Qantas Airways Limited
Qantas Airways Limited (QUBSF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QUBSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBSF | $6.35 | +1.11% | 9.6B | 8.58 | $0.74 | +5.20% |
| AIRYY | $15.63 | -17.74% | 269.9B | 521.00 | $0.03 | N/A |
| ANYYY | $14.71 | -0.27% | 44.1B | 17.93 | $0.82 | +3.71% |
| ANNSF | $28.70 | -1.23% | 43.1B | 17.61 | $1.63 | +3.87% |
| RYAOF | $38.00 | +0.00% | 39.8B | 15.08 | $2.52 | +1.29% |
| AFLYY | $1.06 | -1.85% | 27.7B | 1.53 | $0.69 | N/A |
| AIPUF | $1.58 | +0.00% | 22.6B | 39.50 | $0.04 | +1.62% |
| ICAGY | $9.40 | -0.11% | 21.4B | 5.87 | $1.60 | +2.16% |
| BABWF | $4.57 | -8.60% | 20.8B | 5.78 | $0.79 | +2.31% |
| CHEAF | $0.64 | +0.00% | 18.9B | -64.04 | -$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QUBSF vs AIRYY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 269.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AIRYY trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is 521.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AIRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check AIRYY's competition here
QUBSF vs ANYYY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ANYYY trades at $14.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ANYYY's competition here
QUBSF vs ANNSF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ANNSF trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ANNSF's competition here
QUBSF vs RYAOF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 39.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while RYAOF trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and RYAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RYAOF's competition here
QUBSF vs AFLYY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AFLYY trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check AFLYY's competition here
QUBSF vs AIPUF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AIPUF trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 39.50. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AIPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check AIPUF's competition here
QUBSF vs ICAGY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ICAGY has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ICAGY trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ICAGY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ICAGY's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ICAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ICAGY's competition here
QUBSF vs BABWF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while BABWF trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BABWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BABWF's competition here
QUBSF vs CHEAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CHEAF trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -64.04. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CHEAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CHEAF's competition here
QUBSF vs AIPUY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AIPUY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 33.58. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AIPUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check AIPUY's competition here
QUBSF vs SINGF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while SINGF trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SINGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check SINGF's competition here
QUBSF vs APTPF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while APTPF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and APTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check APTPF's competition here
QUBSF vs SINGY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while SINGY trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check SINGY's competition here
QUBSF vs AICAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AICAF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is 67.48. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AICAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AICAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AICAF's competition here
QUBSF vs CHKIF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CHKIF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -54.24. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CHKIF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHKIF's competition here
QUBSF vs GPAEF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while GPAEF trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 21.29. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GPAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GPAEF's competition here
QUBSF vs ARRPY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ARRPY trades at $11.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ARRPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ARRPY's competition here
QUBSF vs AEOXF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AEOXF trades at $115.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AEOXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AEOXF's competition here
QUBSF vs CPCAY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CPCAY trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CPCAY's competition here
QUBSF vs CPCAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CPCAF trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CPCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CPCAF's competition here
QUBSF vs DLAKY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while DLAKY trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check DLAKY's competition here
QUBSF vs DLAKF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while DLAKF trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to DLAKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check DLAKF's competition here
QUBSF vs AUKNY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AUKNY trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AUKNY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AUKNY's competition here
QUBSF vs FLGZY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while FLGZY trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to FLGZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check FLGZY's competition here
QUBSF vs ASRMF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ASRMF trades at $33.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ASRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ASRMF's competition here
QUBSF vs TKHVY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while TKHVY trades at $67.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 321.76. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to TKHVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check TKHVY's competition here
QUBSF vs UZAPF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while UZAPF trades at $302.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and UZAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check UZAPF's competition here
QUBSF vs QABSY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while QABSY trades at $29.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to QABSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check QABSY's competition here
QUBSF vs ALNPY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ALNPY trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ALNPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ALNPY's competition here
QUBSF vs ALNPF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ALNPF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ALNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALNPF's competition here
QUBSF vs ACKDF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ACKDF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ACKDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ACKDF's competition here
QUBSF vs FPRUF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while FPRUF trades at $84.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FPRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FPRUF's competition here
QUBSF vs FPRUY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while FPRUY trades at $40.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to FPRUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check FPRUY's competition here
QUBSF vs JPNRF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while JPNRF trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and JPNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JPNRF's competition here
QUBSF vs JAPSY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while JAPSY trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check JAPSY's competition here
QUBSF vs TAWNF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while TAWNF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is 6.13. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to TAWNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check TAWNF's competition here
QUBSF vs FGWLF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FGWLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while FGWLF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas FGWLF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to FGWLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FGWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FGWLF's competition here
QUBSF vs GAERF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while GAERF trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to GAERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check GAERF's competition here
QUBSF vs SPASF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while SPASF trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SPASF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check SPASF's competition here
