Qantas Airways Limited
Qantas Airways Limited QUBSF Peers
See (QUBSF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Airlines, Airports & Air Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBSF | $6.30 | +0.00% | 9.8B | 12.04 | $0.54 | +2.56% |
| ANYYY | $13.34 | +0.38% | 197.7B | 87.86 | $0.15 | +8.26% |
| AFLYY | $1.22 | +7.96% | 30.7B | 5.57 | $0.21 | N/A |
| RYAOF | $27.50 | +0.00% | 29.2B | 17.97 | $1.53 | +1.54% |
| AIPUF | $1.31 | -0.16% | 27.7B | 48.50 | $0.04 | +0.04% |
| APTPF | $0.92 | +0.00% | 23.6B | 41.25 | $0.04 | +1.40% |
| BABWF | $4.70 | +11.90% | 22B | 6.91 | $0.68 | +2.16% |
| ICAGY | $9.33 | +0.43% | 21.9B | 6.90 | $1.36 | +1.48% |
| AIRYY | $13.40 | +0.00% | 18.8B | -250.00 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| SINGY | $11.00 | +0.64% | 16.2B | 8.22 | $1.33 | +6.66% |
Stock Comparison
QUBSF vs ANYYY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ANYYY has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ANYYY trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ANYYY's P/E ratio is 87.86. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ANYYY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ANYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs AFLYY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AFLYY has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AFLYY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AFLYY's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AFLYY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AFLYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs RYAOF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RYAOF has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while RYAOF trades at $27.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas RYAOF's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to RYAOF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and RYAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AIPUF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AIPUF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AIPUF trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AIPUF's P/E ratio is 48.50. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AIPUF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AIPUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs APTPF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, APTPF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while APTPF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas APTPF's P/E ratio is 41.25. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to APTPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and APTPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs BABWF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BABWF has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while BABWF trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas BABWF's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to BABWF's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BABWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ICAGY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ICAGY has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ICAGY trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ICAGY's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ICAGY's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ICAGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs AIRYY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AIRYY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AIRYY trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AIRYY's P/E ratio is -250.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AIRYY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AIRYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs SINGY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SINGY has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while SINGY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SINGY's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to SINGY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SINGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs SINGF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SINGF has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while SINGF trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SINGF's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to SINGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and SINGF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AICAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AICAF has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AICAF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AICAF's P/E ratio is -63.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AICAF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AICAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AIPUY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AIPUY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AIPUY trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AIPUY's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AIPUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AIPUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ARRPY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ARRPY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ARRPY trades at $12.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ARRPY's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ARRPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ARRPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AEOXF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AEOXF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AEOXF trades at $122.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AEOXF's P/E ratio is 30.48. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AEOXF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AEOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs GPAEF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GPAEF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while GPAEF trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas GPAEF's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to GPAEF's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GPAEF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CHEAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CHEAF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CHEAF trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CHEAF's P/E ratio is -12.10. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CHEAF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CHEAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs QABSY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, QABSY has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while QABSY trades at $34.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas QABSY's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to QABSY's ROE of +6.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and QABSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs DLAKY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, DLAKY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while DLAKY trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas DLAKY's P/E ratio is 7.27. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to DLAKY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to DLAKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs DLAKF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, DLAKF has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while DLAKF trades at $8.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas DLAKF's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to DLAKF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and DLAKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CPCAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CPCAF has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CPCAF trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CPCAF's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CPCAF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CPCAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CHKIF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CHKIF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CHKIF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CHKIF's P/E ratio is -11.57. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CHKIF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CHKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs ALNPY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ALNPY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ALNPY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ALNPY's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ALNPY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ALNPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs TKHVY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, TKHVY has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while TKHVY trades at $64.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TKHVY's P/E ratio is 2.89. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to TKHVY's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and TKHVY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ALNPF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ALNPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ALNPF trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ALNPF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ALNPF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ALNPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs UZAPF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, UZAPF has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while UZAPF trades at $284.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas UZAPF's P/E ratio is 22.21. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to UZAPF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and UZAPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs JAPSY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, JAPSY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while JAPSY trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JAPSY's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to JAPSY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to JAPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs FLGZY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FLGZY has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while FLGZY trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FLGZY's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to FLGZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FLGZY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CPCAY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CPCAY has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CPCAY trades at $6.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CPCAY's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CPCAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to CPCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs JPNRF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, JPNRF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while JPNRF trades at $22.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JPNRF's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to JPNRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and JPNRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ASRMF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ASRMF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ASRMF trades at $29.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ASRMF's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ASRMF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ASRMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ACKDF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ACKDF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ACKDF trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ACKDF's P/E ratio is 156.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ACKDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ACKDF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AUKNY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AUKNY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AUKNY trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AUKNY's P/E ratio is 171.16. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AUKNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to AUKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs FPRUY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FPRUY has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while FPRUY trades at $37.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FPRUY's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to FPRUY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FPRUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs EJTTF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, EJTTF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while EJTTF trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas EJTTF's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to EJTTF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and EJTTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ACDVF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ACDVF has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ACDVF trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ACDVF's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ACDVF's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ACDVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs ESYJY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ESYJY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ESYJY trades at $7.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ESYJY's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ESYJY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ESYJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs FGWLF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FGWLF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while FGWLF trades at $56.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FGWLF's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to FGWLF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FGWLF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs SPASF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SPASF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while SPASF trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SPASF's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to SPASF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and SPASF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs FPRUF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FPRUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while FPRUF trades at $65.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FPRUF's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to FPRUF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FPRUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ANNSF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ANNSF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ANNSF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ANNSF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ANNSF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to ANNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs GAERF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GAERF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while GAERF trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas GAERF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to GAERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GAERF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs JAIRF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, JAIRF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while JAIRF trades at $30.