.BR trades at €117.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas BREB.BR's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BREB.BR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to BREB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ROLA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ROLA.AS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ROLA.AS trades at €62.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ROLA.AS's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ROLA.AS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to ROLA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs AEEM.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, AEEM.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while AEEM.PA trades at €5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas AEEM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AEEM.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to AEEM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs WESE.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, WESE.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while WESE.PA trades at €71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas WESE.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to WESE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs TKO.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, TKO.PA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while TKO.PA trades at €19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas TKO.PA's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TKO.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to TKO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs VERX.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, VERX.AS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while VERX.AS trades at €42.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas VERX.AS's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VERX.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to VERX.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CB3.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CB3.PA has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CB3.PA trades at €220.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CB3.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CB3.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to CB3.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs SEMD.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, SEMD.AS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while SEMD.AS trades at €5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas SEMD.AS's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEMD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to SEMD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EEUE.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EEUE.PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EEUE.PA trades at €16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EEUE.PA's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EEUE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to EEUE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EHYA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EHYA.AS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EHYA.AS trades at €5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EHYA.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EHYA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to EHYA.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ESE.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ESE.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ESE.PA trades at €26.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ESE.PA's P/E ratio is 26.04. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ESE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs GEMU.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, GEMU.PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while GEMU.PA trades at €9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas GEMU.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GEMU.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to GEMU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EUSRI.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EUSRI.PA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EUSRI.PA trades at €84.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EUSRI.PA's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EUSRI.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EUSRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs TNOW.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, TNOW.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while TNOW.PA trades at €834.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas TNOW.PA's P/E ratio is 39.01. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TNOW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to TNOW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EPAB.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EPAB.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EPAB.PA trades at €35.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EPAB.PA's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPAB.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EPAB.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EXCH.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EXCH.AS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EXCH.AS trades at €5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EXCH.AS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXCH.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EXCH.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ANX.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ANX.PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ANX.PA trades at €219.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ANX.PA's P/E ratio is 33.14. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ANX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs TDIV.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, TDIV.AS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while TDIV.AS trades at €42.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas TDIV.AS's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TDIV.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to TDIV.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs USRI.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, USRI.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while USRI.PA trades at €102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas USRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to USRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to USRI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ANTIN.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ANTIN.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ANTIN.PA trades at €11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ANTIN.PA's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ANTIN.PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ANTIN.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs PABW.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, PABW.PA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while PABW.PA trades at €76.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas PABW.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PABW.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to PABW.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ACWI.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ACWI.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ACWI.PA trades at €473.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ACWI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ACWI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to ACWI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CMUD.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CMUD.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CMUD.PA trades at €66.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CMUD.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CMUD.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to CMUD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs PEUG.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, PEUG.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while PEUG.PA trades at €75.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas PEUG.PA's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PEUG.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to PEUG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs BNKE.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, BNKE.PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while BNKE.PA trades at €242.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas BNKE.PA's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNKE.PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to BNKE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EGOV.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EGOV.PA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EGOV.PA trades at €49.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EGOV.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGOV.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EGOV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs MUSD.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, MUSD.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while MUSD.AS trades at €8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas MUSD.AS's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MUSD.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to MUSD.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs PHAG.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, PHAG.AS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while PHAG.AS trades at €28.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas PHAG.AS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PHAG.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to PHAG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs WAT.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, WAT.PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while WAT.PA trades at €67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas WAT.PA's P/E ratio is 28.51. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WAT.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to WAT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs GIMB.BR Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, GIMB.BR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while GIMB.BR trades at €41.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas GIMB.BR's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GIMB.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to GIMB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EMPA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EMPA.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EMPA.AS trades at €6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EMPA.AS's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EMPA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EMPA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs MPAB.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, MPAB.AS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while MPAB.AS trades at €5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas MPAB.AS's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MPAB.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to MPAB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs AASI.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, AASI.PA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while AASI.PA trades at €39.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas AASI.PA's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AASI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to AASI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EGRI.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EGRI.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EGRI.PA trades at €45.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EGRI.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EGRI.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to EGRI.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs LWCR.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, LWCR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while LWCR.PA trades at €498.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas LWCR.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LWCR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA and LWCR.PA have similar daily volatility (0.37).
QUED.PA vs BNK.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, BNK.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while BNK.PA trades at €45.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas BNK.PA's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BNK.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to BNK.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs INR.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, INR.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while INR.PA trades at €28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas INR.PA's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to INR.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to INR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs CG1.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, CG1.PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while CG1.PA trades at €422.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas CG1.PA's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CG1.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to CG1.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs TFG.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, TFG.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while TFG.AS trades at €16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas TFG.AS's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TFG.AS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to TFG.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs EXA1.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, EXA1.AS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while EXA1.AS trades at €12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas EXA1.AS's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EXA1.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to EXA1.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs WQDA.AS Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, WQDA.AS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while WQDA.AS trades at €9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas WQDA.AS's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WQDA.AS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to WQDA.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs DAX.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, DAX.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while DAX.PA trades at €217.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas DAX.PA's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DAX.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is less volatile compared to DAX.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ESGH.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ESGH.PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ESGH.PA trades at €25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ESGH.PA's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGH.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to ESGH.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.
QUED.PA vs ESGE.PA Comparison
QUED.PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUED.PA stands at 66M. In comparison, ESGE.PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUED.PA is priced at €135.58, while ESGE.PA trades at €34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUED.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 21.31, whereas ESGE.PA's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, QUED.PA's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ESGE.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUED.PA is more volatile compared to ESGE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUED.PA.