QUBSF vs EIFZF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while EIFZF trades at $73.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and EIFZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check EIFZF's competition here
QUBSF vs ACDVF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ACDVF trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ACDVF's competition here
QUBSF vs EJTTF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while EJTTF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to EJTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check EJTTF's competition here
QUBSF vs ESYJY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ESYJY trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ESYJY's competition here
QUBSF vs WZZZY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while WZZZY trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and WZZZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WZZZY's competition here
QUBSF vs JTTRY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while JTTRY trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and JTTRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check JTTRY's competition here
QUBSF vs AFRAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AFRAF trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 1.62. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AFRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AFRAF's competition here
QUBSF vs SEGSF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while SEGSF trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SEGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check SEGSF's competition here
QUBSF vs JAIRF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while JAIRF trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to JAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check JAIRF's competition here
QUBSF vs TAVHY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while TAVHY trades at $26.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and TAVHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TAVHY's competition here
QUBSF vs ELALF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ELALF trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ELALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ELALF's competition here
QUBSF vs BJCHF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while BJCHF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -8.25. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BJCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJCHF's competition here
QUBSF vs NWARF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while NWARF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to NWARF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check NWARF's competition here
QUBSF vs AGZNF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AGZNF trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.47. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AGZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check AGZNF's competition here
QUBSF vs WZZAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while WZZAF trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 5.65. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and WZZAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WZZAF's competition here
QUBSF vs GRPAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GRPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GRPAF's competition here
QUBSF vs BJCHY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while BJCHY trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BJCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BJCHY's competition here
QUBSF vs CTTPY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CTTPY trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CTTPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CTTPY's competition here
QUBSF vs CEBUF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CEBUF trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CEBUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CEBUF's competition here
QUBSF vs ANZLY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 824.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ANZLY trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ANZLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ANZLY's competition here
QUBSF vs ANZFF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 814.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ANZFF trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ANZFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check ANZFF's competition here
QUBSF vs FNNNF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 716.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while FNNNF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FNNNF's competition here
QUBSF vs AIABF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while AIABF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to AIABF's ROE of -2.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AIABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check AIABF's competition here
QUBSF vs HMCTF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while HMCTF trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -20.17. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to HMCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check HMCTF's competition here
QUBSF vs CHRRF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 381.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CHRRF trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CHRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHRRF's competition here
QUBSF vs NOKFF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and NOKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOKFF's competition here
QUBSF vs VIAAY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 142.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while VIAAY trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 16.33. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and VIAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VIAAY's competition here
QUBSF vs NRSAF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while NRSAF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and NRSAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NRSAF's competition here
QUBSF vs HRBR Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while HRBR trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to HRBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check HRBR's competition here
QUBSF vs GOLLQ Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check GOLLQ's competition here
QUBSF vs CEBUY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 63M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CEBUY trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CEBUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CEBUY's competition here
QUBSF vs JETMF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while JETMF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to JETMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check JETMF's competition here
QUBSF vs SASBQ Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check SASBQ's competition here
QUBSF vs CAJTF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CAJTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CAJTF's competition here
QUBSF vs LTMAY Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check LTMAY's competition here
QUBSF vs SKAS Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while SKAS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to SKAS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and SKAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SKAS's competition here
QUBSF vs ACAVF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ACAVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ACAVF's competition here
QUBSF vs NOKPF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while NOKPF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and NOKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NOKPF's competition here
QUBSF vs JETR Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 497.6K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while JETR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to JETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check JETR's competition here
QUBSF vs KLMR Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 37.4K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and KLMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KLMR's competition here
QUBSF vs PACC Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and PACC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PACC's competition here
QUBSF vs BPOL Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BPOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BPOL's competition here
QUBSF vs GLUX Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 897. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GLUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check GLUX's competition here
QUBSF vs RHWI Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and RHWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check RHWI's competition here
QUBSF vs CHHCF Comparison March 2026
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.6B. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.35, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.58, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +1.51%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CHHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.Check CHHCF's competition here