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JAIRF's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to JAIRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and JAIRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ELALF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ELALF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ELALF trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ELALF's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ELALF's ROE of +1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ELALF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs SEGSF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SEGSF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while SEGSF trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SEGSF's P/E ratio is 26.80. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to SEGSF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and SEGSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AFRAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AFRAF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AFRAF trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AFRAF's P/E ratio is 5.24. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AFRAF's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AFRAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs JTTRY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, JTTRY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while JTTRY trades at $14.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JTTRY's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to JTTRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and JTTRY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs TAVHY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, TAVHY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while TAVHY trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TAVHY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to TAVHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and TAVHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs EIFZF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, EIFZF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while EIFZF trades at $43.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas EIFZF's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to EIFZF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and EIFZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs BJCHY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BJCHY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while BJCHY trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas BJCHY's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to BJCHY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BJCHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs BJCHF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BJCHF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while BJCHF trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas BJCHF's P/E ratio is -9.15. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to BJCHF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BJCHF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs WZZZY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, WZZZY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while WZZZY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas WZZZY's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to WZZZY's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to WZZZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs WZZAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, WZZAF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while WZZAF trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas WZZAF's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to WZZAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and WZZAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs NWARF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NWARF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while NWARF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NWARF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to NWARF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and NWARF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ANZLY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ANZLY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ANZLY trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ANZLY's P/E ratio is 16.36. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ANZLY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ANZLY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AGZNF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AGZNF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AGZNF trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AGZNF's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AGZNF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AGZNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs GRPAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GRPAF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while GRPAF trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas GRPAF's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to GRPAF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GRPAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CTTPY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CTTPY has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CTTPY trades at $8.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CTTPY's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CTTPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CTTPY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ANZFF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ANZFF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ANZFF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ANZFF's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ANZFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ANZFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs AIABF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, AIABF has a market cap of 650.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while AIABF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas AIABF's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to AIABF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and AIABF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs FNNNF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, FNNNF has a market cap of 629.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while FNNNF trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas FNNNF's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to FNNNF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and FNNNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs HMCTF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, HMCTF has a market cap of 591.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while HMCTF trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas HMCTF's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to HMCTF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and HMCTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CHRRF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CHRRF has a market cap of 405.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CHRRF trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CHRRF's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CHRRF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CHRRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs NOKFF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NOKFF has a market cap of 354.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while NOKFF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NOKFF's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to NOKFF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and NOKFF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs TAWNF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, TAWNF has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while TAWNF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas TAWNF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to TAWNF's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and TAWNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs NRSAF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NRSAF has a market cap of 114.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while NRSAF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NRSAF's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to NRSAF's ROE of +0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to NRSAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs GOLLQ Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GOLLQ has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while GOLLQ trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas GOLLQ's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to GOLLQ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to GOLLQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs CEBUY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CEBUY has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CEBUY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CEBUY's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CEBUY's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CEBUY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs JETMF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, JETMF has a market cap of 42.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while JETMF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JETMF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to JETMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and JETMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs VIAAY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, VIAAY has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while VIAAY trades at $11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas VIAAY's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to VIAAY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and VIAAY have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs SASBQ Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SASBQ has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while SASBQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SASBQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to SASBQ's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to SASBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs CAJTF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CAJTF has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CAJTF trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CAJTF's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CAJTF's ROE of +2.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CAJTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs HRBR Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, HRBR has a market cap of 23.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while HRBR trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas HRBR's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to HRBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and HRBR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs KLMR Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, KLMR has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while KLMR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas KLMR's P/E ratio is 1.90. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to KLMR's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and KLMR have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs LTMAY Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, LTMAY has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while LTMAY trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas LTMAY's P/E ratio is 0.45. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to LTMAY's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to LTMAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs SKAS Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, SKAS has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while SKAS trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas SKAS's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to SKAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and SKAS have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CEBUF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CEBUF has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CEBUF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CEBUF's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CEBUF's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CEBUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs ACAVF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, ACAVF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while ACAVF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas ACAVF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to ACAVF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and ACAVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs NOKPF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, NOKPF has a market cap of 745.8K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while NOKPF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas NOKPF's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to NOKPF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and NOKPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs JETR Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, JETR has a market cap of 627.1K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while JETR trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas JETR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to JETR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF is less volatile compared to JETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUBSF.
QUBSF vs PACC Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, PACC has a market cap of 2.9K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while PACC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas PACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to PACC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and PACC have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs BPOL Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, BPOL has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while BPOL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas BPOL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to BPOL's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and BPOL have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs GLUX Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, GLUX has a market cap of 898. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while GLUX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas GLUX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to GLUX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and GLUX have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs RHWI Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, RHWI has a market cap of 122. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while RHWI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas RHWI's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to RHWI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and RHWI have similar daily volatility (0.00).
QUBSF vs CHHCF Comparison
QUBSF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUBSF stands at 9.8B. In comparison, CHHCF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUBSF is priced at $6.30, while CHHCF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUBSF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.04, whereas CHHCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUBSF's ROE is +6.20%, compared to CHHCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QUBSF and CHHCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).